Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not in the entire history of audio. Never, anywhere, has this happened.And
if it has, I will ask you to show me a second. This question is partly rhetorical, to show how some people, mainly designing engineers, confuse their own legal liability in design with the reasonable risks everyone takes to live their lives. If you are an engineer, you must design according to the codes. If you are an installer, you are legally liable. If you are an audiophile, a cheater plug is a personal choice. These three situations are distinct, both legally, and practically. Don't let hypothetical or miniscule dangers prevent you from enjoying audio. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() François Yves Le Gal said: Not in the entire history of audio. Never, anywhere, has this happened. Care to back yet another outrageous assertion with some facts, Morein? What is your point, Mr. Chicken? Does it matter whether that statement is literally true or the result of common sense and a little experience in real life? If you want to expatiate on the alleged risks of using a cheater plug, do so. If you want to propound the potential risks to your employer's reputation of using a cheater plug with one of their boxes, do so. But don't expect people to view your agenda-driven haranguing as the disinterested comments of a mere observer, because we know better. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:37:54 -0500, "Robert Morein" wrote: Not in the entire history of audio. Never, anywhere, has this happened. Care to back yet another outrageous assertion with some facts, Morein? Francois, I really believe that what I said is true. As I said, it is partly a rhetorical question. Perhaps there is someone out there with access to casualty databases. As it is, both you and I are posting based on hunches. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:10:26 -0500, "Robert Morein" wrote: I really believe that what I said is true. Beliefs are irrelevant when it come to safety. Ungrounded equipment can kill, period. As it is, both you and I are posting based on hunches. My postings are based on science, regulations as well as common sense. Common sense has to be validated by statistics. Otherwise, common sense is wrong. As far a science is concerened, science is not a system for risk assessement. It is a system for understanding how things work. Thus, one may validly use science to determine how a cheater plug could cause a fatality. But it cannot answer the probability of that happening. The actual risk depends upon awareness, statistics, safeguards, and human behavior, as does every other activity of human endeavor. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"François Yves Le Gal" wrote in
message On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:37:54 -0500, "Robert Morein" wrote: Not in the entire history of audio. Never, anywhere, has this happened. Care to back yet another outrageous assertion with some facts, Morein? I doubt that he can. (1) It's a negative hypothesis, which is difficult or impossible to prove. (2) It presumes that had such a thing happened, it would have been reported and publicized. Let's review: (1) There are safe ways to address the same grounding problems that it has been proposed be dealt with by lifting the safety ground. (2) The origional tweek recommended lifting the safety ground even when there was no clear-cut grounding problem. Lifting the safety ground is simply a dumb thing to do. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arny Krueger" wrote in message . .. "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:37:54 -0500, "Robert Morein" wrote: Not in the entire history of audio. Never, anywhere, has this happened. Care to back yet another outrageous assertion with some facts, Morein? I doubt that he can. (1) It's a negative hypothesis, which is difficult or impossible to prove. Not at all. If people were killed in this way, I'm sure some audiophiles, somewhere, would know about it. There is no evidence whatsoever that a single person in a planet of six billion has died as a consequence of the advocated use. (2) It presumes that had such a thing happened, it would have been reported and publicized. As indeed it would. Let's review: (1) There are safe ways to address the same grounding problems that it has been proposed be dealt with by lifting the safety ground. Sometimes, sometimes not. I advocate the cheater plug only as the last resort. Whether the user wishes to discard equipment that can function well is, of course, up to him. If he has lots of disposable income, he can do it. Alot of us consider such cost totally unreasonable. All alternative methods should be explored. (2) The origional tweek recommended lifting the safety ground even when there was no clear-cut grounding problem. Not correct. The cheater plug should not be used unless there is a hum problem, and should not be left in the circuit if there is no improvement. Lifting the safety ground is simply a dumb thing to do. If it solves the problem, it is a very smart thing to do. The hazard is purely hypothetical. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
François Yves Le Gal wrote:
Ungrounded equipment can kill, period. At the moment my system is "ungrounded". My listening room, which is in the waay back, far away from any grounded outlets, and all the stuff (well three) with the three connections on the equipment side are just plugged in to those normal outlets that accept grunded plugs also. Perhaps this is the reason why the preamp and the Linn cd get the rfi, but more importantly, does this *really* present a danger? I have a three year old toddler and all... |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Fella" wrote in message ... François Yves Le Gal wrote: Ungrounded equipment can kill, period. At the moment my system is "ungrounded". My listening room, which is in the waay back, far away from any grounded outlets, and all the stuff (well three) with the three connections on the equipment side are just plugged in to those normal outlets that accept grunded plugs also. Perhaps this is the reason why the preamp and the Linn cd get the rfi, but more importantly, does this *really* present a danger? I have a three year old toddler and all... Not at all. The following would have to happen simultaneously: 1. Flaw in the equipment. 2. Victim touches good ground. In your living room, there are probably no grounds at all, other than the outlets themselves. If you are concerned, buy a GFCI, and plug the equipment into that. That will provide THREE levels of redundant protection, in addition to the above two. The real danger is that which your toddler presents to your speakers. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Morein" wrote in message ... Not in the entire history of audio. Never, anywhere, has this happened. **Your claim. Prove it. And if it has, I will ask you to show me a second. **YOU made the claim. YOU prove it. This question is partly rhetorical, to show how some people, mainly designing engineers, confuse their own legal liability in design with the reasonable risks everyone takes to live their lives. **Facts are facts. Pretty much most parts of the world have regulations which make your 'tweak' illegal. Here in Australia (and, I would assume in every other 220-240VAC nation), the regulations surrounding electrical equipment is quite clear. Either an item must carry a thrid wire (for earthing) or the equipment must be double insulated. And the ridiculous American habit (surely no longer practised) of connecting neutral to chassis via a large value resistor is absolutely not allowed. In fact, this nonsensical idea is the major cause of hum problems. If you are an engineer, you must design according to the codes. **Precsisely. If you are an installer, you are legally liable. **Yep. Which is why no sane person would ever connect a client's equipment using a cheater plug. Iinstead, we professionals find the source of the fault and rectify it. It is also why, if people are experiencing problems they need to approach a professional for a solution. If you are an audiophile, a cheater plug is a personal choice. **A personal choice which may involve family members, friends, relatives and strangers. These three situations are distinct, both legally, and practically. Don't let hypothetical or miniscule dangers prevent you from enjoying audio. **Indeed. Get a professional to do the job and don't listen to people who live in 110VAC nations, where the risk of electrocution is approximately 1/10th as likely. And where electrical standards are amongst the lowest on the planet. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fella wrote:
François Yves Le Gal wrote: Ungrounded equipment can kill, period. At the moment my system is "ungrounded". My listening room, which is in the waay back, far away from any grounded outlets, and all the stuff (well three) with the three connections on the equipment side are just plugged in to those normal outlets that accept grunded plugs also. Perhaps this is the reason why the preamp and the Linn cd get the rfi, but more importantly, does this *really* present a danger? I have a three year old toddler and all... It sounds to me like your gear doesn't have grounded AC plugs. If that's the case, stop worrying, it was designed to work that way and is fine as is. FYLG, I'm sure, was talking about gear that was designed to be used with a safety ground, but where that safety feature has been disabled via a cheater. Now, as for the RFI issues, that may be related to the lack of a good solid ground. But nobody ever died from listening to RFI at -60db. //Walt |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:38:06 -0500, "Robert Morein" wrote: Common sense has to be validated by statistics. SNIP yet another rant. EOT as far as I'm concerned. I don't argue with morons. Francois, I am surprised. I think of you as an intelligent person. You are essentially abdicating. I would MUCH prefer that you dig up examples of this actually happening, with details. I do not want to win an argument; I want to bring to audiophiles correct and useful information to solve their problems. So, once again, who died? |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... "Robert Morein" wrote in message ... Not in the entire history of audio. Never, anywhere, has this happened. **Your claim. Prove it. And if it has, I will ask you to show me a second. **YOU made the claim. YOU prove it. Nope. Nobody died from use of this tweak. Show me a body. Simple enough. It's harmless. BTW, you are fractionally shortening your lifespan by getting angry. |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:10:32 +0200, Fella wrote: Perhaps this is the reason why the preamp and the Linn cd get the rfi It's one of the reasons: your gear is probably fitted with EMC filters which are rendered ineffective if there's no proper ground connection. That is not true. Neutral functions as an RF ground. Indeed, it is bonded to ground at the mains box. |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:39:10 -0500, Walt wrote: FYLG, I'm sure, was talking about gear that was designed to be used with a safety ground, but where that safety feature has been disabled via a cheater. Or 2 + 1 equipment connected to "universal" 2 mains sockets. Fella mentioned Linn electronics. AFAICT all of them are designed for 2 + 1, and the user manual mentions: "MAINS PLUGS This appliance is supplied with a non-rewireable mains plug for the intended country. Replacement mains leads can be obtained from your Linn retailer. Should you change the plug please dispose of it carefully. A plug with bared conductors is dangerous if engaged in a live socket. Dispose of it carefully? Does this mean I have to go through my junkbox and "dispose" of all my dangerous power cords with exposed pigtails? Seriously, it seems to me that the EU may be more paternalistic than the U.S. Here in the U.S., we do as we please, without paternal oversight. |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Morein" wrote in message ... "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... "Robert Morein" wrote in message ... Not in the entire history of audio. Never, anywhere, has this happened. **Your claim. Prove it. And if it has, I will ask you to show me a second. **YOU made the claim. YOU prove it. Nope. Nobody died from use of this tweak. Show me a body. Simple enough. **It doesn't work that way. YOU make the claim. YOU provide the proof. It's harmless. BTW, you are fractionally shortening your lifespan by getting angry. **I'm not angry. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
François Yves Le Gal wrote:
Add some differential breakers ASAP, and check with a local electrician if a proper ground can be installed. Thanks Francois and others that have answered. My system indeed is designed for grounded outlets. As F. Yves Le Gal says, the Linn especially warns in the manual that I should use a grounded outlet. I had never taken this thing seriously until this thread. What are "differential breakers"? If I could know the concept or perhaps what kind device is in question I will buy it ASAP. Google didn't help much.. I'll also try to find an english speaking electrician in these woods that would undertand my quest for differential breakers.. I have this newly acquired buddy that builds amps (valve stuff) so perhaps he might know also. I will also investigate the grounding thing, my equioment is not in my living room and the door to the listening room where the stuff is, is generally shut. The toddler also somehow understands the importance of the stuff, he rarely ever goes near them when we are listening to music together or when the wife plays music to him during the daytimes when I am gone, keeping the door open then. The wife tells that he rarely has interest to go into the music room ever. But you never know... They'll just have to listen to music from the ht system till I find these differential stuff I guess. Thanks again. |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fella wrote:
François Yves Le Gal wrote: Add some differential breakers ASAP, and check with a local electrician if a proper ground can be installed. Thanks Francois and others that have answered. My system indeed is designed for grounded outlets. As F. Yves Le Gal says, the Linn especially warns in the manual that I should use a grounded outlet. I had never taken this thing seriously until this thread. If your gear is intended to be used with grounded outlets, then use them with grounded outlets. From a safety standpoint, it's like seatbelts, smoke detectors, or fuses: You don't need them unless or until something goes wrong, then you may really wish you had them. What are "differential breakers"? In the US they're called Ground Fault Interupts, or GFI for short. It monitors the current difference between hot and neutral, and shuts off if there's any difference. If current is going out that's not coming back it must be going somewhere, and wherever it's going might be BAD. (e.g. through your toddler) GFIs are overkill for a stereo system, IMHO unless you plan to use it near a hot tub or something... //Walt |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Robert Morein wrote: "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... "Robert Morein" wrote in message ... Not in the entire history of audio. Never, anywhere, has this happened. **Your claim. Prove it. And if it has, I will ask you to show me a second. **YOU made the claim. YOU prove it. Nope. Nobody died from use of this tweak. Show me a body. Simple enough. I've got 3 in the US in 1995 in the category of radios, TVs, and Stereos. http://www.cpsc.gov/LIBRARY/shock95.pdf Now go put your tongue in a light socket Bob, you're getting dim. ScottW |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Mar 2006 15:03:00 -0800, "ScottW" wrote:
I've got 3 in the US in 1995 in the category of radios, TVs, and Stereos. http://www.cpsc.gov/LIBRARY/shock95.pdf Most likely they were tweako-freakos, pal. You could kill them with a pp9 battery, note. |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Morein" wrote in message ... "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:39:10 -0500, Walt wrote: FYLG, I'm sure, was talking about gear that was designed to be used with a safety ground, but where that safety feature has been disabled via a cheater. Or 2 + 1 equipment connected to "universal" 2 mains sockets. Fella mentioned Linn electronics. AFAICT all of them are designed for 2 + 1, and the user manual mentions: "MAINS PLUGS This appliance is supplied with a non-rewireable mains plug for the intended country. Replacement mains leads can be obtained from your Linn retailer. Should you change the plug please dispose of it carefully. A plug with bared conductors is dangerous if engaged in a live socket. Dispose of it carefully? Does this mean I have to go through my junkbox and "dispose" of all my dangerous power cords with exposed pigtails? Seriously, it seems to me that the EU may be more paternalistic than the U.S. **Nope. ALL 220-240VAC nations have much tougher electrical regulations than 110VAC nations. Here in the U.S., we do as we please, without paternal oversight. **And with *only* 110VAC to deal with, that is not altogether surprising. 220-240VAC is FAR more lethal. Around 10 times, as I recall. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
François Yves Le Gal wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:54:44 +0200, Fella wrote: What are "differential breakers"? They are called Ground Fault Interrupters, GFI's or GFIC's on your side of the Pond. They basically sense the current differnce between the live and neutral wire and trigger if it becomes unbalanced by more than a few ma (5 ma +- 1 in the US specs). More info : http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ctric/gfi.html Thanks Francois, much appreciated. |
#22
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Trevor Wilson wrote:
"Fella" wrote in message .. . François Yves Le Gal wrote: Add some differential breakers ASAP, and check with a local electrician if a proper ground can be installed. Thanks Francois and others that have answered. My system indeed is designed for grounded outlets. As F. Yves Le Gal says, the Linn especially warns in the manual that I should use a grounded outlet. I had never taken this thing seriously until this thread. What are "differential breakers"? If I could know the concept or perhaps what kind device is in question I will buy it ASAP. Google didn't help much.. I'll also try to find an english speaking electrician in these woods that would undertand my quest for differential breakers.. I have this newly acquired buddy that builds amps (valve stuff) so perhaps he might know also. **I am unfamiliar with the term 'differential breakers', but I would bet that it refers to a core balance circuit breaker, which detects any difference between active and neutral current flow. Any difference indicates that current is flowing to earth. Either through a leaky path (a human, perhaps) or the earthing on the appliance itself. Thanks Trevor, Francois explained the same thing I guess. I will either draw a gorunded line from the nearest grounded outlet in the house to the hifi room now, or get these devices (looks as though they are special kind of outlets of a sort). |
#23
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Fella" wrote in message ... Trevor Wilson wrote: "Fella" wrote in message .. . François Yves Le Gal wrote: Add some differential breakers ASAP, and check with a local electrician if a proper ground can be installed. Thanks Francois and others that have answered. My system indeed is designed for grounded outlets. As F. Yves Le Gal says, the Linn especially warns in the manual that I should use a grounded outlet. I had never taken this thing seriously until this thread. What are "differential breakers"? If I could know the concept or perhaps what kind device is in question I will buy it ASAP. Google didn't help much.. I'll also try to find an english speaking electrician in these woods that would undertand my quest for differential breakers.. I have this newly acquired buddy that builds amps (valve stuff) so perhaps he might know also. **I am unfamiliar with the term 'differential breakers', but I would bet that it refers to a core balance circuit breaker, which detects any difference between active and neutral current flow. Any difference indicates that current is flowing to earth. Either through a leaky path (a human, perhaps) or the earthing on the appliance itself. Thanks Trevor, Francois explained the same thing I guess. I will either draw a gorunded line from the nearest grounded outlet in the house to the hifi room now, or get these devices (looks as though they are special kind of outlets of a sort). **Such switches are (now) very cheap and easy to buy. Here in Australia (and, I presume everywhere else), they can be purchased in several forms: * A master switch, which covers the whole building. This will normally be installed by a suitably qualified person at the switch box. Here in Australia, all new residences must be fitted with such switches, by law. I use this system on a sub-board for my workshop. As I regularly trip the breaker, it does not interfere with the rest of the building and, of course, the computers. Cost around $30.00 + fitting costs (around $100.00-$150.00). * A plug in switch, which effectively converts an existing switch (but none others) to a safety outlet. Very handy, when dealing with situations where only one outlet needs to be protected. Cost around $30.00. * An extension lead, fitted with a switch. Does the same job as above. Handy when working remote from the building. Cost around $40.00. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#24
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() François Yves Le Gal wrote: On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:39:10 -0500, Walt wrote: The Brown wire must be connected to the Live (Line) supply pin. The Blue wire must be connected to the Neutral supply pin. The Green/Yellow wire must be connected to the Earth (Ground) supply pin." And the leg bone's connected to the knee bone. |
#25
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message news ![]() On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:10:19 +0000, Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote: You could kill them with a pp9 battery, note. Considering that skin resistance is more than 10 K, that fibrillation can happen with currents above 50 ma, what is the minimum lethal level of voltage per Ohm's law? **You can't generalise. There are a raft of differences between humans. There are differences between humans, depending on what they've eaten or drunk. I've measured resistances much lower and much higher than 10k. Differences in the resistance of the internal parts can vary much more still. BTW: I've never met anyone in the electrical/electronics business (at a technical level) who has sweaty palms. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#26
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() paul packer wrote: Trevor Wilson wrote: **Facts are facts. Pretty much most parts of the world have regulations which make your 'tweak' illegal. Here in Australia (and, I would assume in every other 220-240VAC nation), the regulations surrounding electrical equipment is quite clear. Either an item must carry a thrid wire (for earthing) or the equipment must be double insulated. And the ridiculous American habit (surely no longer practised) of connecting neutral to chassis via a large value resistor is absolutely not allowed. In fact, this nonsensical idea is the major cause of hum problems. Probably a stupid question, Trevor, but why are there different voltages in different countries? If the US can power its appliances quite happily with 110V and enjoy a much lower risk of electrocution, why do we have 240V? You can deliver more power through thinner wire. ScottW |
#27
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() paul packer said: And the leg bone's connected to the knee bone. Prove it!™ |
#28
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() paul packer said: Probably a stupid question, Trevor, but why are there different voltages in different countries? If the US can power its appliances quite happily with 110V and enjoy a much lower risk of electrocution, why do we have 240V? We would have had 240 (or 220) as well, but it turned out Westinghouse was a pinko. So much for DC. |
#29
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "paul packer" wrote in message oups.com... Trevor Wilson wrote: **Facts are facts. Pretty much most parts of the world have regulations which make your 'tweak' illegal. Here in Australia (and, I would assume in every other 220-240VAC nation), the regulations surrounding electrical equipment is quite clear. Either an item must carry a thrid wire (for earthing) or the equipment must be double insulated. And the ridiculous American habit (surely no longer practised) of connecting neutral to chassis via a large value resistor is absolutely not allowed. In fact, this nonsensical idea is the major cause of hum problems. Probably a stupid question, Trevor, but why are there different voltages in different countries? **I don't know. There are many possible reasons I can think of and a few I can't. Here's a few possibilities: * The US was the first nation with mains wiring. It was DC (direct current). It is possible that the abitrarily chosen Voltage (something Edison was well known for) then had to be matched to an appropriate AC Voltage. * Lower mains Voltages are more lossy, so other nations probably chose 220-240VAC to overcome losses associated with long distance transmission. *Other nations wanted to be different to the US. If the US can power its appliances quite happily with 110V and enjoy a much lower risk of electrocution, why do we have 240V? **Not quite. Here in Australia, we can happily power quite large air conditioners, heaters and other appliances with a standard power outlet. Americans cannot, without resorting to multi-phase operation, or 'special' 240 VAC outlets. I suspect that, given what is known now, the US would have made the chose for a higher mains Voltage. (BTW, this question comes from someone who's been zapped many times!) **Be careful Paul. After you get electrocuted, there is oblivion. There are no second chances (life after death). :-) -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#30
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Signal" wrote in message ... "Robert Morein" emitted : Ungrounded equipment can kill, period. At the moment my system is "ungrounded". My listening room, which is in the waay back, far away from any grounded outlets, and all the stuff (well three) with the three connections on the equipment side are just plugged in to those normal outlets that accept grunded plugs also. Perhaps this is the reason why the preamp and the Linn cd get the rfi, but more importantly, does this *really* present a danger? I have a three year old toddler and all... Not at all. Sure, if you exclude the risks (however slim) of the toddler being electrocuted and Fella serving time for manslaughter... no danger at all if you exclude these possibilities. It's negligible. I've posted several challenges for evidence that anyone was ever harmed by use of a cheater plug to solve a hum problem in a high quality audio system, and there are no affirmative responses. Zero = Zero = Zero chance of the toddler getting hurt. The following would have to happen simultaneously: 1. Flaw in the equipment. 2. Victim touches good ground. In your living room, there are probably no grounds at all, other than the outlets themselves. Light fittings, radiators and pipework? Here in the U.S., table and floor lamps do not have grounded metalwork, which incidentally, shows the arbitrariness of the regs, since they are as or more likely to develop shorts to frame as a high quality transformer. Radiators are a consideration. Locate the system so it is distant from them. |
#31
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:55:02 -0500, "Robert Morein" wrote: It's one of the reasons: your gear is probably fitted with EMC filters which are rendered ineffective if there's no proper ground connection. That is not true Morein, do you know the difference between common and differential mode when it comes to EMC filters? Then explain how a filter can properly work without a ground connection? Francois, the neutral wire is of larger diameter than the ground wire. In the U.S. the two are bonded at the service entrance. From the POV of EMI, the two are equivalent. Furthermore, the purpose of the cheater plug is to deal with a nonideal condition: The system has hum, and the owner is either unwilling or unable to solve the problem by any other means. In this case, the immediate problem takes priority. EMI is simply not the issue, unless it happens to bother the user more than the hum. In that case, perhaps the user will be happier without the cheater plug. He can figure this out for himself. |
#32
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message ... "Signal" wrote in message ... "Robert Morein" emitted : Not at all. If people were killed in this way, I'm sure some audiophiles, somewhere, would know about it. Never heard of an amplifier bursting into flames whilst idling until I met someone who had that happen to them. The owner had smoke alarms fitted as a precaution, which was fortunate as it happened during the night whilst the family were asleep. It was an Arcam btw. ;-) **Kinda reminds me of the time I had a main street hi fi store. One of my mates called in to buy a stereo system, but I was out on a call. He was so ****ed off he went into the city and purchased a cheap Sansui stereo (it was around 1984). When he caught up with me, I explained that I didn't sell the cheap Sansui stuff (though I sold the more expensive stuff), because it used pressed board base plates and plastic side cheeks. It represented a potential fire hazard, IMO. I must say that I had never heard of one causing a fire, but I did not feel comfortable selling such crap. Anyway, I ran into him at a dinner party a couple of years later and asked how his new house was (since his old one had burned down). "I finally got the report from the fire investigators." He said. The Sansui caught fire, which in turn, set fire to his drapes and burned his house to the ground. He bought his new stereo from me. Colour me conservative, when it comes to electrical equipment. Give me decent earthing and a solid metal chassis. Earthing has nothing to do with fire hazard mitigation. Metal does. |
#33
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
François Yves Le Gal wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:54:44 +0200, Fella wrote: What are "differential breakers"? They are called Ground Fault Interrupters, GFI's or GFIC's on your side of the Pond. They basically sense the current differnce between the live and neutral wire and trigger if it becomes unbalanced by more than a few ma (5 ma +- 1 in the US specs). More info : http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ctric/gfi.html I have just heard that in these neck of the woods the neutral line is usually tied to the ground at the supply, and that such a device (gfi) most probably is not approved for use in this country+... How can I check if the neutral line is tied to the ground at the suply or not? If it is, does it negate the dangers previously mentioned in this thread? And even if it is, with my setup (three wire plugs to two wire outlets) isn't phase a very important issue now? I have this ultra tweako audiophile pal (not as ultra as SHP, but more so a tweako then myself.. ![]() the place. He claims to find out if the phase is correct or not using that pen, he nears the pen to the outlet for the pre-amp, for instance, and if it lights up he claims that I should switch and it would be a big difference in sound. I tried it a couple of times and heard nothing different.. And the pen continued lighting up also.. Right now the all equipment is unplugged in the music room and the door tight shut. If Francois, or others care to answer these questions I thank thee beforehand very many. |
#34
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() George M. Middius wrote: paul packer said: Probably a stupid question, Trevor, but why are there different voltages in different countries? If the US can power its appliances quite happily with 110V and enjoy a much lower risk of electrocution, why do we have 240V? We would have had 240 (or 220) as well, but it turned out Westinghouse was a pinko. So much for DC. What was that, George? |
#35
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Fella" wrote in message
I have just heard that in these neck of the woods the neutral line is usually tied to the ground at the supply, This may be true, but it does not affect the utility of GFCIs. and that such a device (gfi) most probably is not approved for use in this country+... I don't know why a GFCI would be considered to be a safety hazard. How can I check if the neutral line is tied to the ground at the suply or not? Examine the wiring. Measure for significant voltage drops between neutral and safety ground with an AC voltmeter. If it is, does it negate the dangers previously mentioned in this thread? No. And even if it is, with my setup (three wire plugs to two wire outlets) isn't phase a very important issue now? Two wire outlets are a hazard, period. They are also suboptimal when it comes to system performance. I have this ultra tweako audiophile pal (not as ultra as SHP, but more so a tweako then myself.. ![]() pen that lights up all over the place. There are such things as pen-shaped non-contact AC voltage detectors. They work on the principle of induction. He claims to find out if the phase is correct or not using that pen, he nears the pen to the outlet for the pre-amp, for instance, and if it lights up he claims that I should switch and it would be a big difference in sound. He doesn't know what he is talking about. I tried it a couple of times and heard nothing different.. And the pen continued lighting up also.. What can I say? Right now the all equipment is unplugged in the music room and the door tight shut. Seems like your house needs to have its electrical infrastructure modernized. If Francois, or others care to answer these questions I thank thee beforehand very many. It's always best to have your house wiring up to modern code. In the past 3 years I've spent $1,000s with professional electricians, and put dozens of hours of work myself into getting as much of the wiring in my 70+ year old house up to modern standards. For example, I now have three new independent modern wiring panels, and the connection to the main power line is brand new and underground which is rare in my community. This was not driven by just audio, but rather a desire to simply have a safe, capable, modern place to live. |
#36
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Morein" wrote in message ... "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:38:06 -0500, "Robert Morein" wrote: Common sense has to be validated by statistics. SNIP yet another rant. EOT as far as I'm concerned. I don't argue with morons. Francois, I am surprised. I think of you as an intelligent person. You are essentially abdicating. I would MUCH prefer that you dig up examples of this actually happening, with details. When he said "I don't argue with morons", what he really said was "I'm too lazy to do any real debate so I'm going to strong arm while appearing to take the high road." |
#37
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
François Yves Le Gal wrote:
Don't worry too much. just have your wiring brought up to standards, your gear will be safer and will sound much better... Thanks yet again Francois. Spoke with an electrician and the verdict is that will have to re-wire the whole listening room outlets from the point of entry it seems, and yes all the outlets in that room (though I only use one of them) since I just read that around here it is not allowed to have grounded and ungrounded outlets in near vicinity to each other. |
#38
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"paul packer" wrote in message
oups.com Probably a stupid question, Trevor, but why are there different voltages in different countries? If the US can power its appliances quite happily with 110V and enjoy a much lower risk of electrocution, why do we have 240V? It is all about trade-offs. 120 volt wiring must have 4 times the copper to deliver equivalent performance. Most of the world is building on experience with power distribution in the US. IOW they are learning from our mistakes. There is a lot about how power is distributed in the US in homes and neighborhoods that hasn't changed that much since the days of Thomas Edison and his first DC power systems in New York. Those systems were designed mostly for lighting - most electrical appliances hadn't been invented yet. Furthermore, those lighting systems were designed to replace candles and gas lights, which did not develop a lot of light. Bottom line, not a lot of power needed to be distributed and the copper costs were nominal. When I lived in Europe, I perceived that the inherent safety of the household wiring was far greater than what I was used to in the US. There's no safe way to make body contact with 120 volts, so the doubled voltage does not pose that much more risk. |
#39
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Trevor Wilson" wrote in
message "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message news ![]() On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:10:19 +0000, Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote: You could kill them with a pp9 battery, note. Considering that skin resistance is more than 10 K, that fibrillation can happen with currents above 50 ma, what is the minimum lethal level of voltage per Ohm's law? **You can't generalise. There are a raft of differences between humans. There are differences between humans, depending on what they've eaten or drunk. I've measured resistances much lower and much higher than 10k. Differences in the resistance of the internal parts can vary much more still. BTW: I've never met anyone in the electrical/electronics business (at a technical level) who has sweaty palms. I'm not proud to admit that dry oily skin has saved my life any number of times. I've survived minor shocks by just about every kind of electrical power there is through 240v 60 Hz, 350 VDC and 416 V 400 Hz. |
#40
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jeffc" wrote in message ... "Robert Morein" wrote in message ... "François Yves Le Gal" wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:38:06 -0500, "Robert Morein" wrote: Common sense has to be validated by statistics. SNIP yet another rant. EOT as far as I'm concerned. I don't argue with morons. Francois, I am surprised. I think of you as an intelligent person. You are essentially abdicating. I would MUCH prefer that you dig up examples of this actually happening, with details. When he said "I don't argue with morons", what he really said was "I'm too lazy to do any real debate so I'm going to strong arm while appearing to take the high road." He's an engineer. So am I. But some are attracted to the profession because they have trouble dealing with people. Francois is a little more brittle than I imagined. I have no reason to suspect that he is anything less than a fine engineer. I am sure he diligently follows all the safety codes when designing equipment. This is as it should be. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hum when recording audio via audiophile usb, HELP!! | Pro Audio | |||
Pro Tools Plug In Question | Pro Audio | |||
FS: Audio Cables & Adapter Cables | Pro Audio | |||
Pro tools Ilok Plug ins | Pro Audio | |||
M-Audio audiophile 2496 + Serial ATA + WinXP HELP!!!! | Pro Audio |