Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ugggah! High Hard Butt Stuffing on fBay!
Some misguided merft took it in the subwoofer with no Cramolin on this
one! MAGNAVOX SINGLE ENDED PENTODE INTEGRATED AMP-MINT-NICE -Bidding has ended for this item Sold for: US $100.00 Auction ended early with Buy It Now Description COMPLETE MAGNAVOX SINGLE ENDED PENTODE TUBE AMP- USES 6BQ5 TUBES- THIS IS AN INTEGRATED AMP PULLED FROM AN EARLY 1960'S STEREO MAGNAVOX CONSOLE PHONOGRAPH THAT DID NOT HAVE A RADIO TUNER IN IT- HAS ALL THE ORIGINAL MAGNAVOX TUBES IN IT- THEY HAVE ALL BEEN TESTED AND THEY ARE ALL GOOD $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ SPECIAL SPRING SALE OFFER- USE BUY IT NOW- GET FREE SHIPPING ANYWHERE IN THE USA $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ (2) RCA JACK STEREO INPUTS (2) SPEAKER OUTPUT MALE SPADE CONNECTORS (1) SPEAKER OUTPUT COMMON GROUND CONTROL KNOBS ON FRONT FOR VOLUME-BASS-TREBLE ADJUSTMENT POT IN BACK FOR BALANCE THIS AMP SOUND AWESOME AND GIVES THAT GREAT WARM TUBE SOUND- SIMILAR NEW AMPS BUILT LIKE THIS COST $600-1000 OR MORE- THESE OLD AMPS HAVE EXCELLENT OUTPUT TRANSFORMERS AND POWER SUPPLY TRANSFORMER THIS WOULD MAKE A GREAT AMP PROJECT TO PUT INSIDE A NICE BOX CABINET I HAVE TESTED IT EXTENSIVELY THROUGH MY 93 DB/WATT/METER SPEAKERS AND IT SOUNDS AWESOME- STUNNING BASS RESPONSE ! GREAT STEREO IMAGING ! WILL ACCEPT CD, TAPE DECK, OR MAGNETIC/CERAMIC PHONOGRAPH INPUT ALSO (2) OUTPUT SPADE CONNECTORS FOR POWER INDICATOR LIGHT IF YOU WANT ONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Shown in the picture is one of those little power supply/power amp chassis from an old 50s or 60s tube console such as sold at polk Bros. or Woolworths: two output channels consisting of an EL84 and an output transformer suited for a AA5 table radio,e.g. roughly the size of Ann Coulter's or Hilary Clinton's distended clit. Real market value was probably $5-WITH the little console it came with. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Item link?
wrote in message oups.com... Some misguided merft took it in the subwoofer with no Cramolin on this one! MAGNAVOX SINGLE ENDED PENTODE INTEGRATED AMP-MINT-NICE -Bidding has ended for this item Sold for: US $100.00 Auction ended early with Buy It Now Description COMPLETE MAGNAVOX SINGLE ENDED PENTODE TUBE AMP- USES 6BQ5 TUBES- THIS IS AN INTEGRATED AMP PULLED FROM AN EARLY 1960'S STEREO MAGNAVOX CONSOLE PHONOGRAPH THAT DID NOT HAVE A RADIO TUNER IN IT- HAS ALL THE ORIGINAL MAGNAVOX TUBES IN IT- THEY HAVE ALL BEEN TESTED AND THEY ARE ALL GOOD $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ SPECIAL SPRING SALE OFFER- USE BUY IT NOW- GET FREE SHIPPING ANYWHERE IN THE USA $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ (2) RCA JACK STEREO INPUTS (2) SPEAKER OUTPUT MALE SPADE CONNECTORS (1) SPEAKER OUTPUT COMMON GROUND CONTROL KNOBS ON FRONT FOR VOLUME-BASS-TREBLE ADJUSTMENT POT IN BACK FOR BALANCE THIS AMP SOUND AWESOME AND GIVES THAT GREAT WARM TUBE SOUND- SIMILAR NEW AMPS BUILT LIKE THIS COST $600-1000 OR MORE- THESE OLD AMPS HAVE EXCELLENT OUTPUT TRANSFORMERS AND POWER SUPPLY TRANSFORMER THIS WOULD MAKE A GREAT AMP PROJECT TO PUT INSIDE A NICE BOX CABINET I HAVE TESTED IT EXTENSIVELY THROUGH MY 93 DB/WATT/METER SPEAKERS AND IT SOUNDS AWESOME- STUNNING BASS RESPONSE ! GREAT STEREO IMAGING ! WILL ACCEPT CD, TAPE DECK, OR MAGNETIC/CERAMIC PHONOGRAPH INPUT ALSO (2) OUTPUT SPADE CONNECTORS FOR POWER INDICATOR LIGHT IF YOU WANT ONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Shown in the picture is one of those little power supply/power amp chassis from an old 50s or 60s tube console such as sold at polk Bros. or Woolworths: two output channels consisting of an EL84 and an output transformer suited for a AA5 table radio,e.g. roughly the size of Ann Coulter's or Hilary Clinton's distended clit. Real market value was probably $5-WITH the little console it came with. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Fried Cap" wrote in message
Item link? Your question is over Cal's head. But, the answer is: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=5761852 174 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
It wasn't over my head, Arny; I omitted the link to not give the
identity of the seller and buyer, a/k/a Knave and Fool. Since you did: Seller: Seller information 66fourdoor ( 914) Feedback Sco 914 Positive Feedback: 99.8% Member since Dec-31-01 in United States Buyer:scihi |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
No.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
NEW similar trannies are $5 apiece from Antique Electronic Supply. And
how much are 40 year old barbequed caps worth? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Ouch, that's $35 worth at best.
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Fried Cap" wrote in message Item link? Your question is over Cal's head. But, the answer is: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=5761852 174 |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:15:56 -0800, "Fried Cap" wrote:
Ouch, that's $35 worth at best. So, now we're quibbling over spending an extra $65 for a working amp, with NOS tubes that might easily be worth that $35 alone, depending on how they test? One would think that the buyer spent $10,000 on a power amp or something. BTW, Cal should be rejoicing that this item didn't get parted out. s****** "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Fried Cap" wrote in message Item link? Your question is over Cal's head. But, the answer is: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=5761852 174 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"dave weil" wrote in message ... On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:15:56 -0800, "Fried Cap" wrote: Ouch, that's $35 worth at best. So, now we're quibbling over spending an extra $65 for a working amp, with NOS tubes that might easily be worth that $35 alone, depending on how they test? So who says I'm right, the $5 may be closer to the truth. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:34:02 -0800, "Fried Cap" wrote:
"dave weil" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:15:56 -0800, "Fried Cap" wrote: Ouch, that's $35 worth at best. So, now we're quibbling over spending an extra $65 for a working amp, with NOS tubes that might easily be worth that $35 alone, depending on how they test? So who says I'm right, the $5 may be closer to the truth. $95 then. Are we really now complaining about spending an extra $95 for a working two channel amplifier, regardless of how much it theoretically might be worth? Besides, if the tubes test strongly, then they are worth at least $35 by themselves. The fact that people are judging someone harshly for spending a hundred bucks for a working amp seems rather ludicrous, at least to me. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Who's complaining? I just think he got shafted.
"dave weil" wrote in message ... On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:34:02 -0800, "Fried Cap" wrote: "dave weil" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:15:56 -0800, "Fried Cap" wrote: Ouch, that's $35 worth at best. So, now we're quibbling over spending an extra $65 for a working amp, with NOS tubes that might easily be worth that $35 alone, depending on how they test? So who says I'm right, the $5 may be closer to the truth. $95 then. Are we really now complaining about spending an extra $95 for a working two channel amplifier, regardless of how much it theoretically might be worth? Besides, if the tubes test strongly, then they are worth at least $35 by themselves. The fact that people are judging someone harshly for spending a hundred bucks for a working amp seems rather ludicrous, at least to me. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:38:36 -0800, "Fried Cap" wrote:
Who's complaining? I just think he got shafted. Maybe you should worry about the brand of toilet paper he uses. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Fried Cap" wrote in :
Who's complaining? I just think he got shafted. Not me! After you've spent hours drilling holes in steel, you think what your time is worth. Paint the chassis black, wrap it in some wood, re-cap and strap it triode-mode... might be a cool amp. So it goes! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
EC wrote: "Fried Cap" wrote in : Who's complaining? I just think he got shafted. Not me! After you've spent hours drilling holes in steel, you think what your time is worth. Paint the chassis black, wrap it in some wood, re-cap and strap it triode-mode... might be a cool amp. Since the invention of the electric and air hand drills and the drill press, it's gotten to be fast. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe you shouldn't concern yourself about what I should do. What's your
problem? "dave weil" wrote in message news On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:38:36 -0800, "Fried Cap" wrote: Who's complaining? I just think he got shafted. Maybe you should worry about the brand of toilet paper he uses. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Fried Cap" said:
Maybe you shouldn't concern yourself about what I should do. What's your problem? "dave weil" wrote in message news On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:38:36 -0800, "Fried Cap" wrote: Who's complaining? I just think he got shafted. Maybe you should worry about the brand of toilet paper he uses. Top- and crossposting? A: Because it screws the flow of the conversation. Q: Why is top-posting considered annoying? A: Top-posting. Q: What is considered the most annoying thing on Usenet? -- Sander de Waal " SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. " |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Sander deWaal" wrote in message
"Fried Cap" said: Maybe you shouldn't concern yourself about what I should do. What's your problem? "dave weil" wrote in message news On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:38:36 -0800, "Fried Cap" wrote: Who's complaining? I just think he got shafted. Maybe you should worry about the brand of toilet paper he uses. Top- and crossposting? A: Because it screws the flow of the conversation. Q: Why is top-posting considered annoying? A: Top-posting. Q: What is considered the most annoying thing on Usenet? LOL! |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:17:46 -0800, "Fried Cap" wrote:
Maybe you shouldn't concern yourself about what I should do. What's your problem? So why are you concerned about someone spending $100 on an amp? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
dave weil a écrit :
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:17:46 -0800, "Fried Cap" wrote: Maybe you shouldn't concern yourself about what I should do. What's your problem? So why are you concerned about someone spending $100 on an amp? You are losing you time Dave. It would be better that you teach us the DIY confection of an Eq template with a cardboard. ;-) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:43:49 +0200, Lionel
wrote: dave weil a écrit : On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:17:46 -0800, "Fried Cap" wrote: Maybe you shouldn't concern yourself about what I should do. What's your problem? So why are you concerned about someone spending $100 on an amp? You are losing you time Dave. It would be better that you teach us the DIY confection of an Eq template with a cardboard. Is that supposed to be English? If so, then back to the drawing board with you... |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Give him a piece of cardboard and a pair of scissors and he will manufacture you a very nice Eq template ! :-D dave weil a écrit : On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:43:49 +0200, Lionel wrote: dave weil a écrit : On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:17:46 -0800, "Fried Cap" wrote: Maybe you shouldn't concern yourself about what I should do. What's your problem? So why are you concerned about someone spending $100 on an amp? You are losing you time Dave. It would be better that you teach us the DIY confection of an Eq template with a cardboard. Is that supposed to be English? If so, then back to the drawing board with you... No problem, old man, my English is better than your French... ;-) |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:55:48 +0200, Lionel
wrote: Give him a piece of cardboard and a pair of scissors and he will manufacture you a very nice Eq template ! Still not quite right in English, but better than your last attempt, which was horribly botched. And still top posting. Tsk, tsk! |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:55:48 +0200, Lionel
wrote: Is that supposed to be English? If so, then back to the drawing board with you... No problem, old man, my English is better than your French... ;-) Which is why I don't bother botching YOUR language. BTW, I am quite a bit younger than both of your heroes, Howard Ferstler and Arnold Krueger. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
dave weil a écrit :
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:55:48 +0200, Lionel wrote: Is that supposed to be English? If so, then back to the drawing board with you... No problem, old man, my English is better than your French... ;-) Which is why I don't bother botching YOUR language. Sorry I haven't any language. I just speak a little bit better French than English and Italian. BTW, I am quite a bit younger Note my fault if you look lot more older than you are. :-D than both of your heroes, Howard Ferstler and Arnold Krueger. Sorry but in contrary to you I don't need and I haven't any heroes. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
dave weil a écrit :
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:55:48 +0200, Lionel wrote: Give him a piece of cardboard and a pair of scissors and he will manufacture you a very nice Eq template ! Still not quite right in English, but better than your last attempt, which was horribly botched. No problem, old man since you and the others have understood. ;-) And still top posting. Still ? Tsk, tsk! "Tsk, tsk!" ????? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Lionel wrote: Give him a piece of cardboard and a pair of scissors and he will manufacture you a very nice Eq template ! :-D http://tinyurl.com/4bqzs See Page 2. Stephen |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
MINe 109 a écrit :
In article , Lionel wrote: Give him a piece of cardboard and a pair of scissors and he will manufacture you a very nice Eq template ! :-D http://tinyurl.com/4bqzs See Page 2. Stephen So what ? We can check that Weil has plagiarized this article. What's new ? ;-) |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Lionel wrote: MINe 109 a écrit : In article , Lionel wrote: Give him a piece of cardboard and a pair of scissors and he will manufacture you a very nice Eq template ! :-D http://tinyurl.com/4bqzs See Page 2. Stephen So what ? We can check that Weil has plagiarized this article. What's new ? ;-) No, it pretty much supports his anecdote. How do you store your eq curves? Stephen |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
In , MINe 109 wrote :
In article , Lionel wrote: MINe 109 a écrit : In article , Lionel wrote: Give him a piece of cardboard and a pair of scissors and he will manufacture you a very nice Eq template ! :-D http://tinyurl.com/4bqzs See Page 2. Stephen So what ? We can check that Weil has plagiarized this article. What's new ? ;-) No, it pretty much supports his anecdote. How do you store your eq curves? I don't use any eq except under SoundForge, in this case the Eq curves are stored with the waveform. IMHO the concept of Eq template is simply stupid. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Lionel wrote: In , MINe 109 wrote : In article , Lionel wrote: MINe 109 a écrit : In article , Lionel wrote: Give him a piece of cardboard and a pair of scissors and he will manufacture you a very nice Eq template ! :-D http://tinyurl.com/4bqzs See Page 2. Stephen So what ? We can check that Weil has plagiarized this article. What's new ? ;-) No, it pretty much supports his anecdote. How do you store your eq curves? I don't use any eq except under SoundForge, in this case the Eq curves are stored with the waveform. IMHO the concept of Eq template is simply stupid. That's one of several reasons I don't use eq, but in this case a manufacturer saw some advantage in giving away pieces of cardboard. Go figure. Stephen |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
"Lionel" wrote in message ... I haven't any heroes. Of course not, you are French. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
MINe 109 a écrit :
In article , Lionel wrote: In , MINe 109 wrote : In article , Lionel wrote: MINe 109 a écrit : In article , Lionel wrote: Give him a piece of cardboard and a pair of scissors and he will manufacture you a very nice Eq template ! :-D http://tinyurl.com/4bqzs See Page 2. Stephen So what ? We can check that Weil has plagiarized this article. What's new ? ;-) No, it pretty much supports his anecdote. How do you store your eq curves? I don't use any eq except under SoundForge, in this case the Eq curves are stored with the waveform. IMHO the concept of Eq template is simply stupid. That's one of several reasons I don't use eq, but in this case a manufacturer saw some advantage in giving away pieces of cardboard. Go figure. We are agree. This is why I am a little bit sarcastic with the guys who use (or recommend) such "stupid" solution. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Clyde Slick a écrit :
"Lionel" wrote in message ... I haven't any heroes. Of course not, you are French. This wasn't exactly my point but thank you for the compliment. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
"Lionel" wrote in message ... Clyde Slick a écrit : "Lionel" wrote in message ... I haven't any heroes. Of course not, you are French. This wasn't exactly my point but thank you for the compliment. Whatever. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:44:02 +0200, Lionel
wrote: MINe 109 a écrit : In article , Lionel wrote: In , MINe 109 wrote : In article , Lionel wrote: MINe 109 a écrit : In article , Lionel wrote: Give him a piece of cardboard and a pair of scissors and he will manufacture you a very nice Eq template ! :-D http://tinyurl.com/4bqzs See Page 2. Stephen So what ? We can check that Weil has plagiarized this article. What's new ? ;-) No, it pretty much supports his anecdote. How do you store your eq curves? I don't use any eq except under SoundForge, in this case the Eq curves are stored with the waveform. IMHO the concept of Eq template is simply stupid. That's one of several reasons I don't use eq, but in this case a manufacturer saw some advantage in giving away pieces of cardboard. Go figure. We are agree. This is why I am a little bit sarcastic with the guys who use (or recommend) such "stupid" solution. Actually, it's the simplest, easiest solution to the problem that Howard (I demand an eq) Ferstler proposed. Of course, if he wanted to pop for it, he could get one of the eqs that has the ability to memorize curves and store them. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
dave weil a écrit :
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:44:02 +0200, Lionel wrote: MINe 109 a écrit : In article , Lionel wrote: In , MINe 109 wrote : In article , Lionel wrote: MINe 109 a écrit : In article , Lionel wrote: Give him a piece of cardboard and a pair of scissors and he will manufacture you a very nice Eq template ! :-D http://tinyurl.com/4bqzs See Page 2. Stephen So what ? We can check that Weil has plagiarized this article. What's new ? ;-) No, it pretty much supports his anecdote. How do you store your eq curves? I don't use any eq except under SoundForge, in this case the Eq curves are stored with the waveform. IMHO the concept of Eq template is simply stupid. That's one of several reasons I don't use eq, but in this case a manufacturer saw some advantage in giving away pieces of cardboard. Go figure. We are agree. This is why I am a little bit sarcastic with the guys who use (or recommend) such "stupid" solution. Actually, it's the simplest, easiest solution to the problem that Howard (I demand an eq) Ferstler proposed. Blah, blah, blah... |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Stewart Pinkerton a écrit :
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:48:20 +0200, Lionel wrote: Clyde Slick a écrit : "Lionel" wrote in message .. . I haven't any heroes. Of course not, you are French. This wasn't exactly my point but thank you for the compliment. How do you know if there's a war in Europe? Paris is occupied. :-) My grand-father who was in Verdun used to say : "An assault with an English company is the most dangerous... because they're so terrified that they shoot you in the back". :-( What's the French word for 'fair play'? It's 'le fairplay', because there *is* no French word for fair play... The french words are "loyal" and "loyauté" not my fault if the mass media and tabloids from the Perfid Albion don't know that. ;-) |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Some Recording Techniques | Pro Audio | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |