CONCLUSION
No deduction is required. Arny Krueger pleaded guilty to all charges or

trollery and lying deceitfully. The criminal made no plea of ignorance
in mitigation, as in his other crimes we have already considered.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The examination of the criminal in the dock produced a confession:

Question:

So, you claim, Krueger, that it is our usual practice,
supported by our moral philosophy, to make the distortion
in our SET amplifiers as large as possible?

Krueger admits the charges:

So it seems.

Here Krueger admits that:

1. He lied about facts he knew to be untrue ("patent absurdity")
2. He perpetrated the lie as a troll

Question:

Is this patent absurdity a troll, Krueger. or do you
really believe your own dumb ****? If so, prove that we
design our SET amplifiers to "maximize distortion".

Krueger:

See above individual responses to your comments, Jute.

Here the criminal Krueger confirms his confession of guilt to all
charges above.

We conclude that the criminal Arny Krueger trolled and lied dishonestly

in order to enhance his self-image as an "engineer" and "an expert".
His dishonest debating methods will be taken into consideration in
passing sentence.

The complete examination of the criminal Krueger which led to his
confession and conviction is attached.

QED.

Sentence follows when the magistrate has discovered his breath at the
barefaced dishonesty of the criminal Krueger.

Andre Jute
Restoring the magisterium piece by piece

*********

Andre Jute wrote:
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message
oups.com
Arny Krueger wrote:
ÿ the usual SET dogma of maximizing distortion.


Let's see what the words mean before we make the same
sort of
foolish, zero-science, zero-brains, bottom of the
food-tree mistake Krueger made about the musicians:


"usual" i.e. normal, customary or typical. Okay, that is
what we
do, we build...


"SET" i.e. single-ended triode amps.


"dogma" i.e. a set of beliefs that a religious, political,
philosophical or moral group holds to be true. Okay. We
are not a religious or a political group because we have
no articles of faith (we're ecumenical about silicon or
tubes as long as it is melted
sand) nor any desire to proselytize the unwashed. But RAT
is definitely a philosophical and moral group, as the
purpose of our hobby is high fidelity, an attachment to
truth in culture and life, which we usually interpret as
decently flat amps.


Flat response and SET amplifiers don't mix well if operation into normal
speaker loads is considered. SET amps tend to have far higher output
impedances than good SS amps and this means that their response is highly
depdenent on speaker impedance curves.


"maximizing" i.e. to make something as large as possible.
Whether
we want that depends on what is to be made larger. Most
of us don't, for instance, need penis enlargement; those
who do, like the thief Bret Ludwig, is anyway a
treacherous little slimeball Krueger can take away to RAO
with him free of charge.


Note that this response has no useful responsive content once the gratuitous
personal attack is removed.


"distortion" i.e. altering a signal so that it becomes
unclear or unrecognizable. No, that's very definitely not
us.


Wrong. Distortion is altering or size of a signal. Since SET amps have
relatively large amounts of nonlinear distortion, they alter the shape of
signals they amplify. Since SET amps tend to have very nonflat frequency
response with loudspeaker loads, they alter the size of the signal from
frequency to frequency.


So, you claim, Krueger, that it is our usual practice,
supported by our moral philosophy, to make the distortion
in our SET amplifiers as large as possible?


So it seems.


Is this patent absurdity a troll, Krueger. or do you
really believe your own dumb ****? If so, prove that we
design our SET amplifiers to "maximize distortion".


See above individual responses to your comments, Jute.

********

Andre Jute wrote:
CONCLUSION
No deduction is required. Arny Krueger pleaded guilty to all charges or

trollery and lying deceitfully. The criminal made no plea of ignorance
in mitigation, as in his other crimes we have already considered.


You are on powerful drugs, McCoy. He's likely guilty, but has never
admitted it, and never will.

The thief Bret Ludwig wrote:
Andre Jute wrote:
CONCLUSION
No deduction is required. Arny Krueger pleaded guilty to all charges or

trollery and lying deceitfully. The criminal made no plea of ignorance
in mitigation, as in his other crimes we have already considered.


You are on powerful drugs, McCoy. He's likely guilty, but has never
admitted it, and never will.

Perhaps you can't force him to admit his guilt, but I keep proving it
beyond question, and I keep forcing him to admit his guilt. You may be
too slack and incompetent to even something so simple, Ludwig, but I am
not. So tell use, Ludwig:

Why do you snip the quote where Krueger admits his guilt:

So, you claim, Krueger, that it is our usual practice,
supported by our moral philosophy, to make the distortion
in our SET amplifiers as large as possible?
Krueger admits his guilt:
So it seems

.... and the part where he confirms it? (Quoted in the original.)

Unsigned out of contempt for the thief Ludwig, who is worse scum than
Krueger.

Andre Jute wrote:
snip

Unsigned out of contempt for the thief Ludwig, who is worse scum than
Krueger.


High praise!

The only thing to be feared from a creature as Jute is its embrace.

"Bret Ludwig" wrote in message
ups.com...

Andre Jute wrote:
snip

Unsigned out of contempt for the thief Ludwig, who is worse scum than
Krueger.


High praise!

The only thing to be feared from a creature as Jute is its embrace.

I think that makes you very good, from modulo-N wraparound.