It's just so terrible that Normals mock Clerkenstein about his plagiarism.
He's a holy warrior for the Hivie cause, so he should be exempt from common
standards of decency, right?

Krooger boasting about keeping kiddie porn on his computer for years ...
silly of anybody to worry. After all, Arnii is a churchgoin', God-fearin'
Regler Murrican Guy, right?

Bwian Mc****head almost getting Phoebe Johnston fired ... well, we can't
blame Bwian for that, can we? No, let's blame George. That fits our agenda.
Blaming Bwian for his own actions would be wrong because Bwian is also a
holy warrior against the E.H.E.E.

Now let's see.... All those Normals have slandered Clerkie by rubbing his
face in his plagiarism. Naughty, naughty Normals. And they've slandered the
Kroo by calling him to account for his *****admitted****** hosting of kiddie
porn, and for his public airing of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest fantasies.
So let's attack the Normals for trying over and over to get these two
upstanding holy warriors to take responsibility for their own actions. Silly
of them, wasn't it? Clerkie and the Krooborg needn't be held accountable.
That's because they're Special Persons. Didn't you Normals realize that?

Go on now. Leave Them be.

'lil Georgie gurgled:

So let's attack the Normals...

You "normal"???!!!!
Talk about Orwellian doublespeak...


GeoSynch

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote
in message ...


It's just so terrible that Normals mock Clerkenstein about his plagiarism.
He's a holy warrior for the Hivie cause, so he should be exempt from
common
standards of decency, right?

Krooger boasting about keeping kiddie porn on his computer for years ...
silly of anybody to worry. After all, Arnii is a churchgoin', God-fearin'
Regler Murrican Guy, right?

Bwian Mc****head almost getting Phoebe Johnston fired ... well, we can't
blame Bwian for that, can we? No, let's blame George. That fits our
agenda.
Blaming Bwian for his own actions would be wrong because Bwian is also a
holy warrior against the E.H.E.E.

Now let's see.... All those Normals have slandered Clerkie by rubbing his
face in his plagiarism. Naughty, naughty Normals. And they've slandered
the
Kroo by calling him to account for his *****admitted****** hosting of
kiddie
porn, and for his public airing of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest
fantasies.
So let's attack the Normals for trying over and over to get these two
upstanding holy warriors to take responsibility for their own actions.
Silly
of them, wasn't it? Clerkie and the Krooborg needn't be held accountable.
That's because they're Special Persons. Didn't you Normals realize that?

Go on now. Leave Them be.


For best effect, read it as if it were presented by John Cleese.





----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message


And they've slandered the Kroo by calling him to account
for
his *****admitted****** hosting of kiddie porn, and for
his
public airing of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest fantasies.

The files in question were sent to me by unknown person(s)
who were trying to leverage off the death of my son by tying
his death to graphic sexual images. I deleted the files, but
they remained on my hard drive in Outlook Express's deleted
files folder. The files were reconstructed for examination
by an officer of the Michigan State Police, who pronounced
them to be fake kiddie porn - they were actually pictures of
adults.

As far as the public airing of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest
fantasies goes, the authors of the fantasies were mostly
Middius himself and Graham, "The Devil". The essence of my
"airing" was complaining about their many vile postings.
Again, Middius and Gragham were trying to leverage off the
death of my son by tying his name to horrific violent acts.

Why does Middius dredge all this up, so many years later? I
guess he's just trying to relive what he believes to be his
past *glories*. Very sad.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message


And they've slandered the Kroo by calling him to account
for
his *****admitted****** hosting of kiddie porn, and for
his
public airing of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest fantasies.

The files in question were sent to me by unknown person(s)
who were trying to leverage off the death of my son by tying
his death to graphic sexual images. I deleted the files, but
they remained on my hard drive in Outlook Express's deleted
files folder. The files were reconstructed for examination
by an officer of the Michigan State Police, who pronounced
them to be fake kiddie porn - they were actually pictures of
adults.

As far as the public airing of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest
fantasies goes, the authors of the fantasies were mostly
Middius himself and Graham, "The Devil". The essence of my
"airing" was complaining about their many vile postings.
Again, Middius and Gragham were trying to leverage off the
death of my son by tying his name to horrific violent acts.

Why does Middius dredge all this up, so many years later? I
guess he's just trying to relive what he believes to be his
past *glories*. Very sad.


The whole story is a fake. There never were any files.
There was no MSP investigation. This was a pathetic
sympathy troll that got out of hand. Each time
we caught Arny in a lie or inconsistency, he would
cover it up by making yet another lie. Arny's whole story
is one big pathetic sick exhibition of his
pyschological pathologies.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message


The whole story is a fake. There never were any files.
There was no MSP investigation.

Prove it.

The Krooborg whined:

Why does Middius dredge all this up, so many years later?

snicker

It's a good thing you don't have a conscience, Turdy. Else you'd be unable
to live with yourself.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message


The whole story is a fake. There never were any files.
There was no MSP investigation.

Prove it.


You have been making these ridiculous allegations for years.
You are the one who has been accusing a multitude
of your 'enemies' of sending you kiddie porn.
You prove it! Every time you tried to, you
just kept digging a deeper hole for yourself.
Like the forged email headers you provided. Lordy,
even if the headers were true, its no proof
as to the content or attachments to the email.

You can't prove it, because it has all been a gigantic
series of dirty rotten slanderous lies, flowing
out of your sick and perverted imagination.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

George M. Middius a écrit :

Else you'd be unable
to live with yourself.

Experience is speaking.

Clyde Slick said to Turdborg:

You can't prove it, because it has all been a gigantic
series of dirty rotten slanderous lies, flowing
out of your sick and perverted imagination.

.... which is not a crime, note.

George "Faust" Middius wrote :

It's a good thing you don't have a conscience, Turdy. Else you'd be unable
to live with yourself

Experience is speaking...
George has swapped his conscience against a second asshole. ;-)

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message


The whole story is a fake. There never were any files.
There was no MSP investigation.

Prove it.

You have been making these ridiculous allegations for
years.

A fact that proves nothing.

You are the one who has been accusing a multitude
of your 'enemies' of sending you kiddie porn.

A fact that proves nothing.

You prove it!

Not my job.

Every time you tried to, you
just kept digging a deeper hole for yourself.

A unsubstantiated opinion from a highly biased source.

Like the forged email headers you provided.

It's like someone would send me such a thing by 100%
tracable, legitimate means.

Lordy, even if the headers were true, its no proof
as to the content or attachments to the email.

Not my problem, Art. You're the one who started out making
allegations this morning. I'm perfectly happy to let the
issue die. You aren't. So now, why not take responsibility
for your own actions?

You can't prove it,

I *can* prove that Devil and Middius repeatedly posted their
necrophilia/pedophilia/incest fantasies on RAO. Why do you
give them free passes to do this, Art?

because it has all been a gigantic
series of dirty rotten slanderous lies,

Yup, dirty rotten slanderous lies posted on RAO by Middius
and his clique.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Not my problem, Art. You're the one who started out making
allegations this morning.

A transparent LIE!


You started the morning off with this lie:
"The files in question were sent to me by unknown person(s)
who were trying to leverage off the death of my son by tying
his death to graphic sexual images."



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

"Lionel" wrote in message

George M. Middius a écrit :

Else you'd be unable
to live with yourself.

Experience is speaking.

Here's a couple of speculative thoughts.

(1) One of the areas where "The Tape" file that John
Atkinson sent me is incomplete, is that half of the
conversation, presumably by the caller who is known here as
"The Devil", is missing.

Obviously, the caller, who known around here as "The Devil"
feared that he would be identified based on the sound of his
voice. Whose voice would be instantly recognizable to RAO
readers, particularly at this time, particularly since the
posting of the HE2005 debate?

(2) Atkinson has long been adamant that none of his staff
ever posts on RAO. I've always contended that if people post
on RAO under aliases that Atkinson doesn't know, he can't
properly make this claim.

One way that Atkinson could know for sure that his staff
never posts on RAO is if he knows the true identity of
*every* person who posts on RAO, including say "The Devil".
One way Atkinson could know the true identity of "The Devil"
would be if "The Devil" was indeed Atkinson himself.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Not my problem, Art. You're the one who started out
making
allegations this morning.

A transparent LIE!


You started the morning off with this lie:
"The files in question were sent to me by unknown
person(s)
who were trying to leverage off the death of my son by
tying
his death to graphic sexual images."

The thread's OP was Middius. The author of the post I
responded to was by Middius and contained the following:

George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message


And they've slandered the Kroo by calling him to account
for
his ****admitted***** hosting of kiddie porn, and for his
public airing of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest fantasies.

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message
news
Clyde Slick said to Turdborg:

You can't prove it, because it has all been a gigantic
series of dirty rotten slanderous lies, flowing
out of your sick and perverted imagination.

... which is not a crime, note.

However, your long term habit of posting lies and slander of
me might be actionable, except for the fact that being the
coward you are Middius, you've avoided using my true name,
or admitting that the various perversions of it that you've
used were related to me.

Bascially Middius, you're just a rank coward who hides
behind a series of aliases.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Lionel" wrote in message

George M. Middius a écrit :

Else you'd be unable
to live with yourself.

Experience is speaking.

Here's a couple of speculative thoughts.

(1) One of the areas where "The Tape" file that John
Atkinson sent me is incomplete, is that half of the
conversation, presumably by the caller who is known here as
"The Devil", is missing.

Obviously, the caller, who known around here as "The Devil"
feared that he would be identified based on the sound of his
voice. Whose voice would be instantly recognizable to RAO
readers, particularly at this time, particularly since the
posting of the HE2005 debate?

(2) Atkinson has long been adamant that none of his staff
ever posts on RAO. I've always contended that if people post
on RAO under aliases that Atkinson doesn't know, he can't
properly make this claim.

One way that Atkinson could know for sure that his staff
never posts on RAO is if he knows the true identity of
*every* person who posts on RAO, including say "The Devil".
One way Atkinson could know the true identity of "The Devil"
would be if "The Devil" was indeed Atkinson himself.



Arny is totally UNHINGED!!!!!!!!!!
It finally happened~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Clyde Slick said to Mr. ****:

You started the morning off with this lie:
"The files in question were sent to me by unknown person(s)
who were trying to leverage off the death of my son by tying
his death to graphic sexual images."

Yes, Arnii, explain how that is not a lie. It's completely untrue, as in
false, fabricated, contrary to reality. And it was said with the deliberate
attempt to deceive.

Is it your testimony that since you're a Special Person, reality doesn't
enter into your tapestry of lies? That because you're demented, you escape
being responsible for your crimes? If that's your pleading, just say so.
That will be the end of this chapter as far as I'm concerned. I'm sure the
other Normals will also be sympathetic to such a plea.

Feel free to consult with Thing and Slut if you need guidance.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
news
"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Not my problem, Art. You're the one who started out
making
allegations this morning.

A transparent LIE!


You started the morning off with this lie:
"The files in question were sent to me by unknown
person(s)
who were trying to leverage off the death of my son by
tying
his death to graphic sexual images."

The thread's OP was Middius. The author of the post I
responded to was by Middius and contained the following:

George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast
[dot] net wrote in message


And they've slandered the Kroo by calling him to account
for
his ****admitted***** hosting of kiddie porn, and for his
public airing of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest fantasies.



Well Arny!!!
Thank you for admitting that you were lying when you said this:
" Not my problem, Art. You're the one who started out
making allegations this morning."
That is, unless you want to throw another tantrum
nd claim that George and I are the same person.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 08:21:17 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


I *can* prove that Devil and Middius repeatedly posted their
necrophilia/pedophilia/incest fantasies on RAO. Why do you
give them free passes to do this, Art?


Why do YOU get free passes for doing the same thing?

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Lionel" wrote in message

George M. Middius a écrit :

Else you'd be unable
to live with yourself.

Experience is speaking.

Here's a couple of speculative thoughts.

(1) One of the areas where "The Tape" file that John
Atkinson sent me is incomplete, is that half of the
conversation, presumably by the caller who is known here as
"The Devil", is missing.

Obviously, the caller, who known around here as "The Devil"
feared that he would be identified based on the sound of his
voice. Whose voice would be instantly recognizable to RAO
readers, particularly at this time, particularly since the
posting of the HE2005 debate?

The point was that it was you on "The Tape." IIRC, that excerpt was
posted months if not years before the debate.

(2) Atkinson has long been adamant that none of his staff
ever posts on RAO. I've always contended that if people post
on RAO under aliases that Atkinson doesn't know, he can't
properly make this claim.

One way that Atkinson could know for sure that his staff
never posts on RAO is if he knows the true identity of
*every* person who posts on RAO, including say "The Devil".
One way Atkinson could know the true identity of "The Devil"
would be if "The Devil" was indeed Atkinson himself.

Nope. To apply your logic, wouldn't his voice be "instantly
recognizable" to you? You've heard them both.

Here's a speculative thought: "The Devil" was right to obscure his part
of the conversation considering your unfounded speculation at this time.

Stephen

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message


Thank you for admitting that you were lying when you said
this:
" Not my problem, Art. You're the one who started out
making allegations this morning."

It's true that sometimes I can't believe that you and
Middius are as stupid as you are, and not be the same
person. I sometimes can' imagine why anybody with a brain
would defend Middius as strongly as you do, and not be one
of his sockpuppets.

Clyde Slick a écrit :

George and I are the same person.

That's not wrong since you are George's third asshole.

"MINe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Lionel" wrote in message

George M. Middius a écrit :

Else you'd be unable
to live with yourself.

Experience is speaking.

Here's a couple of speculative thoughts.

(1) One of the areas where "The Tape" file that John
Atkinson sent me is incomplete, is that half of the
conversation, presumably by the caller who is known here
as
"The Devil", is missing.

Obviously, the caller, who known around here as "The
Devil"
feared that he would be identified based on the sound of
his
voice. Whose voice would be instantly recognizable to RAO
readers, particularly at this time, particularly since
the
posting of the HE2005 debate?

The point was that it was you on "The Tape." IIRC, that
excerpt was posted months if not years before the debate.

You must be privy to something I don't know, Stephen. You
also seem to think you know quite a bit about a file that
Atkinson sent me by private email. Why is that?

(2) Atkinson has long been adamant that none of his
staff
ever posts on RAO. I've always contended that if people
post
on RAO under aliases that Atkinson doesn't know, he can't
properly make this claim.

One way that Atkinson could know for sure that his staff
never posts on RAO is if he knows the true identity of
*every* person who posts on RAO, including say "The
Devil".
One way Atkinson could know the true identity of "The
Devil"
would be if "The Devil" was indeed Atkinson himself.

Nope. To apply your logic, wouldn't his voice be
"instantly
recognizable" to you? You've heard them both.

Not in any reasonably close proximity.

Here's a speculative thought: "The Devil" was right to
obscure
his part of the conversation considering your unfounded
speculation at this time.

Which unfounded speculation might that be?

Stephen, do you deny that "The Devil" and Middius posted
quite a large number of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest
fantasies on RAO?

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MINe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Lionel" wrote in message

George M. Middius a écrit :

Else you'd be unable
to live with yourself.

Experience is speaking.

Here's a couple of speculative thoughts.

(1) One of the areas where "The Tape" file that John
Atkinson sent me is incomplete, is that half of the
conversation, presumably by the caller who is known here
as
"The Devil", is missing.

Obviously, the caller, who known around here as "The
Devil"
feared that he would be identified based on the sound of
his
voice. Whose voice would be instantly recognizable to RAO
readers, particularly at this time, particularly since
the
posting of the HE2005 debate?

The point was that it was you on "The Tape." IIRC, that
excerpt was posted months if not years before the debate.

You must be privy to something I don't know, Stephen. You
also seem to think you know quite a bit about a file that
Atkinson sent me by private email. Why is that?

You'll find this was discussed right here on RAO.

Another point is that it's the same recording that was distributed to
many RAO regulars years ago. The only reason I haven't deleted my copy
is that it's on my old computer which hasn't been powered up since 2003
or so.

(2) Atkinson has long been adamant that none of his
staff
ever posts on RAO. I've always contended that if people
post
on RAO under aliases that Atkinson doesn't know, he can't
properly make this claim.

One way that Atkinson could know for sure that his staff
never posts on RAO is if he knows the true identity of
*every* person who posts on RAO, including say "The
Devil".
One way Atkinson could know the true identity of "The
Devil"
would be if "The Devil" was indeed Atkinson himself.

Nope. To apply your logic, wouldn't his voice be
"instantly
recognizable" to you? You've heard them both.

Not in any reasonably close proximity.

All Brits sound the same to you? JA has a slight speech impediment,
according to him in posts on RAO. Proximity would not be required.

Here's a speculative thought: "The Devil" was right to
obscure
his part of the conversation considering your unfounded
speculation at this time.

Which unfounded speculation might that be?

Your previous post.

Stephen, do you deny that "The Devil" and Middius posted
quite a large number of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest
fantasies on RAO?

It's all in Google.

Stephen

"MINe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MINe 109" wrote in message


In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Lionel" wrote in message

George M. Middius a écrit :

Else you'd be unable
to live with yourself.

Experience is speaking.

Here's a couple of speculative thoughts.

(1) One of the areas where "The Tape" file that John
Atkinson sent me is incomplete, is that half of the
conversation, presumably by the caller who is known
here
as
"The Devil", is missing.

Obviously, the caller, who known around here as "The
Devil"
feared that he would be identified based on the sound
of
his
voice. Whose voice would be instantly recognizable to
RAO
readers, particularly at this time, particularly since
the
posting of the HE2005 debate?

The point was that it was you on "The Tape." IIRC, that
excerpt was posted months if not years before the
debate.

You must be privy to something I don't know, Stephen. You
also seem to think you know quite a bit about a file that
Atkinson sent me by private email. Why is that?

You'll find this was discussed right here on RAO.

Could you be less specific and informative, Stephen?

Another point is that it's the same recording that was
distributed to many RAO regulars years ago.

Same question. You seem to be claiming perfect knowlege
about my private email, Stephen. How do you know that the
two files are in fact identical?

The only reason I
haven't deleted my copy is that it's on my old computer
which
hasn't been powered up since 2003 or so.

Irrelevant.

(2) Atkinson has long been adamant that none of his
staff
ever posts on RAO. I've always contended that if people
post
on RAO under aliases that Atkinson doesn't know, he
can't
properly make this claim.

One way that Atkinson could know for sure that his
staff
never posts on RAO is if he knows the true identity of
*every* person who posts on RAO, including say "The
Devil".
One way Atkinson could know the true identity of "The
Devil"
would be if "The Devil" was indeed Atkinson himself.

Nope. To apply your logic, wouldn't his voice be
"instantly
recognizable" to you? You've heard them both.

Not in any reasonably close proximity.

All Brits sound the same to you?

Irrelevant, and insulting.

JA has a slight speech
impediment, according to him in posts on RAO. Proximity
would
not be required.

I know no such thing.

Why don't know what he sounds like given that there is a
lengthy voice recording of it on the web?

Here's a speculative thought: "The Devil" was right to
obscure
his part of the conversation considering your unfounded
speculation at this time.

Which unfounded speculation might that be?

Your previous post.

Except this is just baseless name-calling on your part,
Stephen.

Stephen, do you deny that "The Devil" and Middius posted
quite a large number of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest
fantasies on RAO?

It's all in Google.

It's pretty damning, isn't it?

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MINe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MINe 109" wrote in message


In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Lionel" wrote in message

George M. Middius a écrit :

Else you'd be unable
to live with yourself.

Experience is speaking.

Here's a couple of speculative thoughts.

(1) One of the areas where "The Tape" file that John
Atkinson sent me is incomplete, is that half of the
conversation, presumably by the caller who is known
here
as
"The Devil", is missing.

Obviously, the caller, who known around here as "The
Devil"
feared that he would be identified based on the sound
of
his
voice. Whose voice would be instantly recognizable to
RAO
readers, particularly at this time, particularly since
the
posting of the HE2005 debate?

The point was that it was you on "The Tape." IIRC, that
excerpt was posted months if not years before the
debate.

You must be privy to something I don't know, Stephen. You
also seem to think you know quite a bit about a file that
Atkinson sent me by private email. Why is that?

You'll find this was discussed right here on RAO.

Could you be less specific and informative, Stephen?

Yes.

Another point is that it's the same recording that was
distributed to many RAO regulars years ago.

Same question. You seem to be claiming perfect knowlege
about my private email, Stephen. How do you know that the
two files are in fact identical?

I assume they are not identical: one is abridged and removes or obscures
the Devil's side of the conversation.

The only reason I
haven't deleted my copy is that it's on my old computer
which
hasn't been powered up since 2003 or so.

Irrelevant.

It's old, old news.

(2) Atkinson has long been adamant that none of his
staff
ever posts on RAO. I've always contended that if people
post
on RAO under aliases that Atkinson doesn't know, he
can't
properly make this claim.

One way that Atkinson could know for sure that his
staff
never posts on RAO is if he knows the true identity of
*every* person who posts on RAO, including say "The
Devil".
One way Atkinson could know the true identity of "The
Devil"
would be if "The Devil" was indeed Atkinson himself.

Nope. To apply your logic, wouldn't his voice be
"instantly
recognizable" to you? You've heard them both.

Not in any reasonably close proximity.

All Brits sound the same to you?

Irrelevant, and insulting.

It saves time to manufacture offenses, doesn't it?

JA has a slight speech
impediment, according to him in posts on RAO. Proximity
would
not be required.

I know no such thing.

Why don't know what he sounds like given that there is a
lengthy voice recording of it on the web?

Maybe you can't identify voices on the phone. Your next bit is garbled,
but I don't need to know what JA sounds like to know he's not on "The
Tape."

Here's a speculative thought: "The Devil" was right to
obscure
his part of the conversation considering your unfounded
speculation at this time.

Which unfounded speculation might that be?

Your previous post.

Except this is just baseless name-calling on your part,
Stephen.

Except that it's not baseless and it's not name-calling.

Stephen, do you deny that "The Devil" and Middius posted
quite a large number of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest
fantasies on RAO?

It's all in Google.

It's pretty damning, isn't it?

You're in Google, too.

The Krooborg has charged up his AutoLying module.

And they've slandered the Kroo by calling him to account for
his *****admitted****** hosting of kiddie porn, and for his
public airing of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest fantasies.

The files in question were sent to me

Arnii, Arnii, Arnii. It's apparent you're still ignoring your doctor's orders.
what's that? No doctor? Oh, how dreadful for you. All those years of disability
payments but no proper health care. Very sad.

I don't think there is a cure for sociopathy or paranoia, but there are
treatments to help you cope better. Are you going to postpone treatment until
your poor family have to have you confined for your own protection?

Poor little Slut. The best she can do is imitate IKYABWAIBorg's weakest
rejoinders.

Else you'd be unable to live with yourself.

Experience is speaking.

Are you sticking out your tongue at the monitor as you type that, Slut?

"MINe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MINe 109" wrote in message


In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MINe 109" wrote in message



In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"Lionel" wrote in message

George M. Middius a écrit :

Else you'd be unable
to live with yourself.

Experience is speaking.

Here's a couple of speculative thoughts.

(1) One of the areas where "The Tape" file that John
Atkinson sent me is incomplete, is that half of the
conversation, presumably by the caller who is known
here
as "The Devil", is missing.

Obviously, the caller, who known around here as "The
Devil"
feared that he would be identified based on the sound
of
his voice. Whose voice would be instantly
recognizable to
RAO
readers, particularly at this time, particularly
since
the
posting of the HE2005 debate?

The point was that it was you on "The Tape." IIRC,
that
excerpt was posted months if not years before the
debate.

You must be privy to something I don't know, Stephen.
You
also seem to think you know quite a bit about a file
that
Atkinson sent me by private email. Why is that?

You'll find this was discussed right here on RAO.

Could you be less specific and informative, Stephen?

Yes.

I''l bet. And to drive your point home Stephen, you make a
valiant effort at the same. Trouble is, your evasions tell a
sad story about your character, or lack thereof.

Another point is that it's the same recording that was
distributed to many RAO regulars years ago.

Same question. You seem to be claiming perfect knowlege
about my private email, Stephen. How do you know that the
two files are in fact identical?

I assume they are not identical: one is abridged and
removes
or obscures the Devil's side of the conversation.

Chance of story noted.

The only reason I
haven't deleted my copy is that it's on my old computer
which
hasn't been powered up since 2003 or so.

Irrelevant.

It's old, old news.

Doooh!

(2) Atkinson has long been adamant that none of his
staff
ever posts on RAO. I've always contended that if
people post
on RAO under aliases that Atkinson doesn't know, he
can't
properly make this claim.

One way that Atkinson could know for sure that his
staff
never posts on RAO is if he knows the true identity
of
*every* person who posts on RAO, including say "The
Devil".
One way Atkinson could know the true identity of "The
Devil"
would be if "The Devil" was indeed Atkinson himself.

Nope. To apply your logic, wouldn't his voice be
"instantly
recognizable" to you? You've heard them both.

Not in any reasonably close proximity.

All Brits sound the same to you?

Irrelevant, and insulting.

It saves time to manufacture offenses, doesn't it?

I'll leave that to you, Stephen. You obviously tried to
manufacture this offense.

JA has a slight speech
impediment, according to him in posts on RAO. Proximity
would
not be required.

I know no such thing.

Why don't know what he sounds like given that there is a
lengthy voice recording of it on the web?

Maybe you can't identify voices on the phone.

Maybe I can't identify voices that are obliterated. Indeed,
its quite certain that I can't identify voices that are
obliterated.

Your next bit is
garbled, but I don't need to know what JA sounds like to
know
he's not on "The Tape."

That's an interesting clam Stephen. I'll bet that you can't
clarify it very much.

Here's a speculative thought: "The Devil" was right to
obscure
his part of the conversation considering your
unfounded
speculation at this time.

Which unfounded speculation might that be?

Your previous post.

Except this is just baseless name-calling on your part,
Stephen.

Except that it's not baseless and it's not name-calling.

Prove it.

Stephen, do you deny that "The Devil" and Middius
posted
quite a large number of necrophilia/pedophilia/incest
fantasies on RAO?

It's all in Google.

It's pretty damning, isn't it?

You're in Google, too.

So what? I'm in google as objecting to the Devil's lies and
slanders, as well as those of Middius. One thing that is
quite clear Stephen is how evasive you become when it comes
to commenting on their evil deeds. Why is that?

More empty boasting from AutoLiarBorg.

I *can* prove that Devil and Middius repeatedly posted their
necrophilia/pedophilia/incest fantasies on RAO.

Go ahead and prove it, Turdy.

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

Could you be less specific and informative, Stephen?

Yes.

I''l bet. And to drive your point home Stephen, you make a
valiant effort at the same. Trouble is, your evasions tell a
sad story about your character, or lack thereof.

You're making stuff up. Give it a rest.

Stephen

"MINe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

Could you be less specific and informative, Stephen?

Yes.

I''l bet. And to drive your point home Stephen, you make
a
valiant effort at the same. Trouble is, your evasions
tell a
sad story about your character, or lack thereof.

You're making stuff up. Give it a rest.

This is just another example of Stepehen's heavy-duty
evasiveness.

Probably, something about sockpuppets and guilt.

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

Here's a speculative thought: "The Devil" was right to
obscure
his part of the conversation considering your
unfounded
speculation at this time.

Which unfounded speculation might that be?

Your previous post.

Except this is just baseless name-calling on your part,
Stephen.

Except that it's not baseless and it's not name-calling.

Prove it.

Your speculation that JA is really Graham (or vice versa) is unsupported
by your evidence and saying so isn't name-calling.

Stephen

Poor, pathetic Arnii Krooborg is grasping at the slenderest of straws.

Obviously,

Translation: Wild speculation, based on a wisp of a shred of a ghost of
evidence, to follow.

the caller, who known around here as "The Devil"
feared that he would be identified based on the sound of his
voice.

Good, Arnii. That's correct. You should stop there.

Whose voice would be instantly recognizable to RAO
readers, particularly at this time, particularly since the
posting of the HE2005 debate?

LOL! You couldn't be more wrong, you raving retard.


(2) Atkinson has long been adamant that none of his staff
ever posts on RAO. I've always contended that if people post
on RAO under aliases that Atkinson doesn't know, he can't
properly make this claim.

Your paranoia gland is working overtime.

One way that Atkinson could know for sure that his staff
never posts on RAO is if he knows the true identity of
*every* person who posts on RAO, including say "The Devil".
One way Atkinson could know the true identity of "The Devil"
would be if "The Devil" was indeed Atkinson himself.

Such desperation. What will you do when the recording becomes public?

Arny Krueger wrote:
"Clyde "scarecrow" Slick" wrote in message


Thank you for admitting that you were lying when you said
this:
" Not my problem, Art. You're the one who started out
making allegations this morning."

It's true that sometimes I can't believe that you and
Middius are as stupid as you are, and not be the same
person. I sometimes can' imagine why anybody with a brain
would defend Middius as strongly as you do, and not be one
of his sockpuppets.


Key phrase: "anybody with a brain". I think the answer is obvious,
Arny! :-D

George Middius a écrit :
Poor little Slut. The best she can do is imitate IKYABWAIBorg's weakest
rejoinders.


Else you'd be unable to live with yourself.


Experience is speaking.


Are you sticking out your tongue at the monitor as you type that, Slut?

I fully agree this one sucks.
This is why I tried an other one :

------------------------------------------------------------------------
George "Faust" Middius wrote :

It's a good thing you don't have a conscience, Turdy. Else
you'd be unable to live with yourself


Experience is speaking...
George has swapped his conscience against a second asshole. ;-)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Better ?

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

"MINe 109" wrote in message

In article ,
"Arny Krueger" wrote:

Could you be less specific and informative, Stephen?

Yes.

I''l bet. And to drive your point home Stephen, you make
a
valiant effort at the same. Trouble is, your evasions
tell a
sad story about your character, or lack thereof.

You're making stuff up. Give it a rest.

This is just another example of Stepehen's heavy-duty
evasiveness.

Probably, something about sockpuppets and guilt.

Sigh. No one's kicked you around on RAP today, so I guess you got up on
the wrong side of the bed.

Stephen

"George Middius" wrote in
message

****-for-Brains tries to defend his exceedingly ****ful
self.

You can't prove it, because it has all been a gigantic
series of dirty rotten slanderous lies, flowing
out of your sick and perverted imagination.

... which is not a crime, note.

However, your long term habit of posting lies and slander
of
me might be actionable,

You, Arnii Krooger, are a latent pedophile.

Sorry George, but the name right here on my driver's license
is Arnold Krueger.

What happens to your spelling module when you try to type it
out, Midbot?

"George Middius" wrote in
message

More empty boasting from AutoLiarBorg.

I *can* prove that Devil and Middius repeatedly posted
their
necrophilia/pedophilia/incest fantasies on RAO.

Go ahead and prove it, Turdy.

I think you and Stephen need to get your lies back in synch,
Middius.