Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Matrixmusic
 
Posts: n/a
Default BEST A-D COVERTER FOR MIXING?

Any suggestion guys.
I want to mix 24 bit-48khz.
It's solo voice with Orchestra.
Kevin

  #2   Report Post  
John L Rice
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Matrixmusic" wrote in message
oups.com...
Any suggestion guys.
I want to mix 24 bit-48khz.
It's solo voice with Orchestra.
Kevin


Hi Kevin,

I'm not totally sure what you are asking.

Are you mixing from an analog source ( mixer? ) and want an A/D converter to
record your final stereo mix to a digital format? Or do you want 4 to 48
channels of A/D so you can record all of the individual tracks initially to
digital but you want the converters to be as good as possible so that when
you mix it turns out well?

You might want to give us a hint at your budget, especially if the latter
scenario is the correct one. In either case I would think that he Lavry
Engineering Blue series converters would do an outstanding job for you.

Best of luck!

--
John L Rice




  #3   Report Post  
Scott Dorsey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
Matrixmusic wrote:
Any suggestion guys.
I want to mix 24 bit-48khz.
It's solo voice with Orchestra.



I'd look at the Prism and Lavry stuff, as well as the Weiss.

The Grimm box sounded pretty amazing to be with a DSD output, but I
don't know if they have got the PCM output module for it finished yet.

Meitner's converters might also be worth listening to.

The only one of the high end converters I'd suggest staying away from
is the Studer D19.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #4   Report Post  
Lorin David Schultz
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Scott Dorsey" wrote:

The only one of the high end converters I'd suggest staying away from
is the Studer D19.




Do you happen to remember what you didn't like about the Studer?

--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good

(Remove spamblock to reply)


  #5   Report Post  
hank alrich
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lorin David Schultz wrote:

"Scott Dorsey" wrote:


The only one of the high end converters I'd suggest staying away from
is the Studer D19.


Do you happen to remember what you didn't like about the Studer?


The sound. They just blew it. I know, hard to believe. Looked real good
on paper...

--
ha


  #6   Report Post  
Lorin David Schultz
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lorin David Schultz wrote:

Do you happen to remember what you didn't like about the Studer?


"hank alrich" wrote:

The sound.



Oh, THAT. I thought maybe he was disappointed by the lacklustre front
panel graphics.

"The sound." No ****, gittar boy! I was kinda hopin' for a description
of specific sonic characteristics the Studer lacks, or that it imposes
to the detriment of happylistenage. Is it something you can
characterize, or is this another case of our language not being equipped
to describe what we hear?


Looked real good on paper...


That's what happens when you don't use the right Spice...

--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good

(Remove spamblock to reply)


  #7   Report Post  
Scott Dorsey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Lorin David Schultz wrote:
"Scott Dorsey" wrote:

The only one of the high end converters I'd suggest staying away from
is the Studer D19.


Do you happen to remember what you didn't like about the Studer?


I don't know, it just didn't sound good. Stuff going in and coming out just
wound up sounding flatter and duller on the other end. The noise floor was not
even, either.

It was a real disappointment because the modular interfaces made it really
very versatile... you can configure it in all kinds of ways for different
applications. The routing and SRC modules looked very handy, and the ability
to deal with a wide variety of interfaces, even older ones like MADI, is
very slick.

It just didn't sound good.

Incidentally, I am talking about the real D19 rack system, and not the
D19 MicValve, which is completely unrelated. The D19 MicValve also sounds
bad, but for different reasons.
--scott


--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #8   Report Post  
Predrag Trpkov
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
Lorin David Schultz wrote:
"Scott Dorsey" wrote:

The only one of the high end converters I'd suggest staying away from
is the Studer D19.


Do you happen to remember what you didn't like about the Studer?


I don't know, it just didn't sound good. Stuff going in and coming out

just
wound up sounding flatter and duller on the other end. The noise floor

was not
even, either.

It was a real disappointment because the modular interfaces made it really
very versatile... you can configure it in all kinds of ways for different
applications. The routing and SRC modules looked very handy, and the

ability
to deal with a wide variety of interfaces, even older ones like MADI, is
very slick.

It just didn't sound good.

Incidentally, I am talking about the real D19 rack system, and not the
D19 MicValve, which is completely unrelated. The D19 MicValve also sounds
bad, but for different reasons.
--scott



Can you compare them to the converters in the V-Eight?

Predrag


Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"