| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
duh! Or, Is Paranoa Catching?
Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
George M. Middius wrote: Clyde Slick said: I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we will see that happen. That will never happen by choice. There's a disconnect here between what a sane person would feel in Mikey's position and what Mikey actually does feel. He doesn't feel humiliated, embarassed, or ashamed. A sane person probably would feel one or all of those. The evidence has revealed deliberate falsehoods and a lame coverup, both serving a master plan of character assassination. But Mikey doesn't see anything wrong with his behavior. This behavior *is* his norm. In fact, the continuing barrage of argumentation, rebuttals, and insults serves his needs wonderfully -- all he needs is to be noticed. Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the underpants of life. On the other hand we are nearly sure that McKelvy would have the "courage" to discuss and to debate his behaviour in his non-usenet life... For my part I highly doubt that "George M. Middius" is able of the same "easiness" and vehemence in his (her ?) real life than on Usenet. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lionel wrote:
Bruce J. Richman a écrit : George M. Middius wrote: Clyde Slick said: I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we will see that happen. That will never happen by choice. There's a disconnect here between what a sane person would feel in Mikey's position and what Mikey actually does feel. He doesn't feel humiliated, embarassed, or ashamed. A sane person probably would feel one or all of those. The evidence has revealed deliberate falsehoods and a lame coverup, both serving a master plan of character assassination. But Mikey doesn't see anything wrong with his behavior. This behavior *is* his norm. In fact, the continuing barrage of argumentation, rebuttals, and insults serves his needs wonderfully -- all he needs is to be noticed. Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the underpants of life. On the other hand we are nearly sure that McKelvy would have the "courage" to discuss and to debate his behaviour in his non-usenet life... For my part I highly doubt that "George M. Middius" is able of the same "easiness" and vehemence in his (her ?) real life than on Usenet. There are a couple of points of clarification, Lionel : (1) The post to which you responded above was not written by me, but by George M. Middius and Art Sackman. (2) McKelvy has been encouraged to submit his complaints about somebody impersonating a psychologist to the legal authorities in Florida, since public impersonation of a licensed psychologist is a crime in the US. He's also been encouraged to publish his libelous false statements about me in an American print publication. If he does either one of these things, he'll definitely get a chance to debate and discuss his delusional, libelous views in public ........... in a courtroom. So far, he has not exhibited the courage to do so. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : George M. Middius wrote: Clyde Slick said: I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we will see that happen. That will never happen by choice. There's a disconnect here between what a sane person would feel in Mikey's position and what Mikey actually does feel. He doesn't feel humiliated, embarassed, or ashamed. A sane person probably would feel one or all of those. The evidence has revealed deliberate falsehoods and a lame coverup, both serving a master plan of character assassination. But Mikey doesn't see anything wrong with his behavior. This behavior *is* his norm. In fact, the continuing barrage of argumentation, rebuttals, and insults serves his needs wonderfully -- all he needs is to be noticed. Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the underpants of life. On the other hand we are nearly sure that McKelvy would have the "courage" to discuss and to debate his behaviour in his non-usenet life... For my part I highly doubt that "George M. Middius" is able of the same "easiness" and vehemence in his (her ?) real life than on Usenet. There are a couple of points of clarification, Lionel : (1) The post to which you responded above was not written by me, but by George M. Middius and Art Sackman. No need to be clarify (2) McKelvy has been encouraged to submit his complaints about somebody impersonating a psychologist to the legal authorities in Florida, since public impersonation of a licensed psychologist is a crime in the US. He's also been encouraged to publish his libelous false statements about me in an American print publication. If he does either one of these things, he'll definitely get a chance to debate and discuss his delusional, libelous views in public .......... in a courtroom. So far, he has not exhibited the courage to do so. This wasn't really my point but... I have already told you that, IMHO the way you use to pour out your professional "opinions" on a public NG doesn't honor you nor your profession and, still IMHO, this strangely make me think to the character assassination you pretend to denounce in McKelvy behaviour. IMHO this is incompatible with the deontology, the professional ethic. I don't pretend to be original, I am not the first one to tell you that on this forum, just the first "hamas lover".  )Bruce J. Richman |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lionel wrote:
Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : George M. Middius wrote: Clyde Slick said: I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we will see that happen. That will never happen by choice. There's a disconnect here between what a sane person would feel in Mikey's position and what Mikey actually does feel. He doesn't feel humiliated, embarassed, or ashamed. A sane person probably would feel one or all of those. The evidence has revealed deliberate falsehoods and a lame coverup, both serving a master plan of character assassination. But Mikey doesn't see anything wrong with his behavior. This behavior *is* his norm. In fact, the continuing barrage of argumentation, rebuttals, and insults serves his needs wonderfully -- all he needs is to be noticed. Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the underpants of life. On the other hand we are nearly sure that McKelvy would have the "courage" to discuss and to debate his behaviour in his non-usenet life... For my part I highly doubt that "George M. Middius" is able of the same "easiness" and vehemence in his (her ?) real life than on Usenet. There are a couple of points of clarification, Lionel : (1) The post to which you responded above was not written by me, but by George M. Middius and Art Sackman. No need to be clarify (2) McKelvy has been encouraged to submit his complaints about somebody impersonating a psychologist to the legal authorities in Florida, since public impersonation of a licensed psychologist is a crime in the US. He's also been encouraged to publish his libelous false statements about me in an American print publication. If he does either one of these things, he'll definitely get a chance to debate and discuss his delusional, libelous views in public .......... in a courtroom. So far, he has not exhibited the courage to do so. This wasn't really my point but... I have already told you that, IMHO the way you use to pour out your professional "opinions" on a public NG doesn't honor you nor your profession and, still IMHO, this strangely make me think to the character assassination you pretend to denounce in McKelvy behaviour. IMHO this is incompatible with the deontology, the professional ethic. I don't pretend to be original, I am not the first one to tell you that on this forum, just the first "hamas lover". )Bruce J. Richman You're wrong, of course, Because I happen to be a psychologist, that does not mean that I can't express my opinions about the behavior of others here, just like everybody else does. Despite numerous false claims by Krueger and Mckelvy that I've attempted to diagnose their abnormal behavior on RAO, there is no evidence to support that lie. They just use that provfable lie to try and prevent exposure of their character assassination campaigns. Re.; my describing you as a "hamas lover", that was an opinion based on your comparisons of Sharon to Sheik Yassin, the late Hamas leader that was personally responsible for ordering numerous suicide bomber attacks upon civilians. IMHO, there is a big difference between giving orders to blow up school buses and restaurants populated by civilians, and giving orders to kill known militants. Granted, civilians unfortunately get killed in wars, but only one side has made a habit of ordering that type of activity. Perhaps now that Arafat is no longer around, there will be a legitimate attempt on both sides to make peace. Time will tell. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : George M. Middius wrote: Clyde Slick said: I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we will see that happen. That will never happen by choice. There's a disconnect here between what a sane person would feel in Mikey's position and what Mikey actually does feel. He doesn't feel humiliated, embarassed, or ashamed. A sane person probably would feel one or all of those. The evidence has revealed deliberate falsehoods and a lame coverup, both serving a master plan of character assassination. But Mikey doesn't see anything wrong with his behavior. This behavior *is* his norm. In fact, the continuing barrage of argumentation, rebuttals, and insults serves his needs wonderfully -- all he needs is to be noticed. Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the underpants of life. On the other hand we are nearly sure that McKelvy would have the "courage" to discuss and to debate his behaviour in his non-usenet life... For my part I highly doubt that "George M. Middius" is able of the same "easiness" and vehemence in his (her ?) real life than on Usenet. There are a couple of points of clarification, Lionel : (1) The post to which you responded above was not written by me, but by George M. Middius and Art Sackman. No need to be clarify (2) McKelvy has been encouraged to submit his complaints about somebody impersonating a psychologist to the legal authorities in Florida, since public impersonation of a licensed psychologist is a crime in the US. He's also been encouraged to publish his libelous false statements about me in an American print publication. If he does either one of these things, he'll definitely get a chance to debate and discuss his delusional, libelous views in public .......... in a courtroom. So far, he has not exhibited the courage to do so. This wasn't really my point but... I have already told you that, IMHO the way you use to pour out your professional "opinions" on a public NG doesn't honor you nor your profession and, still IMHO, this strangely make me think to the character assassination you pretend to denounce in McKelvy behaviour. IMHO this is incompatible with the deontology, the professional ethic. I don't pretend to be original, I am not the first one to tell you that on this forum, just the first "hamas lover". )Bruce J. Richman You're wrong, of course, Because I happen to be a psychologist, that does not mean that I can't express my opinions about the behavior of others here, just like everybody else does. True but IMHO you shouldn't be so generous with the "professional details" that you use to give more *credibility* to your opinions. This lack of *technical* reserve is, IMHO unethical. Anyway I don't want to discuss that now since this you have already debated the subject here so many time, with people really more qualified and intelligent than me. Despite numerous false claims by Krueger and Mckelvy that I've attempted to diagnose their abnormal behavior on RAO, there is no evidence to support that lie. *I* grant the right to Krueger (or any other professional audio) to make a diagnostic of you audio system on this forum. I cannot grant *you* the right to speak about his relation of "Folie à deux" with McKelvy with full detail, documentation and bibliographic references... and the "Licenced Psychologist" signature. Sorry to be so "pinchy minded" but I am congenitally binded to such primal bias. They just use that provfable lie to try and prevent exposure of their character assassination campaigns. Re.; my describing you as a "hamas lover", that was an opinion based on your comparisons of Sharon to Sheik Yassin, This is what *you* have read not what *I* have written. the late Hamas leader that was personally responsible for ordering numerous suicide bomber attacks upon civilians. IMHO, there is a big difference between giving orders to blow up school buses and restaurants populated by civilians, and giving orders to kill known militants. Granted, civilians unfortunately get killed in wars, but only one side has made a habit of ordering that type of activity. Perhaps now that Arafat is no longer around, there will be a legitimate attempt on both sides to make peace. Time will tell. As in the same time Sharon prefer to make alliance with democrats rather than his previous Zealots allies, the peace is in a better way than one year ago. But you are right time will tell. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lionel wrote:
Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : George M. Middius wrote: Clyde Slick said: I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we will see that happen. That will never happen by choice. There's a disconnect here between what a sane person would feel in Mikey's position and what Mikey actually does feel. He doesn't feel humiliated, embarassed, or ashamed. A sane person probably would feel one or all of those. The evidence has revealed deliberate falsehoods and a lame coverup, both serving a master plan of character assassination. But Mikey doesn't see anything wrong with his behavior. This behavior *is* his norm. In fact, the continuing barrage of argumentation, rebuttals, and insults serves his needs wonderfully -- all he needs is to be noticed. Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the underpants of life. On the other hand we are nearly sure that McKelvy would have the "courage" to discuss and to debate his behaviour in his non-usenet life... For my part I highly doubt that "George M. Middius" is able of the same "easiness" and vehemence in his (her ?) real life than on Usenet. There are a couple of points of clarification, Lionel : (1) The post to which you responded above was not written by me, but by George M. Middius and Art Sackman. No need to be clarify (2) McKelvy has been encouraged to submit his complaints about somebody impersonating a psychologist to the legal authorities in Florida, since public impersonation of a licensed psychologist is a crime in the US. He's also been encouraged to publish his libelous false statements about me in an American print publication. If he does either one of these things, he'll definitely get a chance to debate and discuss his delusional, libelous views in public .......... in a courtroom. So far, he has not exhibited the courage to do so. This wasn't really my point but... I have already told you that, IMHO the way you use to pour out your professional "opinions" on a public NG doesn't honor you nor your profession and, still IMHO, this strangely make me think to the character assassination you pretend to denounce in McKelvy behaviour. IMHO this is incompatible with the deontology, the professional ethic. I don't pretend to be original, I am not the first one to tell you that on this forum, just the first "hamas lover". )Bruce J. Richman You're wrong, of course, Because I happen to be a psychologist, that does not mean that I can't express my opinions about the behavior of others here, just like everybody else does. True but IMHO you shouldn't be so generous with the "professional details" that you use to give more *credibility* to your opinions. Quoting specific valse information that Mcakelvy and/or Krueger have posted, and citing examples of what appears to be a false belief system based on lack of evidence re. my identity - is provision of evidence to support my opinion. just as the current provision of evidence about McKelvy's lying about telephone numbers and sockpuppets by several other posters as provision of evidence. I have made it perfectly clear that my comments are based solely on their online behavior. This lack of *technical* reserve is, IMHO unethical. Professional regulartory boards designed to rule on this issue disagree with you. This is just one of many reaons why McKelvy's bull**** about ethical lapses has never been reported to the appropriate legal authorities. It is, however, unethical and - in a US civil court, at least - illegal to deliberately commit libel by making knowingly false statements about a person's professional identity, vocational activities, and credentials. Anyway I don't want to discuss that now since this you have already debated the subject here so many time, with people really more qualified and intelligent than me. Despite numerous false claims by Krueger and Mckelvy that I've attempted to diagnose their abnormal behavior on RAO, there is no evidence to support that lie. *I* grant the right to Krueger (or any other professional audio) to make a diagnostic of you audio system on this forum. Krueger is not an audio professional. And just as psychologists don't make diagnoses without first making a face-to-face evaluation, I don't know of any audio professional that would "diagnose" a person's audio system wtihout listening it to it first. I cannot grant *you* the right to speak about his relation of "Folie à deux" with McKelvy with full detail, documentation and bibliographic references... and the "Licenced Psychologist" signature. The bibliographic citations re. Folie a deux are presented so that individual readers can make up their own minds as to whether McKelvy and Krueger present similar abnormal online behavior patterns. In my opinion, they do. My use of the title "Licensed Psychologist" is not inappropriate since I've earned that title. I find it interesting that you make no negative comments about, for example, Stewart Pinkerton, using his occupation as an engineer in his signature, or for that matter, Ferstler's neverending boasting about his audio publications in an effort to legitimize their opinions. Sorry to be so "pinchy minded" but I am congenitally binded to such primal bias. They just use that provfable lie to try and prevent exposure of their character assassination campaigns. Re.; my describing you as a "hamas lover", that was an opinion based on your comparisons of Sharon to Sheik Yassin, This is what *you* have read not what *I* have written. the late Hamas leader that was personally responsible for ordering numerous suicide bomber attacks upon civilians. IMHO, there is a big difference between giving orders to blow up school buses and restaurants populated by civilians, and giving orders to kill known militants. Granted, civilians unfortunately get killed in wars, but only one side has made a habit of ordering that type of activity. Perhaps now that Arafat is no longer around, there will be a legitimate attempt on both sides to make peace. Time will tell. As in the same time Sharon prefer to make alliance with democrats rather than his previous Zealots allies, the peace is in a better way than one year ago. But you are right time will tell. Bruce J. Richman Bruce J. Richman |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
George M. Middius wrote: Bruce J. Richman said: Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the underpants of life. On the other hand we are nearly sure snicker There are a couple of points of clarification, Lionel : (1) The post to which you responded above was not written by me, but by George M. Middius and Art Sackman. Could we please have a quasi-professional appraisal of the type of personality that is guided by Kroopologism? I don't give quasi-professional opinions. So I will not ask you why, from you professional POW, "Georg M. Middius" is so obsessed wiht "Kroopologism". :-) |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : Lionel wrote: Bruce J. Richman a écrit : George M. Middius wrote: Clyde Slick said: I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we will see that happen. That will never happen by choice. There's a disconnect here between what a sane person would feel in Mikey's position and what Mikey actually does feel. He doesn't feel humiliated, embarassed, or ashamed. A sane person probably would feel one or all of those. The evidence has revealed deliberate falsehoods and a lame coverup, both serving a master plan of character assassination. But Mikey doesn't see anything wrong with his behavior. This behavior *is* his norm. In fact, the continuing barrage of argumentation, rebuttals, and insults serves his needs wonderfully -- all he needs is to be noticed. Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the underpants of life. On the other hand we are nearly sure that McKelvy would have the "courage" to discuss and to debate his behaviour in his non-usenet life... For my part I highly doubt that "George M. Middius" is able of the same "easiness" and vehemence in his (her ?) real life than on Usenet. There are a couple of points of clarification, Lionel : (1) The post to which you responded above was not written by me, but by George M. Middius and Art Sackman. No need to be clarify (2) McKelvy has been encouraged to submit his complaints about somebody impersonating a psychologist to the legal authorities in Florida, since public impersonation of a licensed psychologist is a crime in the US. He's also been encouraged to publish his libelous false statements about me in an American print publication. If he does either one of these things, he'll definitely get a chance to debate and discuss his delusional, libelous views in public .......... in a courtroom. So far, he has not exhibited the courage to do so. This wasn't really my point but... I have already told you that, IMHO the way you use to pour out your professional "opinions" on a public NG doesn't honor you nor your profession and, still IMHO, this strangely make me think to the character assassination you pretend to denounce in McKelvy behaviour. IMHO this is incompatible with the deontology, the professional ethic. I don't pretend to be original, I am not the first one to tell you that on this forum, just the first "hamas lover". )Bruce J. Richman You're wrong, of course, Because I happen to be a psychologist, that does not mean that I can't express my opinions about the behavior of others here, just like everybody else does. True but IMHO you shouldn't be so generous with the "professional details" that you use to give more *credibility* to your opinions. Quoting specific valse information that Mcakelvy and/or Krueger have posted, and citing examples of what appears to be a false belief system based on lack of evidence re. my identity - is provision of evidence to support my opinion. just as the current provision of evidence about McKelvy's lying about telephone numbers and sockpuppets by several other posters as provision of evidence. I have made it perfectly clear that my comments are based solely on their online behavior. This lack of *technical* reserve is, IMHO unethical. Professional regulartory boards designed to rule on this issue disagree with you. In USA perhaps, but you could be surprised by a french court decision ! This is just one of many reaons why McKelvy's bull**** about ethical lapses has never been reported to the appropriate legal authorities. I am nearly sure that here in France some of your opponents would have the matter to build a receivable file with your past posts on RAO. It is, however, unethical and - in a US civil court, at least - illegal to deliberately commit libel by making knowingly false statements about a person's professional identity, vocational activities, and credentials. McKelvy's errancies have nothing to do with the subject we are discussing. Why don't you sue him ? A good action in law to shake up RAO monotony. This is the kind of series that George M. Middius and me we prefer. ;-) Anyway I don't want to discuss that now since this you have already debated the subject here so many time, with people really more qualified and intelligent than me. Despite numerous false claims by Krueger and Mckelvy that I've attempted to diagnose their abnormal behavior on RAO, there is no evidence to support that lie. *I* grant the right to Krueger (or any other professional audio) to make a diagnostic of you audio system on this forum. Krueger is not an audio professional. And just as psychologists don't make diagnoses without first making a face-to-face evaluation, I don't know of any audio professional that would "diagnose" a person's audio system wtihout listening it to it first. I just wanted to point out that the consequenses aren't the same. I cannot grant *you* the right to speak about his relation of "Folie à deux" with McKelvy with full detail, documentation and bibliographic references... and the "Licenced Psychologist" signature. The bibliographic citations re. Folie a deux are presented so that individual readers can make up their own minds as to whether McKelvy and Krueger present similar abnormal online behavior patterns. In my opinion, they do. My use of the title "Licensed Psychologist" is not inappropriate since I've earned that title. I find it interesting that you make no negative comments about, for example, Stewart Pinkerton, using his occupation as an engineer in his signature, or for that matter, Ferstler's neverending boasting about his audio publications in an effort to legitimize their opinions. OTOH, I find *VERY* interesting that you use the above argument on this *audio* NG. [snip] |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Lionel" wrote in message ... Bruce J. Richman a écrit : George M. Middius wrote: Clyde Slick said: I think Mikey has no choice but to quietly ride off into the sunset. Eventually, we will see that happen. That will never happen by choice. There's a disconnect here between what a sane person would feel in Mikey's position and what Mikey actually does feel. He doesn't feel humiliated, embarassed, or ashamed. A sane person probably would feel one or all of those. The evidence has revealed deliberate falsehoods and a lame coverup, both serving a master plan of character assassination. But Mikey doesn't see anything wrong with his behavior. This behavior *is* his norm. In fact, the continuing barrage of argumentation, rebuttals, and insults serves his needs wonderfully -- all he needs is to be noticed. Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the underpants of life. On the other hand we are nearly sure that McKelvy would have the "courage" to discuss and to debate his behaviour in his non-usenet life... For my part I highly doubt that "George M. Middius" is able of the same "easiness" and vehemence in his (her ?) real life than on Usenet. "At least" you admit to being a sewer worker. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... Bruce J. Richman said: Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the underpants of life. On the other hand we are nearly sure snicker There are a couple of points of clarification, Lionel : (1) The post to which you responded above was not written by me, but by George M. Middius and Art Sackman. Could we please have a quasi-professional appraisal of the type of personality that is guided by Kroopologism? How about one for the type of personality that posts to an audio NG and almost never about audio, but rather is obsessed with harassing those with whom he disagrees, mostly one person who lives in Michigan. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... I don't give quasi-professional opinions. Besides, as AFAIK, there are only 3-6 confirmed Kroopologism converts currently active on RAO. Am I one of them? Norm Strong |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
"normanstrong" wrote in message news:26Zyd.252032$V41.22317@attbi_s52... "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... I don't give quasi-professional opinions. Besides, as AFAIK, there are only 3-6 confirmed Kroopologism converts currently active on RAO. Am I one of them? Norm Strong do you want to be? |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mr. Slick wrote:
"normanstrong" wrote in message news:26Zyd.252032$V41.22317@attbi_s52... "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... I don't give quasi-professional opinions. Besides, as AFAIK, there are only 3-6 confirmed Kroopologism converts currently active on RAO. Am I one of them? Norm Strong do you want to be? Good question. Norm was not one of the people that I had in mind. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Esteemed Music Critic Paul Dormer wrote:
"Clyde Slick" said to McMoronMcMoore : Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd. But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away. The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor, or just a residue from your last butt munching session with Arny. Hardly a pleasant image.. :-S S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t ----------------------------------- It's Grim up north.. True. I think RCA Victor had Mikey in mind when they used the following slogan at one time to describe their logo with a dog and a phonograph: "His Master's Voice". Bruce J. Richman |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mr. Middius said:
Marc Phillips said: Mikey knows he needs to be punished. Well, that's always been the case for Arny and Howard. Mikey, however, is completely oblivious that he's being punished. You might very well be right about that. There are competing layers of neuroses and psychoses with both of RAO's pathological liars -- Mikey and Arnii. The Kroo practically begs to be slapped around, but then he squawks when it happens. He's whined about being "humiliated" dozens of times, even though that's what he tries to do to everyone else, albeit with limited success. Krooger has also boasted of never having lost an audio debate. By that, of course, he means he never *admits* to having lost. Reality is an alien dimension to him. Mikey is deep in denial, as you say. But do you really believe he doesn't even recognize he's been hammered badly for years? I've seen his fatuous claims about why he believes he's targeted for abuse, but is he really so ****ing stupid that he actually believes his own lies? Yes. Boon |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
normanstrong" wrote in message Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message I don't give quasi-professional opinions. Besides, as AFAIK, there are only 3-6 confirmed Kroopologism converts currently active on RAO. Am I one of them? Norm Strong Yes you are one of them Kroopologizer. And you've demonstrated so many times in past your wearisome predilection to run away from thread like an effeminate, sissified chicken lily. You failed the basic rule in open dialogue for Rao. There's nothing more repugnant than a repulsive and deceitful impostor like you, a spineless troll. And then you run away. |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mr. Phillips wrote:
McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message news:20041224151031.06183.00001654@m b-m27.aol.com... McKelvy said: "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... "George M. Middius" wrote in message ... Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the underpants of life. Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd. But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away. The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor, or just a residue from your last butt munching session with Arny. You're standing to [sic] close to Boon. Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all. Boon Now you're hearing things too? That didn't make any sense, Mikey. Because your [sic] an idiot. You said " Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all." Sound implies hearing, dimwit. And yet you couldn't stop yourself from making another basic grammar error. Sounds like you're reaching for straws...quite desperately. That's what I call it when people focus on minute details like spelling. I think you're lying. Of course you do. A pathological liar always assumes that everyone else is lying, too. I assume nothing, it's been revealed over the years that you are an obnoxious twit. OSAF. But then again, you don't live by the same rules you set for others, do you. I play by the same rules as you and the other thugs. So you consider yourself a thug. No, only that I use the same rules on RAO as they do, purely a defensive move. So, in your opinion, two wrongs make a right. So in your opinion you're doing wrong. Not at all. We're going by what YOU say, not by what I say. That is what we are talking about here. We? Seems like it's mostly you. I don't know where you find the time between meals. No, no, no. You can't even keep track of your own arguments. We are discussing a comment that you made, and all of the sudden you can't recall if we're talking about what you said or what I said. It's pretty pathetic. Can you understand that? Of course not. ****ing moron. Can you understand that absolutely nothing you have to say has any importance to me? Absolutely nothing anyone has to say has any importance to you. That's why you look like an idiot. You have no concept of what you look like to others. But, for the record, the answer is "a complete and utter idiot." He also has demonstrated repeatedly, over a 7 year period, that he doesn't care if he's considered to be a compulsive liar driven by delusional fasle beliefs.by almost everybody except Krueger. In fact, he glorifies and supports RAO's other resident compulisve liar. The two of them have been caught so often tellking lie after lie about other people that it ireally is a joike - on them. I didn't think so, you're too obsessed with trying to seem like you are important. Actually, that's pretty far from the truth. But that says a lot more about you and your dissatisfaction with your life than it does about me. Boon Bruce J. Richman |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Mr. Phillips wrote: McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: "Marc Phillips" wrote in message news:20041224151031.06183.00001654@ mb-m27.aol.com... McKelvy said: "Clyde Slick" wrote in message ... "Michael McKelvy" wrote in message ink.net... "George M. Middius" wrote in message ... Deep down, even Mikey knows he's nothing but a skid mark on the underpants of life. Hardly, but I do see you as a giant turd. But we can smell you coming for twenty miles away. The thing is, I don't really know if its your natural odor, or just a residue from your last butt munching session with Arny. You're standing to [sic] close to Boon. Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all. Boon Now you're hearing things too? That didn't make any sense, Mikey. Because your [sic] an idiot. You said " Yeah, that didn't sound stupid at all." Sound implies hearing, dimwit. And yet you couldn't stop yourself from making another basic grammar error. Sounds like you're reaching for straws...quite desperately. That's what I call it when people focus on minute details like spelling. I think you're lying. Of course you do. A pathological liar always assumes that everyone else is lying, too. I assume nothing, it's been revealed over the years that you are an obnoxious twit. OSAF. But then again, you don't live by the same rules you set for others, do you. I play by the same rules as you and the other thugs. So you consider yourself a thug. No, only that I use the same rules on RAO as they do, purely a defensive move. So, in your opinion, two wrongs make a right. So in your opinion you're doing wrong. Not at all. We're going by what YOU say, not by what I say. That is what we are talking about here. We? Seems like it's mostly you. I don't know where you find the time between meals. No, no, no. You can't even keep track of your own arguments. We are discussing a comment that you made, and all of the sudden you can't recall if we're talking about what you said or what I said. It's pretty pathetic. Can you understand that? Of course not. ****ing moron. Can you understand that absolutely nothing you have to say has any importance to me? Absolutely nothing anyone has to say has any importance to you. That's why you look like an idiot. You have no concept of what you look like to others. But, for the record, the answer is "a complete and utter idiot." He also has demonstrated repeatedly, over a 7 year period, that he doesn't care if he's considered to be a compulsive liar driven by delusional fasle beliefs.by almost everybody except Krueger. In fact, he glorifies and supports RAO's other resident compulisve liar. I like having a reliable source for accurate audio information. The two of them have been caught so often tellking lie after lie about other people that it ireally is a joike - on them. Why don't you tell me when I can call you so you can take me up on my proposaL AND GET ME TO SHUT UP? |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
McKelvy said:
Why don't you tell me when I can call you so you can take me up on my proposaL AND GET ME TO SHUT UP? You don't get it. They don't want you to shut up. You're too goddamned funny, squawking like this. Dr. Richman's identity has been proved on this NG more than once. Someone was even nice enough to repost this evidence from the archives. Funny, but I didn't see you respond to that. That's because you really don't care if Dr. Richman's identity has been proven. You just like to squawk. That's why you need to go. Boon |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mr. Phillips wrote:
McKelvy said: Why don't you tell me when I can call you so you can take me up on my proposaL AND GET ME TO SHUT UP? You don't get it. They don't want you to shut up. You're too goddamned funny, squawking like this. Dr. Richman's identity has been proved on this NG more than once. Someone was even nice enough to repost this evidence from the archives. Funny, but I didn't see you respond to that. That's because you really don't care if Dr. Richman's identity has been proven. You just like to squawk. That's why you need to go. Boon Agreed. McKelvy has *never* cared about the facts re. my identity or professional activity or credentials. Whit this delusional asshole, the only thing he cares about is making up more outrageous lies and libelous false statements which, 7 years later, he calls "opinions". Similarly, his phony proposal was nothing more than a transparent attempt to try and reinvent his thoroughly disagraced and exposed history of agenda-driven smear campaigns. I would not be surprised if his next "proposal" involves either (a) the Brooklyn Bridge, (b) free membership in the Raelian club nearest you, (c) alien abductions, or (d) ouija board readings (guaranteed). Bruce J. Richman |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Marc Phillips" wrote in message ... McKelvy said: Why don't you tell me when I can call you so you can take me up on my proposaL AND GET ME TO SHUT UP? You don't get it. They don't want you to shut up. You're too goddamned funny, squawking like this. Dr. Richman's identity has been proved on this NG more than once. Give one example of irrefutable proof that he is who he say he is. Someone was even nice enough to repost this evidence from the archives. That was not proof, that was hearsay. Funny, but I didn't see you respond to that. But I did. I called it hearsay. That's because you really don't care if Dr. Richman's identity has been proven. I do care, if you have conclusive proof post it. You just like to squawk. That's why you need to go. You seem to be doing a lot more squawking and getting slammed a lot more for it. I went through the first 11 pages of Google records that came up after entering your name and found 67 posts with your mane in the subject, they all had the same tone, essentially that you are a prick. Doing the same for my own name I only found 23. People can think what they want about me, but they seem much more adamant about you being a very nasty person. |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Mr. Phillips wrote: McKelvy said: Why don't you tell me when I can call you so you can take me up on my proposaL AND GET ME TO SHUT UP? You don't get it. They don't want you to shut up. You're too goddamned funny, squawking like this. Dr. Richman's identity has been proved on this NG more than once. Someone was even nice enough to repost this evidence from the archives. Funny, but I didn't see you respond to that. That's because you really don't care if Dr. Richman's identity has been proven. You just like to squawk. That's why you need to go. Boon Agreed. McKelvy has *never* cared about the facts re. my identity or professional activity or credentials. I've never found any facts about your idnentity or professional activities I have found that I'm not the only person who has questioned them. Whit this delusional asshole, the only thing he cares about is making up more outrageous lies and libelous false statements which, 7 years later, he calls "opinions". Yep, I'm funny that way, I call opinions what they are, opinions. Similarly, his phony proposal was nothing more than a transparent attempt to try and reinvent his thoroughly disagraced and exposed history of agenda-driven smear campaigns. No, it really is an atempt to find out for sure if you are who you say you are, completely painlessly for you. I would not be surprised if his next "proposal" involves either (a) the Brooklyn Bridge, (b) free membership in the Raelian club nearest you, (c) alien abductions, or (d) ouija board readings (guaranteed). But that would be crazy. :-) |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Mr. Phillips wrote: McKelvy said: Why don't you tell me when I can call you so you can take me up on my proposaL AND GET ME TO SHUT UP? You don't get it. They don't want you to shut up. You're too goddamned funny, squawking like this. Dr. Richman's identity has been proved on this NG more than once. Someone was even nice enough to repost this evidence from the archives. Funny, but I didn't see you respond to that. That's because you really don't care if Dr. Richman's identity has been proven. You just like to squawk. That's why you need to go. Boon Agreed. McKelvy has *never* cared about the facts re. my identity or professional activity or credentials. I've never found any facts about your idnentity or professional activities Only because you've chosen to deny and/lor ignore numerous examples of concrete evidence aqccepted by almost everybody except you and Kruieger. I have found that I'm not the only person who has questioned them. Aside from you and Krueger, only a few sockpuppets probably created by one of you two. You have deliberately ignored and denied any and all evidence prersented for seven years, and everybody else here realizes it. Whit this delusional asshole, the only thing he cares about is making up more outrageous lies and libelous false statements which, 7 years later, he calls "opinions". Yep, I'm funny that way, I call opinions what they are, opinions. Except nobody but you believes they are opinions. That pathetic attempt to change 7 years of deliberate lies and libelous false claims into "opinions" fools nobody but you. Similarly, his phony proposal was nothing more than a transparent attempt to try and reinvent his thoroughly disagraced and exposed history of agenda-driven smear campaigns. No, it really is an atempt to find out for sure if you are who you say you are, completely painlessly for you. Bull****. After 7 years of lying and libeling me, I'm supposed to believe that all of a sudden you've decided to change seek out the truth? Stop calling your obvious lies , "opinions", since they are deliberate attempts to misrepresent the facts. I would not be surprised if his next "proposal" involves either (a) the Brooklyn Bridge, (b) free membership in the Raelian club nearest you, (c) alien abductions, or (d) ouija board readings (guaranteed). But that would be crazy. :-) Just as crazy as thinking anybody would believe your bogus proposal. Just as crazy as believing your lies are opinions. Bruce J. Richman |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Michael McKelvy wrote: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message ... Mr. Phillips wrote: McKelvy said: Why don't you tell me when I can call you so you can take me up on my proposaL AND GET ME TO SHUT UP? You don't get it. They don't want you to shut up. You're too goddamned funny, squawking like this. Dr. Richman's identity has been proved on this NG more than once. Someone was even nice enough to repost this evidence from the archives. Funny, but I didn't see you respond to that. That's because you really don't care if Dr. Richman's identity has been proven. You just like to squawk. That's why you need to go. Boon Agreed. McKelvy has *never* cared about the facts re. my identity or professional activity or credentials. I've never found any facts about your idnentity or professional activities Only because you've chosen to deny and/lor ignore numerous examples of concrete evidence aqccepted by almost everybody except you and Kruieger. I have found that I'm not the only person who has questioned them. Aside from you and Krueger, only a few sockpuppets probably created by one of you two. You have deliberately ignored and denied any and all evidence prersented for seven years, and everybody else here realizes it. The only evidence I've seen, amounts to nothing more than hearsay. You could solve it once and for all by taking about the same amount of time it takes to post one of your complaints, and post the last 4 numbers of the phone I use to call the number that allegedly belongs to you. If you can do that I will not only shut up about it, but give you a public apology. Whit this delusional asshole, the only thing he cares about is making up more outrageous lies and libelous false statements which, 7 years later, he calls "opinions". Yep, I'm funny that way, I call opinions what they are, opinions. Except nobody but you believes they are opinions. That pathetic attempt to change 7 years of deliberate lies and libelous false claims into "opinions" fools nobody but you. Then you can solve the problem once and for all as detailed above. Similarly, his phony proposal was nothing more than a transparent attempt to try and reinvent his thoroughly disagraced and exposed history of agenda-driven smear campaigns. No, it really is an atempt to find out for sure if you are who you say you are, completely painlessly for you. Bull****. After 7 years of lying and libeling me, I'm supposed to believe that all of a sudden you've decided to change seek out the truth? It's all I ever wanted, certainty that you are who you say you are. You have been the one who keeps bringing it up repeatedly. Stop calling your obvious lies , "opinions", since they are deliberate attempts to misrepresent the facts. Then let's confirm the facts. I would not be surprised if his next "proposal" involves either (a) the Brooklyn Bridge, (b) free membership in the Raelian club nearest you, (c) alien abductions, or (d) ouija board readings (guaranteed). But that would be crazy. :-) Just as crazy as thinking anybody would believe your bogus proposal. Just as crazy as believing your lies are opinions. Nothing bogus about it, if you post the last 4 numbers of the phone I call you from, after I give you a time that I will call, it can be put to rest for me forever. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... Paul Dormer said: [Mickey McMickey] I do believe he's asking to be bitch-slapped. Definitely. BTW, what does Arnii call that when he does it with Mickey? ooohhh! I like riddles. Mikey gets Duh....based? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| duh! Or, Is ParanoaT Catching? | Audio Opinions | |||
| Here it is! Part II | Audio Opinions | |||
| Here it is! Part II, Europas catching fire? | Marketplace | |||
| Here it is! Part II, Europas catching fire? | Marketplace | |||
Linear Mode
