Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Under which circumnstances can one particular 24-bit card model be
regarded as better or worse, sonically speaking (that is, other than extra hardware features) ? I've read that even a pcmcia card such as Digigram's can pass unnoticed in sound comparison with bigger units, and that there isn't sound benefit in using a 96k sampling rate over 48 or even 44.1. How accurate are such statements, and how and when can they be proven wrong in a practical world ? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
on topic: we need a rec.audio.pro.ot newsgroup! | Pro Audio | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
OT Political | Pro Audio |