Arny Krueger a écrit :

"Much of what we see here is contrived by/for the online environment."

On RAO everything is *bigger* than on any other newsgroups.

Do you already find elsewhere a guy as stupid as boony-boy... No !

Exhibitionists are here more naked than anywhere else.

Lionel

P.S.
I have done a very good joke yesterday but it has been drawned in a
muddy thread mainly polluted by Boon-the-worm. Please allow me to
reproduce it hereafter, thank you for your attention.

----------------------------------------
Mr. Middius said :
"I wonder what kind of accent "Lionel" (LOL! LOt"S!) has in English."

Marc Phillips answered :
"I bet he sounds like Mickey Mouse in French."

I answered them :
No, you are wrong... Marlon Brando !!!
In this famous scene in "The last tango in Paris" when Marlon say :
"Passe moi le beurre !".
You remember ? Yes, So I have the same accent but in english.
----------------------------------------

Very good isn'it ?

Lionel Chapuis said:

Arny Krueger a écrit :

"Much of what we see here is contrived by/for the online environment."

On RAO everything is *bigger* than on any other newsgroups.

Do you already find elsewhere a guy as stupid as boony-boy... No !

Exhibitionists are here more naked than anywhere else.

Lionel

P.S.
I have done a very good joke yesterday but it has been drawned in a
muddy thread mainly polluted by Boon-the-worm. Please allow me to
reproduce it hereafter, thank you for your attention.

----------------------------------------
Mr. Middius said :
"I wonder what kind of accent "Lionel" (LOL! LOt"S!) has in English."

Marc Phillips answered :
"I bet he sounds like Mickey Mouse in French."

I answered them :
No, you are wrong... Marlon Brando !!!
In this famous scene in "The last tango in Paris" when Marlon say :
"Passe moi le beurre !".
You remember ? Yes, So I have the same accent but in english.
----------------------------------------

Very good isn'it ?

No. In fact, it's very stupid. That's the problem with the sockpuppets who
defend Arny...they are uniformly stupid, boring, yet rabid. They think that
they can win a debate by merely screeching in agony at anything that disagrees
with them, and each one has resorted to name-calling when they've run out of
logic (if they had any to begin with).

Lionel, you sound just like a French version of Zakhann, who had it in for me
but was unable to express it in a way that was witty, concise, logical or
eloquent. In fact, Zakhann was vulgar, sloppy, inconsistent, and illiterate.
So are you.

One day, there will be a Kroopologist who is smart enough, and funny enough,
and logical enough to make us all look bad. But let's face it, every
Kroopologist is immediately at an advantage by defending someone who is a
proven pathological liar, hypocrite, and coward, not to mention a proven
pedophile. It's gonna take someone of extraordinary skills with the written
word NOT to eventually self-destruct, like Lionel here has, or Zakhann, or tor
b, or tony loban, or Paul Wagner, or Gene Steinberg, or...

Boon

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...

One day, there will be a Kroopologist who is smart enough, and funny
enough,
and logical enough to make us all look bad.


And his name won't be Stewart.











----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Yustabe said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...

One day, there will be a Kroopologist who is smart enough, and funny
enough,
and logical enough to make us all look bad.


And his name won't be Stewart.

Oh, there's no love lost between Stewart and Arny.

Boon

Marc Phillips a écrit :

No. In fact, it's very stupid. That's the problem with the sockpuppets who
defend Arny...they are uniformly stupid, boring, yet rabid. They think that
they can win a debate by merely screeching in agony at anything that disagrees
with them, and each one has resorted to name-calling when they've run out of
logic (if they had any to begin with).


Hey Boony-boy don't be so angry because you don't understand. It could
happen to all of us !
Me, for example, I don't understand anything you wrote about all these
guys I don't know and I never met, but please believe me I am not angry
now !

Ok boon you are not very intelligent, but perhaps in your real life you
have other qualities, perhaps you are a nice looking man who know ?

Lionel

P.S.
Do you know what "passe moi le beurre !" means ?

Lionel Chapuis said:

Marc Phillips a écrit :

P.S.
Do you know what "passe moi le beurre !" means ?


I'm sure you're referring to the scene where Marlon tells Maria to get out
the
butter.

Is that what you tell the kids?

Boon



This is what I will tell you !

Yeah, you're going to fly from France to LA just to **** a stranger on the
Internet in the ass.


LOL

No. You stopped being funny when you started being this stupid.

Time's almost up, sockpuppet.

Boon

Sockpuppet Yustabe said:

One day, there will be a Kroopologist who is smart enough, and funny enough,
and logical enough to make us all look bad.

And his name won't be Stewart.

Pinkie's avowed disgust for Mr. **** is one of his two redeeming
virtues. (The other one is his sense of humor, which, although not
swift and agile like a Ferrari, does get the job done.)




This post reformatted by the Resistance,
laboring tirelessly to de-Kroogerize Usenet.

Marc Phillips a écrit :

Yesterday
"Ah, Lionel, don't go away mad! You know what? I like you. You're very
amusing. And hysterical. And clearly a sockpuppet."

Today
"I wish I could say the same; I do not suffer fools gladly."

Overstated mood swing ?

Lionel Chapuis said:

Marc Phillips a écrit :

Yesterday
"Ah, Lionel, don't go away mad! You know what? I like you. You're very
amusing. And hysterical. And clearly a sockpuppet."

Today
"I wish I could say the same; I do not suffer fools gladly."

Overstated mood swing ?

Effective writing skills.

Boon

Lionel Chapuis lionel{dot}chapuis{at}free{dot}fr wrote in message ...
Marc Phillips a écrit :

No. In fact, it's very stupid. That's the problem with the sockpuppets who
defend Arny...they are uniformly stupid, boring, yet rabid. They think that
they can win a debate by merely screeching in agony at anything that disagrees
with them, and each one has resorted to name-calling when they've run out of
logic (if they had any to begin with).


Hey Boony-boy don't be so angry because you don't understand. It could
happen to all of us !
Me, for example, I don't understand anything you wrote about all these
guys I don't know and I never met, but please believe me I am not angry
now !

Ok boon you are not very intelligent, but perhaps in your real life you
have other qualities, perhaps you are a nice looking man who know ?

Lionel

P.S.
Do you know what "passe moi le beurre !" means ?

There is nothing redeemable about Ba-foon, he wasn't even born from
the womb of a woman, he is some other kind of creature. Also, I doubt
very seriously if he is a good looking person, he has ugly loser
written all over him.

(Marc Phillips) wrote in message ...
Yustabe said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...

One day, there will be a Kroopologist who is smart enough, and funny
enough,
and logical enough to make us all look bad.


And his name won't be Stewart.

Oh, there's no love lost between Stewart and Arny.

Boon


There is no love lost between you and the rest of humanity.

Torriesists said:

Hey Boony-boy don't be so angry because you don't understand. It could
happen to all of us !
Me, for example, I don't understand anything you wrote about all these
guys I don't know and I never met, but please believe me I am not angry
now !

Ok boon you are not very intelligent, but perhaps in your real life you
have other qualities, perhaps you are a nice looking man who know ?

Lionel

P.S.
Do you know what "passe moi le beurre !" means ?



Perhaps in real life you have other qualities, perhaps you are an ugly, fat,
failure recording engineer that has also an AOL account yes?

Well, it's become pretty obvious that the many Kroopologists we've seen lately
are really just one or two guys at the most. Arny has to be really bummed that
this is the best support he can muster.

Boon

Marc Phillips a écrit :

Well, it's become pretty obvious that the many Kroopologists we've seen lately
are really just one or two guys at the most. Arny has to be really bummed that
this is the best support he can muster.

Boon



I don't care about the others, Boony-boy, just try to drive your
attention these are the same paranoid arguments you use to criticize
speaking about Mr. Krueger (considering the number of guys he has vexed
here on RAO I'm sure he is right).

Anyway, Little-worm, let's imagine that this thread is an other troll
concerning Arnold Krueger, the experience show that it would have
implied, let's say, 5 or 6 anti-Krueger participants... Right ?
In the present case, except the hypothetic, ectoplasmic Georg M.
Middius(*) you are strangely alone... Does it mean that most of them
doesn't really appreciate your arguments ? Who know ?

(*)Far from trolling about the content I'd just want to note that the
quality of is contribution is dangerously decreasing.

Marc Phillips said:

Well, it's become pretty obvious that the many Kroopologists we've seen lately
are really just one or two guys at the most. Arny has to be really bummed that
this is the best support he can muster.

They do manage to put out a lot of posts, don't they. Perhaps their
goal is the same as Krooger's -- to throw out so much **** that the
toilet gets stopped up. That way RAO resembles the rest of Turdborg's
life.

Lionel Chapuis said:

Marc Phillips a écrit :

Well, it's become pretty obvious that the many Kroopologists we've seen
lately
are really just one or two guys at the most. Arny has to be really bummed
that
this is the best support he can muster.

Boon



I don't care about the others, Boony-boy, just try to drive your
attention these are the same paranoid arguments you use to criticize
speaking about Mr. Krueger (considering the number of guys he has vexed
here on RAO I'm sure he is right).

Anyway, Little-worm, let's imagine that this thread is an other troll
concerning Arnold Krueger, the experience show that it would have
implied, let's say, 5 or 6 anti-Krueger participants... Right ?
In the present case, except the hypothetic, ectoplasmic Georg M.
Middius(*) you are strangely alone... Does it mean that most of them
doesn't really appreciate your arguments ? Who know ?

(*)Far from trolling about the content I'd just want to note that the
quality of is contribution is dangerously decreasing.

Again, the quality of your English is very inconsistent. Sometimes it is
flawless, and sometimes it's a mess. It's becoming very hard to take you
seriously, especially since it appears that you aren't really saying anything
of substance. Maybe you're just trying to distract me away from Arny, hmmm?

Maybe I should just start ignoring you. Would that make you cry?

Boon

Marc Phillips a écrit :


Maybe I should just start ignoring you. Would that make you cry?

Boon



Honestly ?
I thing you have already take to much time to take this decision.
You're a moron, a coward it's not really new.
You are not really intelligent, you have given me so many proofs.

Why a normal human being would continue to humiliate himself ?

Just one question to finish : do you play chess ?