Does anyone remember when that was? When was the last time that I
called him a name or anything like that? I really can't remember the
last time. I know that I did at some point; I'm human and joined in the
fray during some argument or another. But I really doubt that the last
time I called him a name or insulted him was in this calendar year, as
opposed his behavior toward me.

Jenn said:

Does anyone remember when that was? When was the last time that I
called him a name or anything like that? I really can't remember the
last time. I know that I did at some point; I'm human and joined in the
fray during some argument or another. But I really doubt that the last
time I called him a name or insulted him was in this calendar year, as
opposed his behavior toward me.

I think I know what's going on here. You're trying to parse the Krooborg's
manic descent into full-blown borganoia as if rational motivations were at
play. That will never work.

Have you noticed all the times Mr. **** has klaimed he "proved" you did or
said something? No matter how many times you ask for substantiation of these
Kroo-klaims, all you get is "asked and answered". The Krooborg's
konsciousness, such as it is, does not derive facts the way a sane human
being's does. It invents premises that it can attack (i.e. strawborgs, or
what many call putting words in others' mouths). However, unlike when a sane
person does this as a means of parody or ridicule, the Krooborg is entirely
serious in its utterly concrete way. When it klaims, for example, that you
attacked it, the "proof" it has "asked and answered" need exist only in its
tortured mind. No objective, ascertainable evidence need be produced for the
Beast to believe its random accusations utterly and completely.

Nobody has ever been able to connect the Krooborg to the reality of us
humans. You might as well try arguing the virtues of art or music with a
houseplant.






--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:18:08 GMT, Jenn
wrote:

Does anyone remember when that was? When was the last time that I
called him a name or anything like that? I really can't remember the
last time. I know that I did at some point; I'm human and joined in the
fray during some argument or another. But I really doubt that the last
time I called him a name or insulted him was in this calendar year, as
opposed his behavior toward me.


It doesn't matter, Jenn. Arny remembers, and you're now his enemy.

In article ,
(paul packer) wrote:

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:18:08 GMT, Jenn
wrote:

Does anyone remember when that was? When was the last time that I
called him a name or anything like that? I really can't remember the
last time. I know that I did at some point; I'm human and joined in the
fray during some argument or another. But I really doubt that the last
time I called him a name or insulted him was in this calendar year, as
opposed his behavior toward me.


It doesn't matter, Jenn. Arny remembers, and you're now his enemy.

Evidently.

In article ,
George M. Middius cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net
wrote:

Jenn said:

Does anyone remember when that was? When was the last time that I
called him a name or anything like that? I really can't remember the
last time. I know that I did at some point; I'm human and joined in the
fray during some argument or another. But I really doubt that the last
time I called him a name or insulted him was in this calendar year, as
opposed his behavior toward me.

I think I know what's going on here. You're trying to parse the Krooborg's
manic descent into full-blown borganoia as if rational motivations were at
play. That will never work.

Have you noticed all the times Mr. **** has klaimed he "proved" you did or
said something? No matter how many times you ask for substantiation of these
Kroo-klaims, all you get is "asked and answered". The Krooborg's
konsciousness, such as it is, does not derive facts the way a sane human
being's does. It invents premises that it can attack (i.e. strawborgs, or
what many call putting words in others' mouths). However, unlike when a sane
person does this as a means of parody or ridicule, the Krooborg is entirely
serious in its utterly concrete way. When it klaims, for example, that you
attacked it, the "proof" it has "asked and answered" need exist only in its
tortured mind. No objective, ascertainable evidence need be produced for the
Beast to believe its random accusations utterly and completely.

Nobody has ever been able to connect the Krooborg to the reality of us
humans. You might as well try arguing the virtues of art or music with a
houseplant.

Hey George, would you mind sending me your email address so I can write
to you? Thanks, Jenn

From: Jenn
Date: Tues, Mar 21 2006 10:18 pm
Email: Jenn

Does anyone remember when that was? When was the last time that I
called him a name or anything like that?

I've come to the conclusion that taking Mr. Krueger seriously makes
about as much sense as taking Soundhaspriority seriously.

They both just seem to make stuff up as they go.

The only difference between them is that nob doesn't post 'Me too!'
after a SHP post like he does for Arny.

Sad, but true.

You have never insulted him from what I've read here.

If he had any insults from you, he would post them. He doesn't, and
can't.

Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:

I've come to the conclusion that taking Mr. Krueger seriously makes
about as much sense as taking Soundhaspriority seriously.
They both just seem to make stuff up as they go.

And yet the irony here is, that its you and all the others that have
"made stuff up as they go" about me. Sad, but true. I think that if
anyone ever made even a healf-hearted attempt to prove just one single
BS thing that was said about or against me, I'd die of the shock.

Arny however, like his alter ego George Middius, is a PROVEN liar. It
appears Jenn is only starting to realize that.

The only difference between them is that nob doesn't post 'Me too!'
after a SHP post like he does for Arny.

Sad, but true.

Sad, but false, actually. Certainly he does post "Me too", in all of
his responses to me. Only he is echoing the sentiments of everyone
around him, not just Arny.

"Jenn" wrote in message


Does anyone remember when that was?

When you made this post. This is an example of the well-known RAO attack
thread.

wrote:
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:

I've come to the conclusion that taking Mr. Krueger seriously makes
about as much sense as taking Soundhaspriority seriously.
They both just seem to make stuff up as they go.

And yet the irony here is, that its you and all the others that have
"made stuff up as they go" about me. Sad, but true. I think that if
anyone ever made even a healf-hearted attempt to prove just one single
BS thing that was said about or against me, I'd die of the shock.


I disagree, I think you've done an excellent job yourself of proving
that you make it up as you go.
Please have next of kin post your obituary, I'm sure everyone would
enjoy reading your accomplishments.

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 05:23:24 GMT, Jenn
wrote:

In article ,
(paul packer) wrote:

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:18:08 GMT, Jenn
wrote:

Does anyone remember when that was? When was the last time that I
called him a name or anything like that? I really can't remember the
last time. I know that I did at some point; I'm human and joined in the
fray during some argument or another. But I really doubt that the last
time I called him a name or insulted him was in this calendar year, as
opposed his behavior toward me.


It doesn't matter, Jenn. Arny remembers, and you're now his enemy.

Evidently.

Actually I've been through all this. You might note that all my civil
posts to Arnie are answered in a way that suggests I mounted a
full-blown attack. Perhaps it's just that I harbour secret resentments
toward Arnie, and he's so attuned to my sentiments that he can detect
hostility behind my civility. Perhaps that's the case with you. We
could in fact be selling Arnie short. He could be the first great
virtual psychologist, able to probe the unconscious through the phone
line.

paul packer said:

Actually I've been through all this. You might note that all my civil
posts to Arnie are answered in a way that suggests I mounted a
full-blown attack. Perhaps it's just that I harbour secret resentments
toward Arnie, and he's so attuned to my sentiments that he can detect
hostility behind my civility. Perhaps that's the case with you. We
could in fact be selling Arnie short. He could be the first great
virtual psychologist, able to probe the unconscious through the phone
line.

You left out the fecalization factor. A great deal of Mr. ****'s dementia
should rightfully be ascribed to the surfeit of feces in his head.




--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message

Does anyone remember when that was? When was the last time that I
called him a name or anything like that? I really can't remember the
last time. I know that I did at some point; I'm human and joined in
the
fray during some argument or another. But I really doubt that the last
time I called him a name or insulted him was in this calendar year, as
opposed his behavior toward me.

When you made this post. This is an example of the well-known RAO
attack
thread.

You would call THAT an attack? Wow. There's nothing the least bit
critical of you in it, other than stating the obvious that you've had an
insult and name calling spree against me of late ("coward" 4 or 5 times,
etc.) I'm just trying to find out where I insulted you or called you a
name lately, as seem to indicate that subjectivists are always starting
the flame wars.

Jenn wrote:
Does anyone remember when that was? When was the last time that I
called him a name or anything like that? I really can't remember the
last time. I know that I did at some point; I'm human and joined in the
fray during some argument or another. But I really doubt that the last
time I called him a name or insulted him was in this calendar year, as
opposed his behavior toward me.
Maybe it was when you call him "Arny". If somebody call me Arny I too
will be insulted

On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:05:46 -0500, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote:



paul packer said:

Actually I've been through all this. You might note that all my civil
posts to Arnie are answered in a way that suggests I mounted a
full-blown attack. Perhaps it's just that I harbour secret resentments
toward Arnie, and he's so attuned to my sentiments that he can detect
hostility behind my civility. Perhaps that's the case with you. We
could in fact be selling Arnie short. He could be the first great
virtual psychologist, able to probe the unconscious through the phone
line.

You left out the fecalization factor. A great deal of Mr. ****'s dementia
should rightfully be ascribed to the surfeit of feces in his head.

George, you're becoming obsessed with this image. It's ugly. Please
try to think of something pleasant and lovely.

paul packer said:

You left out the fecalization factor. A great deal of Mr. ****'s dementia
should rightfully be ascribed to the surfeit of feces in his head.

George, you're becoming obsessed with this image. It's ugly. Please
try to think of something pleasant and lovely.

It may be ugly, but it's the truth.

Do you like to laugh at absurdities? If so, try chatting with Mikey about
"science". You'll be doubled over in no time.





--
NewsGuy.Com 30Gb $9.95 Carry Forward and On Demand Bandwidth

wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:

I've come to the conclusion that taking Mr. Krueger seriously makes
about as much sense as taking Soundhaspriority seriously.
They both just seem to make stuff up as they go.

And yet the irony here is, that its you and all the others that have
"made stuff up as they go" about me. Sad, but true. I think that if
anyone ever made even a healf-hearted attempt to prove just one single
BS thing that was said about or against me, I'd die of the shock.


The only proof needed is to read any of your posts chronologically and
the evidence is right there in whatever color your monitor displays.

I'll wait and see how much you can explain away.
We don't have to make it up, your quite capable of providing it.
Why would I have to threaten you? Your doing well at making
them to yourself and anyone that dares to contest your "tweaks".

On 23 Mar 2006 09:07:54 -0800, wrote:

Proof is in the fact that you have never substantiated anything
you say, including your claim here.

You first.

I have to applaud soundhaspriority - he's managed to kick the ass of
every piker on this group in a matter of just a couple weeks, and do it
resoundingly. However its child's play as the intellect of most here
is like trying to get seeds to grow in cement.

Now if you could just shut up that Jute character.

On 1 Apr 2006 21:35:12 -0800, "codifus" wrote:

I have to applaud soundhaspriority - he's managed to kick the ass of
every piker on this group in a matter of just a couple weeks, and do it
resoundingly.

Really? Every piker? :-)

However its child's play as the intellect of most here
is like trying to get seeds to grow in cement.

Strange analogy . Is that the best your intellect could come up with?

Now if you could just shut up that Jute character.

Jute is amusing and fairly harmless. It's odd you don't warm to him as
his posts somewhat resemble Mr. Sound's, only not quite as
uncharitable except to tube haters. No one beats Mr. Sound for the
intergalactic "Attack Droid of the Month" award.

paul packer said:

Now if you could just shut up that Jute character.

Jute is amusing and fairly harmless. It's odd you don't warm to him as
his posts somewhat resemble Mr. Sound's, only not quite as
uncharitable except to tube haters.

uh, paulie, who do you think posted this paean to Shovels? It wasn't a
person who is separate and distinct from Shovels.




--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 09:49:29 -0400, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote:



paul packer said:

Now if you could just shut up that Jute character.

Jute is amusing and fairly harmless. It's odd you don't warm to him as
his posts somewhat resemble Mr. Sound's, only not quite as
uncharitable except to tube haters.

uh, paulie, who do you think posted this paean to Shovels? It wasn't a
person who is separate and distinct from Shovels.

Oh....

RAO is confusing, isn't it? And who's "Shovels" this week, anyway?

paul packer said:

uh, paulie, who do you think posted this paean to Shovels? It wasn't a
person who is separate and distinct from Shovels.

Oh....

Sorry to have awakened you.

RAO is confusing, isn't it? And who's "Shovels" this week, anyway?

I know who's soft in the head...





--
A day without Krooger is like a day without arsenic.

On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 21:53:16 -0400, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote:



paul packer said:

uh, paulie, who do you think posted this paean to Shovels? It wasn't a
person who is separate and distinct from Shovels.

Oh....

Sorry to have awakened you.

RAO is confusing, isn't it? And who's "Shovels" this week, anyway?

I know who's soft in the head...

That's from being hit on the head with too many "Shovels".