Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Balanced Audio
My initial research of balanced audio cable is it can eliminiate
interference of mic wire by canceling noise out. I have a Sony MHF-800. I would like to know if it's possible for me to take advantage of balanced audio. What mic and/or accessories do I need? Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"chris" wrote ...
My initial research of balanced audio cable is it can eliminiate interference of mic wire by canceling noise out. I have a Sony MHF-800. I would like to know if it's possible for me to take advantage of balanced audio. What mic and/or accessories do I need? Thanks. Your MD recorder most likely does NOT have balanced inputs. However, there are external devices that will interface (adapt) between balanced mic lines and the unbalanced input of your MD recorder. Note, however, that a good pair of balancing transformers may cost more than your MD recorder. Balanced audio lines are not a magic bullet. Balancing is a valid way of avoiding several kinds of audio interference/artifacts, but never forget the old adage: "If it ain't broke, don't try to fix it." It is entirely possible that unbalanced mic lines may be simpler, cheaper, and even better sounding for your application. Most higher-end microphones have low-impedance balanced outputs. Selecting a mic on the basis of whether it is balanced or not is something like selecting a vehicle based on how many cup holders it has. There are a great many far more important factors that would go into selecting a microphone including your budget and proposed application(s). You could also refer to the FAQ for further discussion, tutorial on balanced lines, etc. at http://www.recaudiopro.net/ A high-end balancing transformer device for MD, DAT, etc. recorders is shown here... http://www.jensentransformers.com/as/as037.pdf Note that this is quite possibly overkill for your application(?) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
chris wrote:
My initial research of balanced audio cable is it can eliminiate interference of mic wire by canceling noise out. I have a Sony MHF-800. I would like to know if it's possible for me to take advantage of balanced audio. What mic and/or accessories do I need? Thanks. The wire does't cancel the sound its the balanced input that does when properly terminated George |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
George Gleason wrote:
chris wrote: My initial research of balanced audio cable is it can eliminiate interference of mic wire by canceling noise out. I have a Sony MHF-800. I would like to know if it's possible for me to take advantage of balanced audio. What mic and/or accessories do I need? Thanks. The wire does't cancel the sound its the balanced input that does when properly terminated George I am sorry if I was not clear. I mean moving the mic wire generates noise. For most audio recording, I don't move the mic but sometimes, when I am doing video, I have to move and there will be noise. That is when connecting to a DV camcorder. It would likely require a pro camcorder with balanced audio input to solve that problem. Let's get back to the Hi-MD. It has a digital optical input so I think there moght be mixers that can take in balanced mike signals, mix it and convert it to digital optical signal. I am just checking out. I don't expect the cost is cheap. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
chris wrote:
George Gleason wrote: chris wrote: My initial research of balanced audio cable is it can eliminiate interference of mic wire by canceling noise out. I have a Sony MHF-800. I would like to know if it's possible for me to take advantage of balanced audio. What mic and/or accessories do I need? Thanks. The wire does't cancel the sound its the balanced input that does when properly terminated George I am sorry if I was not clear. I mean moving the mic wire generates noise. For most audio recording, I don't move the mic but sometimes, when I am doing video, I have to move and there will be noise. That is when connecting to a DV camcorder. It would likely require a pro camcorder with balanced audio input to solve that problem. Maybe. balanced works because signal is on one conductor but ambient noise is on both the wires terminate as + and - at the input anything on single connducotor passes through any this on both conductors hits the input reversed in polarity and cancels itself so if your noise is common to both conductors it cancels but if it is propagated along just one conductor it will pass unaffected Let's get back to the Hi-MD. It has a digital optical input so I think there moght be mixers that can take in balanced mike signals, mix it and convert it to digital optical signal. I am just checking out. I don't expect the cost is cheap. your exceeding my areas of knowledge I am sure someone here know your answer G |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I am sorry if I was not clear. I mean moving the mic wire generates noise.
IMO this is probably a connector problem, or the cable is bad. Balanced cable arrangements eliminate noise induced by electrical interference, but electrical interference doesn't just 'occur' because you move the cables.... -John O |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
chris wrote:
I am sorry if I was not clear. I mean moving the mic wire generates noise. For most audio recording, I don't move the mic but sometimes, when I am doing video, I have to move and there will be noise. That is when connecting to a DV camcorder. It would likely require a pro camcorder with balanced audio input to solve that problem. No, that's not electronic noise. That's probably a mixture of conducted noise caused by crappy microphone shockmounting, and connector noise from those godawful 1/8" phone plugs. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Dorsey wrote:
chris wrote: I am sorry if I was not clear. I mean moving the mic wire generates noise. For most audio recording, I don't move the mic but sometimes, when I am doing video, I have to move and there will be noise. That is when connecting to a DV camcorder. It would likely require a pro camcorder with balanced audio input to solve that problem. No, that's not electronic noise. That's probably a mixture of conducted noise caused by crappy microphone shockmounting, and connector noise from those godawful 1/8" phone plugs. --scott Thank you. You're right. I found out that the noise is from the connector of the mic. It looks like I don't need balanced audio for my purpose but need to find a good sturdy mic with a solid connector. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
chris wrote:
Thank you. You're right. I found out that the noise is from the connector of the mic. It looks like I don't need balanced audio for my purpose but need to find a good sturdy mic with a solid connector. This, in short, is why professional gear uses XLR connectors. The 1/8" plug is just a total disaster for any application, and it is used everywhere in the consumer world because it is so cheap to make. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Dorsey wrote:
chris wrote: Thank you. You're right. I found out that the noise is from the connector of the mic. It looks like I don't need balanced audio for my purpose but need to find a good sturdy mic with a solid connector. This, in short, is why professional gear uses XLR connectors. The 1/8" plug is just a total disaster for any application, and it is used everywhere in the consumer world because it is so cheap to make. The double-gotcha is that most of the gadgets they put those on have to be picked up and turned over to operate because there's no room on the "front" to put all the controls. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
S O'Neill wrote: Scott Dorsey wrote: chris wrote: Thank you. You're right. I found out that the noise is from the connector of the mic. It looks like I don't need balanced audio for my purpose but need to find a good sturdy mic with a solid connector. This, in short, is why professional gear uses XLR connectors. The 1/8" plug is just a total disaster for any application, and it is used everywhere in the consumer world because it is so cheap to make. The double-gotcha is that most of the gadgets they put those on have to be picked up and turned over to operate because there's no room on the "front" to put all the controls. Some consumer grade 1/8" mic input connecotrs also have a kind of phantom power DC feed on them (not 48 V but a few volts DC) for powering electret mics. The DC being there makes the connector MUCH more likely to create noise from mechanical movement. Mark |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
S O'Neill wrote: Scott Dorsey wrote: chris wrote: Thank you. You're right. I found out that the noise is from the connector of the mic. It looks like I don't need balanced audio for my purpose but need to find a good sturdy mic with a solid connector. This, in short, is why professional gear uses XLR connectors. The 1/8" plug is just a total disaster for any application, and it is used everywhere in the consumer world because it is so cheap to make. The double-gotcha is that most of the gadgets they put those on have to be picked up and turned over to operate because there's no room on the "front" to put all the controls. I should have added that if you are using a dynamic mic, adding a DC blocking cap in series with the "hot" lead can reduce the effect of the DC voltage making the connector more noisey. Mark |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Dorsey wrote:
chris wrote: Thank you. You're right. I found out that the noise is from the connector of the mic. It looks like I don't need balanced audio for my purpose but need to find a good sturdy mic with a solid connector. This, in short, is why professional gear uses XLR connectors. The 1/8" plug is just a total disaster for any application, and it is used everywhere in the consumer world because it is so cheap to make. --scott It's the end where the mic is - the shock mounting?. The 1/8" end that connects to the MD or DV is okay. It seems that I just need a higher quality mic. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
In article et,
chris wrote: Scott Dorsey wrote: chris wrote: Thank you. You're right. I found out that the noise is from the connector of the mic. It looks like I don't need balanced audio for my purpose but need to find a good sturdy mic with a solid connector. This, in short, is why professional gear uses XLR connectors. The 1/8" plug is just a total disaster for any application, and it is used everywhere in the consumer world because it is so cheap to make. It's the end where the mic is - the shock mounting?. The 1/8" end that connects to the MD or DV is okay. It seems that I just need a higher quality mic. I thought you said it was from the connector. If it's noise that is conducted from the cable to the microphone, it's conducted noise from poor shockmounting and has nothing to do with the connector. But don't worry, the connector will become noisy soon enough. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
It's the end where the mic is - the shock mounting?. The 1/8" end that connects to the MD or DV is okay. It seems that I just need a higher quality mic. there is no such thing as a "OK" 1/8 connector george |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article et, chris wrote: Scott Dorsey wrote: chris wrote: Thank you. You're right. I found out that the noise is from the connector of the mic. It looks like I don't need balanced audio for my purpose but need to find a good sturdy mic with a solid connector. This, in short, is why professional gear uses XLR connectors. The 1/8" plug is just a total disaster for any application, and it is used everywhere in the consumer world because it is so cheap to make. It's the end where the mic is - the shock mounting?. The 1/8" end that connects to the MD or DV is okay. It seems that I just need a higher quality mic. I thought you said it was from the connector. If it's noise that is conducted from the cable to the microphone, it's conducted noise from poor shockmounting and has nothing to do with the connector. But don't worry, the connector will become noisy soon enough. --scott Sorry, I don't know much about audio recording. This is the first time I heard of shockmounting. I think this is the cause of the unwanted noise. It's a special plug which is part of the cable that connects the mic. I turn the the other end (1/8" plug )around and around but I don't notice any noise. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Rivers wrote:
There are a few possiblities. The most likely is that the noise is mechanical and is picked up by the mic. The other is that bending the cable actually generates a signal (there's a name for this and it's not piezoelectric - it's a different effect). And then of course if it's a crackling, static-like noise, it could be that the cable itself is defective, with a break that makes contact most of the time but opens when stressed. Or it could be the marvelously flaky mini plug moving a small amount in its jack when you move the cable. It's not the wire, I found out. By moving the wire, it vibrates the tail end of the plug that goes into the mic. When I touch the mic, it generates some noise too. You're right about the cost. I've been on the lookout for a compact mic preamp with an optical digital output that costs in the $200 ballpark. $500 for the Core Sound is about as near as close as I've come. Have you had any luck in finding one? -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over, lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
George Gleason wrote:
It's the end where the mic is - the shock mounting?. The 1/8" end that connects to the MD or DV is okay. It seems that I just need a higher quality mic. there is no such thing as a "OK" 1/8 connector george For me, it's alright. I am not doing critical recordings. I just don't want those loud mic noise. I think my mic has no shock mount. I do want to have an external mic on the DV camcorder. What system should I use to avoid those kinds of mic noise? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
chris wrote:
George Gleason wrote: It's the end where the mic is - the shock mounting?. The 1/8" end that connects to the MD or DV is okay. It seems that I just need a higher quality mic. there is no such thing as a "OK" 1/8 connector george For me, it's alright. I am not doing critical recordings. I just don't want those loud mic noise. I think my mic has no shock mount. I do want to have an external mic on the DV camcorder. What system should I use to avoid those kinds of mic noise? I would pack in a case with foam to insure no movement of the unit or connector perhaps even a touch of hot melt glue where the connector goes into the md unit George |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
chris wrote:
For me, it's alright. I am not doing critical recordings. I just don't want those loud mic noise. I think my mic has no shock mount. I do want to have an external mic on the DV camcorder. What system should I use to avoid those kinds of mic noise? Well, for one thing, forget about using a mike on-camera. That's not just a shortcut to induced noise from the camera, it's also not very controllable and much too far from the source. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 00:09:56 -0800, "Richard Crowley"
wrote: Selecting a mic on the basis of whether it is balanced or not is something like selecting a vehicle based on how many cup holders it has. snip Women DO buy vehicles based on THIS FACTOR! I've seen it with my own eyes! There are a great many far more important factors that would go into selecting a microphone including your budget and proposed application(s). snip Balanced lines were around from the initial days of the telephone. Unbalanced lines are comparitively new, as a way to avoid adding expensive repeat coils (proper WECO nomenclature for any 1:1 transformer) on both the transmit and receive sides. The earlier application of unbalanced lines was the coaxial cable for HF and above, invented in 1927 by Bell Labs' Lloyd Espenscheid. Several factors dictate what you can get away with. Certainly cheap equipment with cheap balanced terminating equipment is worse than better gear that's set up for unbalanced inputs. For short runs where no electrostatic field exist, there's nothing really wrong with unbalanced. But for pro work, there's no substitute, of course. dB |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Rivers wrote:
Most microphones have some sort of internal shock mount to isolate the capsule at least a little from handling noise. But some don't, some aren't very effective, and some get stiff with age (just like us). If everybody got stiff with age, they wouldn't sell so much viagra. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
x-no archive: yes
Mike Rivers wrote: writes: You're right about the cost. I've been on the lookout for a compact mic preamp with an optical digital output that costs in the $200 ballpark. Have you had any luck in finding one? If I had, I wouldn't keep it a secret. Wat a minute... is that a trick answer?? -- ha |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"agent86" wrote in message
.. . Mike Rivers wrote: Most microphones have some sort of internal shock mount to isolate the capsule at least a little from handling noise. But some don't, some aren't very effective, and some get stiff with age (just like us). If everybody got stiff with age, they wouldn't sell so much viagra. They say as you get older every thing that's supposed be soft is hard and vice-versa. Everything also gets bigger, hairier, and closer to the ground. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
On 2005-01-05, DeserTBoB wrote:
Women DO buy vehicles based on THIS FACTOR! I've seen it with my own eyes! Ah, comfort. My other half just bought a truck based on *torque*. On the other hand, she *is* a scientist... |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:49:24 GMT, james of tucson
wrote: Ah, comfort. My other half just bought a truck based on *torque*. On the other hand, she *is* a scientist... snip "Torque" ratings won't do you very much good if the engine that generates it won't last very long doing so. Classic example: The Chevrolet small block, as bad a truck engine as there ever was. Before they finally ironed out most of the bugs in this flawed design, most pickups in commercial use would maybe get 70K miles before the camshaft would need replacing or it'd throw a rod. Meanwhile, over at Ford, the old FE engines were good for 300K miles and more. dB |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:25:09 GMT, chris wrote:
I am sorry if I was not clear. I mean moving the mic wire generates noise. For most audio recording, I don't move the mic but sometimes, when I am doing video, I have to move and there will be noise. That is when connecting to a DV camcorder. It would likely require a pro camcorder with balanced audio input to solve that problem. If you have a noisy cable in this way, replace it with a better one. It's noisy because it's a crap cable, not because it's carrying a balanced or unbalanced signal. CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm "Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
On 2005-01-06, DeserTBoB wrote:
Ah, comfort. My other half just bought a truck based on *torque*. On the other hand, she *is* a scientist... snip "Torque" ratings won't do you very much good I don't think anybody looked at ratings. No, this was a scientific determination, made based on the observation of "goddam, this thing has balls." I, the male half of the family, drive a Volvo station wagon (and a 1962 VW van)... |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Laurence Payne wrote:
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:25:09 GMT, chris wrote: I am sorry if I was not clear. I mean moving the mic wire generates noise. For most audio recording, I don't move the mic but sometimes, when I am doing video, I have to move and there will be noise. That is when connecting to a DV camcorder. It would likely require a pro camcorder with balanced audio input to solve that problem. If you have a noisy cable in this way, replace it with a better one. It's noisy because it's a crap cable, not because it's carrying a balanced or unbalanced signal. CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm "Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect I found out the noise's not coming from the cable but from the mic and where it connects to the cable. The cruel method I can think of to avoid the noise is to duck-tape the the mic and bit of the wire to a rod! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 16:59:12 GMT, chris wrote:
I found out the noise's not coming from the cable but from the mic and where it connects to the cable. The cruel method I can think of to avoid the noise is to duck-tape the the mic and bit of the wire to a rod! snip Open up the mic connector and fix the leads. And it's DUCT tape, not "duck tape." dB |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Kuschel wrote:
I found out the noise's not coming from the cable but from the mic and where it connects to the cable. The cruel method I can think of to avoid the noise is to duck-tape the the mic and bit of the wire to a rod! snip Open up the mic connector and fix the leads. And it's DUCT tape, not "duck tape." dB Actually it is both the most common is Duct tape a plasticised tape for sealing air ducts but there is also tape formulated on "duck" cloth as my dad was a sheet metal worker and quite anal about such things I was often "corrected' when I used the wrong name about the house but today I couldn't tell a roll of Duct from a roll of Duck I liked the chromed tape he used that was about 3 inches wide George |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
DeserTBoB wrote:
And it's DUCT tape, not "duck tape." There is now actually a brand name "Duck Tape". That's how they label their duct tape. It's good for holding goosenecks firmly, and for muting guitar strings for chicken pickin'. -- ha |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:52:46 -0600, Tracy Wintermute
wrote: On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:17:26 GMT, (hank alrich) wrote: There is now actually a brand name "Duck Tape". That's how they label their duct tape. It's good for holding goosenecks firmly, and for muting guitar strings for chicken pickin'. Duck, goose, chicken..... What's with all the fowl language? Aww... Get the pluck out of here! ==================== Tracy Wintermute Rushcreek Ranch ==================== ----- http://mindspring.com/~benbradley |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:17:26 GMT, (hank alrich)
wrote: There is now actually a brand name "Duck Tape". That's how they label their duct tape. It's good for holding goosenecks firmly, and for muting guitar strings for chicken pickin'. Duck, goose, chicken..... What's with all the fowl language? ==================== Tracy Wintermute Rushcreek Ranch ==================== |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
George Gleason wrote:
Richard Kuschel wrote: I found out the noise's not coming from the cable but from the mic and where it connects to the cable. The cruel method I can think of to avoid the noise is to duck-tape the the mic and bit of the wire to a rod! snip Open up the mic connector and fix the leads. And it's DUCT tape, not "duck tape." dB Actually it is both the most common is Duct tape a plasticised tape for sealing air ducts but there is also tape formulated on "duck" cloth as my dad was a sheet metal worker and quite anal about such things I was often "corrected' when I used the wrong name about the house but today I couldn't tell a roll of Duct from a roll of Duck I liked the chromed tape he used that was about 3 inches wide George It was orignially called duck tape when the army invented it. They used it to seal their ammunition containers. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"Ben Bradley" wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:52:46 -0600, Tracy Wintermute wrote: On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:17:26 GMT, (hank alrich) wrote: There is now actually a brand name "Duck Tape". That's how they label their duct tape. It's good for holding goosenecks firmly, and for muting guitar strings for chicken pickin'. Duck, goose, chicken..... What's with all the fowl language? Aww... Get the pluck out of here! Yer all a bunch of quacks. Peace, Paul |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 07:21:54 GMT, "Paul Stamler"
wrote: Yer all a bunch of quacks. snip AFLAC!!!!!! |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Yer all a bunch of quacks.
Peace, Paul I'm all quacked up at the sentiment. Honestly, I can't duck the possibilities of something that holds together such disparate industries as quackers and soup. Ducking the obvious barbs, I am all tied up in quackmental tape. Really, it's not worth ducking the barb, but it's worth barbing the duck. Hence peeking at you with Duck on the mind we come up with Peking duck tape and orang-ya-glad I didn't say sauce? -- Roger W. Norman SirMusic Studio "Paul Stamler" wrote in message ... "Ben Bradley" wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 21:52:46 -0600, Tracy Wintermute wrote: On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 20:17:26 GMT, (hank alrich) wrote: There is now actually a brand name "Duck Tape". That's how they label their duct tape. It's good for holding goosenecks firmly, and for muting guitar strings for chicken pickin'. Duck, goose, chicken..... What's with all the fowl language? Aww... Get the pluck out of here! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
on topic: we need a rec.audio.pro.ot newsgroup! | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |