Or one person's view of what it might be.

http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1305

2006 Democrat Contract With Al Qaeda

In article . net,
wrote:

Or one person's view of what it might be.

http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1305

2006 Democrat Contract With Al Qaeda

ZZZZzzzzz

From:
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:07:46 GMT

Or one person's view of what it might be.
http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1305
2006 Democrat Contract With Al Qaeda

God, you're a moron.

I knew you were a Rush Limbaugh minion. I called that one several weeks
ago.

You've never answered: where did your degree come from? I can't believe
that someone who got a degree is so completely unable to think through
a problem.

The only explanation is that you have no higher education, and
therefore fit the mold of a prototypical republican to a tee.

Shhhh! said to Terrierborg:

I knew you were a Rush Limbaugh minion. I called that one several weeks
ago.

Actually, Scottie doesn't hide the fact that he enjoys being wound up by
Rush and Dr. Laura and the rest of their ilk.

You've never answered: where did your degree come from? I can't believe
that someone who got a degree is so completely unable to think through
a problem.

The only explanation is that you have no higher education, and
therefore fit the mold of a prototypical republican to a tee.

No, that's wrong. Terrierborg is educated. The reason for his incredibly
lame views of the world is that he's gripped by fears of what he doesn't
understand. And there's so much he doesn't understand.....

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message news


Shhhh! said to Terrierborg:

I knew you were a Rush Limbaugh minion. I called that one several weeks
ago.

Actually, Scottie doesn't hide the fact that he enjoys being wound up by
Rush and Dr. Laura and the rest of their ilk.

You've never answered: where did your degree come from? I can't believe
that someone who got a degree is so completely unable to think through
a problem.

The only explanation is that you have no higher education, and
therefore fit the mold of a prototypical republican to a tee.

No, that's wrong. Terrierborg is educated. The reason for his incredibly
lame views of the world is that he's gripped by fears of what he doesn't
understand. And there's so much he doesn't understand.....

I don't understand why your brain turned mush all of a sudden but it is
damned scary.

Get a grip George.... its bugeaters post.


ScottW

The mouse ran off with the cheese, and all that was left was the
moldering rind.

No, that's wrong. Terrierborg is educated. The reason for his incredibly
lame views of the world is that he's gripped by fears of what he doesn't
understand. And there's so much he doesn't understand.....

Get a grip George.... its[sic] bugeaters[sic] post.

Take heart, Scottie -- we all recognize that at least one RAO regular is
dumber than you are.

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


The mouse ran off with the cheese, and all that was left was the
moldering rind.

No, that's wrong. Terrierborg is educated. The reason for his
incredibly
lame views of the world is that he's gripped by fears of what he
doesn't
understand. And there's so much he doesn't understand.....

Get a grip George.... its[sic] bugeaters[sic] post.

Take heart, Scottie -- we all recognize that at least one RAO regular is
dumber than you are.

Thanks to you for that George.

ScottW

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
ups.com...
From:
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 00:07:46 GMT

Or one person's view of what it might be.
http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/1305
2006 Democrat Contract With Al Qaeda

God, you're a moron.

I knew you were a Rush Limbaugh minion. I called that one several weeks
ago.

You've never answered: where did your degree come from? I can't believe
that someone who got a degree is so completely unable to think through
a problem.

The only explanation is that you have no higher education, and
therefore fit the mold of a prototypical republican to a tee.

Yep, the predictable Liberal crap. If you aren't a Liberal you must be
stupid.
But of course Liberals aren't elitist.

From:
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:08:34 GMT

The only explanation is that you have no higher education, and
therefore fit the mold of a prototypical republican to a tee.

Yep, the predictable Liberal crap. If you aren't a Liberal you must be
stupid.

Sorry, nob. Just looking at the data the shows that conservatives in
general do not have as much education as liberals. As an objectivist,
you do believe in data, don't you?

But of course Liberals aren't elitist

No, they're more educated. Just look up the data. Why do you think Rush
and Hannity try to tear down higher education all the time? It's
because the more you know, the less you agree with them.

Look, you're the one who published a brainless neocon screed from some
blog on an imaginary liberal 'Contract with Al-Qaeda' as though it was
some kind of proof that the liberals agree with what they do.

It was an utterly stupid thing to do. I merely pointed out that you
(and most conservatives) have a strong tendency to say some very stupid
things.

Prove me wrong, nob: where is your degree from again?

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From:
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:08:34 GMT

The only explanation is that you have no higher education, and
therefore fit the mold of a prototypical republican to a tee.

Yep, the predictable Liberal crap. If you aren't a Liberal you must be
stupid.

Sorry, nob. Just looking at the data the shows that conservatives in
general do not have as much education as liberals. As an objectivist,
you do believe in data, don't you?

But of course Liberals aren't elitist

No, they're more educated. Just look up the data. Why do you think Rush
and Hannity try to tear down higher education all the time?

Because of the liberal bias. Because of stories about leveral profs who
give you bad grades if you prove them wrong.

It's
because the more you know, the less you agree with them.


So you say.

Look, you're the one who published a brainless neocon screed from some
blog on an imaginary liberal 'Contract with Al-Qaeda' as though it was
some kind of proof that the liberals agree with what they do.

It was intended by it's author as humor.

It was an utterly stupid thing to do.

Of course, if I had posted a link to something like smirkingchimp.com it
would have been fine.

I merely pointed out that you
(and most conservatives) have a strong tendency to say some very stupid
things.

Like lower taxes and defend the borders. Stop calling me a conservative, I
am not.

In article .net,
wrote:

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From:
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 17:08:34 GMT

The only explanation is that you have no higher education, and
therefore fit the mold of a prototypical republican to a tee.

Yep, the predictable Liberal crap. If you aren't a Liberal you must be
stupid.

Sorry, nob. Just looking at the data the shows that conservatives in
general do not have as much education as liberals. As an objectivist,
you do believe in data, don't you?

But of course Liberals aren't elitist

No, they're more educated. Just look up the data. Why do you think Rush
and Hannity try to tear down higher education all the time?

Because of the liberal bias. Because of stories about leveral profs who
give you bad grades if you prove them wrong.

And just where has this been validated?

From:
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:53:13 GMT

Because of the liberal bias. Because of stories about leveral profs who
give you bad grades if you prove them wrong.

There are stories that the Holocaust never occurred too.

That sounds like grounds for a lawsuit. Unless of course, it's neocon
bull**** from Rush and the like...

It's because the more you know, the less you agree with them.

So you say.

Well, let's look at your argument: The data clearly shows that
conservatives have less education. But that's a liberal conspiracy,
because if you don't agree with liberal professors at liberal colleges,
you don't get good grades. So in order to get good grades, people who
would otherwise be conservative are transformed into 'Kool-Aid
drinking' liberals by the liberal bias of the liberal professors at
liberal colleges. LOL!

As I said, you need to look at your medication. It's in need of
tweaking.

Look, you're the one who published a brainless neocon screed from some
blog on an imaginary liberal 'Contract with Al-Qaeda' as though it was
some kind of proof that the liberals agree with what they do.

It was intended by it's author as humor.

**********************Begin quote****************************

I was listening to Rush Limbaugh today on my way to an afternoon
meeting and he kept going on and on about the 'Terrorist Bill of
Rights', which I thought was exactly what the Democrats seem to
represent these days.

So, in a blatant rip-off of Rush's excellent analogy, and another
rip-off from the 1994 Congressional Republican Contract With America, I
decided to save the liberal Democrats some time and create for them
'The 2006 Congressional Democrat Contract With Al Qaeda to provide
the same clarity of purpose and promise the Republicans provided
America back in 1994.

This 2006 Congressional Democrat Contract With Al Qaeda lays out what
the Democrat Party promises to do if they are given majorities in
Congress this fall:
********************************End quote******************************

Yup. Chock full of humor. I can see that now.

Like lower taxes and defend the borders.

Your opinion that voluntary taxation would be enough is the stuff
cartoons are made of.

Stop calling me a conservative, I am not.

Let's see: On the one hand, we have nob bashing liberals, buying into
liberal conspiracies, quoting Rush Limbaugh, quoting blogs that quote
Rush Limbaugh, and defending Bushie and his minions.

On the other hand, we have nob saying that he's not a conservative.

I was always taught that if it looks like ****, and if it smells like
****, and if it squishes between your toes when you step on it like
****, it's probably, in reality, ****.

The only difference is that the **** can't claim to be otherwise.

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From:
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:53:13 GMT

Because of the liberal bias. Because of stories about leveral profs who
give you bad grades if you prove them wrong.

There are stories that the Holocaust never occurred too.

That sounds like grounds for a lawsuit. Unless of course, it's neocon
bull**** from Rush and the like...

It's because the more you know, the less you agree with them.

So you say.

Well, let's look at your argument: The data clearly shows that
conservatives have less education.


But that's a liberal conspiracy,

If you say so, I sure didn't.

because if you don't agree with liberal professors at liberal colleges,
you don't get good grades.

There are stories to that effect, yes.

So in order to get good grades, people who
would otherwise be conservative are transformed into 'Kool-Aid
drinking' liberals by the liberal bias of the liberal professors at
liberal colleges. LOL!


If you say so, I didn't.

As I said, you need to look at your medication. It's in need of
tweaking.


You're the one making things up.

Look, you're the one who published a brainless neocon screed from some
blog on an imaginary liberal 'Contract with Al-Qaeda' as though it was
some kind of proof that the liberals agree with what they do.

It was intended by it's author as humor.

**********************Begin quote****************************

I was listening to Rush Limbaugh today on my way to an afternoon
meeting and he kept going on and on about the 'Terrorist Bill of
Rights', which I thought was exactly what the Democrats seem to
represent these days.

So, in a blatant rip-off of Rush's excellent analogy, and another
rip-off from the 1994 Congressional Republican Contract With America, I
decided to save the liberal Democrats some time and create for them
'The 2006 Congressional Democrat Contract With Al Qaeda to provide
the same clarity of purpose and promise the Republicans provided
America back in 1994.

This 2006 Congressional Democrat Contract With Al Qaeda lays out what
the Democrat Party promises to do if they are given majorities in
Congress this fall:
********************************End quote******************************

Yup. Chock full of humor. I can see that now.


Eye of the beholder.

Like lower taxes and defend the borders.

Your opinion that voluntary taxation would be enough is the stuff
cartoons are made of.


Depends on how much money youi thinhk we need.

Stop calling me a conservative, I am not.

Let's see: On the one hand, we have nob bashing liberals, buying into
liberal conspiracies, quoting Rush Limbaugh, quoting blogs that quote
Rush Limbaugh, and defending Bushie and his minions.

On the other hand, we have nob saying that he's not a conservative.

I was always taught that if it looks like ****, and if it smells like
****, and if it squishes between your toes when you step on it like
****, it's probably, in reality, ****.

OK, I'm convinced, you are a ****.


The only difference is that the **** can't claim to be otherwise.

Then don't.

From:
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:31:00 GMT

Well, let's look at your argument: The data clearly shows that
conservatives have less education. But that's a liberal conspiracy,

If you say so, I sure didn't.

Well, then. what precisely is your point in bringing up alleged liberal
bias in higher education? It sure appears that you were trying to use
it as a validation why conservatives are less educated.

because if you don't agree with liberal professors at liberal colleges,
you don't get good grades.

There are stories to that effect, yes.

The point of which are...? The source of which are...?

So in order to get good grades, people who
would otherwise be conservative are transformed into 'Kool-Aid
drinking' liberals by the liberal bias of the liberal professors at
liberal colleges. LOL!

If you say so, I didn't.

So why did you repeat a favorite Rush and conservative rant then?

Your opinion that voluntary taxation would be enough is the stuff
cartoons are made of.

Depends on how much money youi thinhk we need.

More than the $12 your plan would bring in.

Stop calling me a conservative, I am not.

Let's see: On the one hand, we have nob bashing liberals, buying into
liberal conspiracies, quoting Rush Limbaugh, quoting blogs that quote
Rush Limbaugh, and defending Bushie and his minions.

On the other hand, we have nob saying that he's not a conservative.

I was always taught that if it looks like ****, and if it smells like
****, and if it squishes between your toes when you step on it like
****, it's probably, in reality, ****.

OK, I'm convinced, you are a ****.

Typical conservative reaction: get your ass handed to you and then
throw in an IKYABWAI in response.

"Shhhh! I'm Full of Bull****!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From:
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:31:00 GMT

Well, let's look at your argument: The data clearly shows that
conservatives have less education. But that's a liberal conspiracy,

If you say so, I sure didn't.

Well, then. what precisely is your point in bringing up alleged liberal
bias in higher education? It sure appears that you were trying to use
it as a validation why conservatives are less educated.

because if you don't agree with liberal professors at liberal colleges,
you don't get good grades.

There are stories to that effect, yes.

The point of which are...? The source of which are...?

So in order to get good grades, people who
would otherwise be conservative are transformed into 'Kool-Aid
drinking' liberals by the liberal bias of the liberal professors at
liberal colleges. LOL!

If you say so, I didn't.

So why did you repeat a favorite Rush and conservative rant then?

Your opinion that voluntary taxation would be enough is the stuff
cartoons are made of.

Depends on how much money youi thinhk we need.

More than the $12 your plan would bring in.

Stop calling me a conservative, I am not.

Let's see: On the one hand, we have nob bashing liberals, buying into
liberal conspiracies, quoting Rush Limbaugh, quoting blogs that quote
Rush Limbaugh, and defending Bushie and his minions.

On the other hand, we have nob saying that he's not a conservative.

I was always taught that if it looks like ****, and if it smells like
****, and if it squishes between your toes when you step on it like
****, it's probably, in reality, ****.

OK, I'm convinced, you are a ****.

Typical conservative reaction: get your ass handed to you and then
throw in an IKYABWAI in response.

Typical liberal reaction, feign insult when criticised after personal
attack.

From:
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 20:01:26 GMT

Typical liberal reaction, feign insult when criticised after personal
attack.

nob, you're a lucky man. You'll never break your skull.

Solid bone is tough to crack.;-)

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From:
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:31:00 GMT

Well, let's look at your argument: The data clearly shows that
conservatives have less education. But that's a liberal conspiracy,

If you say so, I sure didn't.



Ok, so what we have here is this:

More educated people are more liberal, and tend to vote Democratic.

More affluent people are more conservative, and tend to vote Republican.

So, if educated people are so smart, whey can't they earn more money?



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

In article .net,
wrote:

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From:
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:53:13 GMT

Because of the liberal bias. Because of stories about leveral profs who
give you bad grades if you prove them wrong.

There are stories that the Holocaust never occurred too.

That sounds like grounds for a lawsuit. Unless of course, it's neocon
bull**** from Rush and the like...

It's because the more you know, the less you agree with them.

So you say.

Well, let's look at your argument: The data clearly shows that
conservatives have less education.


But that's a liberal conspiracy,

If you say so, I sure didn't.

because if you don't agree with liberal professors at liberal colleges,
you don't get good grades.

There are stories to that effect, yes.

"There are stories to the effect" that robots are stealing your luggage.

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article .net,
wrote:

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
message
oups.com...
From:
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:53:13 GMT

Because of the liberal bias. Because of stories about leveral profs
who
give you bad grades if you prove them wrong.

There are stories that the Holocaust never occurred too.

That sounds like grounds for a lawsuit. Unless of course, it's neocon
bull**** from Rush and the like...

It's because the more you know, the less you agree with them.

So you say.

Well, let's look at your argument: The data clearly shows that
conservatives have less education.


But that's a liberal conspiracy,

If you say so, I sure didn't.

because if you don't agree with liberal professors at liberal colleges,
you don't get good grades.

There are stories to that effect, yes.

"There are stories to the effect" that robots are stealing your luggage.

But the robots aren't telling them.

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article .net,
wrote:

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
message
oups.com...
From:
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:53:13 GMT

Because of the liberal bias. Because of stories about leveral profs
who
give you bad grades if you prove them wrong.

There are stories that the Holocaust never occurred too.

That sounds like grounds for a lawsuit. Unless of course, it's neocon
bull**** from Rush and the like...

It's because the more you know, the less you agree with them.

So you say.

Well, let's look at your argument: The data clearly shows that
conservatives have less education.


But that's a liberal conspiracy,

If you say so, I sure didn't.

because if you don't agree with liberal professors at liberal colleges,
you don't get good grades.

There are stories to that effect, yes.

"There are stories to the effect" that robots are stealing your luggage.

Which of those stories have any kind of documentation?
There is plenty to give one pause about regarding Conservative students vs.
Liberal Professors.
Note, I'm not saying there is conclusive proof, but there is certainly
enough to make one wonder.

http://www.studentsforacademicfreedo...mes/main2.html

http://www.opinionjournal.com/taste/?id=110005976

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6739040
At Columbia, anguished debate followed the screening of a film by an
advocacy group called The David Project that alleges some faculty violate
students' rights by using the classroom as a platform for anti-Israeli
political propaganda (one Israeli student claims a professor taunted him by
asking, "How many Palestinians did you kill?"). Administrators responded
this month by setting up a new committee to investigate students complaints.

In the wider debate, both sides cite the guidelines on academic freedom
first set out in 1915 by the American Association of University Professors.

The objecting students emphasize the portion calling on teachers to "set
forth justly ... the divergent opinions of other investigators." But many
teachers note the guidelines also say instructors need not "hide (their) own
opinions under a mountain of equivocal verbiage," and that their job is
teaching students "to think for themselves."



A reasonable person could conclude that there is a lack of balance.

From: Clyde Slick
Date: Thurs, Feb 9 2006 7:22 pm
Email: "Clyde Slick"

Ok, so what we have here is this:
More educated people are more liberal, and tend to vote Democratic.
More affluent people are more conservative, and tend to vote Republican.
So, if educated people are so smart, whey can't they earn more money?

Um, because science doesn't pay as much as corporate takeovers?

Um, because conservatives won't take the pay of running the charities
and other social services that they claim should be doing the work of
taking care of less fortunate people (see above)?

Um, because some educated people don't place the emphasis on earning
money that others might?

There are perhaps 7.36 million valid responses to that question.

For example, some less-educated individuals might consider how much
money someone earns as a measure of their intelligence.;-)

Shhhh! said:

For example, some less-educated individuals might consider how much
money someone earns as a measure of their intelligence.;-)

Scottie Terrierborg believes that, but Arnii Krooger does not. Go
figure.™

A reasonable person could conclude that there is a lack of balance.

Um, nob, you're citing advocacy groups as proof:

"Georgetown Conservatives Press for Stronger Campus Presence"

"Those behind the trend call it an antidote to the overwhelming liberal
dominance of university faculties. But many educators, while agreeing
students should never feel bullied, worry that they just want to avoid
exposure to ideas that challenge their core beliefs - an essential
part of education."

"At the University of North Carolina, three incoming freshmen sue over
a reading assignment they say offends their Christian beliefs."

"In Colorado and Indiana, a national conservative group publicizes
student allegations of left-wing bias by professors. Faculty get hate
mail and are pictured in mock "wanted" posters; at least one
college says a teacher received a death threat."

Death threats and wanted posters? LOL! Yup, the problem is intolerance
with the professors.

A reasonable conclusion could be that this is a made-up issue for
spreading the conservative gospel. Conservatives tend to attack the
validity of education. This is because, as we all know by now, educated
people tend to be liberal.

A reasonable person would know that you are not smart enough to see
that as a possibility.

George M. Middius wrote:
Shhhh! said:

For example, some less-educated individuals might consider how much
money someone earns as a measure of their intelligence.;-)

Scottie Terrierborg believes that, but Arnii Krooger does not. Go
figure.™

I never said that.... some very intelligent people are either too lazy
or too scared to even leave their house.

How much money one makes is one measure of their productivity and
overall value to society.

George finds welfare recipients extraordinarily valuable. I suspect
he's running a benefit fraud scam on top of his child porn extortion
ring but that doesn't really benefit society.

ScottW

Scottie, why are you sucking your thumb in public?

George finds welfare recipients extraordinarily valuable.

Hardly.™ I did explore this avenue, but it turns out they're not worth
the bother. No gold fillings or jewelry, and crappy clothing, so you
only get 20 cents a pound. That's even less than horsemeat.

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From: Clyde Slick
Date: Thurs, Feb 9 2006 7:22 pm
Email: "Clyde Slick"

Ok, so what we have here is this:
More educated people are more liberal, and tend to vote Democratic.
More affluent people are more conservative, and tend to vote Republican.
So, if educated people are so smart, whey can't they earn more money?

Um, because science doesn't pay as much as corporate takeovers?


Not all, not nearly all, educated people have specialized in the sciences.
Hardly any of the "more affluent people"
are principals in coprpoarate takeovers.


Um, because conservatives won't take the pay of running the charities
and other social services that they claim should be doing the work of
taking care of less fortunate people (see above)?

Red Cross Director makes $651,857 base salary!

http://www.forbes.com/finance/lists/...niqueId=CH0013


Um, because some educated people don't place the emphasis on earning
money that others might?


There is nothing inherent about
being educated that would reflect upon any differences in financial
motivations



There are perhaps 7.36 million valid responses to that question.

For example, some less-educated individuals might consider how much
money someone earns as a measure of their intelligence.;-)


I'm sure they are very intelligent, however, they not be very smart



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

From: Clyde Slick
Date: Fri, Feb 10 2006 4:08 pm
Email: "Clyde Slick"

For example, some less-educated individuals might consider how much
money someone earns as a measure of their intelligence.;-)

I'm sure they are very intelligent, however, they not be very smart

That be game, set, match.

Thank you for proving my point so eloquently.

George M. Middius wrote:
Scottie, why are you sucking your thumb in public?

George finds welfare recipients extraordinarily valuable.

Hardly.™ I did explore this avenue, but it turns out they're not worth
the bother. No gold fillings or jewelry, and crappy clothing, so you
only get 20 cents a pound. That's even less than horsemeat.

I underestimated your contribution to society... lets see.. glue
factory and 20c/lb
yields what... maybe $80.

ScottW

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...


A reasonable person could conclude that there is a lack of balance.

Um, nob, you're citing advocacy groups as proof:


Um, no I'm pointing to evidence. You can take it or leave it.

"Georgetown Conservatives Press for Stronger Campus Presence"

"Those behind the trend call it an antidote to the overwhelming liberal
dominance of university faculties. But many educators, while agreeing
students should never feel bullied, worry that they just want to avoid
exposure to ideas that challenge their core beliefs - an essential
part of education."

"At the University of North Carolina, three incoming freshmen sue over
a reading assignment they say offends their Christian beliefs."

"In Colorado and Indiana, a national conservative group publicizes
student allegations of left-wing bias by professors. Faculty get hate
mail and are pictured in mock "wanted" posters; at least one
college says a teacher received a death threat."

Death threats and wanted posters? LOL! Yup, the problem is intolerance
with the professors.

A reasonable conclusion could be that this is a made-up issue for
spreading the conservative gospel. Conservatives tend to attack the
validity of education. This is because, as we all know by now, educated
people tend to be liberal.

They might, or they could have the same standard for this as they do for
their own complaints and consider looking at the possibility that it might
be true, and worthy of futher investigation.


A reasonable person would know that you are not smart enough to see
that as a possibility.

That would not be a reasonable person, since I have made no such claim, I
have only stated that such reports existed and shown that there is indeed
evidence. I think it deserves more investigation, particularly since when
I entered "conservative students vs. liberal professors," in the dialog box
for my search it came back with at least 10 pages of articles.

As you say it may be nothing but some people bitching over nothing, or it
may be that where there is smoke there is fire.

Your open minded viewpoint is duly noted.

"ScottW" wrote in message
ps.com...

George M. Middius wrote:
Shhhh! said:

For example, some less-educated individuals might consider how much
money someone earns as a measure of their intelligence.;-)

Scottie Terrierborg believes that, but Arnii Krooger does not. Go
figure.T

I never said that.... some very intelligent people are either too lazy
or too scared to even leave their house.

You haven't learned that what you say doens't mean anthing when discussing
any issue with George? He is quite prolific at putting words in people's
mouths, and truth has absoultely no meaning for him.

How much money one makes is one measure of their productivity and
overall value to society.

George finds welfare recipients extraordinarily valuable. I suspect
he's running a benefit fraud scam on top of his child porn extortion
ring but that doesn't really benefit society.

Apparently so does the Democrat party since they constantlty court their
votes and try to make that an ever larger voting block, along with illegal
aliens.

From:
Date: Fri, Feb 10 2006 6:03 pm
Email:

As you say it may be nothing but some people bitching over nothing, or it
may be that where there is smoke there is fire.

That's what the conservatives hope that you'll think.

Your open minded viewpoint is duly noted.

Well, nob, I base my opinion on my experiences in college. Due to the
military, etc. I attended classes at five different universities, in
four different states. I got my degree in Massachusetts, the heartland
of the evil liberals. I never once had evil liberal views shoved down
my throat by any person employed by the schools.

In fact, the only time that I recall having views shoved down my throat
they were conservative views.

When you were in college, how many professors tried to ram their
liberal viewpoints down your throat?

I'm sure you speak from experience. Where is your degree from again?

wrote in message
ink.net...



Apparently so does the Democrat party since they constantlty court their
votes and try to make that an ever larger voting block, along with illegal
aliens.

Don't forget about ex convict felons!



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

The Bug Eater screeches to a halt by a nest of dead dung beetles.

an ever larger voting block

We're willing to concede your cranium is denser than the best bricks. No
need to embark on an exhaustive series of DBTs to prove the point.

From: Clyde Slick
Date: Fri, Feb 10 2006 6:30 pm
Email: "Clyde Slick"

Don't forget about ex convict felons!

Like (soon to be) Duke Cunningham and Scooter Libby?

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From: Clyde Slick
Date: Fri, Feb 10 2006 6:30 pm
Email: "Clyde Slick"

Don't forget about ex convict felons!

Like (soon to be) Duke Cunningham and Scooter Libby?


No, like the thousands of Democratic armed robbers,
carjackers, murderers, crack dealers, heroin
addicts, pimps and prostitutes in Baltimore.



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From:


Well, let's look at your argument: The data clearly shows that
conservatives have less education.

That is false. The opposite is true, Republicans are better educated.

http://people-press.org/commentary/d...?AnalysisID=95

2004 Republican Democrat
Education

less than HS 20% 41%
HS grad 28% 34%
some college 32% 31%
college grad 33% 32%



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
-------http://www.NewsDemon.com------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
oups.com...
From:


Well, let's look at your argument: The data clearly shows that
conservatives have less education.

That is false. The opposite is true, Republicans are better educated.

http://people-press.org/commentary/d...?AnalysisID=95

2004 Republican Democrat
Education

less than HS 20% 41%
HS grad 28% 34%
some college 32% 31%
college grad 33% 32%



Are you saying a Liberal distorted the truth? Again?
I'm, I'm, positively, underwhelmed.

In article k.net,
wrote:

"Jenn" wrote in message
...
In article .net,
wrote:

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in
message
oups.com...
From:
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:53:13 GMT

Because of the liberal bias. Because of stories about leveral profs
who
give you bad grades if you prove them wrong.

There are stories that the Holocaust never occurred too.

That sounds like grounds for a lawsuit. Unless of course, it's neocon
bull**** from Rush and the like...

It's because the more you know, the less you agree with them.

So you say.

Well, let's look at your argument: The data clearly shows that
conservatives have less education.


But that's a liberal conspiracy,

If you say so, I sure didn't.

because if you don't agree with liberal professors at liberal colleges,
you don't get good grades.

There are stories to that effect, yes.

"There are stories to the effect" that robots are stealing your luggage.

Which of those stories have any kind of documentation?
There is plenty to give one pause about regarding Conservative students vs.
Liberal Professors.
Note, I'm not saying there is conclusive proof, but there is certainly
enough to make one wonder.

http://www.studentsforacademicfreedo...mes/main2.html

I didn't notice anything that supports the notion that there is bias in
grading.


http://www.opinionjournal.com/taste/?id=110005976

No proof of bias in grading.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6739040
At Columbia, anguished debate followed the screening of a film by an
advocacy group called The David Project that alleges some faculty violate
students' rights by using the classroom as a platform for anti-Israeli
political propaganda (one Israeli student claims a professor taunted him by
asking, "How many Palestinians did you kill?"). Administrators responded
this month by setting up a new committee to investigate students complaints.

In the wider debate, both sides cite the guidelines on academic freedom
first set out in 1915 by the American Association of University Professors.

The objecting students emphasize the portion calling on teachers to "set
forth justly ... the divergent opinions of other investigators." But many
teachers note the guidelines also say instructors need not "hide (their) own
opinions under a mountain of equivocal verbiage," and that their job is
teaching students "to think for themselves."

Again, no proof of discrimination in grading.

From:
Date: Sat, Feb 11 2006 1:22 pm
Email:

nob, you are simply underwhelmed. Don't worry, the uneducated
republicans still want you.

Are you saying a Liberal distorted the truth? Again?
I'm, I'm, positively, underwhelmed.

Not at all:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer

The more interesting data is income. The Dems represent the 'average'
American, the republicans the upper 1%.

I think we'll see an even bigger swing here as people start figuring
out that lower taxes= intelligent design with those bozos.

"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message
ups.com...
From:
Date: Sat, Feb 11 2006 1:22 pm
Email:

nob, you are simply underwhelmed. Don't worry, the uneducated
republicans still want you.

Are you saying a Liberal distorted the truth? Again?
I'm, I'm, positively, underwhelmed.

Not at all:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer

The more interesting data is income. The Dems represent the 'average'
American, the republicans the upper 1%.

I think we'll see an even bigger swing here as people start figuring
out that lower taxes= intelligent design with those bozos.

Hopefully they'll figure out that thte Libertarians want lower taxes and
private schools, where you can have whatever curriculum you are willing to
pay for.

Failing that they will likely figure that the I.D. question will be sorted
out by the courts and they can still have the lower taxes.

Since I don't vote for the 2 main parties, I'm sickened by both choices.