Hahahahahahaha.

Not least because I think Michelle deserved to win, but because there
is a certain piquancy in shafting tabloid editors and music executives
all at the same time.

Ew, what an orgy.

--
td

In article z,
The Flying **** Spirals wrote:

Hahahahahahaha.

Not least because I think Michelle deserved to win, but because there
is a certain piquancy in shafting tabloid editors and music executives
all at the same time.

Ew, what an orgy.

But how about that Christmas special coming up?

Stephen

On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 15:40:32 GMT, MINe 109
wrote:

In article z,
The Flying **** Spirals wrote:

Hahahahahahaha.

Not least because I think Michelle deserved to win, but because there
is a certain piquancy in shafting tabloid editors and music executives
all at the same time.

Ew, what an orgy.

But how about that Christmas special coming up?

World Idol? Or the Lennon song?

--
td

In article z,
The Flying **** Spirals wrote:

On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 15:40:32 GMT, MINe 109
wrote:

In article z,
The Flying **** Spirals wrote:

Hahahahahahaha.

Not least because I think Michelle deserved to win, but because there
is a certain piquancy in shafting tabloid editors and music executives
all at the same time.

Ew, what an orgy.

But how about that Christmas special coming up?

World Idol? Or the Lennon song?

World Idol. As a red-blooded 'murrican, I'm rooting for (apologies to
Australian readers) Kelly. Besides, she sang in choir as a kid and I'm
all for that!

Stephen

On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:44:42 +0000, Sang Li
wrote:

It's a weird one - I wanted her to win just to see a spanner thrown in
the works - but does it make sense? 'Pop' and 'commercial' are
synonymous words. Michelle may be talented (she's certainly bland) but
does she have the attributes to be a 'commercial idol'?

Michelle is like a spud in a strawberry field.
Opera perhaps..?

Anyone would think it was Pop Idle.

--
td