"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...

The Dean tape has been shown on the news many times.
It has been reported in the newspapaers, and many columnisits
have commented upon it. Even other Democratic
candidates have criticized the statement.

What I failed to note earlier, is that your reference to "the Dean tape has
been shown on the news many times."

It was not shown in its entirety except on C-SPAN the day of the broadcast.
I watched the C-SPAN live tape of Dean's Dec. 15 foreign policy address, and
taped it. Since your comments below, I've reviewed it. It is 100%
consistent with the official transcript of the Dean website you quoted, (and
which I've quoted on two prior occasions, the first of which when it was
first released immediately following the live broadcast) which does *not*
contain *any* reference to any "permission" the United Nations.

Therefore, every reference you provided, is obviously and patently false,
and since your first reference was to a Fox news smear, it's highly likely
that your other news sources listed picked up variations on this smear.
Given the disgusting level of journalistic integrity at large in America
today, this is hardly surprising.

You've quoted a number of libelous stories. Under the law of libel, anyone
who repeats such libelous stories, is also guilty of libel. That means you
too, Wormtongue.

Hardly surprising given your history this year of falling into the snakepit
of Arnii Krooger, Scott W., Michael McKelvy, Geosinch, and Pajamarama and
revealing your true colors. Quite an illustrious caste of RAO characters
you associate yourself with, Wormtongue. Your mom must be rolling in her
grave by now. And your dad would undoubtedly be thoroughly distgusted and
ashamed of you if he knew what you were up to.

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...

The Dean tape has been shown on the news many times.
It has been reported in the newspapaers, and many columnisits
have commented upon it. Even other Democratic
candidates have criticized the statement.

What I failed to note earlier, is that your reference to "the Dean tape
has
been shown on the news many times."

It was not shown in its entirety except on C-SPAN the day of the
broadcast.
I watched the C-SPAN live tape of Dean's Dec. 15 foreign policy address,
and
taped it. Since your comments below, I've reviewed it. It is 100%
consistent with the official transcript of the Dean website you quoted,
(and
which I've quoted on two prior occasions, the first of which when it was
first released immediately following the live broadcast) which does *not*
contain *any* reference to any "permission" the United Nations.


The Dean website did not include the Q&A.
The quote came from the Q&A.
Does the C-SPAN tape inclyde the Q&A?
The part I did see on the news showed him saying the
words permission of the UN.

Therefore, every reference you provided, is obviously and patently false,
and since your first reference was to a Fox news smear, it's highly likely
that your other news sources listed picked up variations on this smear.
Given the disgusting level of journalistic integrity at large in America
today, this is hardly surprising.


The Dean website did not include the Q&A.
The quote came from the Q&A.

You've quoted a number of libelous stories. Under the law of libel,
anyone
who repeats such libelous stories, is also guilty of libel. That means
you
too, Wormtongue.


The Dean website did not include the Q&A.
The quote came form the Q&A.
Have Mr. Dean sue me!!!

Hardly surprising given your history this year of falling into the
snakepit
of Arnii Krooger, Scott W., Michael McKelvy, Geosinch, and Pajamarama and
revealing your true colors. Quite an illustrious caste of RAO characters
you associate yourself with, Wormtongue. Your mom must be rolling in her
grave by now. And your dad would undoubtedly be thoroughly distgusted and
ashamed of you if he knew what you were up to.


And your legal clients would be ashamed of your behavior, if you
had any legal clients.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

.. Your mom must be rolling in her
grave by now. And your dad would undoubtedly be thoroughly distgusted and
ashamed of you if he knew what you were up to.



Note:

I would not have included any reference to your moribund
legal practice, had you not been so sleazy as to bring my parents into this.
Let's cease and desist from any further familial references as of now.
Agreed?




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

. Your mom must be rolling in her
grave by now. And your dad would undoubtedly be thoroughly distgusted
and
ashamed of you if he knew what you were up to.



Note:

I would not have included any reference to your moribund
legal practice, had you not been so sleazy as to bring my parents into
this.
Let's cease and desist from any further familial references as of now.
Agreed?

That was disgusting. Sanders has really become a slimeball.
Of coure we were never more than a tax deduction to him.

ScottW

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:h8GFb.36668$m83.33417@fed1read01...

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

. Your mom must be rolling in her
grave by now. And your dad would undoubtedly be thoroughly distgusted
and
ashamed of you if he knew what you were up to.



Note:

I would not have included any reference to your moribund
legal practice, had you not been so sleazy as to bring my parents into
this.
Let's cease and desist from any further familial references as of now.
Agreed?

That was disgusting. Sanders has really become a slimeball.
Of coure we were never more than a tax deduction to him.

ScottW



Ah, so my mooching was a win-win situation.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Sockpuppet Yustabe said:

Ah, so my mooching was a win-win situation.

Your mooching and the Terrierborg's pooching.

'lil Georgie chimed in:

Sockpuppet Yustabe said:

Ah, so my mooching was a win-win situation.

Your mooching and the Terrierborg's pooching.

And the Mid-Yut's buttsmooching.


GeoSynch

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message


And your legal clients would be ashamed of your behavior, if you
had any legal clients.

Hasn't it been said here that Sanders does wills?

That means that his clients are dead by the time the world gets really
involved in testing the quality his work, right?

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...

The Dean tape has been shown on the news many times.
It has been reported in the newspapaers, and many columnisits
have commented upon it. Even other Democratic
candidates have criticized the statement.

What I failed to note earlier, is that your reference to "the Dean tape
has
been shown on the news many times."

It was not shown in its entirety except on C-SPAN the day of the
broadcast.
I watched the C-SPAN live tape of Dean's Dec. 15 foreign policy address,
and
taped it. Since your comments below, I've reviewed it. It is 100%
consistent with the official transcript of the Dean website you quoted,
(and
which I've quoted on two prior occasions, the first of which when it was
first released immediately following the live broadcast) which does
*not*
contain *any* reference to any "permission" the United Nations.


The Dean website did not include the Q&A.

Your original claim never reverenced Q&A. It only referenced his speech,
which is reproduced word for word on Dean's website.

The quote came from the Q&A.

Yet not one of the right-wing links you provided mentions this. And not one
of the links references any context. So how would you know this?

Does the C-SPAN tape inclyde the Q&A?

The tape I made did not, as I cut it off after the speech, as I was rushed
for time. So I neither saw nor taped the Q&A's, but I understand C-SPAN did
cover the questions following the speech.

The part I did see on the news showed him saying the
words permission of the UN.

Seeing it on the kind of news channels you watch is hardly a reliable source
of information.

Therefore, every reference you provided, is obviously and patently
false,
and since your first reference was to a Fox news smear, it's highly
likely
that your other news sources listed picked up variations on this smear.
Given the disgusting level of journalistic integrity at large in America
today, this is hardly surprising.

The Dean website did not include the Q&A.
The quote came from the Q&A.

You're repeating yourself. See above.

You've quoted a number of libelous stories. Under the law of libel,
anyone
who repeats such libelous stories, is also guilty of libel. That means
you
too, Wormtongue.

The Dean website did not include the Q&A.
The quote came form the Q&A.
Have Mr. Dean sue me!!!

You're repeating yourself. See above.

Hardly surprising given your history this year of falling into the
snakepit
of Arnii Krooger, Scott W., Michael McKelvy, Geosinch, and Pajamarama
and
revealing your true colors. Quite an illustrious caste of RAO
characters
you associate yourself with, Wormtongue. Your mom must be rolling in
her
grave by now. And your dad would undoubtedly be thoroughly distgusted
and
ashamed of you if he knew what you were up to.

And your legal clients would be ashamed of your behavior, if you
had any legal clients.

My legal clients have always been quite pleased with my work, thank you.

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

. Your mom must be rolling in her
grave by now. And your dad would undoubtedly be thoroughly distgusted
and
ashamed of you if he knew what you were up to.



Note:

I would not have included any reference to your moribund
legal practice,

My legal practice is far from "moribund". You certainly never got that
impression from me. That's just another libelous lie on your behalf.

had you not been so sleazy as to bring my parents into this.
Let's cease and desist from any further familial references as of now.
Agreed?

Fine. No go **** yourself, you miserable, lying scumbag.

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:h8GFb.36668$m83.33417@fed1read01...

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

. Your mom must be rolling in her
grave by now. And your dad would undoubtedly be thoroughly distgusted
and
ashamed of you if he knew what you were up to.



Note:

I would not have included any reference to your moribund
legal practice, had you not been so sleazy as to bring my parents into
this.
Let's cease and desist from any further familial references as of now.
Agreed?

That was disgusting. Sanders has really become a slimeball.
Of coure we were never more than a tax deduction to him.

Interesting how low you've fallen, Scottieborg. You continue to stoop to
Wormtongue's mendacious and childishly resentful level ever since I called
you both out last winter and let you both know you'd both lost a "friend".
Of course, you've both been lying publicly about how that happened since.
Neither of you have an ounce of common sense or integrity in your bodies.

So go **** yourself too, Scottiborg.

And enjoy your "freedom fries".

Sandman said:

My legal clients have always been quite pleased with my work, thank you.

Did your daddy tell you to say that?

Sandman said:

My legal practice is far from "moribund".

How can you handle civil cases if you don't know how to read a financial
statement?

Sandman said:

Interesting how low you've fallen, Scottieborg. You continue to stoop to
Wormtongue's mendacious and childishly resentful level ever since I called
you both out last winter and let you both know you'd both lost a "friend".
Of course, you've both been lying publicly about how that happened since.
Neither of you have an ounce of common sense or integrity in your bodies.

Well, that much is true. Good job, Counselor.

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:h8GFb.36668$m83.33417@fed1read01...

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

. Your mom must be rolling in her
grave by now. And your dad would undoubtedly be thoroughly
distgusted
and
ashamed of you if he knew what you were up to.



Note:

I would not have included any reference to your moribund
legal practice, had you not been so sleazy as to bring my parents
into
this.
Let's cease and desist from any further familial references as of
now.
Agreed?

That was disgusting. Sanders has really become a slimeball.
Of coure we were never more than a tax deduction to him.

Interesting how low you've fallen, Scottieborg. You continue to stoop to
Wormtongue's mendacious and childishly resentful level ever since I
called
you both out last winter and let you both know you'd both lost a
"friend".

My friends aren't liars.

Want proof of your status? Try message ID



Of course, you've both been lying publicly about how that happened since.
Neither of you have an ounce of common sense or integrity in your bodies.

Here's how it happenned.
Care to explain where your common sense and integrity
was revealed in your post:




So go **** yourself too, Scottiborg.

Do you really mean it this time? Or are you lying again?

Does this mean no more dinners at the beach?
You know where you take out time from a nice
evening to rationalize discounting your tab (we did have
separate checks) as a business expense.
Cheap tax evading *******.

Still with all the money you have your Martin Logans right up
against the wall. Audiofool.

ScottW

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...

The Dean tape has been shown on the news many times.
It has been reported in the newspapaers, and many columnisits
have commented upon it. Even other Democratic
candidates have criticized the statement.

What I failed to note earlier, is that your reference to "the Dean
tape
has
been shown on the news many times."

It was not shown in its entirety except on C-SPAN the day of the
broadcast.
I watched the C-SPAN live tape of Dean's Dec. 15 foreign policy
address,
and
taped it. Since your comments below, I've reviewed it. It is 100%
consistent with the official transcript of the Dean website you
quoted,
(and
which I've quoted on two prior occasions, the first of which when it
was
first released immediately following the live broadcast) which does
*not*
contain *any* reference to any "permission" the United Nations.


The Dean website did not include the Q&A.

Your original claim never reverenced Q&A. It only referenced his speech,
which is reproduced word for word on Dean's website.


Yes, at the time I was not aware that the quote came from a Q&A


The quote came from the Q&A.

Yet not one of the right-wing links you provided mentions this. And not
one
of the links references any context. So how would you know this?

Does the C-SPAN tape inclyde the Q&A?

The tape I made did not, as I cut it off after the speech, as I was rushed
for time. So I neither saw nor taped the Q&A's, but I understand C-SPAN
did
cover the questions following the speech.

The part I did see on the news showed him saying the
words permission of the UN.

Seeing it on the kind of news channels you watch is hardly a reliable
source
of information.


The tape is the tape. What channel it is played on is irrelevant.



Therefore, every reference you provided, is obviously and patently
false,
and since your first reference was to a Fox news smear, it's highly
likely
that your other news sources listed picked up variations on this
smear.
Given the disgusting level of journalistic integrity at large in
America
today, this is hardly surprising.

The Dean website did not include the Q&A.
The quote came from the Q&A.

You're repeating yourself. See above.

You've quoted a number of libelous stories. Under the law of libel,
anyone
who repeats such libelous stories, is also guilty of libel. That
means
you
too, Wormtongue.

The Dean website did not include the Q&A.
The quote came form the Q&A.
Have Mr. Dean sue me!!!

You're repeating yourself. See above.

Hardly surprising given your history this year of falling into the
snakepit
of Arnii Krooger, Scott W., Michael McKelvy, Geosinch, and Pajamarama
and
revealing your true colors. Quite an illustrious caste of RAO
characters
you associate yourself with, Wormtongue. Your mom must be rolling in
her
grave by now. And your dad would undoubtedly be thoroughly distgusted
and
ashamed of you if he knew what you were up to.

And your legal clients would be ashamed of your behavior, if you
had any legal clients.

My legal clients have always been quite pleased with my work, thank you.






----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:h8GFb.36668$m83.33417@fed1read01...

"Sockpuppet Yustabe" wrote in message
...

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

. Your mom must be rolling in her
grave by now. And your dad would undoubtedly be thoroughly
distgusted
and
ashamed of you if he knew what you were up to.



Note:

I would not have included any reference to your moribund
legal practice, had you not been so sleazy as to bring my parents into
this.
Let's cease and desist from any further familial references as of now.
Agreed?

That was disgusting. Sanders has really become a slimeball.
Of coure we were never more than a tax deduction to him.

Interesting how low you've fallen, Scottieborg. You continue to stoop to
Wormtongue's mendacious and childishly resentful level ever since I called
you both out last winter and let you both know you'd both lost a "friend".
Of course, you've both been lying publicly about how that happened since.
Neither of you have an ounce of common sense or integrity in your bodies.

So go **** yourself too, Scottiborg.

And enjoy your "freedom fries".



If you were a 'friend', I would not have lost you.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

you associate yourself with, Wormtongue.

I think it would have been cooler to spell it "Wyrmtongue" in keeping with
the RPG geekiness that surrounds the lord of the rings. Not that I am
anti-geek, I am a geek...

Your mom must be rolling in her grave

You shouldn't reference people's deceased relatives. That's a mean way to
flame bait. : )

The Terriorborg just can't stop compulsively lying:

Does this mean no more dinners at the beach?
You know where you take out time from a nice
evening to rationalize discounting your tab (we did have
separate checks) as a business expense.
Cheap tax evading *******.

The fact that I've treated you to dinners had absolutely nothing to do with
business tax writeoffs. You and Wormtongue just pull this crap right out of
your arses. I just happen to be a generous person, as both you and
Wormtongue well know. Not one of the tabs I picked up for any food or drink
I treated either of you to was used as any tax write-off, as the occasions
were personal and had absolutely nothing to do with my law practice.

So I am neither "cheap", nor "tax evading", nor a "*******", nor a "liar".

Amazing how moronic flamers/master-baiters/bait-and-switchers like you and
Wormtongue are constantly projecting your own faults onto others. You both
could use some professional help with that.

Oh, and BTW, my Martin Logans, as you well know, are *not* "right up against
the wall". They are positioned exactly as Martin Logan specifies - at the
correct distance (30") from the back wall, and toed-in exactly 1". You just
can't stop lying, can you, dimbulb?

Let's see if you can finally get one thing straight: When I cut you off
last winter, and further ignored your e-mail invitations (both of them) to
get together again with Wormtongue, didn't it ever occur to you that I had
no further interest in having anything further to do with you, including
talking to you? Despite that obvious fact, you continue to troll me on RAO.
Did my rejections sting you so sorely that you to this date have this insane
compulsion to continue trolling me with your baiting tactics, just like
Wormtongue? Apparently so. Boo hoo. Grow up, get over it, and find
something useful to do with your spare time and quit wasting it trolling
someone who considers you subhuman trash.

Buh-bye....Ping!

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Sandman said:

My legal practice is far from "moribund".

How can you handle civil cases if you don't know how to read a financial
statement?

Huh????

Did they take you of your meds?

Sandman said:

My legal practice is far from "moribund".

How can you handle civil cases if you don't know how to read a financial
statement?

Huh????

Did they take you of your meds?

BTW, it's "Terrierborg". Misspelling "off" is one thing, but that's the
poor little ****er's name, for chrissakes.

Oh, and do you know who invented "Terrierborg"? Wasn't me. Want to take
a guess or two?

"Sandman" wrote in message
...
The Terriorborg just can't stop compulsively lying:

Does this mean no more dinners at the beach?
You know where you take out time from a nice
evening to rationalize discounting your tab (we did have
separate checks) as a business expense.
Cheap tax evading *******.

The fact that I've treated you to dinners had absolutely nothing to do
with
business tax writeoffs. You and Wormtongue just pull this crap right out
of
your arses. I just happen to be a generous person, as both you and
Wormtongue well know. Not one of the tabs I picked up for any food or
drink
I treated either of you to was used as any tax write-off, as the occasions
were personal and had absolutely nothing to do with my law practice.


Both of the times we ate out, I paid my own bill. My mooching was limited to
two dinners at your house, and refreshments during my three visits.




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

"Sandman" wrote in message

The Terriorborg just can't stop compulsively lying:

Does this mean no more dinners at the beach?
You know where you take out time from a nice
evening to rationalize discounting your tab (we did have
separate checks) as a business expense.
Cheap tax evading *******.

The fact that I've treated you to dinners had absolutely nothing to
do with business tax writeoffs. You and Wormtongue just pull this
crap right out of your arses. I just happen to be a generous person,
as both you and Wormtongue well know. Not one of the tabs I picked
up for any food or drink I treated either of you to was used as any
tax write-off, as the occasions were personal and had absolutely
nothing to do with my law practice.

So I am neither "cheap", nor "tax evading", nor a "*******", nor a
"liar".

Amazing how moronic flamers/master-baiters/bait-and-switchers like
you and Wormtongue are constantly projecting your own faults onto
others. You both could use some professional help with that.

Oh, and BTW, my Martin Logans, as you well know, are *not* "right up
against the wall". They are positioned exactly as Martin Logan
specifies - at the correct distance (30") from the back wall, and
toed-in exactly 1". You just can't stop lying, can you, dimbulb?

Let's see if you can finally get one thing straight: When I cut you
off last winter, and further ignored your e-mail invitations (both of
them) to get together again with Wormtongue, didn't it ever occur to
you that I had no further interest in having anything further to do
with you, including talking to you? Despite that obvious fact, you
continue to troll me on RAO. Did my rejections sting you so sorely
that you to this date have this insane compulsion to continue
trolling me with your baiting tactics, just like Wormtongue?
Apparently so. Boo hoo. Grow up, get over it, and find something
useful to do with your spare time and quit wasting it trolling
someone who considers you subhuman trash.

Buh-bye....Ping!

Just goes to show you that Sanders, Middius, Scottw, and Yustabe can't get
along with each other, any better than they get along with me.

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Sandman said:

Interesting how low you've fallen, Scottieborg. You continue to stoop
to
Wormtongue's mendacious and childishly resentful level ever since I
called
you both out last winter and let you both know you'd both lost a
"friend".
Of course, you've both been lying publicly about how that happened
since.
Neither of you have an ounce of common sense or integrity in your
bodies.

Well, that much is true. Good job, Counselor.


With all the name calling going on I feel I should make a comment here.

Both Jim and Middius, I disagree with politically. However, I have met Jim
and found him to be a gentlemen and, to my knowledge, a fine lawyer and
these are things to be respected. As to Middius, I've never met him. He
appears a person of strong opinions and a sharp pin, which has bleed me from
time to time. His steadfastness to principle although perhaps different than
my, is still something to respect.
I try to treat those who I disagree with respect and the hope that either I
by reasoned argument will change their mind or have my mine changed by
theirs.
Disrespect must be earn and so far neither of them have earn it from me and
hopefully I have not earn it from them.
This philosophy of handling debate on the net may not be the way for all,
but leave it as a suggestion for your consideration.

Phil

Phil said:

Both Jim and Middius

How come he gets to be "Jim" but I'm not "George"? Maybe you're scared.

I know Krooger is terrified of me, but that's only because he's insane.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
ScottW wrote:


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Just goes to show you that Sanders, Middius, Scottw, and Yustabe can't
get
along with each other, any better than they get along with me.

I get along with Yustabe just fine. We had a great time his last visit.
If Middius wasn't a shut-in refusing all contact with humankind,
I'd likely find him quite amusing company.

Sander's wife will get wind of what he's become some day
and pull his internet plug again.

I wouldn't expect to escape an encounter with you
without being driven to commit some kind of felonious assault.
I'm sure the worst the courts would hit me with is
involuntary manslaughter.


Is Dr. Kervorkian in Michigan?




ScottW






As a hopefully neutral observer of the recent unpleasantnesses that
compulsive
liar Krueger alludes to, I think the following observation is in order.
All of
the aforementioned invdividuals, with the exception of Krueger, have at
least
demonstrated the ability to have cordial relationships with most of the
individuals on RAO. In addition, they've learned how to disagree with
divergent
points of view without constantly being compelled to engage in personal
attacks.

Excuse me there Bruce, but Sanders engaged in lies and personal insults
the first time I pointed out that some of his comments regarding the state
of the war with Iraq were not factual.
He went into a Krooger tirade the likes of which Arny would have a
difficult time in mustering up.
Yustabe has maintained an extreme level of patience and cordiality
in the face of Sanders' lies, slanders, and profane insults.
Frankly, Sanders' grossly unfair treatment in this manner convinced me
that I no longer need to show him any courtesy, or respect.
He is a blatant liar, and henceforth will be treated as such.

No matter how frequently the messenger rather thaqn the message has
been attacked, all of this pales in comparison to the chronic,
long-term,
constant barrage of slander, lies, defamation and basically delusional
vitriol
that has routinely emanated from Krueger. Any comparison between Krueger
and
any other person on RAO (with one glaring exception) re. any index of
normal
human behavior would be inappropriate and misguided.

There is a subtle difference. Everyone knows Arny is a **** and generally
ignore
his lies. Sander's has only turned to lying, and profane insults since
the onset of
the war. Hence, some folks (Anderson for example) don't know the
despicable
person he has become. It's sad, but I can deal with it.

ScottW

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


The Terrierborg snarls at his erstwhile master.

If Middius wasn't a shut-in refusing all contact with humankind,
I'd likely find him quite amusing company.

No, that's wrong. At my first opportunity, I'd push your head into a
toilet or dump a pot of food on you.

Well, that might not be amusing but I'm willing to risk it.
I think you're all type and no action.
Let me know if you ever make it to SoCal and I'll meet
you at a place of your choosing.
I'll pick up the tab, no tax deductions.

ScottW

ScottieLiarBorg whined:

He is a blatant liar, and henceforth will be treated as such.

Do you wonder why you get so little respect in turn?

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


ScottieLiarBorg whined:

He is a blatant liar, and henceforth will be treated as such.

Do you wonder why you get so little respect in turn?

I don't want respect from liars.

ScottW

Woof woof woof.

ScottieLiarBorg whined:

He is a blatant liar, and henceforth will be treated as such.

Do you wonder why you get so little respect in turn?

I don't want respect from liars.

We're not just talking about Sanders here.

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Woof woof woof.

ScottieLiarBorg whined:

He is a blatant liar, and henceforth will be treated as such.

Do you wonder why you get so little respect in turn?

I don't want respect from liars.

We're not just talking about Sanders here.

I said liars. You get the 's'.

ScottW

The Idiot said:

He is a blatant liar, and henceforth will be treated as such.

Do you wonder why you get so little respect in turn?

I don't want respect from liars.

We're not just talking about Sanders here.

I said liars. You get the 's'.

Still bollixed by common English expressions, I see.

Or perhaps you're saying that anybody who doesn't respect you is,
perforce, a "liar". That would enshrine you right next to Gregipus in
the Usenet Hall of Flame.

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:4HmGb.37769$m83.25035@fed1read01...

"Sandman" wrote in message
...
The Terriorborg just can't stop compulsively lying:

Does this mean no more dinners at the beach?
You know where you take out time from a nice
evening to rationalize discounting your tab (we did have
separate checks) as a business expense.
Cheap tax evading *******.

The fact that I've treated you to dinners had absolutely nothing to do
with
business tax writeoffs. You and Wormtongue just pull this crap right
out
of
your arses. I just happen to be a generous person, as both you and
Wormtongue well know.

You never picked up a tab you lying ****ant.

I wasn't referring to that particular dinner. I have indeed treated you to
dinners at my home. Try not being such an hysterically hostile jerkoff
before calling someone a "lying ****ant".

I never claimed you were "cheap" or a "mooch". You were actually quite
generous in your own way, and my complaints about you have nothing to do
with that.

You did ask me if I could endure you disscussing
some legal bs on trusts so you could write off
your tab which was for your dinner, not mine.

I made a joke about saying maybe if I asked you if you had a will yet I
could claim my bill as a business writeoff, and you now pretend you couldn't
see I was obviously joking? How dense are you?

And yet you presume to being psychic and somehow knowing that I claimed that
dinner bill as a business writeoff when in fact I did not and would not.
Now *that's* offensive.

And since you bring up that particular dinner, I recall Liliana asking me
afterwards if you were always so rude and uncouth in public. Why? Because
with our wives present, you start running your mouth off at dinner about
some BS about digital vs. analogue, and your usual obsessive rant about
Stereophile not doing blind tests, and as soon as I began offering my
opinion you cut me off loudly: "Everything you just said is a crock! You
sound just like Trotsky". I quickly changed the subject, in deference to
the women present. I also to this day have no idea what you thought you
meant about the Trotsky remark, because I never paid any attention to any of
your RAO exchanges with him.

You're so generous you accused Art of being a
cheapskate. That was a hoot.

I referred to him as a "mooch". Because, contrary to what he's posted
recently, I picked up our lunch tab at an Italian restaurant in Del Mar the
first time I met him, offered to do the same at a Mexican restaurant in Old
Town (I don't recall whether he offered to pay anything or not), and treated
him to some rather expensive dinners on two occasions in my home, simply out
of generosity and my habit of trying to be a good host, and at the time I
finally got fed up with him on RAO last February, on reflection I realized
there was never any give-and-take in my relationship with him (contrary to
my relationship with you, which was give-and-take) - in his case, I did all
the giving and he did all the taking.

Not one of the tabs I picked up for any food or drink
I treated either of you to was used as any tax write-off, as the
occasions
were personal and had absolutely nothing to do with my law practice.

So you were lying to me when you aked if I minded if I could listen
to that dribble so you could write it off.

No, you idiot, it was a joke, meant as a joke, and said in a clearly joking
manner.

Either you're a liar or a taxcheat, you choose.

See above - it was a joke, not a lie. See above also - you have the gall to
call me a "taxcheat", which makes you a liar.

I take that back, you're definitely
a liar as you never "picked up a tab" for me.

You really are dense. I "picked up the tab" for you every time I invited
you over for food/drinks. You didn't go to the grocery store with me - I
had all the food and drinks waiting when you arrived on each occasion. I
never claimed I paid for any of your meals at any restaurant.

So I am neither "cheap", nor "tax evading", nor a "*******", nor a
"liar".

You're all the above, and detached from reality.

See above. You've gone completely over the cliff.

Amazing how moronic flamers/master-baiters/bait-and-switchers like you
and
Wormtongue are constantly projecting your own faults onto others. You
both
could use some professional help with that.

Oh, and BTW, my Martin Logans, as you well know, are *not* "right up
against
the wall". They are positioned exactly as Martin Logan specifies - at
the
correct distance (30") from the back wall, and toed-in exactly 1". You
just
can't stop lying, can you, dimbulb?

How's this for more painful truth, you can't handle your booze.
A couple bottles of wine and you don't know where you're at.
Friggin lightweight.
Ever find your lighter you lost falling into my garden at our last party?

That's one of your most disgusting and pathetic lies to date. I never fell
into your garden. I dropped my lighter between the seats of my car, which I
found the next day.

Does your wife know when you heard some ladies were nude in the spa
you headed straight out there? They didn't want your skinny ass
intruding
you stupid moron.

Is this how deranged your mind has become? I take it back - this one beats
your earlier lie by a long shot - disgusting, pathetic, obscene, and insane.

Let's see if you can finally get one thing straight: When I cut you off
last winter, and further ignored your e-mail invitations (both of them)
to
get together again with Wormtongue, didn't it ever occur to you that I
had
no further interest in having anything further to do with you, including
talking to you?

(final worthless crapola deleted).

Scott, grow up. I don't hate you. I simply have no respect for you.
People like you don't make me angry, they bore me. You're so stubborn and
relentless in your uncontrollable online hostility that you just never know
when to stop, do you?

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:UOmGb.37771$m83.14617@fed1read01
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message

I wouldn't expect to escape an encounter with you
without being driven to commit some kind of felonious assault.

Thanks for admitting that you are unable to behave like a mature adult,
Scotty.

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


The Idiot said:

He is a blatant liar, and henceforth will be treated as such.

Do you wonder why you get so little respect in turn?

I don't want respect from liars.

We're not just talking about Sanders here.

I said liars. You get the 's'.

Still bollixed by common English expressions, I see.

Don't blame me if you haven't mastered the concept
of plurality. I thought you were the old English school
marm in a previous sex.

Or perhaps you're saying that anybody who doesn't respect you is,
perforce, a "liar". That would enshrine you right next to Gregipus in
the Usenet Hall of Flame.

Not at all. But that would lead us to you speaking for others
and you don't do that, do you?

ScottW

"Sandman" wrote in message


Scott, grow up. I don't hate you. I simply have no respect for you.
People like you don't make me angry, they bore me. You're so
stubborn and relentless in your uncontrollable online hostility that
you just never know when to stop, do you?

Sanders, I felt that way about you about 6 years ago, before my opinion of
you went really downhill.

One final word to the Terrierborg:

Your last several posts have convinced me that you and Wormtongue are the
most stupid, disgusting, hypocritical, pathological liars and crashing bores
I've ever run into. I've never run into Arnii, but in my book you're right
down at his level.

You're obviously trying to drive me out of your little RAO sandbox again
with your despicable crap.

Sorry, I'll do what I feel like, regardless of either of you.

And for the record, you can both continue posting your putrid baiting and
lie yourselves blue in the face about me all you want - I've just made a
Christmas resolution not to read or respond to any more of your posts. So
don't pretend that you somehow "win" if I don't fall for your baiting.
You're both ancient history to me now - in the process of being permanently
erased from my memory.

"Sandman" wrote in message
...

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:4HmGb.37769$m83.25035@fed1read01...

"Sandman" wrote in message
...
The Terriorborg just can't stop compulsively lying:

Does this mean no more dinners at the beach?
You know where you take out time from a nice
evening to rationalize discounting your tab (we did have
separate checks) as a business expense.
Cheap tax evading *******.

The fact that I've treated you to dinners had absolutely nothing to
do
with
business tax writeoffs. You and Wormtongue just pull this crap right
out
of
your arses. I just happen to be a generous person, as both you and
Wormtongue well know.

You never picked up a tab you lying ****ant.

I wasn't referring to that particular dinner. I have indeed treated you
to
dinners at my home.

And picking up the tab usually means at a restaurant.
You've wined and dined at my place just as often.

Try not being such an hysterically hostile jerkoff
before calling someone a "lying ****ant".

Why? You went into insulting rant when I simply pointed
out that your assessment of the war wasn't based on the facts.
This exchange is no longer one sided, with you slinging mud
and no facts. My mud sticks because its got the secret ingredient.
Truth.

I never claimed you were "cheap" or a "mooch". You were actually quite
generous in your own way, and my complaints about you have nothing to do
with that.

No, you simply demand your friends accept all the fallacy you spout.
You couldn't accept one minor difference of opinion or factual
correction without screaming, 'You backstabbing...."
Review a little history and see when you went off on Art.



or this post which was followed up with an e-mail of insults.



and then the breakup:



Note: All I did was point out how ridiculous your
17,000 casualty prediction was.

Read it carefully. With the benefit of hindsight,
did you have anything right?



You did ask me if I could endure you disscussing
some legal bs on trusts so you could write off
your tab which was for your dinner, not mine.

I made a joke about saying maybe if I asked you if you had a will yet I
could claim my bill as a business writeoff, and you now pretend you
couldn't
see I was obviously joking? How dense are you?

Some funny 15 minute joke. Did you see me laughing?
Try some more spin, liar.

And yet you presume to being psychic and somehow knowing that I claimed
that
dinner bill as a business writeoff when in fact I did not and would not.
Now *that's* offensive.

You said that was your intent. I took you at your word.
Was I mistaken to take you for your word? I suppose so.


And since you bring up that particular dinner, I recall Liliana asking me
afterwards if you were always so rude and uncouth in public. Why?

Why don't you bring her on and let her type for herself and see
what your behaviour is like in this public forum.
I'll bet she has no clue what she won on the internet.

Because
with our wives present, you start running your mouth off at dinner about
some BS about digital vs. analogue, and your usual obsessive rant about
Stereophile not doing blind tests, and as soon as I began offering my
opinion you cut me off loudly: "Everything you just said is a crock! You
sound just like Trotsky".

If I spoke loudly it was because you wouldn't shut up with your
second graders understanding of the pitfalls of digital.
Same stupid crap of "samples can't adequately represent a continuous
signal which analog is".
Please. I'd had enough. Little did I know you were just getting
warmed up to follow with 15 minutes of lawyering.

I quickly changed the subject, in deference to
the women present. I also to this day have no idea what you thought you
meant about the Trotsky remark, because I never paid any attention to any
of
your RAO exchanges with him.

You're so generous you accused Art of being a
cheapskate. That was a hoot.

I referred to him as a "mooch". Because, contrary to what he's posted
recently, I picked up our lunch tab at an Italian restaurant in Del Mar
the
first time I met him, offered to do the same at a Mexican restaurant in
Old
Town (I don't recall whether he offered to pay anything or not), and
treated
him to some rather expensive dinners on two occasions in my home, simply
out
of generosity and my habit of trying to be a good host, and at the time I
finally got fed up with him on RAO last February, on reflection I
realized
there was never any give-and-take in my relationship with him (contrary
to
my relationship with you, which was give-and-take) - in his case, I did
all
the giving and he did all the taking.

You never picked up any tabs when I was out with you alone or
with you and Art. I think you're delusional. Further, to expect Art to
entertain while he is on the west coast visiting his father thousands of
miles from his place is a bit wacked. I'm sure, in spite of you're being
such an ass, Art would welcome you into his home and provide
all the comforts he has to offer if you went back east.
Unlike you he is a true nice guy, you're an intolerant fake.

Not one of the tabs I picked up for any food or drink
I treated either of you to was used as any tax write-off, as the
occasions
were personal and had absolutely nothing to do with my law practice.

So you were lying to me when you aked if I minded if I could listen
to that dribble so you could write it off.

No, you idiot, it was a joke, meant as a joke, and said in a clearly
joking
manner.

Spin, spin, spin. Jokes take 2 minutes. You're lawyer crap gave me
a jaw ache trying to suppress my frown.


Either you're a liar or a taxcheat, you choose.

See above - it was a joke, not a lie. See above also - you have the gall
to
call me a "taxcheat", which makes you a liar.

BS, you don't spend 15 min. on a joke that isn't funny.
Well, maybe you do.


I take that back, you're definitely
a liar as you never "picked up a tab" for me.

You really are dense. I "picked up the tab" for you every time I invited
you over for food/drinks.

Liar, I provided the Champagne. I even recall your wife commenting
that I brought over better Champagne than you provided the first
time. Then there was the cheescake and all the different fruit toppings.
Too bad you couldn't stay sober long enough to cook.
You also visited my place numerous times.
Do you intend to compensate me for those occasions?


You didn't go to the grocery store with me - I
had all the food and drinks waiting when you arrived on each occasion. I
never claimed I paid for any of your meals at any restaurant.

So I am neither "cheap", nor "tax evading", nor a "*******", nor a
"liar".

You're all the above, and detached from reality.

See above. You've gone completely over the cliff.

Amazing how moronic flamers/master-baiters/bait-and-switchers like
you
and
Wormtongue are constantly projecting your own faults onto others.
You
both
could use some professional help with that.

Oh, and BTW, my Martin Logans, as you well know, are *not* "right up
against
the wall". They are positioned exactly as Martin Logan specifies -
at
the
correct distance (30") from the back wall, and toed-in exactly 1".
You
just
can't stop lying, can you, dimbulb?

How's this for more painful truth, you can't handle your booze.
A couple bottles of wine and you don't know where you're at.
Friggin lightweight.
Ever find your lighter you lost falling into my garden at our last
party?

That's one of your most disgusting and pathetic lies to date. I never
fell
into your garden. I dropped my lighter between the seats of my car,
which I
found the next day.

You called me days later looking for it. You even asked me to check in the
garden. We found the plants trampled. The spin just keeps on spinning.


Does your wife know when you heard some ladies were nude in the spa
you headed straight out there? They didn't want your skinny ass
intruding
you stupid moron.

Is this how deranged your mind has become? I take it back - this one
beats
your earlier lie by a long shot - disgusting, pathetic, obscene, and
insane.

He sputters embarrassed "It's a lie, I didn't, I wouldn't, I couldn't."
But you did.


Let's see if you can finally get one thing straight: When I cut you
off
last winter, and further ignored your e-mail invitations (both of
them)
to
get together again with Wormtongue, didn't it ever occur to you that
I
had
no further interest in having anything further to do with you,
including
talking to you?

(final worthless crapola deleted).

Scott, grow up. I don't hate you. I simply have no respect for you.
People like you don't make me angry, they bore me. You're so stubborn
and
relentless in your uncontrollable online hostility that you just never
know
when to stop, do you?

You sound like a whiny little boy crying uncle.
I want no respect from delusional liars like you.
It came down to this. You chose to issue personal insults to people
who were only offering a different point of view and some
corrections to factual details you had in error. It was you who
went into the realm demeaning lies and insults. We've endured this
one sided tirade of yours for months.
Pardon me for getting my fill of it.
I gave you a dose of your own with
one ingredient you can't handle. The truth.
Nothing I've said about you is a lie.
Don't blame me for your stone throwing from your
glass house. I suggest you don't go barefoot for awhile.

ScottW

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"ScottW" wrote in message
news:UOmGb.37771$m83.14617@fed1read01
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message

I wouldn't expect to escape an encounter with you
without being driven to commit some kind of felonious assault.

Thanks for admitting that you are unable to behave like a mature adult,

All mature adults step on cockroaches when given
opportunity.

ScottW

"Sandman" wrote in message
...
One final word to the Terrierborg:

Your last several posts have convinced me that you and Wormtongue are the
most stupid, disgusting, hypocritical, pathological liars and crashing
bores
I've ever run into. I've never run into Arnii, but in my book you're
right
down at his level.

You're obviously trying to drive me out of your little RAO sandbox again
with your despicable crap.

Sorry, I'll do what I feel like, regardless of either of you.

And for the record, you can both continue posting your putrid baiting and
lie yourselves blue in the face about me all you want - I've just made a
Christmas resolution not to read or respond to any more of your posts.
So
don't pretend that you somehow "win" if I don't fall for your baiting.
You're both ancient history to me now - in the process of being
permanently
erased from my memory.



Is this adieu, again? Does anyone have a count on the final words
I've gotten? Sorry but I've lost track.

ScottW