Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
We occasionally still use DAT tape. Have always used and liked the
Quantegy product. 3 questions: Anybody know if Quantegy is gonna sell DAT tape again? Am sure that Quantegy's was just a rebranding of someone else's product. Anyone know who's? What does anyone here who still uses a lot of DAT tape a year currently like? Thanks. David Correia Celebration Sound Warren, Rhode Island www.CelebrationSound.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
david wrote:
We occasionally still use DAT tape. Have always used and liked the Quantegy product. 3 questions: Anybody know if Quantegy is gonna sell DAT tape again? I don't know. Right now, I am not sure if Quantegy is going to try to have a complete line or not. Am sure that Quantegy's was just a rebranding of someone else's product. Anyone know who's? At one point it was the Fuji tape. What does anyone here who still uses a lot of DAT tape a year currently like? I still have about 2,000 of the KAO brand 120 meter DDS tapes left from a large buy I did in '98. They seemed very solid so I figured I should stock up. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() What does anyone here who still uses a lot of DAT tape a year currently like? I don't use DAT any more, but when I did, I bought HHB for the most part. I did pick up a TDK Pro a couple of times and never had an issue with them, but pretty much stuck to HHB otherwise. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If nobody is using DAT, then what is the standard for
mixdowns/mastering? CDR? Does anyone have faith in the life expectancy of CDR's? I'm currently working on setting up my own studio and was going to go for DAT, maybe I should into something like the Aleisis Masterlink? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keilan wrote:
If nobody is using DAT, then what is the standard for mixdowns/mastering? CDR? Does anyone have faith in the life expectancy of CDR's? I'm currently working on setting up my own studio and was going to go for DAT, maybe I should into something like the Aleisis Masterlink? Quarter-inch. It's not expensive, it sounds good, and it maybe even has a future. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keilan wrote:
If nobody is using DAT, then what is the standard for mixdowns/mastering? CDR? Does anyone have faith in the life expectancy of CDR's? I'm currently working on setting up my own studio and was going to go for DAT, maybe I should into something like the Aleisis Masterlink? I still have a Panasonic 3800 DAT for tranfer work, but usually use the Masterlink for Final Mastering now. I really like the unit. Great value for the features, etc. -- --Scot www.RonnieJamesDio.org www.SMCProductions.org www.CraigGoldy.org www.TonyIommi.org www.ScotClayton.org |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:47:06 -0400, Scott Dorsey wrote
(in article ): Keilan wrote: If nobody is using DAT, then what is the standard for mixdowns/mastering? CDR? Does anyone have faith in the life expectancy of CDR's? I'm currently working on setting up my own studio and was going to go for DAT, maybe I should into something like the Aleisis Masterlink? Quarter-inch. It's not expensive, it sounds good, and it maybe even has a future. --scott ? Ty Ford -- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric stuff are at www.tyford.com |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If nobody is using DAT, then what is the standard for
mixdowns/mastering? Since DAWs, and Pro Tools in particular, have pretty much taken over, I think most people are mixing into new tracks within the DAW. Many people still use 44.1/24 bit for their entire project so a simple dithering down is all that's required for a 16 bit CD. Replication masters are usually CDRs burned from applications like Jam, Master List CD or others. Ted Spencer, NYC |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
david wrote:
We occasionally still use DAT tape. Have always used and liked the Quantegy product. 3 questions: Anybody know if Quantegy is gonna sell DAT tape again? Am sure that Quantegy's was just a rebranding of someone else's product. Anyone know who's? I understood that their DATs were 467 in a shell, the same formulation as used for DASH and ProDigi. I.E. their own product not a rebranding. It is said they'll continue to make 467, so I would say the answer is 'yes'. Thanks. -- JP Morris - aka DOUG the Eagle (Dragon) -=UDIC=- Fun things to do with the Ultima games http://www.it-he.org Reign of the Just - An Ultima clone http://rotj.it-he.org d+++ e+ N+ T++ Om U1234!56!7'!S'!8!9!KAW u++ uC+++ uF+++ uG---- uLB---- uA--- nC+ nR---- nH+++ nP++ nI nPT nS nT wM- wC- y a(YEAR - 1976) |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() We use Maxell DDS tapes now (HS-4/60S), in 60 meter length, which is 2 hours as audio. They are half the price of Maxell's pro audio DATs (125 minute) and we have had no issues. Except the dang shrinkwrap on the DDS boxes are hell to undo. We have gotten random dropouts from tapes more than about 5 years old from all brands. In article , david wrote: We occasionally still use DAT tape. Have always used and liked the Quantegy product. 3 questions: Anybody know if Quantegy is gonna sell DAT tape again? Am sure that Quantegy's was just a rebranding of someone else's product. Anyone know who's? What does anyone here who still uses a lot of DAT tape a year currently like? Thanks. David Correia Celebration Sound Warren, Rhode Island www.CelebrationSound.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question FAQ: rec.audio.* Recording 2/99 (part 7 of 13) | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |