Bruce -ph'dada'- Richman wrote:
Of course, if Lionel really believes that Jacques Chirac or
I am insane, then he has proven that he is delusional
- SINCE HE HAS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT HIS FALSE BELIEFS.

Yet, Bruce Richman has repeatedly posted things like:

"Lionel's Demonstration of His Insanity"
"..insane guy like Georg M. Middius "
"No problem, Howard [Ferstler]. Next time, while demonstrating
your comprehensive knowledge of personality assessment and
fortune-telling, I'd suggest that you just add in the 95%
(approximately) of all RAO active posters that think you're
just insane."

.....you don't really want me to go down the Google record
for more of the same, ehh?

::
Which is it, Richman, you *don't belief* that what you are
posting yourself
or, once again, you think you can get away with the very
same thing you accuse others of
-----
This does give rational people, let alone professionals,
some valid reasons to question your 'professionalism', hmm ?

Shape up, booooy :-)
Rudy

Ruud Broens wrote:

Bruce -ph'dada'- Richman wrote:

A very revealing start from a self-appointed, self-righteous,
holier-than-though "historian" who claims his goal is to get rid of the
flames on RAO. I guess we can pretty well take the rest of what he
says as further evidence of his "objectivity".


Of course, if Lionel really believes that Jacques Chirac or
I am insane, then he has proven that he is delusional
- SINCE HE HAS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT HIS FALSE BELIEFS.

Yet, Bruce Richman has repeatedly posted things like:

"Lionel's Demonstration of His Insanity"
"..insane guy like Georg M. Middius "
"No problem, Howard [Ferstler]. Next time, while demonstrating
your comprehensive knowledge of personality assessment and
fortune-telling, I'd suggest that you just add in the 95%
(approximately) of all RAO active posters that think you're
just insane."

....you don't really want me to go down the Google record
for more of the same, ehh?


Feel free to distort the Google history, and also feel free to ignore
such trivial details as dates, preceding posts by others, etc. As I've
already demonstrated in the response to your other attack thread,
you're self-serving distortions of history are pretty transparent.

LOL !!!



::
Which is it, Richman, you *don't belief* that what you are
posting yourself
or, once again, you think you can get away with the very
same thing you accuse others of
-----
This does give rational people, let alone professionals,
some valid reasons to question your 'professionalism', hmm ?

Shape up, booooy :-)
Rudy

So Rudy, in his illogical, highly lie-itensive way, decides that only
non-professionals have the right to use terms like "insanity" - which
is not even a psychiatric or psychological term, but a legal term, used
mainly by attornies and judges in actual practice.

Rudy, has, since it serves his flaming agenda, tried to present the
false argument that RAO is a professional environment rather than
simply a Usenet NG, and therefore, people should act "professionally" -
that is, unless they want to insult people that he chooses. Does
anybody really believe this nonsense? He apparently endorses and
supports the use of terms like "senile", "paranoid" and "delirium",
among others by people who clearly are not qualified to use these
terms, while he condemns those of a person who *is* qualified to use
these terms.
What's wrong with this picture? let me guess - he wants to clear the
road for the unopposed production of more flames by those that can't
provide any evidence for their false claims.

As his 2 attack threads in less than 24 hours clearly demonstrates, the
*last* thing Rudy "the Google History expert" Broens apparently wants
is an unmoderated NG that contains only audio content.

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

You are right Bruce all Dutchmen are hypocrite...
Sue all them Bruce go!!!
Sue all them Bruce go, go !!!

Lionel wrote:
Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :

You are right Bruce all Dutchmen are hypocrite...
Sue all them Bruce go!!!
Sue all them Bruce go, go !!!


"LIBEL!!"
"SOCKPUPPET!!"
"CHARACTER ASSASSINATION!!"
"SEVEN YEAR HISTORY!!"
"ANTI-SEMETIC!!"
"DELUSIONAL!!"
"HAMAS SUPPORTER!!"
"=2E......

Lionel wrote:
Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :

You are right Bruce all Dutchmen are hypocrite...
Sue all them Bruce go!!!
Sue all them Bruce go, go !!!

Idiotic lack of reading comprehension noted. Delusional drooling
noted. Lack of understanding the legal system noted.
Lionel making a fool of himself as usual,noted.

"Bruce J. Richman" said:


Ruud Broens wrote:

Bruce -ph'dada'- Richman wrote:

A very revealing start from a self-appointed, self-righteous,
holier-than-though "historian" who claims his goal is to get rid of the
flames on RAO. I guess we can pretty well take the rest of what he
says as further evidence of his "objectivity".

I'm sorry folks, I have no longer any control over my sockpuppet Rudy.
It suddenly decided to post on its own and there's noting I can do to
prevent it.

--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Lionel wrote:

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

You are right Bruce all Dutchmen are hypocrite...
Sue all them Bruce go!!!
Sue all them Bruce go, go !!!


Idiotic lack of reading comprehension noted. Delusional drooling
noted. Lack of understanding the legal system noted.
Lionel making a fool of himself as usual,noted.

Do you want more paper ?

Lionel wrote:
Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :
Lionel wrote:

Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :

You are right Bruce all Dutchmen are hypocrite...
Sue all them Bruce go!!!
Sue all them Bruce go, go !!!


Idiotic lack of reading comprehension noted. Delusional drooling
noted. Lack of understanding the legal system noted.
Lionel making a fool of himself as usual,noted.

Do you want more paper ?

The only kind of paper you use, in place of napkins, is toilet paper.

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Lionel wrote:

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

Lionel wrote:


Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

You are right Bruce all Dutchmen are hypocrite...
Sue all them Bruce go!!!
Sue all them Bruce go, go !!!


Idiotic lack of reading comprehension noted. Delusional drooling
noted. Lack of understanding the legal system noted.
Lionel making a fool of himself as usual,noted.

Do you want more paper ?


The only kind of paper you use, in place of napkins, is toilet paper.

That's true but considering the quantity of note you take, it could be
usefull. :-)

Sander deWaal wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" said:


Ruud Broens wrote:

Bruce -ph'dada'- Richman wrote:

A very revealing start from a self-appointed, self-righteous,
holier-than-though "historian" who claims his goal is to get rid of
the
flames on RAO. I guess we can pretty well take the rest of what he
says as further evidence of his "objectivity".

I'm sorry folks, I have no longer any control over my sockpuppet
Rudy.
It suddenly decided to post on its own and there's noting I can do to
prevent it.



It happens, Sander. Just like in "Pinochio" (not the Disney version)

"Ruud Broens" wrote in message

Bruce -ph'dada'- Richman wrote:
Of course, if Lionel really believes that Jacques Chirac or
I am insane, then he has proven that he is delusional
- SINCE HE HAS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT HIS FALSE BELIEFS.

Yet, Bruce Richman has repeatedly posted things like:

"Lionel's Demonstration of His Insanity"

Sounds like a Richman post.

"..insane guy like Georg M. Middius "

That text was originionated by Lionel, not Brucie.

"No problem, Howard [Ferstler]. Next time, while demonstrating
your comprehensive knowledge of personality assessment and
fortune-telling, I'd suggest that you just add in the 95%
(approximately) of all RAO active posters that think you're
just insane."


Sounds like a Richman post.

....you don't really want me to go down the Google record
for more of the same, ehh?

Richman spews this stuff like an world-class active volcano.

Which is it, Richman, you *don't believe* that what you are
posting yourself
or, once again, you think you can get away with the very
same thing you accuse others of
-----

Obviously, in Richman's eyes, he can do no wrong.

This does give rational people, let alone professionals,
some valid reasons to question your 'professionalism', hmm ?

Right, and when that happens, Richman gives them his *professional
treatment* as well.

Shape up, booooy :-)

Not a chance that Richman will change his ways. Notice that I've been
ignoring his posts for more than a day, and like Weil, he just just tries to
troll me several times every day. Both of them are obviously immature and
needy of any kind of attention, to the point of self-destruction. If they
can't do anything worth of positive attention, then they jump right on the
low road and try for some negative attention.

Friendly advice, just ignore Richman. L:ike Herpes, he is unlikely to go
away by himself. But, at least you won't be inflaming the sore spot by
scratching it.

Sander deWaal wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" said:


Ruud Broens wrote:

Bruce -ph'dada'- Richman wrote:

A very revealing start from a self-appointed, self-righteous,
holier-than-though "historian" who claims his goal is to get rid of
the
flames on RAO. I guess we can pretty well take the rest of what he
says as further evidence of his "objectivity".

I'm sorry folks, I have no longer any control over my sockpuppet
Rudy.
It suddenly decided to post on its own and there's noting I can do to
prevent it.


:0) Have they shown the "Chuckie" movies in the Netherlands?


http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...ayphotohosting

Any resemblance between Sander and Rudy is purely fictious and
unintentional. (A paraphrase of what appears at the end of most
American movies).
:-)






--
Sander de Waal
" SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. "

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...ayphotohosting

T you Bruce for sharing your professional experience :

_Case n° 1_ :

This kind teenager had few problem with her history teacher. Naively her
parents have submit this problem to Dr Richman science and
professionalism...
Here's the result. :-(

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...




Friendly advice, just ignore Richman. L:ike Herpes, he is unlikely to go
away by himself. But, at least you won't be inflaming the sore spot by
scratching it.


Finally, a subject where we can rely on Arny's experiential advice - Herpes.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Ruud Broens" wrote in message

Bruce -ph'dada'- Richman wrote:
Of course, if Lionel really believes that Jacques Chirac or
I am insane, then he has proven that he is delusional
- SINCE HE HAS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT HIS FALSE BELIEFS.

Yet, Bruce Richman has repeatedly posted things like:

"Lionel's Demonstration of His Insanity"

Sounds like a Richman post.

"..insane guy like Georg M. Middius "

That text was originionated by Lionel, not Brucie.

"No problem, Howard [Ferstler]. Next time, while demonstrating
your comprehensive knowledge of personality assessment and
fortune-telling, I'd suggest that you just add in the 95%
(approximately) of all RAO active posters that think you're
just insane."


Sounds like a Richman post.

....you don't really want me to go down the Google record
for more of the same, ehh?

Richman spews this stuff like an world-class active volcano.

Which is it, Richman, you *don't believe* that what you are
posting yourself
or, once again, you think you can get away with the very
same thing you accuse others of
-----

Obviously, in Richman's eyes, he can do no wrong.

This does give rational people, let alone professionals,
some valid reasons to question your 'professionalism', hmm ?

Right, and when that happens, Richman gives them his *professional
treatment* as well.

Shape up, booooy :-)

Not a chance that Richman will change his ways. Notice that I've been
ignoring his posts for more than a day, and like Weil, he just just tries
to troll me several times every day. Both of them are obviously immature
and needy of any kind of attention, to the point of self-destruction. If
they can't do anything worth of positive attention, then they jump right
on the low road and try for some negative attention.

Friendly advice, just ignore Richman. L:ike Herpes, he is unlikely to go
away by himself. But, at least you won't be inflaming the sore spot by
scratching it.


I just hope he is not a sockpuppet, just think of the harm he could be doing
if he's borrowed the name of another Dr. Richman.

Arny Krueger wrote:


"Ruud Broens" wrote in message

Bruce -ph'dada'- Richman wrote:
Of course, if Lionel really believes that Jacques Chirac or
I am insane, then he has proven that he is delusional
- SINCE HE HAS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT HIS FALSE BELIEFS.

Yet, Bruce Richman has repeatedly posted things like:

"Lionel's Demonstration of His Insanity"

Sounds like a Richman post.



"Richman Craps on RAO" sounds like a Krueger post. As do numerous
attack threads from this compulsive liar with ny name in the title that
he's spewed for almost 7 years.

"..insane guy like Georg M. Middius "

That text was originionated by Lionel, not Brucie.



Little Arnie Krueger shocks RAO by doing something he rarely does - he
forgets who he is and inadvertently tells the truth.




"No problem, Howard [Ferstler]. Next time, while demonstrating
your comprehensive knowledge of personality assessment and
fortune-telling, I'd suggest that you just add in the 95%
(approximately) of all RAO active posters that think you're
just insane."


Sounds like a Richman post.



....you don't really want me to go down the Google record
for more of the same, ehh?

Richman spews this stuff like an world-class active volcano.

Krueger has a documented Krueger record of being its most frequent
poster and most frequent flamer for many years. For those wanting a
more accurate picture of Krueger's unchallenged and unequaled record of
flaming more separate people than any other RAO poster, just take a
look that the famous thread entitled "Have You Had A Bad Krueger
Experience". This thread, started by Ed Shain in 1999, has 1787 posts
- also AFAIK, a record for an RAO thread. The number of different
people contributing to it, as well as the rather large number of people
listed as having been trashed by Krueger, is quite impressive.
Needless to say, the number of people smeared by Krueger has increased
significantly since then.





Which is it, Richman, you *don't believe* that what you are
posting yourself
or, once again, you think you can get away with the very
same thing you accuse others of
-----

Obviously, in Richman's eyes, he can do no wrong.

Delusions of omniscience noted - LOL !!! Krueger is here engaged in
both mind-reading and lying, both of which he does quite poorly. In
point of fact, many of commented on the widely known factor that
Krueger rarely, if ever, admits that he's made an error.


This does give rational people, let alone professionals,
some valid reasons to question your 'professionalism', hmm ?

Right, and when that happens, Richman gives them his *professional
treatment* as well.




Kruegers "treatments" consist of lies, libel and repetitive attack
threads and idiotic statements about many different posters. Since
Krueger's "career" seems to be primarily dedicating to defecating on a
large number of newsgroup (except RAHE, which had the good sense to
prevent him from creating a stench there), his "professional
activities" are well known.

Shape up, booooy :-)

Not a chance that Richman will change his ways. Notice that I've been

ignoring his posts for more than a day, and like Weil, he just just
tries to
troll me several times every day. Both of them are obviously immature
and
needy of any kind of attention, to the point of self-destruction.

A whole day. For Krueger, given his attack dog mentality and highly
conditioned need to smear others, that must have been quite an
accomplishment. However, Krueger, as is his habit, exhibits his usual
case of selective amnesia when he forgets to mention that most of us
have gone considerably longer than one day with never mentioning the
name of RAO's most widely hated and despised poster.

If they
can't do anything worth of positive attention, then they jump right
on the
low road and try for some negative attention.


Krueger's remarkable ability to project his OWN basic motivations and
strategies is all that the sentence above actually indicates. Just
substitute the word "Krueger" for "they" and you'll have a pretty
accurate picture of Krueger's behavior.



Friendly advice, just ignore Richman. L:ike Herpes, he is unlikely to
go
away by himself. But, at least you won't be inflaming the sore spot
by
scratching it.


For those that want to know how to handle Krueger's despicable lies,
smear campaigns, and predictablde attdmpts to generate attack threads
containing false information about his numerous enemies, here's some
reasonable advice:

(1) Krueger is like a cancerous growth that has metastisised over a 7
year period in the body of RAO. It is occasionally dormant or in
remission for brief period, when he is on vacation or perhaps
hospitalized for his rather obvious psychiatric problems, but given the
following stinuli, you can almost bet the house that this pervasive
sickness will be directed at you:

(1) Talk about tubed electronics in a positive way, and expect to be
personally attacked. (Not just your point of view, but you,
personally, if you disagree with his trashing your preferences).

(2) Talk about vinyl in a positive way, and expect to be personally
attacked. (Not just your point of view, but you, personally, if you
disagree with his trashing your preferences).

(3) Disagree in almost any shape or form with Krueger's
anti-individual-preference, anti-choice dogma and his claims about
double blind testing and you are highly likely to be smeared - and not
just your views, but you, personally, since this is how Krueger
operates.

(4) Most importantly, disagree with any of krueger's false claims about
other people and you will become, in his mind, part of a clique or
conspiracy and therefore, also be targeted for personal attacks.

Krueger is essentially the Doberman attack dog equivalent of one of
Pavlov's highly conditioned experimental canines. Exhibit any of the
stimuli described in situations # 1 to # 4 above, and you will be
almost certain to elicit a conditioned response containing the
predictable excretion for which Krueger is so widely hated and
despised.

Since he's been unable to eliminate all his enemies (as noted in the
Bad krueger Experience thread), he just keeps firing away, ad nauseam.

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Ruud Broens" wrote in message

Bruce -ph'dada'- Richman wrote:
Of course, if Lionel really believes that Jacques Chirac or
I am insane, then he has proven that he is delusional
- SINCE HE HAS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT HIS FALSE BELIEFS.

Yet, Bruce Richman has repeatedly posted things like:

"Lionel's Demonstration of His Insanity"

Sounds like a Richman post.

"..insane guy like Georg M. Middius "

That text was originionated by Lionel, not Brucie.

"No problem, Howard [Ferstler]. Next time, while demonstrating
your comprehensive knowledge of personality assessment and
fortune-telling, I'd suggest that you just add in the 95%
(approximately) of all RAO active posters that think you're
just insane."


Sounds like a Richman post.

....you don't really want me to go down the Google record
for more of the same, ehh?

Richman spews this stuff like an world-class active volcano.

Which is it, Richman, you *don't believe* that what you are
posting yourself
or, once again, you think you can get away with the very
same thing you accuse others of
-----

Obviously, in Richman's eyes, he can do no wrong.

This does give rational people, let alone professionals,
some valid reasons to question your 'professionalism', hmm ?

Right, and when that happens, Richman gives them his *professional
treatment* as well.

Shape up, booooy :-)

Not a chance that Richman will change his ways. Notice that I've been
ignoring his posts for more than a day, and like Weil, he just just
tries to troll me several times every day. Both of them are
obviously immature and needy of any kind of attention, to the point
of self-destruction. If they can't do anything worth of positive
attention, then they jump right on the low road and try for some
negative attention. Friendly advice, just ignore Richman. L:ike Herpes,
he is unlikely
to go away by himself. But, at least you won't be inflaming the sore
spot by scratching it.


I just hope he is not a sockpuppet, just think of the harm he could
be doing if he's borrowed the name of another Dr. Richman.

He might even be real. Unless an AI is writing his posts, there's a pretty
sick person someplace that is writing them.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

Friendly advice, just ignore Richman. L:ike Herpes, he is unlikely
to go away by himself. But, at least you won't be inflaming the sore
spot by scratching it.

Finally, a subject where we can rely on Arny's experiential advice -
Herpes.

Delusions of omniscience noted.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...
:
: Ruud Broens wrote:
:
: Bruce -ph'dada'- Richman wrote:
:
: A very revealing start from a self-appointed, self-righteous,
: holier-than-though "historian" who claims his goal is to get rid of the
: flames on RAO. I guess we can pretty well take the rest of what he
: says as further evidence of his "objectivity".
:
:
: Of course, if Lionel really believes that Jacques Chirac or
: I am insane, then he has proven that he is delusional
: - SINCE HE HAS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT HIS FALSE BELIEFS.
:
: Yet, Bruce Richman has repeatedly posted things like:
:
: "Lionel's Demonstration of His Insanity"
: "..insane guy like Georg M. Middius "
: "No problem, Howard [Ferstler]. Next time, while demonstrating
: your comprehensive knowledge of personality assessment and
: fortune-telling, I'd suggest that you just add in the 95%
: (approximately) of all RAO active posters that think you're
: just insane."
:
: ....you don't really want me to go down the Google record
: for more of the same, ehh?
:
:
: Feel free to distort the Google history, and also feel free to ignore
: such trivial details as dates, preceding posts by others, etc. As I've
: already demonstrated in the response to your other attack thread,
: you're self-serving distortions of history are pretty transparent.
:
: LOL !!!
:
:
:
: ::
: Which is it, Richman, you *don't belief* that what you are
: posting yourself
: or, once again, you think you can get away with the very
: same thing you accuse others of
: -----
: This does give rational people, let alone professionals,
: some valid reasons to question your 'professionalism', hmm ?
:
: Shape up, booooy :-)
: Rudy
:
: So Rudy, in his illogical, highly lie-itensive way, decides that only
: non-professionals have the right to use terms like "insanity" - which
: is not even a psychiatric or psychological term, but a legal term, used
: mainly by attornies and judges in actual practice.
.................................................. .......

Let's do some 'spelling out' for you, Bruce:-)

BJR: one is delusional, if one believes a person to be insane
without the evidence to support that belief.

RB: applying this to some of BJR's postings:
at least twice in a very short Google-lookup i find BJR claiming
several persons to be insane (or: having an IQ of 70 or below)
combining this with a BJR posting : (just google richman + face, lad's

"As I've said before many times, a formal diagnosis can NOT be given by a
licensed mental health professional without a face-to-face personal evaluation.
Therefore, any labeling done here could merely be descriptive and said to
"resemble" the behavior pattern often found in people with a certain diagnosis."

:-)))))
Rudy
.................................................. .........

: Rudy, has, since it serves his flaming agenda, tried to present the
: false argument that RAO is a professional environment rather than
: simply a Usenet NG, and therefore, people should act "professionally" -
: that is, unless they want to insult people that he chooses. Does
: anybody really believe this nonsense? He apparently endorses and
: supports the use of terms like "senile", "paranoid" and "delirium",
: among others by people who clearly are not qualified to use these
: terms, while he condemns those of a person who *is* qualified to use
: these terms.
: What's wrong with this picture? let me guess - he wants to clear the
: road for the unopposed production of more flames by those that can't
: provide any evidence for their false claims.
:
: As his 2 attack threads in less than 24 hours clearly demonstrates, the
: *last* thing Rudy "the Google History expert" Broens apparently wants
: is an unmoderated NG that contains only audio content.
:

Ruud Broens a écrit :

Let's do some 'spelling out' for you, Bruce:-)

BJR: one is delusional, if one believes a person to be insane
without the evidence to support that belief.

RB: applying this to some of BJR's postings:
at least twice in a very short Google-lookup i find BJR claiming
several persons to be insane (or: having an IQ of 70 or below)
combining this with a BJR posting : (just google richman + face, lad's

"As I've said before many times, a formal diagnosis can NOT be given by a
licensed mental health professional without a face-to-face personal evaluation.
Therefore, any labeling done here could merely be descriptive and said to
"resemble" the behavior pattern often found in people with a certain diagnosis."

:-)))))
Rudy

I have a message for you Rudy.
"Good luck". ;-)

"Lionel" wrote in message
...
: Ruud Broens a écrit :
:
: Let's do some 'spelling out' for you, Bruce:-)
:
: BJR: one is delusional, if one believes a person to be insane
: without the evidence to support that belief.
:
: RB: applying this to some of BJR's postings:
: at least twice in a very short Google-lookup i find BJR claiming
: several persons to be insane (or: having an IQ of 70 or below)
: combining this with a BJR posting : (just google richman + face, lad's
:
: "As I've said before many times, a formal diagnosis can NOT be given by a
: licensed mental health professional without a face-to-face personal
evaluation.
: Therefore, any labeling done here could merely be descriptive and said to
: "resemble" the behavior pattern often found in people with a certain
diagnosis."
:
: :-)))))
: Rudy
:
: I have a message for you Rudy.
: "Good luck". ;-)

Plus que ca change, plus c'est la meme chose
is what you mean ?
C'est possible, certainement :-)
Rudy

Ruud Broens wrote:
"Lionel" wrote in message
...
: Ruud Broens a =E9crit :
:
: Let's do some 'spelling out' for you, Bruce:-)
:
: BJR: one is delusional, if one believes a person to be insane
: without the evidence to support that belief.
:
: RB: applying this to some of BJR's postings:
: at least twice in a very short Google-lookup i find BJR
claiming
: several persons to be insane (or: having an IQ of 70 or
below)
: combining this with a BJR posting : (just google richman +
face, lad's
:
: "As I've said before many times, a formal diagnosis can NOT be
given by a
: licensed mental health professional without a face-to-face
personal
evaluation.
: Therefore, any labeling done here could merely be descriptive
and said to
: "resemble" the behavior pattern often found in people with a
certain
diagnosis."
:
: :-)))))
: Rudy
:
: I have a message for you Rudy.
: "Good luck". ;-)

Plus que ca change, plus c'est la meme chose
is what you mean
?
C'est possible, certainement :-)
Rudy

No evidence presented to support Rudy's neverending efforts to revise
history through distortion and selective editing.

LOL 1!!

No evidence presented to support Rudy's neverending efforts to revise
history through distortion and selective editing.

LOL 1!!

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Ruud Broens" wrote in message

Bruce -ph'dada'- Richman wrote:
Of course, if Lionel really believes that Jacques Chirac or
I am insane, then he has proven that he is delusional
- SINCE HE HAS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT HIS FALSE BELIEFS.

Yet, Bruce Richman has repeatedly posted things like:

"Lionel's Demonstration of His Insanity"

Sounds like a Richman post.

"..insane guy like Georg M. Middius "

That text was originionated by Lionel, not Brucie.

"No problem, Howard [Ferstler]. Next time, while demonstrating
your comprehensive knowledge of personality assessment and
fortune-telling, I'd suggest that you just add in the 95%
(approximately) of all RAO active posters that think you're
just insane."


Sounds like a Richman post.

....you don't really want me to go down the Google record
for more of the same, ehh?

Richman spews this stuff like an world-class active volcano.

Which is it, Richman, you *don't believe* that what you are
posting yourself
or, once again, you think you can get away with the very
same thing you accuse others of
-----

Obviously, in Richman's eyes, he can do no wrong.

This does give rational people, let alone professionals,
some valid reasons to question your 'professionalism', hmm ?

Right, and when that happens, Richman gives them his *professional
treatment* as well.

Shape up, booooy :-)

Not a chance that Richman will change his ways. Notice that I've been
ignoring his posts for more than a day, and like Weil, he just just
tries to troll me several times every day. Both of them are
obviously immature and needy of any kind of attention, to the point
of self-destruction. If they can't do anything worth of positive
attention, then they jump right on the low road and try for some
negative attention. Friendly advice, just ignore Richman. L:ike Herpes,
he is unlikely
to go away by himself. But, at least you won't be inflaming the sore
spot by scratching it.


I just hope he is not a sockpuppet, just think of the harm he could
be doing if he's borrowed the name of another Dr. Richman.

He might even be real. Unless an AI is writing his posts, there's a pretty
sick person someplace that is writing them.

I don't know about sick, but I do suspect that he is just screwing with us.

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
ink.net
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
"Ruud Broens" wrote in message

Bruce -ph'dada'- Richman wrote:
Of course, if Lionel really believes that Jacques Chirac or
I am insane, then he has proven that he is delusional
- SINCE HE HAS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT HIS FALSE BELIEFS.

Yet, Bruce Richman has repeatedly posted things like:

"Lionel's Demonstration of His Insanity"

Sounds like a Richman post.

"..insane guy like Georg M. Middius "

That text was originionated by Lionel, not Brucie.

"No problem, Howard [Ferstler]. Next time, while demonstrating
your comprehensive knowledge of personality assessment and
fortune-telling, I'd suggest that you just add in the 95%
(approximately) of all RAO active posters that think you're
just insane."


Sounds like a Richman post.

....you don't really want me to go down the Google record
for more of the same, ehh?

Richman spews this stuff like an world-class active volcano.

Which is it, Richman, you *don't believe* that what you are
posting yourself
or, once again, you think you can get away with the very
same thing you accuse others of
-----

Obviously, in Richman's eyes, he can do no wrong.

This does give rational people, let alone professionals,
some valid reasons to question your 'professionalism', hmm ?

Right, and when that happens, Richman gives them his *professional
treatment* as well.

Shape up, booooy :-)

Not a chance that Richman will change his ways. Notice that I've been
ignoring his posts for more than a day, and like Weil, he just just
tries to troll me several times every day. Both of them are
obviously immature and needy of any kind of attention, to the point
of self-destruction. If they can't do anything worth of positive
attention, then they jump right on the low road and try for some
negative attention. Friendly advice, just ignore Richman. L:ike Herpes,
he is unlikely
to go away by himself. But, at least you won't be inflaming the sore
spot by scratching it.


I just hope he is not a sockpuppet, just think of the harm he could
be doing if he's borrowed the name of another Dr. Richman.

He might even be real. Unless an AI is writing his posts, there's a pretty
sick person someplace that is writing them.

Here's the primary reason I think he's having us on and essentially playing
a game.

I said:

" I'm capable of accepting my fault, hope about you and yours?"

And Bruce replied:

"There's none for me to accept."

Either he's having us on, or he's _________________ fill in the blank.