Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Part time lurker, almost never a poster here... I wondered where to ask
this, and I figure ROA and RAT is a good a place as any. Over the course of my life, I've been slowly eliminating unnecessary, plebian possessions, consumables, behaviors, and other aspects of my life that are otherwise unsophisticated, mundane, low-brow, and commonplace. As I've done so, I've grown more and more disdain for the proles and their monster truck rallies, pro wrestling, and walmart furniture. I feel there are certainly things I'm leaving out on my journey from middle class commoner to urbane, misanthropic sophisticate, though I am definitely on the right track. Help me complete the transformation by pointing out anything I've missed. So far, I have addressed the following categories: - Music: Went from mass-marketed pop to various avant-garde and obscure genres (almost exclusively on vinyl of course) - TV: Went from an average 20-30 hr/wk viewer to no TV at all (I still watch movies on the computer, however). - Movies: Went from Hollywood mechanical narratives to art house experimental and foreign films. - Stereo: Went from mass-fi shelf system to extremely expensive audiophile system. - Clothing: Went from typical 90s fad wear to a more mature, classic look, usually from European designers. - Books: Went from reading mystery and scifi to more obscure classic literature and obscure contemporary prose and poetry. - Food: Went from eating junk food to various ethnic cuisines, often Mediterranean (I plan to get better cooking skills soon). - Beverages: Switched from coffee to tea and from dark beers to premium reds. - Furnitu Threw out anything made out of fiber or particle board or veneered. Slowly replacing with handmade real wood and metal furniture. - Health: Quit binge drinking and smoking. Started a 3-day/wk exercise plan. That's about all I can think of right now. There are little things too, like replacing my touchtone phone with a vintage all-metal rotary. I'm not an anachrophile or a luddite. I only eliminate those things which cause more stress than they relieve. There many modern things I don't intend to change (like my computers) and many commonplace items which still have a place (like paper towels). |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
..edu, huh? Lemme guess - you're so cool by now, your
**** comes out wrapped in cellophane. LV Bruce C. Miller wrote: (A major snob rant is mercifully excised) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce C. Miller" wrote in message oups.com... Part time lurker, almost never a poster here... I wondered where to ask this, and I figure ROA and RAT is a good a place as any. [snip] - Health: Quit binge drinking and smoking. Started a 3-day/wk exercise plan. That's about all I can think of right now. There are little things too, like replacing my touchtone phone with a vintage all-metal rotary. I'm not an anachrophile or a luddite. I only eliminate those things which cause more stress than they relieve. There many modern things I don't intend to change (like my computers) and many commonplace items which still have a place (like paper towels). Bruce, I read a tidbit on the reading habits of the literati. Surprisingly, the most luminous minds of our generation read lots and lots of junk. The difference between these people, and more average individuals, is that they read and experience many more things. In their lives, the valve that closes off experience and culture is wide open. For some people, cloistering themselves from the vulgar, and the low-brow pursuits of ordinary people makes them happy. So be it. But I wouldn't take it as an article of faith that this will work for you. Don't make it a goal in and of itself. You, too, could have a brilliant mind, yet enjoy Jello, Twinkies, and Metallica, and if that's the case, feel no guilt. Enjoy every sunny day. People in search of Bohemia sometimes find themselves conforming to another standard that is as confining as the one they abandoned. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce C. Miller" wrote in message oups.com... Part time lurker, almost never a poster here... I wondered where to ask this, and I figure ROA and RAT is a good a place as any. Over the course of my life, I've been slowly eliminating unnecessary, plebian possessions, consumables, behaviors, and other aspects of my life that are otherwise unsophisticated, mundane, low-brow, and commonplace. As I've done so, I've grown more and more disdain for the proles and their monster truck rallies, pro wrestling, and walmart furniture. I feel there are certainly things I'm leaving out on my journey from middle class commoner to urbane, misanthropic sophisticate, though I am definitely on the right track. Help me complete the transformation by pointing out anything I've missed. So far, I have addressed the following categories: - Music: Went from mass-marketed pop to various avant-garde and obscure genres (almost exclusively on vinyl of course) - TV: Went from an average 20-30 hr/wk viewer to no TV at all (I still watch movies on the computer, however). - Movies: Went from Hollywood mechanical narratives to art house experimental and foreign films. - Stereo: Went from mass-fi shelf system to extremely expensive audiophile system. - Clothing: Went from typical 90s fad wear to a more mature, classic look, usually from European designers. - Books: Went from reading mystery and scifi to more obscure classic literature and obscure contemporary prose and poetry. - Food: Went from eating junk food to various ethnic cuisines, often Mediterranean (I plan to get better cooking skills soon). - Beverages: Switched from coffee to tea and from dark beers to premium reds. - Furnitu Threw out anything made out of fiber or particle board or veneered. Slowly replacing with handmade real wood and metal furniture. - Health: Quit binge drinking and smoking. Started a 3-day/wk exercise plan. That's about all I can think of right now. There are little things too, like replacing my touchtone phone with a vintage all-metal rotary. I'm not an anachrophile or a luddite. I only eliminate those things which cause more stress than they relieve. There many modern things I don't intend to change (like my computers) and many commonplace items which still have a place (like paper towels). For me vinyl playback would fall into that category of things that cause more stress than it relieves. All the work that goes into setting up the rig, the expense, the time involved in cleaning each disk before playback, and the monstrous levels of noise and distortion inherent in the media. If it works for you, go for it. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce C. Miller" wrote in message oups.com... Part time lurker, almost never a poster here... I wondered where to ask this, and I figure ROA and RAT is a good a place as any. Over the course of my life, I've been slowly eliminating unnecessary, plebian possessions, consumables, behaviors, and other aspects of my life that are otherwise unsophisticated, mundane, low-brow, and commonplace. As I've done so, I've grown more and more disdain for the proles and their monster truck rallies, pro wrestling, and walmart furniture. I feel there are certainly things I'm leaving out on my journey from middle class commoner to urbane, misanthropic sophisticate, though I am definitely on the right track. Help me complete the transformation by pointing out anything I've missed. So far, I have addressed the following categories: - Music: Went from mass-marketed pop to various avant-garde and obscure genres (almost exclusively on vinyl of course) - TV: Went from an average 20-30 hr/wk viewer to no TV at all (I still watch movies on the computer, however). - Movies: Went from Hollywood mechanical narratives to art house experimental and foreign films. - Stereo: Went from mass-fi shelf system to extremely expensive audiophile system. - Clothing: Went from typical 90s fad wear to a more mature, classic look, usually from European designers. What ever happenned to comfort? - Books: Went from reading mystery and scifi to more obscure classic literature and obscure contemporary prose and poetry. - Food: Went from eating junk food to various ethnic cuisines, often Mediterranean (I plan to get better cooking skills soon). - Beverages: Switched from coffee to tea and from dark beers to premium reds. Yuch... You'd forgo a healthy Stoudt for a red. That is stressin. - Furnitu Threw out anything made out of fiber or particle board or veneered. Slowly replacing with handmade real wood and metal furniture. I'd be stressing why the furniture was something to stress over. - Health: Quit binge drinking and smoking. Started a 3-day/wk exercise plan. That's about all I can think of right now. There are little things too, like replacing my touchtone phone with a vintage all-metal rotary. I'm not an anachrophile or a luddite. I only eliminate those things which cause more stress than they relieve. There many modern things I don't intend to change (like my computers) Now theres a stress item that you shouldn't overlook. and many commonplace items which still have a place (like paper towels). How about the toilet paper. Charmin has very nice new stress relieving variety. Scented or not, as you like. ScottW |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Morein wrote:
"Bruce C. Miller" wrote in message oups.com... Part time lurker, almost never a poster here... I wondered where to ask this, and I figure ROA and RAT is a good a place as any. [snip] - Health: Quit binge drinking and smoking. Started a 3-day/wk exercise plan. That's about all I can think of right now. There are little things too, like replacing my touchtone phone with a vintage all-metal rotary. I'm not an anachrophile or a luddite. I only eliminate those things which cause more stress than they relieve. There many modern things I don't intend to change (like my computers) and many commonplace items which still have a place (like paper towels). Bruce, I read a tidbit on the reading habits of the literati. Surprisingly, the most luminous minds of our generation read lots and lots of junk. The difference between these people, and more average individuals, is that they read and experience many more things. In their lives, the valve that closes off experience and culture is wide open. For some people, cloistering themselves from the vulgar, and the low-brow pursuits of ordinary people makes them happy. So be it. But I wouldn't take it as an article of faith that this will work for you. Don't make it a goal in and of itself. You, too, could have a brilliant mind, yet enjoy Jello, Twinkies, and Metallica, and if that's the case, feel no guilt. Enjoy every sunny day. People in search of Bohemia sometimes find themselves conforming to another standard that is as confining as the one they abandoned. This is certainly true to an extent. For me, I've already spent over a quarter century soaking in tv, pop music, junk food, and everything else without regard. I've probably wasted a good year or two of my life just in front of the TV. I think that's more than enough for one lifetime. I've been at it long enough to make an informed decision, I believe. So far, eliminating such things has only improved my quality of life overall. I'm not becoming a recluse, I'm just putting a little more thought into the things I consume and do. Just like most people wouldn't even think to improve the sound quality of their stereo, even if they listen to it every day and have plenty of money to do so, so too are most things. Once you realize it is possible, the rewards are yours. I'm trying to identify as many of those things as I can. The downside to this, of course, is that the more you do this, the less you have in common with the average man. Some people will think you're a snob even if they find out you don't own a TV. I don't think game shows and rap should be outlawed, I just don't want to voluntarily subject myself to any more of it than I have to. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ScottW wrote:
"Bruce C. Miller" wrote in message oups.com... - Clothing: Went from typical 90s fad wear to a more mature, classic look, usually from European designers. What ever happenned to comfort? A lot of the various fads that have come in and out of style were of questionable comfort as well. At home, I wear whatever is the most comfortable. - Beverages: Switched from coffee to tea and from dark beers to premium reds. Yuch... You'd forgo a healthy Stoudt for a red. That is stressin. I do think I had decent taste in beers, even in my youth. I never could stomach the urinal water most Americans drink. These days, I mainly only drink a glass or two with a dinner, and for that I tend to prefer a nice red, though I don't hold anything against the cultural refinement of a consumer of certain dark beers. - Furnitu Threw out anything made out of fiber or particle board or veneered. Slowly replacing with handmade real wood and metal furniture. I'd be stressing why the furniture was something to stress over. It's not a high priority, which is why it isn't anywhere near done yet. Personally, there's something intangibly better about sitting in a nice, well crafted wooden chair than sitting in a $15 plastic lawn chair from K-Mart. I'm not an anachrophile or a luddite. I only eliminate those things which cause more stress than they relieve. There many modern things I don't intend to change (like my computers) Now theres a stress item that you shouldn't overlook. The computer, or rather my profession involving them, pays for all of this. So, getting rid of the computer would require me getting rid of everything else ![]() and many commonplace items which still have a place (like paper towels). How about the toilet paper. Charmin has very nice new stress relieving variety. Scented or not, as you like. I'd prefer a clean ass to a dirty but perfumed one, but either way works for me. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce C. Miller" wrote in message oups.com... The downside to this, of course, is that the more you do this, the less you have in common with the average man. Some people will think you're a snob even if they find out you don't own a TV. I'd just think you lack self control. I don't think game shows and rap should be outlawed, I just don't want to voluntarily subject myself to any more of it than I have to. So why did you have to ban all TVs from your home to avoid game shows and rap? I think TV is actually coming into a new golden age with the digital channel offerings. I was just watching an awesome tribute to Muddy Waters last night on IN HD. Lots of good stuff on TV and I can't remember the last time I watched a game show.... take it back.... there was this hotty on Fear Factor in a tight T-shirt they dunked in a tank...does that count? ScottW |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce C. Miller" wrote in message oups.com... Part time lurker, almost never a poster here... I wondered where to ask this, and I figure ROA and RAT is a good a place as any. Over the course of my life, I've been slowly eliminating unnecessary, plebian possessions, consumables, behaviors, and other aspects of my life that are otherwise unsophisticated, mundane, low-brow, and commonplace. As I've done so, I've grown more and more disdain for the proles and their monster truck rallies, pro wrestling, and walmart furniture. I feel there are certainly things I'm leaving out on my journey from middle class commoner to urbane, misanthropic sophisticate, though I am definitely on the right track. Help me complete the transformation by pointing out anything I've missed. So far, I have addressed the following categories: - Music: Went from mass-marketed pop to various avant-garde and obscure genres (almost exclusively on vinyl of course) - TV: Went from an average 20-30 hr/wk viewer to no TV at all (I still watch movies on the computer, however). - Movies: Went from Hollywood mechanical narratives to art house experimental and foreign films. - Stereo: Went from mass-fi shelf system to extremely expensive audiophile system. - Clothing: Went from typical 90s fad wear to a more mature, classic look, usually from European designers. - Books: Went from reading mystery and scifi to more obscure classic literature and obscure contemporary prose and poetry. - Food: Went from eating junk food to various ethnic cuisines, often Mediterranean (I plan to get better cooking skills soon). - Beverages: Switched from coffee to tea and from dark beers to premium reds. - Furnitu Threw out anything made out of fiber or particle board or veneered. Slowly replacing with handmade real wood and metal furniture. - Health: Quit binge drinking and smoking. Started a 3-day/wk exercise plan. That's about all I can think of right now. There are little things too, like replacing my touchtone phone with a vintage all-metal rotary. I hate to ask you about the changes in your sexual activities, but, what the hell. Want to share them with us? |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clyde Slick wrote:
snip I hate to ask you about the changes in your sexual activities, but, what the hell. Want to share them with us? I won't get into the gory details, but this has been another mixed bag. Compared to when I was, say, 20 or so (I'm 27 now) it is now easier for me to talk to girls and show them a good time on a date, even if most of it is just conversation. However, I seem to be less impressed with the things that come out of their mouths. This could very well be because I've become jaded though, so I can't say that my lifestyle change has had a direct cause-effect relationship with this. It could be any number of things. I can only say it's gotten worse since I've gotten out of college, as most of the females I've met since then have only a high school education, and seem to be stuck at that level of intellectual maturity. I wish I lived in a more urban setting. I wager there would be more artsy or eccentric types around. In real life, I tend not to even mention my interests when asked. People often ask what type of music I like, to which I respond, "Oh, various types..." Spares me the confused, blank stares. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce C. Miller" wrote in message oups.com... ScottW wrote: "Bruce C. Miller" wrote in message oups.com... - Clothing: Went from typical 90s fad wear to a more mature, classic look, usually from European designers. What ever happenned to comfort? A lot of the various fads that have come in and out of style were of questionable comfort as well. At home, I wear whatever is the most comfortable. - Beverages: Switched from coffee to tea and from dark beers to premium reds. Yuch... You'd forgo a healthy Stoudt for a red. That is stressin. I do think I had decent taste in beers, even in my youth. I never could stomach the urinal water most Americans drink. These days, I mainly only drink a glass or two with a dinner, and for that I tend to prefer a nice red, though I don't hold anything against the cultural refinement of a consumer of certain dark beers. Newcastle Brown Ale for the lighter evening.... Pilsner Urquell when I have a taste for hops.... and Sam Adams Stoudt (unless I can get over to BevMo and get a real Guinness...those stupid CO2 cartridge drafts weren't at all brilliant. - Furnitu Threw out anything made out of fiber or particle board or veneered. Slowly replacing with handmade real wood and metal furniture. I'd be stressing why the furniture was something to stress over. It's not a high priority, which is why it isn't anywhere near done yet. Personally, there's something intangibly better about sitting in a nice, well crafted wooden chair than sitting in a $15 plastic lawn chair from K-Mart. Till you need to paint or varnish it again.... and again...... I've decided low stress requires low maintenance. ScottW |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce C. Miller" wrote in message oups.com... Clyde Slick wrote: snip I hate to ask you about the changes in your sexual activities, but, what the hell. Want to share them with us? I won't get into the gory details, but this has been another mixed bag. Compared to when I was, say, 20 or so (I'm 27 now) it is now easier for me to talk to girls and show them a good time on a date, even if most of it is just conversation. However, I seem to be less impressed with the things that come out of their mouths. This could very well be because I've become jaded though, so I can't say that my lifestyle change has had a direct cause-effect relationship with this. It could be any number of things. I can only say it's gotten worse since I've gotten out of college, as most of the females I've met since then have only a high school education, and seem to be stuck at that level of intellectual maturity. I wish I lived in a more urban setting. I wager there would be more artsy or eccentric types around. In real life, I tend not to even mention my interests when asked. People often ask what type of music I like, to which I respond, "Oh, various types..." Spares me the confused, blank stares. Sorry I asked. I was expecting something a little funnier. However, I submit that you would be more impressed with what comes out of your date's mouth if it were your come coming out of your date's mouth. |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce C. Miller wrote
I feel there are certainly things I'm leaving out on my journey from middle class commoner to urbane, misanthropic sophisticate, though I am definitely on the right track. Help me complete the transformation by pointing out anything I've missed. So far, I have addressed the following categories: Hello Bruce, Long time ago I read a book written by an American author, "Walden" by Henry David Thoreau. Even reading in Japanese translation, I was deeply impressed because I thought I saw one of ultimate forms of DIY and simple life. Though, when I joined an American company later, some of co-workers mentioned that the book was virtually about how to avoid taxes. (^^ ![]() Anyway, I think that things you have done so far are based on consumption of things. Chosing A over B is like that. DIY or "creation" of something might open the door toward satisfaction you didn't expect since this is rec.autio.tubes. It can be a very small project. Atsunori |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're not a Bohemian, Bruce, you're a snob.
A Bohemian is created by his culture and taste and achivements. You don't choose to be a Bohemian; bohemianism chooses you. Bohemianism is not a tool for posing as fashionably cool. I think you've been lucky so far not to meet a girl of genuine intellect and taste. When you do, her contempt for your pretentious shallowness will sear your soul. Andre Jute Artist. Intellectual. Bicyclist. Sophisticate. Dressed daily in joggers. Visit Andre Jute at http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/ Those who don't care about their image can stick to Jute on Amps http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/JUTE%20ON%20AMPS.htm "an unbelievably comprehensive web site" -- Hi-Fi News & Record Review Bruce C. Miller wrote: Part time lurker, almost never a poster here... I wondered where to ask this, and I figure ROA and RAT is a good a place as any. Over the course of my life, I've been slowly eliminating unnecessary, plebian possessions, consumables, behaviors, and other aspects of my life that are otherwise unsophisticated, mundane, low-brow, and commonplace. As I've done so, I've grown more and more disdain for the proles and their monster truck rallies, pro wrestling, and walmart furniture. I feel there are certainly things I'm leaving out on my journey from middle class commoner to urbane, misanthropic sophisticate, though I am definitely on the right track. Help me complete the transformation by pointing out anything I've missed. So far, I have addressed the following categories: - Music: Went from mass-marketed pop to various avant-garde and obscure genres (almost exclusively on vinyl of course) - TV: Went from an average 20-30 hr/wk viewer to no TV at all (I still watch movies on the computer, however). - Movies: Went from Hollywood mechanical narratives to art house experimental and foreign films. - Stereo: Went from mass-fi shelf system to extremely expensive audiophile system. - Clothing: Went from typical 90s fad wear to a more mature, classic look, usually from European designers. - Books: Went from reading mystery and scifi to more obscure classic literature and obscure contemporary prose and poetry. - Food: Went from eating junk food to various ethnic cuisines, often Mediterranean (I plan to get better cooking skills soon). - Beverages: Switched from coffee to tea and from dark beers to premium reds. - Furnitu Threw out anything made out of fiber or particle board or veneered. Slowly replacing with handmade real wood and metal furniture. - Health: Quit binge drinking and smoking. Started a 3-day/wk exercise plan. That's about all I can think of right now. There are little things too, like replacing my touchtone phone with a vintage all-metal rotary. I'm not an anachrophile or a luddite. I only eliminate those things which cause more stress than they relieve. There many modern things I don't intend to change (like my computers) and many commonplace items which still have a place (like paper towels). |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think you are headed in the right direction, just
look at how upset some people are here!!!!. regards Mark |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 19:43:21 -0400, "Robert Morein"
wrote: For some people, cloistering themselves from the vulgar, and the low-brow pursuits of ordinary people makes them happy. Yep. Makes me deleriously happy. So be it. It is. But I wouldn't take it as an article of faith that this will work for you. Don't make it a goal in and of itself. It just comes naturally, doesn't it? If it doesn't, don't do it. You, too, could have a brilliant mind, yet enjoy Jello, Twinkies, and Metallica, and if that's the case, feel no guilt. He mightn't feel any guilt, but he probably wouldn't have such a brilliant mind after a while either. When was the last time you met a brilliant Metallica fan? Not lately? Well, there's a reason... :-) Actually I thought Bruce's post was a put-on. Now I'm not sure what to think. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Atsunori Tamagawa wrote:
Bruce C. Miller wrote I feel there are certainly things I'm leaving out on my journey from middle class commoner to urbane, misanthropic sophisticate, though I am definitely on the right track. Help me complete the transformation by pointing out anything I've missed. So far, I have addressed the following categories: Hello Bruce, Long time ago I read a book written by an American author, "Walden" by Henry David Thoreau. Even reading in Japanese translation, I was deeply impressed because I thought I saw one of ultimate forms of DIY and simple life. Though, when I joined an American company later, some of co-workers mentioned that the book was virtually about how to avoid taxes. (^^ ![]() Anyway, I think that things you have done so far are based on consumption of things. Chosing A over B is like that. DIY or "creation" of something might open the door toward satisfaction you didn't expect since this is rec.autio.tubes. It can be a very small project. Atsunori This is a good point. Some of these changes involve eliminating unneccessary frivoltries, but alot are simply replacing one consumable for another. However, I think there is an important distinction between my consumption and that of the average American; a difference I picked up from hifi audio. That is, instead of buying a large amount of cheap junk, I tend to buy a small amount of nice things that last. As most people will go through, say, 10 home stereos in their lives, I purchased components that should last the rest of my life. I've simply extended the same concept to other catagories as well. Consumerism itself is rather stressful for me and alot of these changes have served to reduce it from being a major aspect of my life. But, what things in my could I do myself? I can't make my own furniture without a woodshop and a lot of tools (something I'd rather not own). I can't make clothes that are presentable enough to go to work in. I can't make my own wine, movies, cheese, and so on. I do what I can myself, like cooking, making an amp, or writing code, but I don't have anything against the specialisation of labor. |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andre Jute wrote:
You're not a Bohemian, Bruce, you're a snob. A Bohemian is created by his culture and taste and achivements. You don't choose to be a Bohemian; bohemianism chooses you. Bohemianism is not a tool for posing as fashionably cool. I would have thought you would have been more supportive. I'm not trying to fit into a specific label. There are Bohemian aspects of my current thinking, but a true Bohemian (if such a thing exists) would probably consider my lifestyle unimpressive. I use the term for lack of a better description. Additionally, these changes have happened slowly over the last 10 years or so. It's not like I woke up one day and decided I no longer liked Hollywood movies and was going to watch art films. In the case of film, for example, I gradually grew disenchanted with the assembly line of cookie cutter plots and gravitated more towards more thoughtful films, like I would assume any intelligent person would after getting a constant dose of Hollywood for years and years. I don't hate those who can find enjoyment out of a mindless action flick, but having experienced it countless times, I'm tired of it. If that makes me a snob, then I guess I am one. I think you've been lucky so far not to meet a girl of genuine intellect and taste. When you do, her contempt for your pretentious shallowness will sear your soul. Hell, I'd be happy to meet one who wasn't crazy or just living for the next shopping fix. Besides, I haven't said anything about my own intellect. I could very well be quite intelligent. Or not. I don't think any of this stuff has much to do with true intellect. One could be a cultured idiot or an uncultured genius. I don't discount the possibility that I still need character development or have personality flaws to address. Pretentiousness may very well be one of them. Your criticism isn't exactly constructive, however. Andre Jute Artist. Intellectual. Bicyclist. Sophisticate. Dressed daily in joggers. I at least have to dress professionally for work, so I might as well do it well. I realise that after a certain age, there's not much point in trying to look good, especially if you're married. I am still young by comparison to most here and a bachelor, so it's not yet a complete waste of time and effort. I put more effort into physical fitness than clothes though. A fat man in a $2000 suit is still a fat man, after all. |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ScottW wrote:
"Bruce C. Miller" wrote in message oups.com... The downside to this, of course, is that the more you do this, the less you have in common with the average man. Some people will think you're a snob even if they find out you don't own a TV. I'd just think you lack self control. I don't think game shows and rap should be outlawed, I just don't want to voluntarily subject myself to any more of it than I have to. So why did you have to ban all TVs from your home to avoid game shows and rap? I live by myself, so I only had one TV to begin with. I don't look at it as if I had banned TVs from my life. I didn't watch it, so I reclaimed some floor space. Even if you don't own one, TV is so ubiquitous and omnipresent in American culture, that you can't completely avoid it. Plus, every time I see one blaring insulting commercials, I'm reminded why I got rid of mine. I think TV is actually coming into a new golden age with the digital channel offerings. I was just watching an awesome tribute to Muddy Waters last night on IN HD. Lots of good stuff on TV and I can't remember the last time I watched a game show.... take it back.... there was this hotty on Fear Factor in a tight T-shirt they dunked in a tank...does that count? I'm not opposed to all visual media of the TV variety. I'll occasionally buy or borrow a DVD boxset of a show or two. I recently watched a few seasons of 24 on DVD. It was OK, but I don't think I could watch it in weekly installments, with all those 4 minute commercial interruptions. My time is valuable. I really don't get that much out of most of the shows I watch. It's a simple question for me. Is what I get from TV worth trading my time, the price of the TV and any other components, the subscription fees, having to watch commercials, the electricity to run it, and the physical side effects of inactivity? For me, no. If you think that sounds like a good deal, I certainly won't stop you. |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Oct 2005 06:15:42 -0700, "Bruce C. Miller"
wrote: Andre Jute wrote: You're not a Bohemian, Bruce, you're a snob. A Bohemian is created by his culture and taste and achivements. You don't choose to be a Bohemian; bohemianism chooses you. Bohemianism is not a tool for posing as fashionably cool. I would have thought you would have been more supportive. Funny, I'd have thought that too. But hey, this is RAO! I'm not trying to fit into a specific label. There are Bohemian aspects of my current thinking, but a true Bohemian (if such a thing exists) would probably consider my lifestyle unimpressive. I use the term for lack of a better description. Additionally, these changes have happened slowly over the last 10 years or so. It's not like I woke up one day and decided I no longer liked Hollywood movies and was going to watch art films. In the case of film, for example, I gradually grew disenchanted with the assembly line of cookie cutter plots and gravitated more towards more thoughtful films, like I would assume any intelligent person would after getting a constant dose of Hollywood for years and years. Or maybe it wouldn't take years and years. I pretty much have always disliked thoughtless pap. That's not a boast, just a fact. But we're probably not talking pure intelligence here so much as it's pretty sister, discrimination. In some discrimination is innate, in others learned, but the man who comes to it by his own inner means is to be admired. I hope you're right that those of any intelligence whatsoever will eventually tire of cinematic crap--or just crap generally--but I fear you're not. I don't hate those who can find enjoyment out of a mindless action flick, but having experienced it countless times, I'm tired of it. If that makes me a snob, then I guess I am one. It just makes you someone who's tired of mindless action flicks. I think you've been lucky so far not to meet a girl of genuine intellect and taste. When you do, her contempt for your pretentious shallowness will sear your soul. Hell, I'd be happy to meet one who wasn't crazy or just living for the next shopping fix. Besides, I haven't said anything about my own intellect. I could very well be quite intelligent. Or not. I don't think any of this stuff has much to do with true intellect. One could be a cultured idiot or an uncultured genius. Except that's more difficult than being a cultured genius or an uncultured idiot. Generally, people conform to stereotypes more often than not. I suggest you have an innate intelligence and discrimination that's leading you on a search for the better things in life, because there's something in you that needs sustenance. In other words, you've had enough Snickers bars. Now it's time for a nourishing salad roll. I don't discount the possibility that I still need character development or have personality flaws to address. Pretentiousness may very well be one of them. Your criticism isn't exactly constructive, however. Actually it was pretty stupid. The only thing wrong with your post was that it was so honest I thought it was a put-on. That's because one just doesn't expect honesty on RAO. Ignore the knockers. Go on as you're going--straight on till morning. ;-) |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Robert Morein wrote: "Bruce C. Miller" wrote in message oups.com... Part time lurker, almost never a poster here... I wondered where to ask this, and I figure ROA and RAT is a good a place as any. [snip] - Health: Quit binge drinking and smoking. Started a 3-day/wk exercise plan. That's about all I can think of right now. There are little things too, like replacing my touchtone phone with a vintage all-metal rotary. I'm not an anachrophile or a luddite. I only eliminate those things which cause more stress than they relieve. There many modern things I don't intend to change (like my computers) and many commonplace items which still have a place (like paper towels). Bruce, I read a tidbit on the reading habits of the literati. Surprisingly, the most luminous minds of our generation read lots and lots of junk. The difference between these people, and more average individuals, is that they read and experience many more things. In their lives, the valve that closes off experience and culture is wide open. For some people, cloistering themselves from the vulgar, and the low-brow pursuits of ordinary people makes them happy. So be it. But I wouldn't take it as an article of faith that this will work for you. Don't make it a goal in and of itself. You, too, could have a brilliant mind, yet enjoy Jello, Twinkies, and Metallica, and if that's the case, feel no guilt. Enjoy every sunny day. People in search of Bohemia sometimes find themselves conforming to another standard that is as confining as the one they abandoned. All the fukking bohemians I have ever known are not very good at making other people happy. Warning to Bohemians:- Keep it private if you want real respect. Patrick Turner. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "paul packer" wrote in message ... On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 19:43:21 -0400, "Robert Morein" wrote: For some people, cloistering themselves from the vulgar, and the low-brow pursuits of ordinary people makes them happy. Yep. Makes me deleriously happy. So be it. It is. But I wouldn't take it as an article of faith that this will work for you. Don't make it a goal in and of itself. It just comes naturally, doesn't it? If it doesn't, don't do it. You, too, could have a brilliant mind, yet enjoy Jello, Twinkies, and Metallica, and if that's the case, feel no guilt. He mightn't feel any guilt, but he probably wouldn't have such a brilliant mind after a while either. When was the last time you met a brilliant Metallica fan? Not lately? Well, there's a reason... :-) I was just thinking hypothetically ![]() |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce C. Miller wrote:
Andre Jute wrote: You're not a Bohemian, Bruce, you're a snob. I would have thought you would have been more supportive. Why ever? If you lurk on RAT you will know I admire precision of thought and expression. But why should I stroke someone who hasn't even troubled to discover the correct name for what he aspires to? You don't even know what a Bohemian is. Bohemia was a part of central London inhabited by artists and people closely involved with them. Painters, models, art dealers, are one example of a set of related bohemians. They produced works of art or were instrumental in producing them or in selling them. Someone who merely goes to a gallery to look at the painting made by Bohemian doesn't thereby become a Bohemian. Some Bohemians had a louche lifestyle, free love and all that, and some didn't wash too often, and some moved out to the countryside and committed incest with their daughers (Eric Gill), but the distinguishing mark of all was a life in the arts. (Note that all this is in the past tense. Bohemia is now inhabited by my publishers -- those who haven't yet moved further out, all of whom would be hugely flattered to be called louche and some of whom may still dream of being offered free love but all of whom would certainly not touch the person who offered it with a ten-foot pole.) Bohemianism doesn't describe what you are trying to do with your life. If you had said merely that you want to be a cultured person, or stylish, or a trendy, or a hanger-on of the arts or intellectual life, I would have helped you out with a list of the right possessions, words and attitudes. Now that the communications revolution will put all information instantly at your fingertips, and all entertainment, literature, etc, we need enlightened, actively discriminating consumers of culture, which you are as specifically as you are not a Bohemian. (I suspect anyway from your writing and obsession with lists that you would be most uncomfortable with the general standard of hygiene among the arty-farties.) A Bohemian is created by his culture and taste and achivements. You don't choose to be a Bohemian; bohemianism chooses you. Bohemianism is not a tool for posing as fashionably cool. I'm not trying to fit into a specific label. There are Bohemian aspects of my current thinking, but a true Bohemian (if such a thing exists) would probably consider my lifestyle unimpressive. I use the term for lack of a better description. Uh-huh. You couldn't have looked very hard. A cultured person suits fine. Additionally, these changes have happened slowly over the last 10 years or so. It's not like I woke up one day and decided I no longer liked Hollywood movies and was going to watch art films. In the case of film, for example, I gradually grew disenchanted with the assembly line of cookie cutter plots and gravitated more towards more thoughtful films, like I would assume any intelligent person would after getting a constant dose of Hollywood for years and years. I don't hate those who can find enjoyment out of a mindless action flick, but having experienced it countless times, I'm tired of it. If that makes me a snob, then I guess I am one. What makes you a snob is publicly expressed contempt for sound middle-class values, and dumb cracks about the proletariat. What makes you a snob is choosing some form of consumption because it is a minority interest. What makes you a snob is looking down on majority tastes. All of these solecisms you have publicly admitted to. I think you've been lucky so far not to meet a girl of genuine intellect and taste. When you do, her contempt for your pretentious shallowness will sear your soul. Hell, I'd be happy to meet one who wasn't crazy or just living for the next shopping fix. Besides, I haven't said anything about my own intellect. You told us you don't have your brain in gear even to the minor extent of using a dictionary about the name of your life-changing aspiration. You told us you have gullibly exchanged one set of designer labels for a more expensive, less comfortable set in what you consume, think and dream. When I was in advertising, we used to dream of cloning trendies like you; an associate of mine had a list on his wall of 900 plus trendy things we had made trendy that we would not be seen dead wearing, doing, consuming or thinking. As a 13-year old intern (I had just published a book of poems, so this ad agency offered me a vacation job complete with first class air tickets--there is the root of my expense account tastes!) I sat in a meeting where this man turned rough, uncomfortable, cowhand's pants into fashion gear: you own a pair of jeans, don't you, Bruce? None of the guys in that meeting would be seen dead in jeans. I could very well be quite intelligent. Or not. I don't think any of this stuff has much to do with true intellect. One could be a cultured idiot or an uncultured genius. To be cultured, discrimination, a learned art, is as good as true intellect. True intellect gives entree to intellectual activities peripheral to the arts, like criticism, and talent besides can make one an artist. None of this necessarily brings happiness. Critics want to be artists. True artists are never satisfied; the desire to do better is what drives them. I know many perfectly self-satisfied trendies; I don't let them in my house, of course, but they are at least happy in their ignorance of the greener grass in the paddock next door. I don't discount the possibility that I still need character development or have personality flaws to address. Pretentiousness may very well be one of them. Your criticism isn't exactly constructive, however. Suck me. Who said that I have a duty to be supportive of every dithering teenager who flies his broomstick across my horizon? Andre Jute Artist. Intellectual. Bicyclist. Sophisticate. Dressed daily in joggers. I at least have to dress professionally for work, so I might as well do it well. I realise that after a certain age, there's not much point in trying to look good, especially if you're married. I am still young by comparison to most here and a bachelor, so it's not yet a complete waste of time and effort. I put more effort into physical fitness than clothes though. A fat man in a $2000 suit is still a fat man, after all. Never had a 2000 dollar suit in my life. My suits were from Pierre Cardin's own hand (1), before he was famous, were cheap (if I paid for them at all, they might have been complimentary), and the dozen or so (which I wore with shirts off the last few bolts of Macclesfield silk that my fashion account exec snared) lasted until I gave up wearing suits for good and reverted to being a barefoot genius in a track suit. When I meet Nelson Mandela, I stretch all the way to unpressed chinos and an old yachting blazer. Note as a lesson in the snobbery of possessions that things have greater value than mere expense when they are unobtainable by anyone else (Cardin will never be young and unknown again, the silk mills of Macclesfield are silent forever). Note in the snobbery of superiority that inverse snobbery (unpressed chinos) works better than mere brand names (actually my chinos are off the rack at Marks & Spencer, the British parent of Brook Bros, but *you* shouldn't ever admit that). There you go, Bruce, you only have to ask and I give you a lesson in superficiality for which we will skip the gratitude. Andre Jute Trendiness coach (1) In an earlier sullen genius stage I wore suits of Irish linen cut for me by Lars Erik Christian of Copenhagen. The jackets had no sleeves and no pockets (I didn't carry money because I didn't have time to go anywhere where my company didn't run a tab and my assistants always had a hankie and a cigar and credit cards, on which I once bought a second Learjet because the ashtrays in the first one were full). The silk shirts I wore with these suits had no buttons either to press into my skin. Anyone who didn't like my navel could find another consultant. I wore no shoes and my minders rolled a carpet out of the plane to the car, and from the car to whichever building I wanted to enter. But you shouldn't try that either; you need real talent and productivity to be worth that much hassle and expense. |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Lord Valve wrote: .edu, huh? Lemme guess - you're so cool by now, your **** comes out wrapped in cellophane. LV Don't mind his Lordship's crack, Bruce. He really has a heart of gold. If you want sartorial advice, no one better to suck up to than Lord Valve, the leading pimp in Denver. Knock the .edu off your address before you write to him, as his ladies are always leaving him to go to college so that they can learn to speak like him. He's a cool cat in pinstripes with flares to match his black Jaguar with the red leather and a dolly with thigh boots and big bazoombas for a driver. Don't make any cracks about fat guys either--he's still hurting from having lost 8 stone in a bet about his willpower. Andre Jute Trendiness coach to aristocracy |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andre Jute wrote:
Bruce C. Miller wrote: Andre Jute wrote: You're not a Bohemian, Bruce, you're a snob. I would have thought you would have been more supportive. Why ever? If you lurk on RAT you will know I admire precision of thought and expression. But why should I stroke someone who hasn't even troubled to discover the correct name for what he aspires to? You don't even know what a Bohemian is. Bohemia was a part of central London inhabited by artists and people closely involved with them. Actually, that part of London is a part of Bohemia, rather than the other way around. Bohemianism manifested itself in various urban centers all over the Northern hemisphere. Painters, models, art dealers, are one example of a set of related bohemians. They produced works of art or were instrumental in producing them or in selling them. Someone who merely goes to a gallery to look at the painting made by Bohemian doesn't thereby become a Bohemian. Some Bohemians had a louche lifestyle, free love and all that, and some didn't wash too often, and some moved out to the countryside and committed incest with their daughers (Eric Gill), but the distinguishing mark of all was a life in the arts. (Note that all this is in the past tense. Bohemia is now inhabited by my publishers -- those who haven't yet moved further out, all of whom would be hugely flattered to be called louche and some of whom may still dream of being offered free love but all of whom would certainly not touch the person who offered it with a ten-foot pole.) Bohemianism doesn't describe what you are trying to do with your life. Bohemianism, in the way the term is generally used today, still refers to the international cultural movement that you mention in part. The lifestyle it represents is one much more "primitive" than to that which I aspire. This is why I qualified my usage of the label with the adjective "modern." Now, if we're done arguing semantics... If you had said merely that you want to be a cultured person, or stylish, or a trendy, or a hanger-on of the arts or intellectual life, I would have helped you out with a list of the right possessions, words and attitudes. Now that the communications revolution will put all information instantly at your fingertips, and all entertainment, literature, etc, we need enlightened, actively discriminating consumers of culture, which you are as specifically as you are not a Bohemian. (I suspect anyway from your writing and obsession with lists that you would be most uncomfortable with the general standard of hygiene among the arty-farties.) As you have observed with my mechanical obsession of list making (an obsession involving the making of a single list, by the way), art is an influence on my life but will never be a way of life. This is because while I am an eccentric, I am also a practical person. A non-relativist cannot give himself completely to art without corrupting his world view. Thus, I don't admire art or artists in the same way that I suspect the majority of true art devotees do. Take abstract art for an extreme example. While an artist can claim that a formless blob of paint can represent, say, a rebellion against architecture, I would say he's full of ****. However, I can appreciate such a painting on an aesthetic level. I can even more appreciate a clever and well executed metaphor in more realistic art or ones that effectively evoke emotions, but I won't worship it as some inexpressible cosmic gospel. This kind of limited appreciation will exclude me from any art groupie crowd. snip Additionally, these changes have happened slowly over the last 10 years or so. It's not like I woke up one day and decided I no longer liked Hollywood movies and was going to watch art films. In the case of film, for example, I gradually grew disenchanted with the assembly line of cookie cutter plots and gravitated more towards more thoughtful films, like I would assume any intelligent person would after getting a constant dose of Hollywood for years and years. I don't hate those who can find enjoyment out of a mindless action flick, but having experienced it countless times, I'm tired of it. If that makes me a snob, then I guess I am one. What makes you a snob is publicly expressed contempt for sound middle-class values, and dumb cracks about the proletariat. What makes you a snob is choosing some form of consumption because it is a minority interest. What makes you a snob is looking down on majority tastes. All of these solecisms you have publicly admitted to. In practice, I have a live and let live policy with our plebian friends. However, I shouldn't have to immediately follow a phrase like "no, I mainly only watch independent films" with the phrase "but I'm not a snob." An anti-cultural backlash awaits you in the majority of commoners out there. Try telling some of the locals in your area about your tastes in wines, electronics, and other finery and you'll experience it too. snip I could very well be quite intelligent. Or not. I don't think any of this stuff has much to do with true intellect. One could be a cultured idiot or an uncultured genius. To be cultured, discrimination, a learned art, is as good as true intellect. True intellect gives entree to intellectual activities peripheral to the arts, like criticism, and talent besides can make one an artist. None of this necessarily brings happiness. Critics want to be artists. True artists are never satisfied; the desire to do better is what drives them. I know many perfectly self-satisfied trendies; I don't let them in my house, of course, but they are at least happy in their ignorance of the greener grass in the paddock next door. I want to be and am an engineer, first and foremost. In whatever time I have left over from this, I want to experience the best of what the arts and the good life in general have to offer. The life of a starving artist is something I want to avoid, but that doesn't mean I have to be a trendy hanger-on. I can experience and even try my hand at art up to the point that it ceases to enrich my life. I have no intention of suffering for it. In addition, you'll notice that art appreciation is but one part of a larger development process. Just as important is time away from stimulus. Alot of people's lives are constant overstimulation from television, radio, traffic, and signs. I read on your site that you listen to music 12 hrs a day. I've found that time alone with one's thoughts can be just as enlightening as quality sensory input. My goal is simply to reduce the noise and improve the quality of the signal. |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce C. Miller" said:
snip You're digging yourself deeper and deeper into it, my boy. You value silence and like to be alone with your thoughts, you wrote. I suggest you continue doing so for a while, and post back to us when you have a clue as to why you get reactions like Andre's. You expected agreement and even appraisal, especially from him, and you're not getting it. Au contraire. To me, it is painfully clear why this is so. Confucius say: "Lead by example." *) *) but do so in silence -- "Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes." - Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005 |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
paul packer wrote:
On 4 Oct 2005 06:15:42 -0700, "Bruce C. Miller" wrote: Andre Jute wrote: snip I think you've been lucky so far not to meet a girl of genuine intellect and taste. When you do, her contempt for your pretentious shallowness will sear your soul. Hell, I'd be happy to meet one who wasn't crazy or just living for the next shopping fix. Besides, I haven't said anything about my own intellect. I could very well be quite intelligent. Or not. I don't think any of this stuff has much to do with true intellect. One could be a cultured idiot or an uncultured genius. Except that's more difficult than being a cultured genius or an uncultured idiot. Generally, people conform to stereotypes more often than not. I suggest you have an innate intelligence and discrimination that's leading you on a search for the better things in life, because there's something in you that needs sustenance. In other words, you've had enough Snickers bars. Now it's time for a nourishing salad roll. Precisely! I'm not sure what nerve gets struck in people when you tell them you don't subscribe to some common behavior you have decided you are better without. Perhaps it is indictative of some primal need for humans to enforce the status quo on fringe members of society. An unwashed peasant will see a man of sensible tastes drinking a fine wine and will ask, "wouldn't you be happier if you added a spot of poop to your wine?" The gentleman will of course reply "No, I prefer not to consume human feces." The peasant will then feel a strange need to become angry and mock the gentleman's lack of poor taste. I don't discount the possibility that I still need character development or have personality flaws to address. Pretentiousness may very well be one of them. Your criticism isn't exactly constructive, however. Actually it was pretty stupid. The only thing wrong with your post was that it was so honest I thought it was a put-on. That's because one just doesn't expect honesty on RAO. Ignore the knockers. Go on as you're going--straight on till morning. ;-) Thanks. Yes, I have better things to do than troll flamebait, which is why I seldom post here ![]() |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sander deWaal wrote:
"Bruce C. Miller" said: snip You're digging yourself deeper and deeper into it, my boy. You value silence and like to be alone with your thoughts, you wrote. I suggest you continue doing so for a while, and post back to us when you have a clue as to why you get reactions like Andre's. You expected agreement and even appraisal, especially from him, and you're not getting it. Au contraire. Well, he seems to have been set off by my use of a certain word. Hopefully my most recent reply will clear things up for him. To me, it is painfully clear why this is so. Confucius say: "Lead by example." *) *) but do so in silence The subject matter is benign, in my opinion. There are more important things in life than what movies we watch. Had my post been "The making of a modern Intelligensia" or "The making of a Moral Superior," then perhaps what Confucius says would be more relevant. Besides, I'm asking for advice, not preaching it. |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce C. Miller" said:
The subject matter is benign, in my opinion. There are more important things in life than what movies we watch. Had my post been "The making of a modern Intelligensia" or "The making of a Moral Superior," then perhaps what Confucius says would be more relevant. Besides, I'm asking for advice, not preaching it. Confucius say:"The quest for moral guidance lies within". -- "Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes." - Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005 |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sander deWaal wrote:
"Bruce C. Miller" said: The subject matter is benign, in my opinion. There are more important things in life than what movies we watch. Had my post been "The making of a modern Intelligensia" or "The making of a Moral Superior," then perhaps what Confucius says would be more relevant. Besides, I'm asking for advice, not preaching it. Confucius say:"The quest for moral guidance lies within". Confucius certainly talks alot for someone who suggests leading in silence. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've changed my mind. I think we should encourage young Bruce, as an
example toujours l'outrage. -- Andre Sander deWaal wrote: "Bruce C. Miller" said: snip You're digging yourself deeper and deeper into it, my boy. You value silence and like to be alone with your thoughts, you wrote. I suggest you continue doing so for a while, and post back to us when you have a clue as to why you get reactions like Andre's. You expected agreement and even appraisal, especially from him, and you're not getting it. Au contraire. To me, it is painfully clear why this is so. Confucius say: "Lead by example." *) *) but do so in silence -- "Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes." - Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005 |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce C. Miller" wrote in message oups.com... Andre Jute wrote: Bruce C. Miller wrote: Andre Jute wrote: You're not a Bohemian, Bruce, you're a snob. I would have thought you would have been more supportive. Why ever? If you lurk on RAT you will know I admire precision of thought and expression. But why should I stroke someone who hasn't even troubled to discover the correct name for what he aspires to? You don't even know what a Bohemian is. Bohemia was a part of central London inhabited by artists and people closely involved with them. Actually, that part of London is a part of Bohemia, rather than the other way around. Bohemianism manifested itself in various urban centers all over the Northern hemisphere. Painters, models, art dealers, are one example of a set of related bohemians. They produced works of art or were instrumental in producing them or in selling them. Someone who merely goes to a gallery to look at the painting made by Bohemian doesn't thereby become a Bohemian. Some Bohemians had a louche lifestyle, free love and all that, and some didn't wash too often, and some moved out to the countryside and committed incest with their daughers (Eric Gill), but the distinguishing mark of all was a life in the arts. (Note that all this is in the past tense. Bohemia is now inhabited by my publishers -- those who haven't yet moved further out, all of whom would be hugely flattered to be called louche and some of whom may still dream of being offered free love but all of whom would certainly not touch the person who offered it with a ten-foot pole.) Bohemianism doesn't describe what you are trying to do with your life. Bohemianism, in the way the term is generally used today, still refers to the international cultural movement that you mention in part. The lifestyle it represents is one much more "primitive" than to that which I aspire. This is why I qualified my usage of the label with the adjective "modern." Now, if we're done arguing semantics... If you had said merely that you want to be a cultured person, or stylish, or a trendy, or a hanger-on of the arts or intellectual life, I would have helped you out with a list of the right possessions, words and attitudes. Now that the communications revolution will put all information instantly at your fingertips, and all entertainment, literature, etc, we need enlightened, actively discriminating consumers of culture, which you are as specifically as you are not a Bohemian. (I suspect anyway from your writing and obsession with lists that you would be most uncomfortable with the general standard of hygiene among the arty-farties.) As you have observed with my mechanical obsession of list making (an obsession involving the making of a single list, by the way), art is an influence on my life but will never be a way of life. This is because while I am an eccentric, I am also a practical person. A non-relativist cannot give himself completely to art without corrupting his world view. Thus, I don't admire art or artists in the same way that I suspect the majority of true art devotees do. Take abstract art for an extreme example. While an artist can claim that a formless blob of paint can represent, say, a rebellion against architecture, I would say he's full of ****. However, I can appreciate such a painting on an aesthetic level. I can even more appreciate a clever and well executed metaphor in more realistic art or ones that effectively evoke emotions, but I won't worship it as some inexpressible cosmic gospel. This kind of limited appreciation will exclude me from any art groupie crowd. snip Additionally, these changes have happened slowly over the last 10 years or so. It's not like I woke up one day and decided I no longer liked Hollywood movies and was going to watch art films. In the case of film, for example, I gradually grew disenchanted with the assembly line of cookie cutter plots and gravitated more towards more thoughtful films, like I would assume any intelligent person would after getting a constant dose of Hollywood for years and years. I don't hate those who can find enjoyment out of a mindless action flick, but having experienced it countless times, I'm tired of it. If that makes me a snob, then I guess I am one. What makes you a snob is publicly expressed contempt for sound middle-class values, and dumb cracks about the proletariat. What makes you a snob is choosing some form of consumption because it is a minority interest. What makes you a snob is looking down on majority tastes. All of these solecisms you have publicly admitted to. In practice, I have a live and let live policy with our plebian friends. However, I shouldn't have to immediately follow a phrase like "no, I mainly only watch independent films" with the phrase "but I'm not a snob." An anti-cultural backlash awaits you in the majority of commoners out there. Try telling some of the locals in your area about your tastes in wines, electronics, and other finery and you'll experience it too. snip I could very well be quite intelligent. Or not. I don't think any of this stuff has much to do with true intellect. One could be a cultured idiot or an uncultured genius. To be cultured, discrimination, a learned art, is as good as true intellect. True intellect gives entree to intellectual activities peripheral to the arts, like criticism, and talent besides can make one an artist. None of this necessarily brings happiness. Critics want to be artists. True artists are never satisfied; the desire to do better is what drives them. I know many perfectly self-satisfied trendies; I don't let them in my house, of course, but they are at least happy in their ignorance of the greener grass in the paddock next door. I want to be and am an engineer, first and foremost. In whatever time I have left over from this, I want to experience the best of what the arts and the good life in general have to offer. The life of a starving artist is something I want to avoid, but that doesn't mean I have to be a trendy hanger-on. I can experience and even try my hand at art up to the point that it ceases to enrich my life. I have no intention of suffering for it. In addition, you'll notice that art appreciation is but one part of a larger development process. Just as important is time away from stimulus. Alot of people's lives are constant overstimulation from television, radio, traffic, and signs. I read on your site that you listen to music 12 hrs a day. I've found that time alone with one's thoughts can be just as enlightening as quality sensory input. My goal is simply to reduce the noise and improve the quality of the signal. I can't decide whether you are a bore or a boor. |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only one thing do you lack, grasshopper.
You must reduce your sleep to 90 minutes a night--then will you the illumination see. "Bruce C. Miller" wrote in message oups.com... Part time lurker, almost never a poster here... I wondered where to ask this, and I figure ROA and RAT is a good a place as any. Over the course of my life, I've been slowly eliminating unnecessary, plebian possessions, consumables, behaviors, and other aspects of my life that are otherwise unsophisticated, mundane, low-brow, and commonplace. As I've done so, I've grown more and more disdain for the proles and their monster truck rallies, pro wrestling, and walmart furniture. I feel there are certainly things I'm leaving out on my journey from middle class commoner to urbane, misanthropic sophisticate, though I am definitely on the right track. Help me complete the transformation by pointing out anything I've missed. So far, I have addressed the following categories: - Music: Went from mass-marketed pop to various avant-garde and obscure genres (almost exclusively on vinyl of course) - TV: Went from an average 20-30 hr/wk viewer to no TV at all (I still watch movies on the computer, however). - Movies: Went from Hollywood mechanical narratives to art house experimental and foreign films. - Stereo: Went from mass-fi shelf system to extremely expensive audiophile system. - Clothing: Went from typical 90s fad wear to a more mature, classic look, usually from European designers. - Books: Went from reading mystery and scifi to more obscure classic literature and obscure contemporary prose and poetry. - Food: Went from eating junk food to various ethnic cuisines, often Mediterranean (I plan to get better cooking skills soon). - Beverages: Switched from coffee to tea and from dark beers to premium reds. - Furnitu Threw out anything made out of fiber or particle board or veneered. Slowly replacing with handmade real wood and metal furniture. - Health: Quit binge drinking and smoking. Started a 3-day/wk exercise plan. That's about all I can think of right now. There are little things too, like replacing my touchtone phone with a vintage all-metal rotary. I'm not an anachrophile or a luddite. I only eliminate those things which cause more stress than they relieve. There many modern things I don't intend to change (like my computers) and many commonplace items which still have a place (like paper towels). |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Lord Valve wrote: Bruce C. Miller wrote: (A major snob rant is mercifully excised) .edu, huh? Lemme guess - you're so cool by now, your **** comes out wrapped in cellophane. LV Speaking of which, how's that college-loving daughter of yours doing this semester? (You must not hear from her very often, seeing as how you're probably blocking her .edu domain.) --E |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Andre Jute wrote: Lord Valve wrote: .edu, huh? Lemme guess - you're so cool by now, your **** comes out wrapped in cellophane. LV Don't mind his Lordship's crack, Bruce. He really has a heart of gold. If you want sartorial advice, no one better to suck up to than Lord Valve, the leading pimp in Denver. Knock the .edu off your address before you write to him, as his ladies are always leaving him to go to college so that they can learn to speak like him. He's a cool cat in pinstripes with flares to match his black Jaguar with the red leather and a dolly with thigh boots and big bazoombas for a driver. Don't make any cracks about fat guys either--he's still hurting from having lost 8 stone in a bet about his willpower. Hey - I remember that thread. ;-) Remember - I can see through you, Andre. ;-) LV |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 4 Oct 2005 18:24:42 -0400, "Clyde Slick"
wrote: In addition, you'll notice that art appreciation is but one part of a larger development process. Just as important is time away from stimulus. Alot of people's lives are constant overstimulation from television, radio, traffic, and signs. I read on your site that you listen to music 12 hrs a day. I've found that time alone with one's thoughts can be just as enlightening as quality sensory input. My goal is simply to reduce the noise and improve the quality of the signal. I can't decide whether you are a bore or a boor. And why does that conundrum raise its ugly head in your fevered brain, Art? |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Lord Valve wrote: Andre Jute wrote: Lord Valve wrote: .edu, huh? Lemme guess - you're so cool by now, your **** comes out wrapped in cellophane. LV Don't mind his Lordship's crack, Bruce. He really has a heart of gold. If you want sartorial advice, no one better to suck up to than Lord Valve, the leading pimp in Denver. Knock the .edu off your address before you write to him, as his ladies are always leaving him to go to college so that they can learn to speak like him. He's a cool cat in pinstripes with flares to match his black Jaguar with the red leather and a dolly with thigh boots and big bazoombas for a driver. Don't make any cracks about fat guys either--he's still hurting from having lost 8 stone in a bet about his willpower. Hey - I remember that thread. ;-) Remember - I can see through you, Andre. ;-) LV Oh, darn. And I so looked forward to being a troublemaker. Andre Jute Transparent |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Lord Valve wrote: Andre Jute wrote: Lord Valve wrote: .edu, huh? Lemme guess - you're so cool by now, your **** comes out wrapped in cellophane. LV Don't mind his Lordship's crack, Bruce. He really has a heart of gold. If you want sartorial advice, no one better to suck up to than Lord Valve, the leading pimp in Denver. Knock the .edu off your address before you write to him, as his ladies are always leaving him to go to college so that they can learn to speak like him. He's a cool cat in pinstripes with flares to match his black Jaguar with the red leather and a dolly with thigh boots and big bazoombas for a driver. Don't make any cracks about fat guys either--he's still hurting from having lost 8 stone in a bet about his willpower. Hey - I remember that thread. ;-) Remember - I can see through you, Andre. ;-) LV Oh, darn. And I so looked forward to being a troublemaker. Andre Jute Transparent |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
21st Century E-Commerce Money Making Formula | Audio Opinions | |||
21st Century E-Commerce Money Making Formula | Pro Audio | |||
Movie Making Manual Wikibook | Pro Audio | |||
Anyone making DC to Nashville trips in a van or truck? | Pro Audio | |||
Anyone making DC to Nashville trips in a van or truck? | Pro Audio |