Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been trying to wrap my head around something for a few weeks and it's
just not coming together. It all comes down to one basic question: What is so wrong about truncation? Some thoughts that have been in my head...If you're hitting full scale levels using a 24 bit ad, are the most significant 16 bits coming out any different than they would on a 16 bit ad. While wrestling with this I put together a little spreadsheet that takes a 24 bit word, truncates the 8 LSBs and then compares the truncated output to the 24 bit output in terms of % of full scale. As expected, the deviations only appear on the last couple of bits. Then I consider my recording situations (live concerts in bars/clubs) and the fact that the levels at which the quantization error occur are far below the ambient noise. Does that mean it doesn't matter? This is not meant to question the merits of 24 bit - that much I understand. This is about running a 16 bit capture device and a 24 bit source e.g. backup on a JB3 when I do 24 bit laptop recording. thanks david |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
24>16 question | Pro Audio | |||
newbie question - aardvark q10 + external mixer? | Pro Audio | |||
RCA out and Speaker Question in 2004 Ranger Edge Question | Car Audio | |||
capacitor + parallel wiring question? | Car Audio | |||
question on Pioneer DEH-P4600MP | Car Audio |