Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Radiowars
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bose vs Cambridge blind in person soundtests

Just had 15 guests listen to both the new bose
wave radio and the cambridge soundworks 740 radio
side by side, without knowing which was which,

check out the results of the listening tests at
www.radiowars.homestead.com


  #2   Report Post  
Arny Krueger
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Radiowars wrote:
Just had 15 guests listen to both the new bose
wave radio and the cambridge soundworks 740 radio
side by side, without knowing which was which,


The so-called blind listening test description does not detail the
means by which this was actually an apples-to-apples sonic comparison.
IOW, tests like this can be systematically biased by loudness, choice
of music, positioning of equipment, etc.

  #3   Report Post  
Clyde Slick
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
ups.com...

Radiowars wrote:
Just had 15 guests listen to both the new bose
wave radio and the cambridge soundworks 740 radio
side by side, without knowing which was which,


The so-called blind listening test description does not detail the
means by which this was actually an apples-to-apples sonic comparison.
IOW, tests like this can be systematically biased by loudness, choice
of music, positioning of equipment, etc.


sorry as it was, "at least" they listened to the actual equipment.


  #4   Report Post  
dave weil
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 26 Dec 2004 08:17:25 -0800, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:


The so-called blind listening test description


According to the description of the test itself, this wasn't a
"so-called" blind listening test, it *was* "blind listening test".
  #5   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default


I was in Boston a few weeks ago. Home of both Bose and Cambridge
Soundworks. At any rate, after comparing the new Bose Wave Music
System to the Cambridge Soundworks 740...I found my conclusion was the
same as your panel...MUCH to my surprise. Even if both units had cost
the same, I would have purchased the Cambridge 740. Add the $150 price
difference and it becomes a no brainer. Purchasers seem to be paying
for Bose' extensive and expensive ad campaign rather than for the
quality of the Bose radio. Not to say the Bose was bad. IF I had not
known about the Cambridge740, and I had listened to the new Bose, I
would have purchased the Bose...no doubt about it.



  #6   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Given the variety of music tested, and the consistancy of opinions, I
am confident that his results represent the 'real world' performance of
the competing units. If the results were close...8 for unit one and 7
for unit two...you MIGHT question him, but the results were so
overwhelmingly in favor of one radio, that I put alot of stock in the
results.

Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Art of Bose Bashing and Amar's Supposed Descent into Mediocrity Wylie Williams General 3 September 27th 04 03:16 AM
The Art of Bose Bashing and Amar's Supposed Descent into Mediocrity Robby Marketplace 0 August 22nd 04 07:13 AM
Why shouldn't someone buy Bose? Stephen McLuckie High End Audio 59 April 20th 04 03:01 AM
My equipment review of the Bose 901 TonyP Audio Opinions 65 February 13th 04 01:06 AM
Richman's ethical lapses Michael McKelvy Audio Opinions 9 December 12th 03 08:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:31 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"