Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() About 20 years ago, there was a writer named Jim Eilworth who wrote a piece called "The Lowest Common Denominator".* I first heard it read by the author as an "editorial correspondent" piece on the easy listening station WRFM-AM.* (one of the earliest automated AM-FM stations, then located in Clifton NJ.)* I only heard it once more on that station about 6 years later, and both times I wish I had a tape recorder.* I must not have been alone in my admiration for the piece since it appeared on a business website, plagiarized by some management consultant. While I cannot recall the entire piece, the essence was while it could be argued that lowering a standard to accommodate the masses makes things easier, it ultimately hurts us since it encourages a downward vicious spiral in both expectations and quality.* While short-term numbers will look better (read: inflated), it is very difficult to recover from low standards.* It is like grinding down a part to fit, realizing you went too far, and then realizing further that it is going to be very difficult to replace what was lost to the grinding wheel. I'm also not buying the excuse that the average boom box is the reason why we see waveforms that resemble toothpaste.* I remember the sound of the AM radio in my father's 4 cylinder 1964 Chevy II with a 4x6 speaker in an all-metal dashboard when tuned to WABC.* It sounded far worse than any boom box made today, yet when I listen to a CD of the Beach Boys or the Beatles, I hear some rather nice sounds. Dumbing down the audio quality at the source is not the answer, nor is it good for the long-term viability of the field. * * Forget anything about sounding good on high end equipment since those 0.1 percent of the population having monitoring equipment is not the target at all. Well, the record companies have successfully alienated me as a customer.* I don't buy any new music.* I don't like the "artists" and I don't like the sound quality.* I don't like the fact that the audio and music has become a secondary consideration to the video.* I'm not alone; even in my culturally-dead area, many in my age range grew up with some fairly nice 1970s-era stereo systems.* We know what good sound is, even if we can't quantify it in technical terms.* We grew up listening to "Dark Side of the Moon", "Aja", "Fly Like an Eagle", "The Wall", "Hotel California", "Leftoverture", "A Night at the Opera", and our auntie's copy of "Revolver".* Given that people in my demographic are at their peak earning years, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the execs are neglecting a pretty large source of income. At some point, the technology for very high quality music reproduction will become extremely cheap.* People may one day look back at the Walkman, and wonder how we managed to scrape up $80 for something that sounded to them the way a scratchy old 78 sounds to us today.* Record companies will regret that they chose to let quality slip so much.* To see this takes long-term thinking, and the average MBA's idea of long-term is a three month time frame. Furthermore, those who allowed that quality to slip will one day regret they stood by and allowed a project to be mixed at the Pro Tools "puree" setting.* They will have a lot of explaining to do, and the "just following orders" defense won't cut it.* If I were in the business and faced with receiving a credit on a project like that, I would either insist that my name be eliminated, or replaced with "Alan Smithee". Has anyone ever wondered why the community remembers names like George Martin, Geoff Emerick, Mr. & Mrs. Bob Fine, Doug Sax, Stan Ricker, George Massenberg, etc.? Does anyone ever wonder why the name of "Ampex" is synonymous with "high quality" and "durability", and does anyone think this group would exist today if it didn't?? Barring the unlikely event that sound quality standards are allowed to return to that if a 1920s-era regenerative AM receiver, does anyone here REALLY think that the mainstream product being released today will be praised for audio quality some 20 years from now??? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
on topic: we need a rec.audio.pro.ot newsgroup! | Pro Audio | |||
DNC Schedule of Events | Pro Audio |