Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
new song for evaluation - "Bongo Congo"
been awhile since I've done a full-blown song, and it's also been
awhile that I've had a chance to play with Apple's GarageBand . Now that I've had a chance again, I fired up some loops and this came out. It's jazzy with a blues flavour, and I found some bongo loops that meshed nicely with the drum loops I used in the piece. I also did something else this time different - instead of using the POD, I used Garageband's built-in amp modelling, as I never really gave that a fair chance since I first got the program. And I think I wound up getting some pretty interesting results, particularly the clean rhythm and the bass sound. The lead's a bit lazy and not as accurate as I usually like to have it, but it was fun playing with that tone. Used - Peavey Predator Plus (using GFS Rail pickup in neck), rhythm and solos; Dreibelbass, bass line. Mac G4, Garageband, Samson mixer, POD 2 (for solo, the rest of the guitars used Garageband's built-in amp emulation). As usual, have a listen and give me an idea how I did..... http://fileserv6.soundclick.com/fast...bongocongo.mp3 -- Dan Dreibelbis, Guitar Nerd - Better Living Through Home Recording Now On Soundclick for your listening pleasure! http://www.soundclick.com/bands/2/da...elbismusic.htm new song "Bongo Congo" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Daniel Dreibelbis wrote in
: been awhile since I've done a full-blown song, and it's also been awhile that I've had a chance to play with Apple's GarageBand . Now that I've had a chance again, I fired up some loops and this came out. It's jazzy with a blues flavour, and I found some bongo loops that meshed nicely with the drum loops I used in the piece. I also did something else this time different - instead of using the POD, I used Garageband's built-in amp modelling, as I never really gave that a fair chance since I first got the program. And I think I wound up getting some pretty interesting results, particularly the clean rhythm and the bass sound. The lead's a bit lazy and not as accurate as I usually like to have it, but it was fun playing with that tone. Used - Peavey Predator Plus (using GFS Rail pickup in neck), rhythm and solos; Dreibelbass, bass line. Mac G4, Garageband, Samson mixer, POD 2 (for solo, the rest of the guitars used Garageband's built-in amp emulation). As usual, have a listen and give me an idea how I did..... http://fileserv6.soundclick.com/fast...bongocongo.mp3 Not my cup of tea...sorry. I'm listening to Jane Monheit. mmmmm...good! Too much compression/limiting though! Arrgh! r |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The one thing you could do, especially since it's such a basic song, is to
make the rhythm part worth listening to. You have it patterned and it's repetitious but not only that, you didn't perform it correctly throughout the pattern. And remember, most people who could help you take your music someplace want to hear something really outstanding within the first 10 seconds. If you haven't gotten through enough of the intro after 10 seconds to establish the entire pattern, you've alreadly lost the battle. But, overall, and if I were one to give a score, I'd have to say that you have a ways to go both with your playing AND your recording/loop making, so rather than be confused, I'd suggest you concentrate on the playing. Know your songs inside and out, backwards and forwards. If you can't pick up a song on the 3 beat of measure 52, work on it until you can - from memory. You're no good to your recordings until you're good to your music. Arrangement is key to a song's acceptability, but it's not something everyone knows or understands. Playing ability is key to acceptance past the 10 second mark, but arrangements will make that a moot point. In both cases you've already lost your listeners because the drum beat in is four measures and 36 seconds long. Try this for ****s and giggles. Do the drum intro for one measure, jump to the 5, glissand down to the 4 and go right into the rhythm on 1 of the 4th measure. Hey, you're already into the song and it took about 8 seconds. And btw, songs are told by lyrics unless you're a world class composer that can illicit an immediate response to the creative side of the average person's mind. Don't make them try to figure out what the guitar riffs mean, tell them what the song is with lyrics and then make the guitar visually elucidate what the lyrics tell them. This is such a basic tune that it really only needs maybe 15 words to make lyrics, and it takes until 1:36 to get to anything worth trying to listen to, and believe me you don't want to hear what I have to say about your guitar lead playing. At least, if you don't have lyrics you could have a recurring theme that would be called, oh, I don't know, maybe the melody? So my suggestion to you would be to re-read what I wrote, think about it, learn how to do your job, forget about loops and such unless you've actually got the chops to play with them, and learn what the idea behind music really is. Honestly you'd have just as many people wanting to jump up and dance to just the drum loop, and even more honestly, they'd probably sit back down when the rhythm comes in. Blunt, I know. You're lucky that I even gave it a listen, but I do try to find out what some of the people here do and often come away wondering just what newsgroup they think they are on. It's like watching a cable show at 11 PM and then seeing a kiddie commercial for some toy. Who the frick do they think they are marketing too? And who do you think your "base" would be? I know that you're more than likely going to take all of this as some asshole who's coming down on you, but the fact is that A) you asked for it, and B) if no one tells you, you'll never know. It is honestly more beneficial to understand the why of music before you understand the technical details of making music. Reach inside, find what makes music move you and go from there. But if this is the pathway of your endeavor, then you have a long row to hoe. If you're going to be a GarageBand artist, they you won't be an artist. Work on being an artist and come back and tell us how it worked out. -- Roger W. Norman SirMusic Studio "Daniel Dreibelbis" wrote in message ... been awhile since I've done a full-blown song, and it's also been awhile that I've had a chance to play with Apple's GarageBand . Now that I've had a chance again, I fired up some loops and this came out. It's jazzy with a blues flavour, and I found some bongo loops that meshed nicely with the drum loops I used in the piece. I also did something else this time different - instead of using the POD, I used Garageband's built-in amp modelling, as I never really gave that a fair chance since I first got the program. And I think I wound up getting some pretty interesting results, particularly the clean rhythm and the bass sound. The lead's a bit lazy and not as accurate as I usually like to have it, but it was fun playing with that tone. Used - Peavey Predator Plus (using GFS Rail pickup in neck), rhythm and solos; Dreibelbass, bass line. Mac G4, Garageband, Samson mixer, POD 2 (for solo, the rest of the guitars used Garageband's built-in amp emulation). As usual, have a listen and give me an idea how I did..... http://fileserv6.soundclick.com/fast...bongocongo.mp3 -- Dan Dreibelbis, Guitar Nerd - Better Living Through Home Recording Now On Soundclick for your listening pleasure! http://www.soundclick.com/bands/2/da...elbismusic.htm new song "Bongo Congo" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Roger W. Norman wrote:
The one thing you could do, especially since it's such a basic song, is to Roger, you're far too kind. Really.. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
my new song on Soundclick: "Bongo Congo" | Pro Audio | |||
my new song on Soundclick: "Bongo Congo" | Pro Audio | |||
New Song "Moonshine" | Pro Audio | |||
Raw Multi-Track -- What Style Of Music? | Pro Audio | |||
Internet Song Database Problems and Solutions | General |