Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Margaret's audio gourmet thread was fun. That gave me the idea for this
one. Rate each component in the audio chain by percentage of importance in the overall sound or enjoyment of your system. For the sake of argument, assume a well-recorded source (CD, LP, etc.) with no physical problems. Speaker Room interaction with the speaker Speaker cable Power amplifier(s) Preamplifier CD/DVD player Audio interconnects Power cords/power conditioners Stand 'Tweaks' For those who listen to vinyl: Turntable Tonearm Cartridge Phono preamp For those who listen to tubed equipment: Tube brand or type Feel free to add items that I overlooked, or to disregard any of these that I've placed on the list if they have no importance to you. Here's mine: 55% Speaker 10% Room interaction with the speaker 0% Speaker cable 4% Power amplifier(s) 5% Preamplifier 4% CD/DVD player 2% Audio interconnects 0% Power cords 0% Stand 2% 'Tweaks' 3% Tube brand or type 4% Turntable 2% Tonearm 6% Cartridge 3% Phono preamp |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
Rate each component in the audio chain by percentage of importance in the overall sound or enjoyment of your system. For the sake of argument, assume a well-recorded source (CD, LP, etc.) with no physical problems. 6% Speaker 2% Room interaction with the speaker 0% Speaker cable ..5% Power amplifier(s) ..5% Preamplifier 1% CD/DVD player 1% Turntable, Tonearm, Cartridge, Phono preamp 0% Audio interconnects 0% Power cords/power conditioners 0% Stand 0% 'Tweaks' 10% Quality of the recording 30% Quality of the performance 50% My mood or attitude Note that my overall enjoyment is primarily determined by my mood. I may be underestimating it. This is assuming that everything works - if there's a problem with the AC, a power conditioner may alleviate that problem. If there's a cold solder joint in the speaker cables, replacing it with one that's not broken will help. If the speakers are sitting on top of inverted steel garbage cans, decent non-resonant stands will help. IOW, there's no single component that won't ruin a system if it's broken. //Walt |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Any link in the chain can put you out in the cold, so it's impossibble
to establish an absolute hierarchy. But in general you get the speaker and the room to work together for the results you want, then give them the right amp: the source end is determined by what the material you want to listen to happens to be recorded on. Saying CD is better than vinyl, for instance is simply ridiculous if the material you want to listen to is available on vinyl and not CD! Some music is not available on CD. Some is, but not very well mastered. In those cases the vinyl is superior! On the other hand-some things are available only on CD, the CD transfer is better than the available vinyl (it happens), or you are just not interested in ****ing with vinyl. With vinyl, the first order of battle is: good vinyl. Because many LPs suck. They do now and always did. Then, you want a turntable and arm that work together, a cartridge that works with the arm, and.....a preamp designed to work with that cartridge. Expensive cartridges are a waste of money if the preamp does not load them exactly properly. I do tend to prefer tube phono stages, particularly those using 90 volt TV front end tubes (6DJ8s). Joe Curcio designed one that was particularly good about twenty years ago. I have never heard a commercially built one as good as several homebrew ones, including one that used N-channel FETs and similar voltages to the 6DJ8 one, and another using Sowter transformers and a pair of Jensen 990 op amps(!). ARC and other popular commercial high end efforts are not significantly better than reworked Marantz 7s and even more expensive than a real 7C. With CD players, get a moderately priced one and do not upgrade it. Instead buy a good outboard DAC. If you get an outboard DAC insist, demand, it satisfactorily drive your power amp directly. In my opinion the Benchmark DAC is as good as any. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message oups.com... Margaret's audio gourmet thread was fun. That gave me the idea for this one. Rate each component in the audio chain by percentage of importance in the overall sound or enjoyment of your system. For the sake of argument, assume a well-recorded source (CD, LP, etc.) with no physical problems. Speaker Room interaction with the speaker Power amplifier(s) Speaker cable CD/DVD player Preamplifier Audio interconnects Power cords/power conditioners Stand 'Tweaks' For those who listen to vinyl: Turntable Tonearm Cartridge Phono preamp For those who listen to tubed equipment: Tube brand or type Feel free to add items that I overlooked, or to disregard any of these that I've placed on the list if they have no importance to you. Here's mine: 55% Speaker 10% Room interaction with the speaker 0% Speaker cable 4% Power amplifier(s) 5% Preamplifier 4% CD/DVD player 2% Audio interconnects 0% Power cords 0% Stand 2% 'Tweaks' 3% Tube brand or type 4% Turntable 2% Tonearm 6% Cartridge 3% Phono preamp Here's mine, in order from most important to least: Speaker Room interaction with the speaker Power amplifier(s) Stand Speaker cable CD/DVD player Preamplifier Audio interconnects Power cords/power conditioners 'Tweaks' |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
Margaret's audio gourmet thread was fun. That gave me the idea for this one. Rate each component in the audio chain by percentage of importance in the overall sound or enjoyment of your system. For the sake of argument, assume a well-recorded source (CD, LP, etc.) with no physical problems. FIRST Room interaction with the speaker SECOND Speaker (including speaker management -- bass, delay, level) everything else DISTANT THIRD, except for room EQ. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" said:
55% Speaker 10% Room interaction with the speaker The latter figure is "slightly" higher IME. -- "Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes." - Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005 |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sander deWaal" wrote in message ... "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" said: 55% Speaker 10% Room interaction with the speaker The latter figure is "slightly" higher IME. Agree absolutely. Probably more like 55% and 35%. Without taming the room the best speakers won't sound as good as they should. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! wrote:
Rate each component in the audio chain by percentage of importance in the overall sound or enjoyment of your system. For the sake of argument, assume a well-recorded source (CD, LP, etc.) with no physical problems. Most important: room interaction with the speaker. Second: speaker. No importance: speaker cables, interconnects, power amplifier(s), preamplifier, CD/DVD player if well designed. No importance: power cords, power conditioner, equipment stand. Important: speaker stands for small speakers. _Maybe_ 1%: tweaks. But please no green ink, cable risers, air bladders, etc. I have assumed that the equipment is not ugly and at least looks good and that one knows how to choose a component. I have not given many percentages, because it is difficult to do so. --124 |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sander deWaal" wrote in message ... "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" said: 55% Speaker 10% Room interaction with the speaker The latter figure is "slightly" higher IME. Agreed. If you move good speakers between different rooms there's a tendency to hear bigger differences than if you switch (level-matched, bias controlled) among good speakers in the same room. |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Signal wrote "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" emitted : Margaret's audio gourmet thread was fun. That gave me the idea for this one. Rate each component in the audio chain by percentage ... 'Tweaks' 100% Oh Yeah! Same here. This always put us in the good mood, oh yeah. .... well, what happen if we're not in the good mood... hmm. Wait ! I thought hi-fi help to induce good mood. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Sander deWaal" wrote in message ... "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" said: 55% Speaker 10% Room interaction with the speaker The latter figure is "slightly" higher IME. Agreed. If you move good speakers between different rooms there's a tendency to hear bigger differences than if you switch (level-matched, bias controlled) among good speakers in the same room. Note: That 'assumption' has not been properly ABX'ed, level matched, and eyes gouged out. -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "124"
Date: 11 Jan 2006 07:28:35 -0800 _Maybe_ 1%: tweaks. But please no green ink, cable risers, air bladders, etc. Perhaps a definition of 'tweaks' is in order... The 2% tweaks in my list refers to spikes I put under my speakers to raise them off the floor. Maybe that's actually a necessity.:-) I do have one CD that was treated with green ink. It's a MFSL that I bought used on ebay. It came that way. |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Walt
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:47:51 -0500 50% My mood or attitude A great addition. Some of the 'best' music I've ever heard was hanging out with friends, sucking down a couple of beers, and listening to music on a cheap boom box. It had to be my mood. It certainly wasn't the sound quality. |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: From: Walt Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:47:51 -0500 50% My mood or attitude A great addition. Some of the 'best' music I've ever heard was hanging out with friends, sucking down a couple of beers, and listening to music on a cheap boom box. It had to be my mood. It certainly wasn't the sound quality. Tetrahydrocannabinol works wonders for sound. Graham |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Pooh Bear
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:10:48 +0000 Tetrahydrocannabinol works wonders for sound. Do you treat your CDs with it? Does it increase 'high' frequency response? |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() PoopieNerd said: Tetrahydrocannabinol works wonders for sound. Ya reckin'? Those darn "audiophools" and their durned designer drugs. Haw, haw, haw. |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "124" wrote No importance: speaker cables, interconnects, power amplifier(s), preamplifier, CD/DVD player if well designed. Do you shop exclusively at appliance stores? No importance: power cords, power conditioner, equipment stand. How would you know? Important: speaker stands for small speakers. Works for larger speakers, too. But there are few products available for this purpose. |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote Without taming the room the best speakers won't sound as good as they should. What acoustic dampening products are you using now? In what configuration? |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Morein" wrote Here's mine, in order from most important to least: Speaker Room interaction with the speaker Power amplifier(s) Well, maybe. Depends on speaker demands. Stand Speaker cable Speaker cable this high in ranking. Why? CD/DVD player Preamplifier Preamps next to interconnects you must be kidding. I'd put them before power amps. Audio interconnects Power cords/power conditioners Not so with power conditioners. Oh, I forgot, you don't have any experience with them. |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bret Ludwig" wrote Instead buy a good outboard DAC. If you get an outboard DAC insist, demand, it satisfactorily drive your power amp directly. In my opinion the Benchmark DAC is as good as any. What is the voltage output RMS? "Good as any"... what other variable DAC's have you used in your setup? |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: "Bret Ludwig"
Date: 10 Jan 2006 07:56:53 -0800 I do tend to prefer tube phono stages, particularly those using 90 volt TV front end tubes (6DJ8s). This may be more appropriate for rec.audio.tubes, but since you brought it up... I'm in the process of designing a pair of monoblocks based on the Marantz Model 9. Any recommendations on 6DJ8/6922/7308s? |
#22
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" said:
I'm in the process of designing a pair of monoblocks based on the Marantz Model 9. Any recommendations on 6DJ8/6922/7308s? Microphonics are your worst enemy in tube phono stages. IMO NOS Telefunken are hard to beat. Philips E88CC is next best, but test them thoroughly for microphonics. As with all NOS tubes, expect that the best tubes are already pulled from the stash......... Current production JJ Tesla is usually good wrt. microphonics. -- "Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes." - Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005 |
#23
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pooh Bear wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: A great addition. Some of the 'best' music I've ever heard was hanging out with friends, sucking down a couple of beers, and listening to music on a cheap boom box. It had to be my mood. It certainly wasn't the sound quality. Tetrahydrocannabinol works wonders for sound. One of the cheapest "upgrades" around! 8) |
#24
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Pooh Bear wrote: Tetrahydrocannabinol works wonders for sound. It certainly got me through CES last week. Boon |
#25
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Signal wrote EddieM emitted : Margaret's audio gourmet thread was fun. That gave me the idea for this one. Rate each component in the audio chain by percentage ... 'Tweaks' 100% Oh Yeah! Same here. This always put us in the good mood, oh yeah. ... well, what happen if we're not in the good mood... hmm. Wait ! I thought hi-fi help to induce good mood. Dunno what yr on about mate ;-) I like hi-fi with lotsa tweaks. Tweaks are good. It's good for the mind, body, and soul. Tweak is it. -- S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t |
#26
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Pooh Bear wrote: Tetrahydrocannabinol works wonders for sound. It certainly got me through CES last week. Not to mention the snack bar! -- Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service -------http://www.NewsDemon.com------ Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access |
#27
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Powell wrote:
"124" wrote No importance: speaker cables, interconnects, power amplifier(s), preamplifier, CD/DVD player if well designed. Do you shop exclusively at appliance stores? No. No importance: power cords, power conditioner, equipment stand. How would you know? How would _you_ know? Important: speaker stands for small speakers. Works for larger speakers, too. How would you know? But there are few products available for this purpose. Why? --124 |
#28
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Powell" wrote in message ... "124" wrote No importance: speaker cables, interconnects, power amplifier(s), preamplifier, CD/DVD player if well designed. Do you shop exclusively at appliance stores? Actually, appliance stores do a pretty good job of hyping speaker cables and interconnects these days. No importance: power cords, power conditioner, equipment stand. How would you know? Personal experience. Important: speaker stands for small speakers. Works for larger speakers, too. Agreed. But there are few products available for this purpose. Huh? |
#29
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Powell" wrote in message ... "Robert Morein" wrote Here's mine, in order from most important to least: Speaker Room interaction with the speaker Power amplifier(s) Well, maybe. Depends on speaker demands. Stand Speaker cable Speaker cable this high in ranking. Why? CD/DVD player Preamplifier Preamps next to interconnects you must be kidding. I'd put them before power amps. Audio interconnects Power cords/power conditioners Not so with power conditioners. Oh, I forgot, you don't have any experience with them. Isn't there one in every component? :-) Aren't they called bridge rectifiers? |
#30
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ink.net... "Powell" wrote in message ... "Robert Morein" wrote Here's mine, in order from most important to least: Speaker Room interaction with the speaker Power amplifier(s) Well, maybe. Depends on speaker demands. Stand Speaker cable Speaker cable this high in ranking. Why? Good question. The preamp or optical player would seem to be a better bet. CD/DVD player Preamplifier Preamps next to interconnects you must be kidding. I'd put them before power amps. Agreed. Generally inconsequential, but... Audio interconnects Power cords/power conditioners Not so with power conditioners. Oh, I forgot, you don't have any experience with them. Getting experience with power conditioners is something like failing an IQ test. I admit it, I have one but it was a gift. Isn't there one in every component? :-) Aren't they called bridge rectifiers? More like the power transformer. |
#31
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message ups.com... From: Pooh Bear Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:10:48 +0000 Tetrahydrocannabinol works wonders for sound. Do you treat your CDs with it? Does it increase 'high' frequency response? It makes it all sound like, you know, better. |
#32
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... wrote in message ink.net... "Powell" wrote in message ... "Robert Morein" wrote Here's mine, in order from most important to least: Speaker Room interaction with the speaker Power amplifier(s) Well, maybe. Depends on speaker demands. Stand Speaker cable Speaker cable this high in ranking. Why? Good question. The preamp or optical player would seem to be a better bet. CD/DVD player Preamplifier Preamps next to interconnects you must be kidding. I'd put them before power amps. Agreed. Generally inconsequential, but... Audio interconnects Power cords/power conditioners Not so with power conditioners. Oh, I forgot, you don't have any experience with them. Getting experience with power conditioners is something like failing an IQ test. I admit it, I have one but it was a gift. Isn't there one in every component? :-) Aren't they called bridge rectifiers? More like the power transformer. I stand corrected. Been a very long time since I had occaison to study that. IIRC the BR smoothes out the ripple from AC, no? |
#33
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#34
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: From: Pooh Bear Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:10:48 +0000 Tetrahydrocannabinol works wonders for sound. Do you treat your CDs with it? Does it increase 'high' frequency response? You treat the listener ! It actually works too. ;-) Graham |
#36
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
said:
Been way too long since I cracked a book on this stuff. Just stop searching for GW and political sites on Google and take some time to read this instead: http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/ampins/ampins.htm -- "Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes." - Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005 |
#37
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote Been way too long since I cracked a book... This is apparent on many levels. ![]() |
#38
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arny Krueger" wrote Do you shop exclusively at appliance stores? Actually, appliance stores do a pretty good job of hyping speaker cables and interconnects these days. Yes, have you seen the rush to produce pricey HDMI/DVI cables. Maybe I'll have to get one. ![]() |
#39
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "124" wrote No importance: speaker cables, interconnects, power amplifier(s), preamplifier, CD/DVD player if well designed. Do you shop exclusively at appliance stores? No. Yea, so whaaaaat? No importance: power cords, power conditioner, equipment stand. How would you know? How would _you_ know? Quack, quack, quack... Important: speaker stands for small speakers. Works for larger speakers, too. How would you know? Empirical and analytical experiences. But there are few products available for this purpose. Why? Some reasons include: * Problem matching of widely varying differences in speaker base sizes. * Cost to manufacture. * The lack of choices for height sizes needed for optimum fidelity. |
#40
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sander deWaal" wrote I'm in the process of designing a pair of monoblocks based on the Marantz Model 9. Any recommendations on 6DJ8/6922/7308s? Microphonics are your worst enemy in tube phono stages. True, and there are helpful tube dampening mechanisms to reduce microphonics. IMO NOS Telefunken are hard to beat. Philips E88CC is next best, but test them thoroughly for microphonics. As with all NOS tubes, expect that the best tubes are already pulled from the stash......... I've used six different brands of 6922/6DJ8 low noise variants in a ARC-LS2. The Sovtek was, for me, the best sounding. Current production JJ Tesla is usually good wrt. microphonics. Last year I switched out the Penta-China tubes in my microphone preamp for highly sorted RAM - Sovtek 12AX7 from: http://www.tubeaudiostore.com. Best Sovteck yet. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
It's amazing what you can find when you look. | Audio Opinions |