Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Huh? No big fanfare about the Mbox 2?
I don't see any chat here about the new Mbox 2. What's up?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 15:38:57 -0700, k9audio wrote:
I don't see any chat here about the new Mbox 2. What's up? It's the Mbox, with midi sockets and a new case. The only impressive feature I saw in the Gizmondo preview was the 48GHz sampling rate. Should sort out the lack of top end sparkle we are struggling with when recording at just 192KHz. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I see ProTools M-Powered as bigger news. Many more I/F options for Protools
LE, and very cheap to get into. NS. "Mike Rivers" wrote in message oups.com... wrote: I don't see any chat here about the new Mbox 2. What's up? No publicity yet, I guess. What MBox 2? I've not heard of it yet. The hubhub I've heard was that Guitar Center was selling the original MBox for $350, complete with ProTools LE of course. That's a deal that's hard to pass up. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message
ups.com... I don't see any chat here about the new Mbox 2. What's up? Not much to say about it really. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 22:56:48 +0000, philicorda wrote:
The only impressive feature I saw in the Gizmondo preview was the 48GHz sampling rate. Should sort out the lack of top end sparkle we are struggling with when recording at just 192KHz. Arny, where are you? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 15:38:57 -0700, k9audio wrote:
I don't see any chat here about the new Mbox 2. What's up? Probably 'cause nobody here really gives much of a rat's ass. Are you a Digi shill or what? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The best news is that since it pushed down the retail price of MBoxes,
now the ones that were going for $375 on Craig's List will be a better deal at $250. And anyone that doesn't think a full MBox with PTools LE for that s in denial. I hate 4 input boxes that only give 2 of them via spdif. That's barely a plus at all. And I can't find any reference to USB 2.0 so it's not firewire or USB 2, adds midi port, 48k, two spdif inputs and for that they cycle a product? I don't get it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
well, one could think that they started seeing the street and used
price of the original Mbox going down, so they recycle it w/midi and a new box so that they can continue to get +400 for them. all with out much more cost to them. And people love brand new versions. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
philicorda wrote: On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 15:38:57 -0700, k9audio wrote: I don't see any chat here about the new Mbox 2. What's up? It's the Mbox, with midi sockets and a new case. The only impressive feature I saw in the Gizmondo preview was the 48GHz sampling rate. Should sort out the lack of top end sparkle we are struggling with when recording at just 192KHz. " Mbox 2 lets you to use two analog inputs and two channels of S/PDIF digital input at the same time to achieve four simultaneous channels of audio input." I always thought the mbox had a max of 2 channels in. David Correia www.Celebrationsound.com |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
The M-Audio Boxes leave it in the shade. They had to do something.
I'm waiting for the DIGI 007... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
James Bond recording stuff?
"studiorat" ha scritto nel messaggio oups.com... The M-Audio Boxes leave it in the shade. They had to do something. I'm waiting for the DIGI 007... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Federico wrote:
James Bond recording stuff? License to kill music? Rob R. "studiorat" ha scritto nel messaggio oups.com... The M-Audio Boxes leave it in the shade. They had to do something. I'm waiting for the DIGI 007... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I just took a quick look out of curiousity, and the new features in the
Mbox2 come with some tradeoffs compared to the original Mbox. First, the outputs are unbalanced. Second, the output level is slightly lower. Third, the noise is slightly higher. Fourth, the headphone amp is weenier and has only one jack. There may be other differences too... those are just what I noticed in a quick comparison. Whether or not any of those differences matter in a product at that price point is a valid question, particularly in light of the added features. -- "It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!" - Lorin David Schultz in the control room making even bad news sound good (Remove spamblock to reply) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Lorin David Schultz wrote: First, the outputs are unbalanced. Second, the output level is slightly lower. That's to take care of all the people who ask "Will it hurt my sound quality to connect it to an unbalanced input?" and "Why is the level so hot when I play a recording?" Third, the noise is slightly higher. That's so you can tell when it's turned on. Fourth, the headphone amp is weenier and has only one jack. A mini headphone jack? Obviously this is designed to be an accessory for the iPod. Did I miss an announcement that Apple bought out Avid? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Rob Reedijk wrote:
Federico wrote: "studiorat" ha scritto nel messaggio groups.com... The M-Audio Boxes leave it in the shade. They had to do something. I'm waiting for the DIGI 007... James Bond recording stuff? License to kill music? Unfortunately, that activity has not been regulated much at all. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Lorin David Schultz wrote: I just took a quick look out of curiousity, and the new features in the Mbox2 come with some tradeoffs compared to the original Mbox. First, the outputs are unbalanced. Yeah, and MBox has balanced outputs? In your dreams. Check again, mr genius. Second, the output level is slightly lower. Wrong. Third, the noise is slightly higher. Where are you RMAA graphics to show that? Fourth, the headphone amp is weenier and has only one jack. There may be other differences too... those are just what I noticed in a quick comparison. Yeah. I think there are more, like MIDI output and an uglier look. Were you too busy measuring the noise level to notice that? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
wrote:
Yeah, and MBox has balanced outputs? In your dreams. Check again, mr genius. Huh? What's with the attitude? Why do you need to be insulting to make your point? Of course the Mbox has balanced outputs. Where did you get the idea it doesn't? Second, the output level is slightly lower. Wrong. According to Digidesign's own specs: Original Mbox: Maximum Output: +4.2 dBu Mbox2: Maximum Output: +4 dBV You do the math (hint: it's not 200mV difference). Third, the noise is slightly higher. Where are you RMAA graphics to show that? I'm not nearly that interested -- all I did was compare Digi's own published specs on their web site. You can too. Yeah. I think there are more, like MIDI output and an uglier look. Were you too busy measuring the noise level to notice that? I can't even begin to imagine why you would have a problem with what I wrote, or why you would choose to both champion and denigrate the Mbox2 in the same post, but it doesn't really matter to me. I didn't say one was a better choice than the other, I said there's no such thing as a free lunch. The Mbox2 adds some features, but sacrifices others and does so at the expense of some of the specs. Like I said, whether the changes matter or not depends on the user's needs, preferences and expectations. -- "It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!" - Lorin David Schultz in the control room making even bad news sound good (Remove spamblock to reply) |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Huh? No big fanfare about the Mbox 2?
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:58:30 GMT, "Lorin David Schultz"
wrote: wrote: Yeah, and MBox has balanced outputs? In your dreams. Check again, mr genius. Huh? What's with the attitude? Why do you need to be insulting to make your point? Of course the Mbox has balanced outputs. Where did you get the idea it doesn't? Second, the output level is slightly lower. Wrong. According to Digidesign's own specs: Original Mbox: Maximum Output: +4.2 dBu Mbox2: Maximum Output: +4 dBV You do the math (hint: it's not 200mV difference). Third, the noise is slightly higher. Where are you RMAA graphics to show that? I'm not nearly that interested -- all I did was compare Digi's own published specs on their web site. You can too. Yeah. I think there are more, like MIDI output and an uglier look. Were you too busy measuring the noise level to notice that? I can't even begin to imagine why you would have a problem with what I wrote, or why you would choose to both champion and denigrate the Mbox2 in the same post, but it doesn't really matter to me. I didn't say one was a better choice than the other, I said there's no such thing as a free lunch. The Mbox2 adds some features, but sacrifices others and does so at the expense of some of the specs. Like I said, whether the changes matter or not depends on the user's needs, preferences and expectations. Tight. Stop frontin' |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Extension cable for the Digidesign Mbox | Pro Audio | |||
Mbox and DP 4.12 | Pro Audio | |||
several mbox, pro tools LE n logic audio questions | Pro Audio | |||
snap, crackle and pop on mbox | Pro Audio | |||
mbox and asio performance | Pro Audio |