Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan wrote:
LP, Cassette, VHS Tape Conversion to CD/DVD High quality conversion from analog to digital format. Send in your LPs, Cassette, and VHS Tapes for conversion to CD or DVD. Quality guaranteed or your money back. I use state of the art digital audio and video recording software and equipment. Prices Single item: $15 2 to 5 items: $12 ea. 6 or mo $8 ea. Return postage included. The analog audio digitization process includes noise cancellation (eg. tape hiss), pop/click elimination and volume normalization. The cost for any further processing is negotiable. For an additional $2 per item, I will record your audio source media in DVD audio format. DVD audio format can provide up to 24 bit quantization depth and 96kHz sampling frequency. Additional CD copies are $3 each. Duplicate cassette or VHS tapes are $5 each. DVD copies are $5 each. Other Service CD/DVD duplication ($3/$5 w/ labels) All customers have web access to samples of their digitized media. Email me for details/requests. Contact Website: http://home.earthlink.net/~nickersd2001 Are you sure your name is really "Dan"? ![]() ![]() Anybody who so blatantly advertises on RAO the conversion of all these different media (especially all that old analog crap) fo CD's might be using an alias on this NG. I think you need to answer several questions about your operation before we can consider your services: (1) Is your favorite music source a digital work station? (2) Are you a fan of the "Motown Sound" (but only on the superior digital transfers)?, (3) Are you an admirer and user of the famed McDonald's statistical reporting methodology when discussing digital media?, and (4) when performing your daily ablutions, do you have a distinct preference for the use of high valuecurrency? ![]() ![]() Bruce J. Richman |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
Are you sure your name is really "Dan"? ![]() ![]() Why not? Richman, do you seriously believe that only one person in the world, namely me, has figured out the superiority of digital media? Anybody who so blatantly advertises on RAO the conversion of all these different media (especially all that old analog crap) fo CD's might be using an alias on this NG. I think you need to answer several questions about your operation before we can consider your services: (1) Is your favorite music source a digital work station? (2) Are you a fan of the "Motown Sound" (but only on the superior digital transfers)?, (3) Are you an admirer and user of the famed McDonald's statistical reporting methodology when discussing digital media?, and (4) when performing your daily ablutions, do you have a distinct preference for the use of high valuecurrency? ![]() ![]() Just goes to show that Richman is so completely paranoid and delusional that he seriously thinks that I'd set up a web site with a Massachusetts phone number to conceal the fact that it's mine. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Are you sure your name is really "Dan"? ![]() ![]() Why not? Richman, do you seriously believe that only one person in the world, namely me, has figured out the superiority of digital media? Anybody who so blatantly advertises on RAO the conversion of all these different media (especially all that old analog crap) fo CD's might be using an alias on this NG. I think you need to answer several questions about your operation before we can consider your services: (1) Is your favorite music source a digital work station? (2) Are you a fan of the "Motown Sound" (but only on the superior digital transfers)?, (3) Are you an admirer and user of the famed McDonald's statistical reporting methodology when discussing digital media?, and (4) when performing your daily ablutions, do you have a distinct preference for the use of high valuecurrency? ![]() ![]() Just goes to show that Richman is so completely paranoid and delusional that he seriously thinks that I'd set up a web site with a Massachusetts phone number to conceal the fact that it's mine. Actually, all it shows is that Krueger was stupid and delusional enough to take the above post seriously and consequently respond to it with his usual mixing of hatred and fabrications. Obviously, his totally consuming anti-subjective-preference, anti-tube, anti-vinyl agenda has once again perpetuated his disconnect with reality. And, of course, it also demonstrates Krueger's compulsive need to engage in unprovoked personal attacks. The post which he smeared above never mentioned his name. But what else can one expect from this paranoid hatemonger who also attacked posts from Sanders and Atkinson today as well. And quite predictably, as is his custom, he attacked them personally and not just their views. Just another hardworking character assassination day in the pathetic life of RAO"s most widely hated and despised poster. Bruce J. Richman |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
Arny Krueger wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Are you sure your name is really "Dan"? ![]() ![]() Why not? Richman, do you seriously believe that only one person in the world, namely me, has figured out the superiority of digital media? Anybody who so blatantly advertises on RAO the conversion of all these different media (especially all that old analog crap) fo CD's might be using an alias on this NG. I think you need to answer several questions about your operation before we can consider your services: (1) Is your favorite music source a digital work station? (2) Are you a fan of the "Motown Sound" (but only on the superior digital transfers)?, (3) Are you an admirer and user of the famed McDonald's statistical reporting methodology when discussing digital media?, and (4) when performing your daily ablutions, do you have a distinct preference for the use of high valuecurrency? ![]() ![]() Just goes to show that Richman is so completely paranoid and delusional that he seriously thinks that I'd set up a web site with a Massachusetts phone number to conceal the fact that it's mine. Actually, all it shows is that Krueger was stupid and delusional enough to take the above post seriously and consequently respond to it with his usual mixing of hatred and fabrications. Yet another lame IKWYABWAI from Bruce Richman, who never seems to have ever had an origional idea in his life. Obviously, his totally consuming anti-subjective-preference, anti-tube, anti-vinyl agenda has once again perpetuated his disconnect with reality. Prove it. And, of course, it also demonstrates Krueger's compulsive need to engage in unprovoked personal attacks. Unprovoked? You're even more delusional than I thought, Richman. I suppose your gratuitous attack from last night doesn't actually exist. The post which he smeared above never mentioned his name. Lame attempt at deceit, Richman. You didn't have to mention my name, you described me in unmistakable terms. But what else can one expect from this paranoid hatemonger who also attacked posts from Sanders and Atkinson today as well. Richman the deceiver would like one and all to believe that Sanders and Atkinson have never attacked me. And quite predictably, as is his custom, he attacked them personally and not just their views. Given that their views about me are totally fallacious, libelous and despicable, attacking them personally seems highly appropriate. Just another hardworking character assassination day in the pathetic life of RAO"s most widely hated and despised poster. Nope, Middius had nothing to do with this particular post. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arny Krueger lies again:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Arny Krueger wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message Are you sure your name is really "Dan"? ![]() ![]() Why not? Richman, do you seriously believe that only one person in the world, namely me, has figured out the superiority of digital media? Anybody who so blatantly advertises on RAO the conversion of all these different media (especially all that old analog crap) fo CD's might be using an alias on this NG. I think you need to answer several questions about your operation before we can consider your services: (1) Is your favorite music source a digital work station? (2) Are you a fan of the "Motown Sound" (but only on the superior digital transfers)?, (3) Are you an admirer and user of the famed McDonald's statistical reporting methodology when discussing digital media?, and (4) when performing your daily ablutions, do you have a distinct preference for the use of high valuecurrency? ![]() ![]() Just goes to show that Richman is so completely paranoid and delusional that he seriously thinks that I'd set up a web site with a Massachusetts phone number to conceal the fact that it's mine. Actually, all it shows is that Krueger was stupid and delusional enough to take the above post seriously and consequently respond to it with his usual mixing of hatred and fabrications. Yet another lame IKWYABWAI from Bruce Richman, who never seems to have ever had an origional idea in his life. Baloney. This is just another delusional false claim by Krueger who got so easily exposed as unable to tell the difference between humor and the usual vituperation he's so richly earned by smearing people and libeling them for over 7 years on RAO. This despicable cretin just sits around looking at RAO posts looking for any and all opportunities to attack his many documented "enemies". LOL!!!! Obviously, his totally consuming anti-subjective-preference, anti-tube, anti-vinyl agenda has once again perpetuated his disconnect with reality. Prove it. It's been proven over and over again on RAO by your lengthy history of anti-vinyl and anti-tube posts, including starting threads with derogatory comments about vinyl in the title. Also proven by yout trashing the honest inquiries of people coming on RAO that you don't even know by making assinine characterizations of vinyl playback, ridiculous descriptions of tubed electronics, etc. And of course, your attacks upon subjectivists are a matter of public record on both RAO and RAHE. Of course, you've been banned from the latter, no doubt because the moderators tiring of having to constantly censor your posts containing personal attacks. And, of course, it also demonstrates Krueger's compulsive need to engage in unprovoked personal attacks. Unprovoked? You're even more delusional than I thought, Richman. I suppose your gratuitous attack from last night doesn't actually exist. It must be the voices in your head telling you what lies to spew, Krueger. I responded to a post from a fellow named Dan and asked him some questions. Only a paranoid, egomaniacal, zealot such as yourself woult take it personally, given that your name was never mentioned. The post which he smeared above never mentioned his name. Lame attempt at deceit, Richman. You didn't have to mention my name, you described me in unmistakable terms. Bull****, Krueger. I've never met you (thank God!) and don't profess to have any knowledge of such items as your taste in music, your main source of music, or how you er manage such trivialities as wiping. But since you are now claiming that I've "described (me)( in unmistakable terms", I guess we can conclude that: (1) You're a big fan of the "Motown sound" (2) Your main music source is a digital work station. (3) You routinely wipe with high currency bills. and (4) Use quasi-McDonald's statistios when promoting your anti-vinyl propganda with misleading statistical reports. Thanks for sharing. Thanks for admitting that the characteristics many have attributed to you are true. Such rare moments of honest self-disclosure from Krueger probably should be preserved for posterity. But what else can one expect from this paranoid hatemonger who also attacked posts from Sanders and Atkinson today as well. Richman the deceiver would like one and all to believe that Sanders and Atkinson have never attacked me. Krueger, the compulsive liar, is now trying to ratiionalize his newest current unprovoked personal attacks on the grounds that "once upon a time", some really bad people named Atkinsan and Sanders said some uncomplimentary trhings about him. How long ago, Krueger? A day, a week, a month? Or is that all irrelevant in your compulsive need to engage in unprovoked personal attacks whenever you see fit. And quite predictably, as is his custom, he attacked them personally and not just their views. Given that their views about me are totally fallacious, libelous and despicable, attacking them personally seems highly appropriate. Wrong again. And of course, you've just revealed quite clearly why you were banned from a moderated audio discussion group named RAHE. As the rules for that forum clearly indicate, you can attack messages but not the messenger. Unfortunately your paranoid delusions prevent you from making that critical distinction. Just another hardworking character assassination day in the pathetic life of RAO"s most widely hated and despised poster. Nope, Middius had nothing to do with this particular post. Lane attempt at diversion and misrepresentation duly noted. Bruce J. Richman |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Atkinson" wrote in message
om (Bruce J. Richman) wrote in message To the best of my knowledge, I have not "attacked" Mr. Krueger, only pointed out on various occasions that his public statements about me or about Stereophile were not supported by the facts, or were based on his own insufficient understanding of the subject, or were erroneous because he had not actually read the articles he was criticizing. Typical of Atkinson's deceptions. How about this quote from one of his posts? From: (John Atkinson) Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio Subject: SACD does not make technical sense Date: 6 May 2003 10:21:33 -0700 Message-ID: "For every logical sane thing you say, Arnie Krueger will come back with at least one, and usually two or three stark-raving tangential, illogical, insane responses." From: (John Atkinson) Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion Date: 5 May 2003 08:01:20 -0700 Message-ID: "I have not e-mailed anyone about the insane paranoid rantings Mr. Krueger has been posting about me on r.a.o. and r.a.t. I also don't have a "scanner" to track Mr. Krueger's postings. " From: (John Atkinson) Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion Date: 23 Jul 2002 20:59:24 -0700 Message-ID: "Except that I didn't deny accusing Mr. Krueger of plagiarism. Instead I voiced my suspicion that Mr. Krueger is insane. "Insane. Or at least delusional. "Insane. Or at least someone who believes he can read minds. "Insane. " Insane, Or at least paranoid. "Perhaps dangerously paranoid. "Instead I oiced my suspicion that Mr. Krueger is insane. "Insane. Or at least delusional. "Insane. "Insane. "Insane, Or at least paranoid. "Perhaps dangerously paranoid. "As I said, insane. etc., etc., etc. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
You're spending your time proving that people have called you insane in the past. Since he just baldly claimed that those posts never happened, it was worth the little bit of work it took to again show what a liar Atkinson is. How's that working out for you? I obviously deserve a tail and two ears. Are you ready to take a few runs at my red cape, Phillips? LOL! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arny said:
Are you ready to take a few runs at my red cape, Phillips? I don't know why you're trying to come on to me. I'm not eleven years old. Boon |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
Arny said: Are you ready to take a few runs at my red cape, Phillips? I don't know why you're trying to come on to me. I'm not eleven years old. Really? Based on how you behave around here Phillips, I was sure you were exactly eleven. Darn! |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Marc Phillips" wrote in message Arny said: Are you ready to take a few runs at my red cape, Phillips? I don't know why you're trying to come on to me. I'm not eleven years old. Really? Based on how you behave around here Phillips, I was sure you were exactly eleven. Darn! Whatsa matter? All the neighborhood 11 year old boys finally got wise to you? So, now you have to go to California to get one? ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MINe 109 wrote in message
... In article , "Arny Krueger" wrote: "John Atkinson" wrote in message om (Bruce J. Richman) wrote in message To the best of my knowledge, I have not "attacked" Mr. Krueger, only pointed out on various occasions that his public statements about me or about Stereophile were not supported by the facts, or were based on his own insufficient understanding of the subject, or were erroneous because he had not actually read the articles he was criticizing. Typical of Atkinson's deceptions. How about this quote from one of his posts? From: (John Atkinson) Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion,uk.rec.audio Subject: SACD does not make technical sense Date: 6 May 2003 10:21:33 -0700 Message-ID: "For every logical sane thing you say, Arnie Krueger will come back with at least one, and usually two or three stark-raving tangential, illogical, insane responses." No time to check, but I think this a quote from Gindi, therefore not a quote of JA. I was indeed quoting from a posting of Michael Gindi's. Hence the quotation marks. I think it fair to note that Mr. Krueger has been confused in the past by the appropriate use of quotation marks. From: (John Atkinson) Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion Date: 5 May 2003 08:01:20 -0700 Message-ID: "I have not e-mailed anyone about the insane paranoid rantings Mr. Krueger has been posting about me on r.a.o. and r.a.t. I also don't have a "scanner" to track Mr. Krueger's postings. " These are clearly about Arny's posts, not Arny himself. As I said, I do try to keep my comments on Mr. Krueger's actions separate from the single instance where I have made what might be considered an "attack." And as I also said, Mr. Krueger seems unable to distinguish between the two. He has also claimed in the past that any criticism or correction of his comments is equivalent to a personal attack because it will bring into the disrepute of his peers, the technical definition of libel. He is wrong in this belief. From: (John Atkinson) Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion Date: 23 Jul 2002 20:59:24 -0700 Message-ID: "Except that I didn't deny accusing Mr. Krueger of plagiarism. Instead I voiced my suspicion that Mr. Krueger is insane. "Insane. Or at least delusional. "Insane. Or at least someone who believes he can read minds. "Insane. " Insane, Or at least paranoid. "Perhaps dangerously paranoid. "Instead I oiced my suspicion that Mr. Krueger is insane. "Insane. Or at least delusional. "Insane. "Insane. "Insane, Or at least paranoid. "Perhaps dangerously paranoid. "As I said, insane. etc., etc., etc. The "insane" comments are, as JA has said, arguable. Indeed. And as I had already mentioned the existence of this posting, for Mr. Krueger to quote from it is hardly the "gotcha" he believes it to be. Merry Xmas! And to you Stephen. -- John John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
... "Marc Phillips" wrote in message You're spending your time proving that people have called you insane in the past. Since he just baldly claimed that those posts never happened, it was worth the little bit of work it took to again show what a liar Atkinson is. "Baldly claimed"? Here's what I actually wrote, Mr. Krueger: " I did once voice the suspicion that Mr. Krueger was insane..." It seems to me that far from claiming that that post never happened, I was stipulating to its existence. How's that working out for you? I obviously deserve a tail and two ears. And I am sure you will look very fetching in them, Mr. Krueger. :-) John Atkinson Editor, Stereophile |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Marc Phillips" wrote in message Arny said: Are you ready to take a few runs at my red cape, Phillips? I don't know why you're trying to come on to me. I'm not eleven years old. Really? Based on how you behave around here Phillips, I was sure you were exactly eleven. Darn! Whatsa matter? All the neighborhood 11 year old boys finally got wise to you? Those neighborhood 11 year old boys are a figment of your imagination. So, now you have to go to California to get one? Last time I looked, you go to California more often than I do. BTW, you still haven't explained your fascination with my butt. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Marc Phillips" wrote in message Arny said: Are you ready to take a few runs at my red cape, Phillips? I don't know why you're trying to come on to me. I'm not eleven years old. Really? Based on how you behave around here Phillips, I was sure you were exactly eleven. Darn! Whatsa matter? All the neighborhood 11 year old boys finally got wise to you? Those neighborhood 11 year old boys are a figment of your imagination. So, now you have to go to California to get one? Last time I looked, you go to California more often than I do. I go to California to meet with some of my wonderful friends from RAO. None of them live in Detroit. BTW, you still haven't explained your fascination with my butt. You mean pcabx.com? ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arny said:
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message Arny said: Are you ready to take a few runs at my red cape, Phillips? I don't know why you're trying to come on to me. I'm not eleven years old. Really? Based on how you behave around here Phillips, I was sure you were exactly eleven. Darn! Darn? DARN? LOL! You couldn't have ****ed that up more if I had written your response for you. I guess that's your Christmas gift to me. Thanks! Boon |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mr. Phillips wrote:
Arny said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message Arny said: Are you ready to take a few runs at my red cape, Phillips? I don't know why you're trying to come on to me. I'm not eleven years old. Really? Based on how you behave around here Phillips, I was sure you were exactly eleven. Darn! Darn? DARN? LOL! You couldn't have ****ed that up more if I had written your response for you. I guess that's your Christmas gift to me. Thanks! Boon It seems that RAO's self-appointed spelling policeman has about the same level of expertise and/or hypocrisy when it comes to spelling as he does when trying to deceive the RAO public with McDonald=s variety statistics or Google "lists". He also asked of another poster today who made a claim, and I quote, "why note"? No wonder that practically nobody on RAO believes anything he has to say. Bruce J. Richman |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Zakky Chimp-Boy chattered: I don't know why you're trying to come on to me. I'm not eleven years old. I know that, you have to be about 45 however with the mind of an 8 year old. Every time the Terrierborg gets in trouble, the even-stupider Chimp-Boy appears. Coincidence? |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zakhann said:
(Marc Phillips) wrote in message ... Arny said: Are you ready to take a few runs at my red cape, Phillips? I don't know why you're trying to come on to me. I'm not eleven years old. Boon I know that, you have to be about 45 however with the mind of an 8 year old. That would be your fantasy of me. a mindless Ba-foon A mindless sockpuppet, you mean. Go hide from me for another six months. Boon |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
George M. Middius wrote in message . ..
Zakky Chimp-Boy chattered: I don't know why you're trying to come on to me. I'm not eleven years old. I know that, you have to be about 45 however with the mind of an 8 year old. Every time the Terrierborg gets in trouble, the even-stupider Chimp-Boy appears. Coincidence? Minus mouth speaks. George Minus is sadisitic, he's into pain. Arny has been kicking his has ass for years and he wants more, out of the thousands of debate with Arny he hasn't won one. I don't know about him, but I can't take an ass kicking more than once, I don't like getting my ass beat, Georgie Minus really is into that kind of thing. |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Zakhann" wrote in message
om (Marc Phillips) wrote in message ... A mindless sockpuppet, you mean. Go hide from me for another six months. I don't like you!! Marc Phillips quite obviously doesn't even like himself. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zakhann said:
(Marc Phillips) wrote in message ... Zakhann said: (Marc Phillips) wrote in message ... Arny said: Are you ready to take a few runs at my red cape, Phillips? I don't know why you're trying to come on to me. I'm not eleven years old. Boon I know that, you have to be about 45 however with the mind of an 8 year old. That would be your fantasy of me. a mindless Ba-foon A mindless sockpuppet, you mean. Go hide from me for another six months. Boon I don't like you!! I don't care! Boon |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arny said:
"Zakhann" wrote in message . com (Marc Phillips) wrote in message ... A mindless sockpuppet, you mean. Go hide from me for another six months. I don't like you!! Marc Phillips quite obviously doesn't even like himself. That would be a fantasy of yours. Boon |