Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Beyma CP25 vs. JBL 'Labia' HF Driver
Any comments?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message Any comments? No. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The JBL has a better name. geoff |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Geoff Wood wrote:
The JBL has a better name. Given who posted the question, it's quite sure that its obsolete. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
That's the only advantage the JBL driver has over the Beyma CP25
Geoff Wood wrote: The JBL has a better name. geoff |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ups.com... Geoff Wood wrote: The JBL has a better name. That's the only advantage the JBL driver has over the Beyma CP25 More like the only advantage the Beyma has is the price. MrT. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
A local speaker company gave a presentation about a year ago on their
development of new horn profiles for cinema installations. They used Beyma comp drivers and detailed all the problems they had detecting the cause of resonances. Turned out to be air leaks from the compression chambers, or 'false' sub-chambers within the compression chamber arising from poor casting technique. No comment on JBL, but Beyma are 'cheap clones' and the above experience suggests consistency from sample to sample may be unreliable compared to JBL. wrote in message ups.com... That's the only advantage the JBL driver has over the Beyma CP25 Geoff Wood wrote: The JBL has a better name. geoff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Beyma CP25 vs. JBL 'Labia' HF Driver | Tech | |||
Question for the Ferstlerian | Audio Opinions | |||
What do you prefer in your 300B SE? | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Doppler Distortion - Fact or Fiction | Pro Audio | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 3/5) | Car Audio |