Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, I decided to renew my music education by teaching myself some
piano. With no goals other than to please myself, I bought a Fatar MIDI keyboard controller with weighted keys, and the Steinberg VFX plugin called "Grand Piano." I was informed that in some cases (I'm not sure whether Steinberg's product actually qualifies), digital samples are now provided by actual instrument simulations in software, which produce an eerie, detailed reality of the instrument. Not surprising, since everything electronic has at least the possibility of getting better and better. But this leads to the question of how to reproduce the sample via loudspeakers. In the case of conventional recordings, the problem is so complex as to defy solution, due to the wide variety of miking techniques. But in the case of sampled sound, we start with something that is supposed to be mathematically precise, which means there is a chance to make optimum choices in reproduction. Any guidelines? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() digital samples are now provided by actual instrument simulations in software, which produce an eerie, detailed reality of the instrument. this is called physical-modelling, and is a different thing to sampling (recording existing acoustic sounds). It can indeed result in soma amazingly realistic instrument sounds. I had a Yamaha VL70m physical-modelling synth, which was excellent. I doubt if the Stienburg Grand Piano uses physical-modelling . . . much more likely it uses sampling, which is actual recordings of actual piano notes. A Sampled sound must use a microphone or some kind of pick-up to sample the sound in the first place. Physical-modelling doesn't, as it uses mathematics to create a new sound from fundamental mathematical concepts, rather than replaying a recording of an acoustic sound. Physical-modelling can also be applied to such things as guitar-amplifiers, which are intentionally colouring and changing the sound in desired ways. Chris http://www.chris-melchior.com/string.htm (real strings for realistic prices) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Morein wrote:
Recently, I decided to renew my music education by teaching myself some piano. With no goals other than to please myself, I bought a Fatar MIDI keyboard controller with weighted keys, and the Steinberg VFX plugin called "Grand Piano." I was informed that in some cases (I'm not sure whether Steinberg's product actually qualifies), digital samples are now provided by actual instrument simulations in software, which produce an eerie, detailed reality of the instrument. Not surprising, since everything electronic has at least the possibility of getting better and better. But this leads to the question of how to reproduce the sample via loudspeakers. In the case of conventional recordings, the problem is so complex as to defy solution, due to the wide variety of miking techniques. But in the case of sampled sound, we start with something that is supposed to be mathematically precise, which means there is a chance to make optimum choices in reproduction. Any guidelines? Why not break some new ground and find some speakers that actually sound good? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Robert Morein wrote: Recently, I decided to renew my music education by teaching myself some piano. With no goals other than to please myself, I bought a Fatar MIDI keyboard controller with weighted keys, and the Steinberg VFX plugin called "Grand Piano." I was informed that in some cases (I'm not sure whether Steinberg's product actually qualifies), digital samples are now provided by actual instrument simulations in software, which produce an eerie, detailed reality of the instrument. Not surprising, since everything electronic has at least the possibility of getting better and better. But this leads to the question of how to reproduce the sample via loudspeakers. In the case of conventional recordings, the problem is so complex as to defy solution, due to the wide variety of miking techniques. But in the case of sampled sound, we start with something that is supposed to be mathematically precise, which means there is a chance to make optimum choices in reproduction. Any guidelines? Why not break some new ground and find some speakers that actually sound good? My question is not directed toward subjective pleasure. As far as speakers that sound good, I have an ample set to choose from. I keep the following around the house: Acoustat 2+2 Kef Reference III Near 50m Polk LSi15 AR BXI 58j and a bunch of other bookshelf speakers. In fact, Arny, it's more in the direction of how you seem to think about things. We have an electronic piano, which has presumably been fashioned with great care. How do we find a transducer that reproduces the sound as close as possible to a real piano, positioned similarly in the room, without the difficulty of positioning a real grand piano in the same place for comparison, which is well nigh impossible. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Morein wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Why not break some new ground and find some speakers that actually sound good? My question is not directed toward subjective pleasure. As far as speakers that sound good, I have an ample set to choose from. I keep the following around the house: Acoustat 2+2 Kef Reference III Near 50m Polk LSi15 AR BXI 58j and a bunch of other bookshelf speakers. Obviously Robert, none of them sound good enough to you. We have an electronic piano, which has presumably been fashioned with great care. More care than your audio system? More care than the recordings you play on it? How do we find a transducer that reproduces the sound as close as possible to a real piano, positioned similarly in the room, without the difficulty of positioning a real grand piano in the same place for comparison, which is well nigh impossible. Why not break some new ground and find some speakers that actually sound good, according to you? Robert, you haven't specified which model of Studiologic MIDI controller that you've got. Many seem to run well under $1000. Why are you hyperventilating? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Robert Morein wrote: "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Why not break some new ground and find some speakers that actually sound good? My question is not directed toward subjective pleasure. As far as speakers that sound good, I have an ample set to choose from. I keep the following around the house: Acoustat 2+2 Kef Reference III Near 50m Polk LSi15 AR BXI 58j and a bunch of other bookshelf speakers. Obviously Robert, none of them sound good enough to you. We have an electronic piano, which has presumably been fashioned with great care. More care than your audio system? More care than the recordings you play on it? How do we find a transducer that reproduces the sound as close as possible to a real piano, positioned similarly in the room, without the difficulty of positioning a real grand piano in the same place for comparison, which is well nigh impossible. Why not break some new ground and find some speakers that actually sound good, according to you? Robert, you haven't specified which model of Studiologic MIDI controller that you've got. Many seem to run well under $1000. Why are you hyperventilating? Arny, the type of midi controller is irrelevant to the reproduction of synthesized samples. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Morein wrote:
Arny, the type of midi controller is irrelevant to the reproduction of synthesized samples. You're nuts. I'm out of this discussion. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The synth itself will reproduce the sampled sound up to its ability to
do so. Some synthesizers are better at this than others. Which model FATAR controller do you have? I used to have a Roland A-90 Controller hooked up to a Yamaha TG-33 box which gave some amazing sounds. Lots of your synth groups used this box in the late 80's early 90's. A few years ago I broke away from the Midi Controller/Sound box setup to a Roland XP-80 Music Workstation. More expansion now than I will ever use. I use a pair of JBL 6208 Bi-amped Reference Monitors. The XP-80 uses sampled sounds, and combined with those monitors, the sounds are extremely realistic. http://www.lansingheritage.org/html/.../1996-6208.htm How are you on your understanding of MIDI technology? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DualInfo" wrote in message ups.com... The synth itself will reproduce the sampled sound up to its ability to do so. Some synthesizers are better at this than others. Which model FATAR controller do you have? I used to have a Roland A-90 Controller hooked up to a Yamaha TG-33 box which gave some amazing sounds. Lots of your synth groups used this box in the late 80's early 90's. A few years ago I broke away from the Midi Controller/Sound box setup to a Roland XP-80 Music Workstation. More expansion now than I will ever use. I use a pair of JBL 6208 Bi-amped Reference Monitors. The XP-80 uses sampled sounds, and combined with those monitors, the sounds are extremely realistic. http://www.lansingheritage.org/html/.../1996-6208.htm How are you on your understanding of MIDI technology? Fine, thanks. Thanks for the JBL reference. Perhaps studio monitors are the way to go. Opinions? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Political | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |