Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just had 15 guests listen to both the new bose
wave radio and the cambridge soundworks 740 radio side by side, without knowing which was which, check out the results of the listening tests at www.radiowars.homestead.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Radiowars wrote: Just had 15 guests listen to both the new bose wave radio and the cambridge soundworks 740 radio side by side, without knowing which was which, The so-called blind listening test description does not detail the means by which this was actually an apples-to-apples sonic comparison. IOW, tests like this can be systematically biased by loudness, choice of music, positioning of equipment, etc. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ups.com... Radiowars wrote: Just had 15 guests listen to both the new bose wave radio and the cambridge soundworks 740 radio side by side, without knowing which was which, The so-called blind listening test description does not detail the means by which this was actually an apples-to-apples sonic comparison. IOW, tests like this can be systematically biased by loudness, choice of music, positioning of equipment, etc. sorry as it was, "at least" they listened to the actual equipment. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Dec 2004 08:17:25 -0800, "Arny Krueger"
wrote: The so-called blind listening test description According to the description of the test itself, this wasn't a "so-called" blind listening test, it *was* "blind listening test". |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I was in Boston a few weeks ago. Home of both Bose and Cambridge Soundworks. At any rate, after comparing the new Bose Wave Music System to the Cambridge Soundworks 740...I found my conclusion was the same as your panel...MUCH to my surprise. Even if both units had cost the same, I would have purchased the Cambridge 740. Add the $150 price difference and it becomes a no brainer. Purchasers seem to be paying for Bose' extensive and expensive ad campaign rather than for the quality of the Bose radio. Not to say the Bose was bad. IF I had not known about the Cambridge740, and I had listened to the new Bose, I would have purchased the Bose...no doubt about it. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Given the variety of music tested, and the consistancy of opinions, I am confident that his results represent the 'real world' performance of the competing units. If the results were close...8 for unit one and 7 for unit two...you MIGHT question him, but the results were so overwhelmingly in favor of one radio, that I put alot of stock in the results. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Art of Bose Bashing and Amar's Supposed Descent into Mediocrity | General | |||
The Art of Bose Bashing and Amar's Supposed Descent into Mediocrity | Marketplace | |||
Why shouldn't someone buy Bose? | High End Audio | |||
My equipment review of the Bose 901 | Audio Opinions | |||
Richman's ethical lapses | Audio Opinions |