http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/price.html

Goofy said:

http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/price.html

The text pages behind the price list sounds like a New Age version of Joly
tripping on some kind of designer psychedelic. It's even more difficult to
follow than Krooglish!

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
...
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/price.html

Do you think "Soundhaspriority" is shilling for them, or is them?

Robert Morein wrote:
"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
...
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/price.html

Do you think "Soundhaspriority" is shilling for them, or is them?

A pound certainly doesn't buy what it used to.
Definitely no ulterior motives in those previous threads.

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


Goofy said:

http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/price.html

The text pages behind the price list sounds like a New Age version of Joly
tripping on some kind of designer psychedelic. It's even more difficult to
follow than Krooglish!


I am Zakhann, and I am on your Jolly ass.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

wrote:
Robert Morein wrote:
"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
...
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/price.html

Do you think "Soundhaspriority" is shilling for them, or is them?

A pound certainly doesn't buy what it used to.
Definitely no ulterior motives in those previous threads.


The price list especially 11 pounds for standard RCA
plug, puts the last few days debates where
they belong- in the Alice in Wonderland country.
No if someone published this spoof here here
all our audio thinkers would open their college textbooks and
start contributing solemnly.
The idea makes one
laugh hahaha or or feel nauseated depending on mood.
When will someone start a serious high end audio opinion
forum without a constant chorus of Best BUY lovers to whom
all music sounds the same as the supermarket tinkle-tinkle,
the home-grown politicians venting on the captive RAO
audience the latest newspaper
editorial they managed to understand and the self-nominated
RAO scientists telling the
conductors and performers what music is all about.
Ludovic Mirabel .

On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 19:07:12 -0500, "Robert Morein"
wrote:


"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
.. .
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/price.html

Do you think "Soundhaspriority" is shilling for them, or is them?

I can't help thinking that you missed my posts...

When I posted this:

'"**We** therefore chose the words "Sound has Priority" to 'tap into'
that
specific Morphic resonance energy pattern which existed before the
sense of sight developed." - May Belt.

via a proxy server replied:

"I told you that my name had meaning, didn't I, goofball? I told you
that it's a self-contained tweak, that alone can help improve your
sound, if you have the right materials. I find it interesting that you
would go to all the trouble to research **my** name, but you wouldn't
bother to take 30 seconds to see if any of **my** tweaks actually
work!
And you wonder why I call you an ignorant sheep? Hmm....."

**s added by me.

I don't think it is rocket science. Note that my conclusion that it is
May Belt posting as has not been disputed
by
There is stuff about *L-shapes* on there too, which is what I googled
for when I found "Sound has Priority".
May Belt seems to be the most active part of the Belt dynasty at
present. She signed the most recent P.W.B spam here.

On 11 Mar 2006 17:05:29 -0800, wrote:


Robert Morein wrote:
"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
...
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/price.html

Do you think "Soundhaspriority" is shilling for them, or is them?

A pound certainly doesn't buy what it used to.
Definitely no ulterior motives in those previous threads.

If you prefer dollars:
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/priceus.html
or Euros:
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/priceeu.html

Goofball (aka Brian Peppers) wrote:

I can't help thinking that you missed my posts...

God forbid, we wouldn't want to do that, and miss out on all the vital
factual information you provide to the group! You must be the offical
group "fact checker".

Seriously, you people are really and truly "freaks of nature". You
should not have survived the evolution process, but somehow, did. And
perhaps that's why you ended up here in this dungheap that respectable
audiophiles have long since abandoned, buzzing about spewing pointless
crap every day, on the topic of almost everything but audio. When I
start posting some of the few threads that actually purport to bring up
the subject of audio, all the trolls on the group immediately start the
personal attacks, followed by the most insane paranoid conspiracy
conjecture I've seen in one place. But you do make me laugh. Large,
hearty, bellyfull laughs. Particularly after seeing threads like this.
And I feel infinitely more intelligent, simply from reading all the
infinitely stupid things that people write and think on this group.

I stop reading for but a few hours, and when I come back, there are
three new threads talking about me, and over 60 messages combined in
those threads alone. So much for trying to keep a low profile. You RAO
rowdies just adore your kitchen sink dramas, don't you? I'm starting to
see that this newsgroup is a substitute for the exciting lives that
none of you regulars have. And since I'm constantly being accused of
being a troll, to that I say, why on earth are so many people
responding?? Something doesn't jibe in what you boys are saying, do you
realize that? Now let's see what this cretin has to say for himself....

When I posted this:

'"**We** therefore chose the words "Sound has Priority" to 'tap into'
that
specific Morphic resonance energy pattern which existed before the
sense of sight developed." - May Belt.

via a proxy server replied:

"I told you that my name had meaning, didn't I, goofball? I told you
that it's a self-contained tweak, that alone can help improve your
sound, if you have the right materials. I find it interesting that you
would go to all the trouble to research my name, but you wouldn't
bother to take 30 seconds to see if any of my tweaks actually
work!
And you wonder why I call you an ignorant sheep? Hmm....."


I don't think it is rocket science.

To type a phrase into Google, find the phrase in question, and then
find a photo on a site somewhere and then conclude it must be me? No,
it certainly isn't rocket science. You got that much right. Which is
exactly why even a moron like you can accomplish that task. However, so
far as it having any meaning evidence-wise, its only evidence that
you're a moron. Thank you for proving it for me once again. You make
that SO easy to do.

Admit it. You really thought that was a brilliant move on your part,
didn't you Goofball? Type the phrase into Google, and whatever comes
up, that's our guy! No, our gal! Or other! And you actually sit there
and wonder why I call you a bleeding imbecile??

And with all this time to trace IPs, research internet sites, comb the
web in the hopes of finding dirt on me, and trolling me all over the
newgroup, how on earth _do_ you find the time for all this sailing you
lied about doing? Oh. I just answered my own question, didn't I?

Note that my conclusion that it is
May Belt posting as has not been disputed
by

Ho! There we have it folks! An undisputed conclusion does not mean the
target in question hasn't yet responded, or has decided not to respond
, or has perhaps died. No, it means that the undisputed conclusion,
after 30 minutes, becomes indisputable FACT, on RAO! As was exemplified
by all the other members in subsequent posts, who took this idiot's
conclusion on his say-so. Blind adherence to popular conjecture,
without questioning it. By both objectivists and subjectivists alike!

Gee, and you wonder why I say that I have proved the group is filled
with non-thinking sheep, and you're simply one of them?


There is stuff about *L-shapes* on there too, which is what I googled
for when I found "Sound has Priority".

Good for you, boy! Here's a lollipop for being such a clever little
Goofball rascal! You'll find even more stuff about my L-shapes on my
site: www.biogeometry.com. As I'm sure you will have already
"concluded", I'm all the people you read about on **my** site. I'm also
everyone here and everyone else on the web. But that's another story.

Now you know I can't be as good a net detective as you are, but I did
do some "brilliant Goofball Googling" like you, and I concluded that
this sex offender, was you:

http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/peppers.asp

Given that its been 30 seconds now and you haven't disputed this fact,
note that it has been concluded as RAO FACT now, that you are the
Goofball in the picture, and that your real name is "Brian Peppers". I
don't know whether to call you he, she or "it", because I don't know
what the hell you are. But no way are you getting near my children, you
disgusting creature.

Robert Morein wrote:

"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
...
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/price.html

Do you think "Soundhaspriority" is shilling for them, or is them?

I think he's working for the government, spying on ALL of us! Be
careful what you say! He might reveal your deepest secrets! Like you
having tried his tweaks, and liked it!

LOL! What a maroon. I would tell you to go back on your meds Robert,
because the paranoia monster is creeping out again. Except I don't
think it would do any good on this group, since everyone else in this
squirrel factory appears to be even more paranoid than you, judging by
all the people (and genders!) I was supposed to have been, thus far.

This may be a moot point but.... does anyone actually hold down a job
on this group?

On 12 Mar 2006 02:03:27 -0800, wrote:


Goofball (aka Brian Peppers) wrote:

No I am not Brian Peppers, whoever he is.

Good for you, boy! Here's a lollipop for being such a clever little
Goofball rascal! You'll find even more stuff about my L-shapes on my
site: www.biogeometry.com.

Are you claiming to be Dr I****** K****?

said:

This may be a moot point but.... does anyone actually hold down a job
on this group?

We all have ordinary jobs. For some reason, we never had a witch doctor
until now. Welcome!

wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:
Robert Morein wrote:
"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
...
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/price.html

Do you think "Soundhaspriority" is shilling for them, or is them?

A pound certainly doesn't buy what it used to.
Definitely no ulterior motives in those previous threads.


The price list especially 11 pounds for standard RCA
plug, puts the last few days debates where
they belong- in the Alice in Wonderland country.
No if someone published this spoof here here
all our audio thinkers would open their college textbooks and
start contributing solemnly.
The idea makes one
laugh hahaha or or feel nauseated depending on mood.
When will someone start a serious high end audio opinion
forum without a constant chorus of Best BUY lovers to whom
all music sounds the same as the supermarket tinkle-tinkle,
the home-grown politicians venting on the captive RAO
audience the latest newspaper
editorial they managed to understand and the self-nominated
RAO scientists telling the
conductors and performers what music is all about.
Ludovic Mirabel .

Ludovic, I did post one on concert halls a while back. I would have expected
you to reply:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...2e690b34f62608

Goofball_star_dot_etal said:


I don't think it is rocket science. Note that my conclusion that it is
May Belt posting as has not been disputed
by


Color me naive, gullible and all that, but I have not seen mr. or mrs.
SHP shilling any Belt products on this newsgroup.
So far, all references to any Belt products were made by others.
IIRC, I was the first to mention the name "Peter Belt" in a
conversation with SHP.

Furthermore, I have not seen him (or her) "selling" anything.
The tweaks posted here, can be done with material that everybody
already has at his disposal, and cost very little time to implement.
No references to commercial products were made by SHP.

So, to infer that SHP actually is May Belt or in any way attached to
the "Belt dynasty" is IMHO premature and not proven.

--

- Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -

said:


site: www.biogeometry.com.


Thanks for the link, that's an interesting site!

--

- Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 09:28:52 -0500, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote:



said:

This may be a moot point but.... does anyone actually hold down a job
on this group?

We all have ordinary jobs. For some reason, we never had a witch doctor
until now. Welcome!



I am very proud of you, George for "just saying no to quackery". I
cannot say how much this means to me and I forgive you for calling me
a "purse-swinger" when my back was turned.

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:26:39 +0100, Sander deWaal
wrote:

Goofball_star_dot_etal said:


I don't think it is rocket science. Note that my conclusion that it is
May Belt posting as has not been disputed
by


Color me naive, gullible and all that, but I have not seen mr. or mrs.
SHP shilling any Belt products on this newsgroup.
So far, all references to any Belt products were made by others.
IIRC, I was the first to mention the name "Peter Belt" in a
conversation with SHP.

Furthermore, I have not seen him (or her) "selling" anything.
The tweaks posted here, can be done with material that everybody
already has at his disposal, and cost very little time to implement.
No references to commercial products were made by SHP.

So, to infer that SHP actually is May Belt or in any way attached to
the "Belt dynasty" is IMHO premature and not proven.


"Sound Has Priority" Label "Sound Has Priority" Label Each
100 GBP

Close enough.

"not proven" I agree. It does sound more like a Benchimol than a
little old lady. SHP seems to have admitted to selling tweaks and has
mentioned sevaral tweaks also mentioned on the PWB site. Do you think
it is promoting a competitor's products or trying to discredit the
nice Belt family. If it sells it must advertise and probably, these
days, has a web site. Go find another site so full of crap.

Goofball_star_dot_etal said:


So, to infer that SHP actually is May Belt or in any way attached to
the "Belt dynasty" is IMHO premature and not proven.


"Sound Has Priority" Label "Sound Has Priority" Label Each
100 GBP

Close enough.


So anyone logging onto RAO with an address like
" must be an employee of, or at least
affiliated with, the Krell company?

I'm sorry, but that seems to be stretching things a bit too far IMO.

--

- Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -

wrote in message
ups.com...

Goofball (aka Brian Peppers) wrote:

I can't help thinking that you missed my posts...

God forbid, we wouldn't want to do that, and miss out on all the vital
factual information you provide to the group! You must be the offical
group "fact checker".

Seriously, you people are really and truly "freaks of nature". You
should not have survived the evolution process, but somehow, did.

Evolution and man are taking separate paths.

ScottW

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:21:15 +0100, Sander deWaal
wrote:

Goofball_star_dot_etal said:


So, to infer that SHP actually is May Belt or in any way attached to
the "Belt dynasty" is IMHO premature and not proven.


"Sound Has Priority" Label "Sound Has Priority" Label Each
100 GBP

Close enough.


So anyone logging onto RAO with an address like
" must be an employee of, or at least
affiliated with, the Krell company?


No, when people deliberately lie and decieve, all bets are off.

I am disappointed that you snipped the 'I agree" bit.

I'm sorry, but that seems to be stretching things a bit too far IMO.

If there is no connection between SHP and the Belt empire I am very
sorry and will apologize profusely. I perhaps have too much faith in
my intuition but it has a 99% success rate.
Keep an open mind.

I take it as an undeserved compliment that you should want my
opinion
.. "Undeserved" is not just false modesty figure of speech..
I did admire your erudite impressions but could add very little of my
own.
My experience of concert halls is very limited. As a kid I first heard
"serious"
music from the back rows of the upper gallery of Warsaw Philharmonic
which was as much as I could afford at that time. After that Vancouver
venues became the limit of my concert hall experience.
Much as I love this city I can not claim it to be of major world
musical interest.
One P.S. I expect that very soon Dick Pierce et al will be
ridiculing
what they are pleased to group as "the audiophiles" for putting
aspirine
under their loudspeakers. He went on for years about the green marking
pen rims for cds.
Ludovic Mirabel

experience
Robert Morein wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:
Robert Morein wrote:
"Goofball_star_dot_etal" wrote in message
...
http://www.belt.demon.co.uk/price.html

Do you think "Soundhaspriority" is shilling for them, or is them?

A pound certainly doesn't buy what it used to.
Definitely no ulterior motives in those previous threads.


The price list especially 11 pounds for standard RCA
plug, puts the last few days debates where
they belong- in the Alice in Wonderland country.
No if someone published this spoof here here
all our audio thinkers would open their college textbooks and
start contributing solemnly.
The idea makes one
laugh hahaha or or feel nauseated depending on mood.
When will someone start a serious high end audio opinion
forum without a constant chorus of Best BUY lovers to whom
all music sounds the same as the supermarket tinkle-tinkle,
the home-grown politicians venting on the captive RAO
audience the latest newspaper
editorial they managed to understand and the self-nominated
RAO scientists telling the
conductors and performers what music is all about.
Ludovic Mirabel .

Ludovic, I did post one on concert halls a while back. I would have expected
you to reply:

Goofy said:

One P.S. I expect that very soon Dick Pierce et al will be ridiculing
what they are pleased to group as "the audiophiles" for putting
aspirine under their loudspeakers.

And a good thing too. It is insane.

I thought the aspirin was supposed to go on top of the loudspeaker. Does
this mean my results were invalid and I have to start over from the
beginning?

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


said:

This may be a moot point but.... does anyone actually hold down a job
on this group?

We all have ordinary jobs. For some reason, we never had a witch doctor
until now. Welcome!



But once we had a witch!!!



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


Goofy said:

One P.S. I expect that very soon Dick Pierce et al will be
ridiculing
what they are pleased to group as "the audiophiles" for putting
aspirine under their loudspeakers.

And a good thing too. It is insane.

I thought the aspirin was supposed to go on top of the loudspeaker. Does
this mean my results were invalid and I have to start over from the
beginning?

You've just given yourself a headache. Fortunately, the solution is close at
hand

Goofball_star_dot_etal said:


If there is no connection between SHP and the Belt empire I am very
sorry and will apologize profusely. I perhaps have too much faith in
my intuition but it has a 99% success rate.
Keep an open mind.


I have probably too much faith in people, and so far, that "flaw" in
my character has been a mixed blessing.

I wouldn't have it any other way, though.

I'll try to keep my mind open from now on :-)

--

- Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:26:39 +0100, Sander deWaal
wrote:

Goofball_star_dot_etal said:


I don't think it is rocket science. Note that my conclusion that it is
May Belt posting as has not been disputed
by


Color me naive, gullible and all that, but I have not seen mr. or mrs.
SHP shilling any Belt products on this newsgroup.

" In my last article, I mentioned a new free Belt ‘device,’ a small
rectangle of white paper (pin-pricked with small holes in each corner
and another at the intersection of the diagonals) but have now taken
its use a step or two further. When the pin-pricked rectangle was
applied to the wood of one of my loudspeakers, it initially changed
the perceived sound of the whole audio system for the better. But the
next Belt-induced steps really are Snark-like because the benefits are
enhanced even further by a) placing a picture / photograph of a four
legged animal with a tail underneath the paper rectangle and then b)
placing a single common-or-garden aspirin tablet of all things over
the rectangle's centre pin-prick. There is no doubt in either my mind
or my wife’s that this extraordinary process did make a perceptible
difference to overall performance of our home audio system, even
though the Belts’ explanation for it does take a fair amount grappling
with…well, for me at least. "

http://www.musicweb-international.co...ep05/Snark.htm

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:33:30 +0100, Sander deWaal
wrote:

Goofball_star_dot_etal said:


If there is no connection between SHP and the Belt empire I am very
sorry and will apologize profusely. I perhaps have too much faith in
my intuition but it has a 99% success rate.
Keep an open mind.


I have probably too much faith in people, and so far, that "flaw" in
my character has been a mixed blessing.

Me too...until...

I wouldn't have it any other way, though.

I'll try to keep my mind open from now on :-)

Sometimes you just have to ping and see what happens.

Sander deWaal said:

I'll try to keep my mind open from now on :-)

Thanks Mr. Sander for admitting your to bigotted to appreciate CD is
perfect. LOL Mr. dWala its like you went fishing and, caught a bottle of
aspirin Mr. Dewwal. ;-)

Goofball_star_dot_etal said:

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:26:39 +0100, Sander deWaal
wrote:


Color me naive, gullible and all that, but I have not seen mr. or mrs.
SHP shilling any Belt products on this newsgroup.


" In my last article, I mentioned a new free Belt €˜device, a small
rectangle of white paper (pin-pricked with small holes in each corner
and another at the intersection of the diagonals) but have now taken
its use a step or two further. When the pin-pricked rectangle was
applied to the wood of one of my loudspeakers, it initially changed
the perceived sound of the whole audio system for the better. But the
next Belt-induced steps really are Snark-like because the benefits are
enhanced even further by a) placing a picture / photograph of a four
legged animal with a tail underneath the paper rectangle and then b)
placing a single common-or-garden aspirin tablet of all things over
the rectangle's centre pin-prick. There is no doubt in either my mind
or my wifes that this extraordinary process did make a perceptible
difference to overall performance of our home audio system, even
though the Belts explanation for it does take a fair amount grappling
with€¦well, for me at least. "

http://www.musicweb-international.co...ep05/Snark.htm


Yep, that's what it says on the above webpage.
However, I have not seen any mention of Belt *in this newsgroup* by
SHP, before *I* mentioned him in one of my replies.

Obviously, you're on some crusade, and if you search long enough, you
might even be able to prove that SHP *is* attached in any way to the
"Belt Imperium". Or not.

I wish you good luck, but sure you don't mind me not joining you in
this quest?

--

- Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 21:44:09 +0000, Goofball_star_dot_etal
wrote:

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:33:30 +0100, Sander deWaal
wrote:

Goofball_star_dot_etal said:


If there is no connection between SHP and the Belt empire I am very
sorry and will apologize profusely. I perhaps have too much faith in
my intuition but it has a 99% success rate.
Keep an open mind.


I have probably too much faith in people, and so far, that "flaw" in
my character has been a mixed blessing.

Me too...until...

I wouldn't have it any other way, though.

I'll try to keep my mind open from now on :-)

Sometimes you just have to ping and see what happens.

"ping" as in give something a knock or impulse not as in IP ping,
note.

Goofball_star_dot_etal said:


I'll try to keep my mind open from now on :-)


Sometimes you just have to ping and see what happens.


"ping" as in give something a knock or impulse not as in IP ping,
note.


I got that the first time, you will note.
I may be Dutch, and even a (dark) blonde, but some neurotransmitters
are still firing.

Maybe this is a good moment to tell you that "Belt" is the Dutch word
for "junkyard" or "scrapheap".

Make of that what you will :-)

--

- Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:48:25 +0100, Sander deWaal
wrote:

Goofball_star_dot_etal said:

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:26:39 +0100, Sander deWaal
wrote:


Color me naive, gullible and all that, but I have not seen mr. or mrs.
SHP shilling any Belt products on this newsgroup.


" In my last article, I mentioned a new free Belt ‘device,’ a small
rectangle of white paper (pin-pricked with small holes in each corner
and another at the intersection of the diagonals) but have now taken
its use a step or two further. When the pin-pricked rectangle was
applied to the wood of one of my loudspeakers, it initially changed
the perceived sound of the whole audio system for the better. But the
next Belt-induced steps really are Snark-like because the benefits are
enhanced even further by a) placing a picture / photograph of a four
legged animal with a tail underneath the paper rectangle and then b)
placing a single common-or-garden aspirin tablet of all things over
the rectangle's centre pin-prick. There is no doubt in either my mind
or my wife’s that this extraordinary process did make a perceptible
difference to overall performance of our home audio system, even
though the Belts’ explanation for it does take a fair amount grappling
with…well, for me at least. "

http://www.musicweb-international.co...ep05/Snark.htm


Yep, that's what it says on the above webpage.
However, I have not seen any mention of Belt *in this newsgroup* by
SHP, before *I* mentioned him in one of my replies.


So..

Obviously, you're on some crusade, and if you search long enough, you
might even be able to prove that SHP *is* attached in any way to the
"Belt Imperium". Or not.

Don't cry for SHP too much:

"
By the way, I had my "guys" check into it, and found that your real
name is Brian Peppers. Although you LOOK just like your fake usenet
name, "Goofball". And your picture has been posted he

http://www.snopes.com/photos/people/peppers.asp "


I wish you good luck, but sure you don't mind me not joining you in
this quest?

Not at all but I would rather you did not call it "some crusade" or
"quest"

Goofball_star_dot_etal said:


However, I have not seen any mention of Belt *in this newsgroup* by
SHP, before *I* mentioned him in one of my replies.


So..


Well, that's what started this argument.
My opinion still stands that SHP didn't shill "Belt" products on this
newsgroup.
He might have the ideas of some of his tweaks from that website
though.

Still not selling anything on RAO as far as I can see, and that was
the claim.


Not at all but I would rather you did not call it "some crusade" or
"quest"


OK, how about "a pastime" then? ;-)

--

- Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -

George M. Middius cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net
said:


I'll try to keep my mind open from now on :-)


Thanks Mr. Sander for admitting your to bigotted to appreciate CD is
perfect. LOL Mr. dWala its like you went fishing and, caught a bottle of
aspirin Mr. Dewwal. ;-)


To be honest, I could use one or two of them at the moment.

Keeping your mind open is guaranteed to get you a headache with
temperatures like this outside.

--

- Never argue with idiots, they drag you down their level and beat you with experience. -

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 23:35:06 +0100, Sander deWaal
wrote:


OK, how about "a pastime" then? ;-)

Much better, thanks!

Goofball_star_dot_etal wrote:
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:26:39 +0100, Sander deWaal
wrote:

Goofball_star_dot_etal said:


I don't think it is rocket science. Note that my conclusion that it is
May Belt posting as has not been disputed
by


Color me naive, gullible and all that, but I have not seen mr. or mrs.
SHP shilling any Belt products on this newsgroup.

" In my last article, I mentioned a new free Belt 'device,' a small
rectangle of white paper (pin-pricked with small holes in each corner
and another at the intersection of the diagonals) but have now taken
its use a step or two further. When the pin-pricked rectangle was
applied to the wood of one of my loudspeakers, it initially changed
the perceived sound of the whole audio system for the better. But the
next Belt-induced steps really are Snark-like because the benefits are
enhanced even further by a) placing a picture / photograph of a four
legged animal with a tail underneath the paper rectangle and then b)
placing a single common-or-garden aspirin tablet of all things over
the rectangle's centre pin-prick. There is no doubt in either my mind
or my wife's that this extraordinary process did make a perceptible
difference to overall performance of our home audio system, even
though the Belts' explanation for it does take a fair amount grappling
with...well, for me at least. "

http://www.musicweb-international.co...ep05/Snark.htm

Oh no, I've time warped back to my teen years as a scout,
going on a hunt for the illusive snark.
Is the more successful method snark bait or trapping using snark lure?

Goofy quoted Shovels' shilling:

"next Belt-induced steps really are Snark-like because the benefits are
enhanced even further by a) placing a picture / photograph of a four
legged animal with a tail underneath the paper rectangle and then b)
placing a single common-or-garden aspirin tablet of all things over
the rectangle's centre pin-prick."

I would like to observe that no comparisons are listed with pictures of
other kinds of animals or other types of medications. How about a
caterpillar paired with a Valium? A ladybug combined with a frozen dollop
of Pepto-Bismol? These alleged "tweaks" are seriously under-researched,
science-wise. I think we should all take a step back and wait for Shovels
to provide some credible credentials for his alleged "research".

Sander deWaal wrote:
said:


site: www.biogeometry.com.


Thanks for the link, that's an interesting site!


in a crackpot kind of way.


--
-S
"If men were angels, no government would be necessary." - James Madison (1788)

George M. Middius wrote:

said:

This may be a moot point but.... does anyone actually hold down a job
on this group?

We all have ordinary jobs. For some reason, we never had a witch doctor
until now. Welcome!

Thanks! In the small undeveloped village where I come from, I was the
local hifi audio guru. (We were too superstitious to engage a witch
doctor). With the lack of medical facilities, or the experts to run
them, people often died of all kinds of treacherous diseases and the
like. But they had the finest sounding hifi systems on the island to
listen to whilst they were dying. And that's thanks to me. And now the
good "employable" quote unquote "people" of RAO, can "enjoy the magic".
Again, thanks to me divulging some of my powerful audio medicine magic.


Once the threats have died down, I'm sure I will be receiving many
thanks and praises for that.... Say George... what are them there tar
and feathers for?

George M. Middius wrote:

Goofy quoted Shovels' shilling:

"next Belt-induced steps really are Snark-like because the benefits are
enhanced even further by a) placing a picture / photograph of a four
legged animal with a tail underneath the paper rectangle and then b)
placing a single common-or-garden aspirin tablet of all things over
the rectangle's centre pin-prick."

I would like to observe that no comparisons are listed with pictures of
other kinds of animals or other types of medications. How about a
caterpillar paired with a Valium? A ladybug combined with a frozen dollop
of Pepto-Bismol? These alleged "tweaks" are seriously under-researched,
science-wise. I think we should all take a step back and wait for Shovels
to provide some credible credentials for his alleged "research".

Don't call me "Shovels". It's stupid and it's childish of you. I could
call you a lot of things, but I'm not doing that, am I? Do you want to
be taken seriously, or do you just want to be taken seriously as being
a fool? If you want to be something more than an audio dilletante who
prefers spending his life arguing politics than learning things about
the hobby you pretend to have an interest in, then don't observe. Do.
Otherwise, you don't know any more about audio than Kreuger does, and
have no right to be attacking him for his infinite ignorance.

How about a caterpillar with a valium? Try it yourself, instead of
asking questions, or even pretending to. I've never tried it, but I
won't ridicule you if you wish to, as you would me. I will say from my
experience, I think it's not likely to do anything; same with your
stupid Pepto Bismol idea. Both are attempts on your part to invalidate
someone else's intelligence and experience. All they do however, is
prove your lack of intelligence and experience, George.

I will agree with your otherwise facetious statement that the tweaks
are seriously under-researched, science wise, and as is evident from
the flock of RAO sheep, otherwise. But nothing's stopping you, is
there. I've already taken my "step back" and I'm waiting for you or one
of you Flatlanders to try the techniques. If you're not interested in
them, then don't talk about "credible credentials", and pretend you're
interested. You wouldn't understand the foundation of the techniques
even if I explained them to you. You especially, George.