87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.

Drake wrote:
87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.

It shows you how desperate and compulsive some of RAO's flamers are to
seek out any excuse to initiate a new smear campaign. Note who started
flinging the smears first. That tells you a lot. Or is that "LOT's".
Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...

Drake wrote:
87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.

It shows you how desperate and compulsive some of RAO's flamers are to
seek out any excuse to initiate a new smear campaign. Note who started
flinging the smears first. That tells you a lot. Or is that "LOT's".
Bruce J. Richman

You and who else?

Drake a écrit :
87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.

We were looking for a statisitician...
Welcome to the club ! ;-)

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Drake wrote:

87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.


It shows you how desperate and compulsive some of RAO's flamers are to
seek out any excuse to initiate a new smear campaign. Note who started
flinging the smears first. That tells you a lot. Or is that "LOT's".
Bruce J. Richman


99,99% of the time, BJ (lol) is at the origin of the flames... This
"test" message is an other proof of his inevitable culpability. (lol)

Lionel, the compulsive liar, and flaming fool wrote:


Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Drake wrote:

87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.


It shows you how desperate and compulsive some of RAO's flamers are to
seek out any excuse to initiate a new smear campaign. Note who started
flinging the smears first. That tells you a lot. Or is that "LOT's".
Bruce J. Richman


99,99% of the time, BJ (lol) is at the origin of the flames... This
"test" message is an other proof of his inevitable culpability. (lol)



As usual, Lionel has no evidence,no facts, and no brains. Since he was the
first person and Krueger the second to attack a thread containing only one word
"test", it's pretty clear that these chronic compulsive liars will flame
anything - even a one word post.

Perhaps Lionel would like to list all the people he's attacked in the short
time he's been polluting RAO. We all know he hopes to match Krueger's record
of having a lost of enemies that he can attack, but Krueger adds new ones all
the time, a feat that Lionel does not have the stamina to duplicate, even
though this anti-semitic, Hamas Lover tries his best to be as obnoxious and
incoherent as possible.


Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
groups.com...

Drake wrote:
87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.

It shows you how desperate and compulsive some of RAO's flamers are to
seek out any excuse to initiate a new smear campaign. Note who started
flinging the smears first. That tells you a lot. Or is that "LOT's".
Bruce J. Richman

You and who else?



More lies from RAO's dependable lying sack of ****.

The thread clearly shows that your idol and best friiend, Krueger, and the
idiot, Lionel, starting slinging mud right away.
As is your usual custom, you quickly joined the smears, because that's all
you
know how to do.

More lies and disinformation about threads from McKelvy. Similar to the
lies
he's been spreading about others for over 7 years.

Q.E.D.


Thanks for proving my point by being the first to attack in a new thread
as
well. You're so predictable. LOL !!!!

I notice you've avoided my proposal. No surprise since it would expose
you
even more as a phony.



Bruce J. Richman


Better check again.

"Drake" wrote in message


87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.

It's almost scary to reflect on the fact that RAO seems to have improved
quite a bit lately.

Flames are running something like 50% of the traffic as opposed to more like
100% a month or two ago.

"Drake" wrote in message
...
87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.

Hold on, we aren't nearly done yet.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Lionel, the compulsive liar, and flaming fool wrote:


Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Drake wrote:

87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.


It shows you how desperate and compulsive some of RAO's flamers are to
seek out any excuse to initiate a new smear campaign. Note who started
flinging the smears first. That tells you a lot. Or is that "LOT's".
Bruce J. Richman


99,99% of the time, BJ (lol) is at the origin of the flames... This
"test" message is an other proof of his inevitable culpability. (lol)



As usual, Lionel has no evidence,no facts, and no brains. Since he was
the
first person and Krueger the second to attack a thread containing only one
word
"test", it's pretty clear that these chronic compulsive liars will flame
anything - even a one word post.

How exactly is responding to the single word "test" with the single word
"congratulation" an attack? Tell the truth, you ran of Xanax again, didn't
you?


Perhaps Lionel would like to list all the people he's attacked in the
short
time he's been polluting RAO.

Pretty mcuh everybody, as I said he's eqaul opportunity, but he did give yo
and I that glorious meeting of minds, where we agreed on something for a
change.

We all know he hopes to match Krueger's record
of having a lost of enemies that he can attack,

How many people on the "lost"? How do you know that is his intention?
Crystal Ball?

but Krueger adds new ones all
the time, a feat that Lionel does not have the stamina to duplicate, even
though this anti-semitic, Hamas Lover tries his best to be as obnoxious
and
incoherent as possible.


At least he's not nearly as redundant as your esteemed self.

snicker

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Lionel, the compulsive liar, and flaming fool wrote:


Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :
Drake wrote:

87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.


It shows you how desperate and compulsive some of RAO's flamers
are to
seek out any excuse to initiate a new smear campaign. Note who
started
flinging the smears first. That tells you a lot. Or is that
"LOT's".
Bruce J. Richman


99,99% of the time, BJ (lol) is at the origin of the flames... This
"test" message is an other proof of his inevitable culpability.
(lol)



As usual, Lionel has no evidence,no facts, and no brains. Since he
was
the
first person and Krueger the second to attack a thread containing
only one
word
"test", it's pretty clear that these chronic compulsive liars will
flame
anything - even a one word post.

How exactly is responding to the single word "test" with the single
word
"congratulation" an attack? Tell the truth, you ran of Xanax again,
didn't
you?


Try facing reality, idiotic liar McKelvy, you can't be this stupid can
you? Oh yes, even your addiction to marcotic painkillers and
indulgence in hallucinogencis don't seem to help.

We'll all just chalk up your lack of awareness of sarcasm in Lionel's
response to your basic lack of understanding, and of course, your
readiness to always attack Krueger's many enemies.



Perhaps Lionel would like to list all the people he's attacked in
the
short
time he's been polluting RAO.

Pretty mcuh everybody, as I said he's eqaul opportunity, but he did
give yo
and I that glorious meeting of minds, where we agreed on something
for a
change.

We all know he hopes to match Krueger's record
of having a lost of enemies that he can attack,

How many people on the "lost"? How do you know that is his
intention?
Crystal Ball?


You compulsive liars and flamers all want to be No. 1. You've already
proved to most of us that you're No. 2.


but Krueger adds new ones all
the time, a feat that Lionel does not have the stamina to
duplicate, even
though this anti-semitic, Hamas Lover tries his best to be as
obnoxious
and
incoherent as possible.


At least he's not nearly as redundant as your esteemed self.

snicker

And you've once again neglected to condemn or even admit that you lied
about Krueger not engaging in another unprovoked personal attack on
this very thread - as the 2nd attacker after your good friend and soul
mate, Lionel.

Thanks for once again proving how hypocritical you are, flamer.
LOL !!! LOL !!!!

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Lionel, the compulsive liar, and flaming fool wrote:


Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Drake wrote:

87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.


It shows you how desperate and compulsive some of RAO's flamers
are to
seek out any excuse to initiate a new smear campaign. Note who
started
flinging the smears first. That tells you a lot. Or is that
"LOT's".
Bruce J. Richman


99,99% of the time, BJ (lol) is at the origin of the flames... This
"test" message is an other proof of his inevitable culpability.
(lol)



As usual, Lionel has no evidence,no facts, and no brains. Since he
was
the
first person and Krueger the second to attack a thread containing
only one
word
"test", it's pretty clear that these chronic compulsive liars will
flame
anything - even a one word post.

How exactly is responding to the single word "test" with the single
word
"congratulation" an attack? Tell the truth, you ran out of Xanax again,
didn't
you?


Try facing reality, idiotic liar McKelvy, you can't be this stupid can
you? Oh yes, even your addiction to marcotic painkillers and
indulgence in hallucinogencis don't seem to help.

If you think his single word response was an attack, plese explain why.
For the record I'm addicted to niether marcotics or narcotics.

We'll all just chalk up your lack of awareness of sarcasm in Lionel's
response to your basic lack of understanding, and of course, your
readiness to always attack Krueger's many enemies.



Perhaps Lionel would like to list all the people he's attacked in
the
short
time he's been polluting RAO.

Pretty much everybody, as I said he's eqaul opportunity, but he did
give you
and I that glorious meeting of minds, where we agreed on something
for a
change.

We all know he hopes to match Krueger's record
of having a lost of enemies that he can attack,

How many people on the "lost"? How do you know that is his
intention?
Crystal Ball?


You compulsive liars and flamers all want to be No. 1. You've already
proved to most of us that you're No. 2.

Middius posts more than I do and more than Arny. Finding things where he's
not flaming somebody would be an easier thing to count.

but Krueger adds new ones all
the time, a feat that Lionel does not have the stamina to
duplicate, even
though this anti-semitic, Hamas Lover tries his best to be as
obnoxious
and
incoherent as possible.


At least he's not nearly as redundant as your esteemed self.

snicker

And you've once again neglected to condemn or even admit that you lied
about Krueger not engaging in another unprovoked personal attack on
this very thread - as the 2nd attacker after your good friend and soul
mate, Lionel.

This thread? He hasn't flamed anybody in this thread.
Do you mean some other thread?

Lionel, are we friends?
Bruce is there anything in the Google archive that would indicate Lionel and
I are friends?

Thanks for once again proving how hypocritical you are, flamer.
LOL !!! LOL !!!!

Thanks for proving you don't know what the **** you're talking about, again.

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Lionel, the compulsive liar, and flaming fool wrote:


Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :
Drake wrote:

87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.


It shows you how desperate and compulsive some of RAO's flamers
are to
seek out any excuse to initiate a new smear campaign. Note who
started
flinging the smears first. That tells you a lot. Or is that
"LOT's".
Bruce J. Richman


99,99% of the time, BJ (lol) is at the origin of the flames...
This
"test" message is an other proof of his inevitable culpability.
(lol)



As usual, Lionel has no evidence,no facts, and no brains. Since
he
was
the
first person and Krueger the second to attack a thread containing
only one
word
"test", it's pretty clear that these chronic compulsive liars
will
flame
anything - even a one word post.

How exactly is responding to the single word "test" with the single
word
"congratulation" an attack? Tell the truth, you ran out of Xanax
again,
didn't
you?


Try facing reality, idiotic liar McKelvy, you can't be this stupid
can
you? Oh yes, even your addiction to marcotic painkillers and
indulgence in hallucinogencis don't seem to help.

If you think his single word response was an attack, plese explain
why.
For the record I'm addicted to niether marcotics or narcotics.


Really? "niether" ?

Remember your recent comments about Xanas and restraints? Explain for
the record how you have any knowledge that either of those words have
any relationship to me.


We'll all just chalk up your lack of awareness of sarcasm in Lionel's
response to your basic lack of understanding, and of course, your
readiness to always attack Krueger's many enemies.



Perhaps Lionel would like to list all the people he's attacked in
the
short
time he's been polluting RAO.

Pretty much everybody, as I said he's eqaul opportunity, but he did
give you
and I that glorious meeting of minds, where we agreed on something
for a
change.

We all know he hopes to match Krueger's record
of having a lost of enemies that he can attack,

How many people on the "lost"? How do you know that is his
intention?
Crystal Ball?


You compulsive liars and flamers all want to be No. 1. You've
already
proved to most of us that you're No. 2.

Middius posts more than I do and more than Arny. Finding things
where he's
not flaming somebody would be an easier thing to count.

but Krueger adds new ones all
the time, a feat that Lionel does not have the stamina to
duplicate, even
though this anti-semitic, Hamas Lover tries his best to be as
obnoxious
and
incoherent as possible.


At least he's not nearly as redundant as your esteemed self.

snicker

And you've once again neglected to condemn or even admit that you
lied
about Krueger not engaging in another unprovoked personal attack on
this very thread - as the 2nd attacker after your good friend and
soul
mate, Lionel.

This thread? He hasn't flamed anybody in this thread.
Do you mean some other thread?



That's a lie. Claiming that a person is "sucking at the baby bottle of
AOL" and claiming that "Richman probably doesn't even know what an ISP
is" (paraphrased quotes) are not attacks? They would be in the view of
any objective observer, which excludes you. Why do you think Krueger
even entered his comment right after Lionel?

Lionel, are we friends?
Bruce is there anything in the Google archive that would indicate
Lionel and
I are friends?

Thanks for once again proving how hypocritical you are, flamer.
LOL !!! LOL !!!!

Thanks for proving you don't know what the **** you're talking about,
again.

Thanks for once again demonstrating that you can';t tell the truth
about Krueger or the posts that you make, hypocrite.

Thanks for once again proving that you're an idiot with no idea of what
actually happens on RAO.

Thanks for once again confirming that you're full of ****, as most of
us have known for a long time.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
ups.com...

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Lionel, the compulsive liar, and flaming fool wrote:


Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Drake wrote:

87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.


It shows you how desperate and compulsive some of RAO's flamers
are to
seek out any excuse to initiate a new smear campaign. Note who
started
flinging the smears first. That tells you a lot. Or is that
"LOT's".
Bruce J. Richman


99,99% of the time, BJ (lol) is at the origin of the flames...
This
"test" message is an other proof of his inevitable culpability.
(lol)



As usual, Lionel has no evidence,no facts, and no brains. Since
he
was
the
first person and Krueger the second to attack a thread containing
only one
word
"test", it's pretty clear that these chronic compulsive liars
will
flame
anything - even a one word post.

How exactly is responding to the single word "test" with the single
word
"congratulation" an attack? Tell the truth, you ran out of Xanax
again,
didn't
you?


Try facing reality, idiotic liar McKelvy, you can't be this stupid
can
you? Oh yes, even your addiction to marcotic painkillers and
indulgence in hallucinogencis don't seem to help.

If you think his single word response was an attack, plese explain
why.
For the record I'm addicted to niether marcotics or narcotics.


Really? "niether" ?

Remember your recent comments about Xanas and restraints? Explain for
the record how you have any knowledge that either of those words have
any relationship to me.


We'll all just chalk up your lack of awareness of sarcasm in Lionel's
response to your basic lack of understanding, and of course, your
readiness to always attack Krueger's many enemies.



Perhaps Lionel would like to list all the people he's attacked in
the
short
time he's been polluting RAO.

Pretty much everybody, as I said he's eqaul opportunity, but he did
give you
and I that glorious meeting of minds, where we agreed on something
for a
change.

We all know he hopes to match Krueger's record
of having a lost of enemies that he can attack,

How many people on the "lost"? How do you know that is his
intention?
Crystal Ball?


You compulsive liars and flamers all want to be No. 1. You've
already
proved to most of us that you're No. 2.

Middius posts more than I do and more than Arny. Finding things
where he's
not flaming somebody would be an easier thing to count.

but Krueger adds new ones all
the time, a feat that Lionel does not have the stamina to
duplicate, even
though this anti-semitic, Hamas Lover tries his best to be as
obnoxious
and
incoherent as possible.


At least he's not nearly as redundant as your esteemed self.

snicker

And you've once again neglected to condemn or even admit that you
lied
about Krueger not engaging in another unprovoked personal attack on
this very thread - as the 2nd attacker after your good friend and
soul
mate, Lionel.

This thread? He hasn't flamed anybody in this thread.
Do you mean some other thread?



That's a lie. Claiming that a person is "sucking at the baby bottle of
AOL" and claiming that "Richman probably doesn't even know what an ISP
is" (paraphrased quotes) are not attacks? They would be in the view of
any objective observer, which excludes you. Why do you think Krueger
even entered his comment right after Lionel?

Lionel, are we friends?
Bruce is there anything in the Google archive that would indicate
Lionel and
I are friends?

Thanks for once again proving how hypocritical you are, flamer.
LOL !!! LOL !!!!

Thanks for proving you don't know what the **** you're talking about,
again.

Thanks for once again demonstrating that you can';t tell the truth
about Krueger or the posts that you make, hypocrite.

Thanks for once again proving that you're an idiot with no idea of what
actually happens on RAO.

Thanks for once again confirming that you're full of ****, as most of
us have known for a long time.

Thanks for showing what a thin skinned **** you are.

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
ups.com...

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Lionel, the compulsive liar, and flaming fool wrote:


Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :
Drake wrote:

87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.


It shows you how desperate and compulsive some of RAO's
flamers
are to
seek out any excuse to initiate a new smear campaign. Note
who
started
flinging the smears first. That tells you a lot. Or is that
"LOT's".
Bruce J. Richman


99,99% of the time, BJ (lol) is at the origin of the flames...
This
"test" message is an other proof of his inevitable culpability.
(lol)



As usual, Lionel has no evidence,no facts, and no brains.
Since
he
was
the
first person and Krueger the second to attack a thread
containing
only one
word
"test", it's pretty clear that these chronic compulsive liars
will
flame
anything - even a one word post.

How exactly is responding to the single word "test" with the
single
word
"congratulation" an attack? Tell the truth, you ran out of Xanax
again,
didn't
you?


Try facing reality, idiotic liar McKelvy, you can't be this stupid
can
you? Oh yes, even your addiction to marcotic painkillers and
indulgence in hallucinogencis don't seem to help.

If you think his single word response was an attack, plese explain
why.
For the record I'm addicted to niether marcotics or narcotics.


Really? "niether" ?

Remember your recent comments about Xanas and restraints? Explain
for
the record how you have any knowledge that either of those words have
any relationship to me.


We'll all just chalk up your lack of awareness of sarcasm in
Lionel's
response to your basic lack of understanding, and of course, your
readiness to always attack Krueger's many enemies.



Perhaps Lionel would like to list all the people he's attacked
in
the
short
time he's been polluting RAO.

Pretty much everybody, as I said he's eqaul opportunity, but he
did
give you
and I that glorious meeting of minds, where we agreed on
something
for a
change.

We all know he hopes to match Krueger's record
of having a lost of enemies that he can attack,

How many people on the "lost"? How do you know that is his
intention?
Crystal Ball?


You compulsive liars and flamers all want to be No. 1. You've
already
proved to most of us that you're No. 2.

Middius posts more than I do and more than Arny. Finding things
where he's
not flaming somebody would be an easier thing to count.

but Krueger adds new ones all
the time, a feat that Lionel does not have the stamina to
duplicate, even
though this anti-semitic, Hamas Lover tries his best to be as
obnoxious
and
incoherent as possible.


At least he's not nearly as redundant as your esteemed self.

snicker

And you've once again neglected to condemn or even admit that you
lied
about Krueger not engaging in another unprovoked personal attack on
this very thread - as the 2nd attacker after your good friend and
soul
mate, Lionel.

This thread? He hasn't flamed anybody in this thread.
Do you mean some other thread?



That's a lie. Claiming that a person is "sucking at the baby bottle
of
AOL" and claiming that "Richman probably doesn't even know what an
ISP
is" (paraphrased quotes) are not attacks? They would be in the view
of
any objective observer, which excludes you. Why do you think Krueger
even entered his comment right after Lionel?

Lionel, are we friends?
Bruce is there anything in the Google archive that would indicate
Lionel and
I are friends?

Thanks for once again proving how hypocritical you are, flamer.
LOL !!! LOL !!!!

Thanks for proving you don't know what the **** you're talking
about,
again.

Thanks for once again demonstrating that you can';t tell the truth
about Krueger or the posts that you make, hypocrite.

Thanks for once again proving that you're an idiot with no idea of
what
actually happens on RAO.

Thanks for once again confirming that you're full of ****, as most of
us have known for a long time.

Thanks for showing what a thin skinned **** you are.

Thanks for demonstrating for all to see what a delusional, compulsive
flaming asshole you are. Thanks for demonstrating that you can't stop
frothing at the moutn whenever you see my name.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
ups.com...

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Lionel, the compulsive liar, and flaming fool wrote:


Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Drake wrote:

87 flames to a test message. What a bunch of losers.


It shows you how desperate and compulsive some of RAO's flamers
are to
seek out any excuse to initiate a new smear campaign. Note who
started
flinging the smears first. That tells you a lot. Or is that
"LOT's".
Bruce J. Richman


99,99% of the time, BJ (lol) is at the origin of the flames...
This
"test" message is an other proof of his inevitable culpability.
(lol)



As usual, Lionel has no evidence,no facts, and no brains. Since
he
was
the
first person and Krueger the second to attack a thread containing
only one
word
"test", it's pretty clear that these chronic compulsive liars
will
flame
anything - even a one word post.

How exactly is responding to the single word "test" with the single
word
"congratulation" an attack? Tell the truth, you ran out of Xanax
again,
didn't
you?


Try facing reality, idiotic liar McKelvy, you can't be this stupid
can
you? Oh yes, even your addiction to marcotic painkillers and
indulgence in hallucinogencis don't seem to help.

If you think his single word response was an attack, plese explain
why.
For the record I'm addicted to niether marcotics or narcotics.


Really? "niether" ?

Remember your recent comments about Xanas and restraints? Explain for
the record how you have any knowledge that either of those words have
any relationship to me.


We'll all just chalk up your lack of awareness of sarcasm in Lionel's
response to your basic lack of understanding, and of course, your
readiness to always attack Krueger's many enemies.



Perhaps Lionel would like to list all the people he's attacked in
the
short
time he's been polluting RAO.

Pretty much everybody, as I said he's eqaul opportunity, but he did
give you
and I that glorious meeting of minds, where we agreed on something
for a
change.

We all know he hopes to match Krueger's record
of having a lost of enemies that he can attack,

How many people on the "lost"? How do you know that is his
intention?
Crystal Ball?


You compulsive liars and flamers all want to be No. 1. You've
already
proved to most of us that you're No. 2.

Middius posts more than I do and more than Arny. Finding things
where he's
not flaming somebody would be an easier thing to count.

but Krueger adds new ones all
the time, a feat that Lionel does not have the stamina to
duplicate, even
though this anti-semitic, Hamas Lover tries his best to be as
obnoxious
and
incoherent as possible.


At least he's not nearly as redundant as your esteemed self.

snicker

And you've once again neglected to condemn or even admit that you
lied
about Krueger not engaging in another unprovoked personal attack on
this very thread - as the 2nd attacker after your good friend and
soul
mate, Lionel.

This thread? He hasn't flamed anybody in this thread.
Do you mean some other thread?



That's a lie. Claiming that a person is "sucking at the baby bottle of
AOL" and claiming that "Richman probably doesn't even know what an ISP
is" (paraphrased quotes) are not attacks? They would be in the view of
any objective observer, which excludes you. Why do you think Krueger
even entered his comment right after Lionel?

Lionel, are we friends?
Bruce is there anything in the Google archive that would indicate
Lionel and
I are friends?

Thanks for once again proving how hypocritical you are, flamer.
LOL !!! LOL !!!!

Thanks for proving you don't know what the **** you're talking about,
again.

Thanks for once again demonstrating that you can';t tell the truth
about Krueger or the posts that you make, hypocrite.

Thanks for once again proving that you're an idiot with no idea of what
actually happens on RAO.

Thanks for once again confirming that you're full of ****, as most of
us have known for a long time.

Thanks for showing what a thin skinned **** you are.