"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
...
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul Dormer wrote:


As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.


S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
-----------------------------------
It's Grim up north..




ROFLMAO !!!!



Bruce J. Richman

Mr. Phillips wrote:


McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
. ..
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

Boon





It's time to cue up the Volkswagon music:

" Duh, duh, duh..................duh, duh, duh............. duh, duh, duh".


Paul could call this fine "home" and ask for the resident telling everybody
he's the Minister of Information. He's a big Baghdad Bob fan calling himself
Metropolitan Mikey.

http://www.dmh.ca.gov/Statehospitals/Metro/default.asp




Bruce J. Richman

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
. ..
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:37:43 GMT, "Michael McKelvy"
wrote:


"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
...
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

Which one of the two of you in California should he call?

Bruce J. Richman spewed:

He's a big Baghdad Bob fan calling himself Metropolitan Mikey.

Bruce, you should apologize for your unprovoked personal attack on Mr.
Phillips. Save what little residual professional integrity you have
left.

(Ho Ho Ho, happy holidays!)

TB

Paul Dormer wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" emitted :

As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

BZZZT!

Incorrect answer. You know what to do if you don't want your identity
to be publicly questioned until 2012.


S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
-----------------------------------
It's Grim up north..



However, we can still question his sanity.



Bruce J. Richman

Timothy Brown lied:


Bruce J. Richman spewed:

He's a big Baghdad Bob fan calling himself Metropolitan Mikey.

Bruce, you should apologize for your unprovoked personal attack on Mr.
Phillips. Save what little residual professional integrity you have
left.

(Ho Ho Ho, happy holidays!)

TB


Tim, you should apologize to the Usenet poopulation at large for your reading
comprehension problems and inability to realize - doe to your blatant stupidity
and dishonesty - that the reference to Mikey refers to McKelvy, not Phillips.;

No wonder you've been fired for incompetence by Pete Goudreau and probably
other knowledgable professionals as well. It's quite understandable and
predictable that you would support a delusional liar like McKelvy. After all,
the two of you have so much in common.



Bruce J. Richman

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
After all,
the two of you have so much in common.

Folie à deux ?


Bruce J. Richman

Bruce J. Richman wrote:


Tim, you should apologize to the Usenet poopulation at large for your
reading
comprehension problems and inability to realize - doe to your blatant
stupidity
and dishonesty - that the reference to Mikey refers to McKelvy, not
Phillips.;

'Twas an honest mistake. So you should apologize to Mikey, then....

No wonder you've been fired for incompetence by Pete Goudreau and
probably
other knowledgable professionals as well.

You should apologize to me for repeating such a baseless slander. You
have no proof of the above. Goudreau has disappeared, unable to
function in internet society.

Feliz Navidad.

TB

"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
...
"Michael McKelvy" emitted :

As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.

I'm in the book, call me if you

BZZZT!

Incorrect. I've already explained what you need to do.


S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
-----------------------------------
It's Grim up north..
You know my name, you know the number.

From: "Michael McKelvy"
Date: 12/22/2004 3:31 PM Pacific Standard Time
Message-id: et


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
.. .
"Michael McKelvy" emitted :

As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.

I'm in the book, call me if you

BZZZT!

Incorrect. I've already explained what you need to do.


S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
-----------------------------------
It's Grim up north..
You know my name, you know the number.


He doesn't know for sure.

Bruce J. Richman wrote:
"You have absolutely no knowledge of what I do
professionally."

I can say the same of you. All the evidence you have about me are the
claims of someone's posts on USENET. Someone you've never met. Someone
who has abandoned this group.

TB

McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
...
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

In a book? Does it get delivered to your door on the planet you live on?

Boon

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
m...
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

In a book? Does it get delivered to your door on the planet you live on?

It's a figure of speech. But then you knew that.

McKelvy said:



"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
om...
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

In a book? Does it get delivered to your door on the planet you live on?

It's a figure of speech. But then you knew that.

If you were using a figure of speech, then you were speaking figuratively,
which means you had no intention of complying with Paul's request. Once again
you cannot live up to your own rules. Once again you look like a complete
idiot in front of the group. But you're used to that.

Boon

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net...

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
om...
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number
to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

In a book? Does it get delivered to your door on the planet you live on?

It's a figure of speech. But then you knew that.


So, when you slander and when you are wrong, that is dodge no. 2
First, "it was an opinion"
Now "it was a figure of speech"

Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
news:f5bhs0hrrrr420ekgsg8k8emntbfjhfj02@4ax. com...
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number
to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

In a book? Does it get delivered to your door on the planet you live on?

It's a figure of speech. But then you knew that.


So, when you slander and when you are wrong, that is dodge no. 2
First, "it was an opinion"
Now "it was a figure of speech"



Juat like his role model and hero, Krueger, McKelvy will never admit to
deliberately lying and libeling other people. He will just try to invent new
fabrications to cover up all the old ones by playing word games. These are so
obvious, they insult the intelligence of us all.



Bruce J. Richman

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:



"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
news:f5bhs0hrrrr420ekgsg8k8emntbfjhfj02@4ax. com...
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number
to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why
haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and
a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

In a book? Does it get delivered to your door on the planet you live
on?

It's a figure of speech. But then you knew that.

If you were using a figure of speech, then you were speaking figuratively,
which means you had no intention of complying with Paul's request.

Clearly you are insane. It simply means that I'm listed in the phone
directory and if he wishes to call me he can get the number.

Once again
you cannot live up to your own rules.

Once again you prove that you are a fat fool.

Once again you look like a complete
idiot in front of the group. But you're used to that.

Once again you show that you have little regard for truth.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net...

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
news:f5bhs0hrrrr420ekgsg8k8emntbfjhfj02@4ax. com...
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number
to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why
haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and
a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

In a book? Does it get delivered to your door on the planet you live
on?

It's a figure of speech. But then you knew that.


So, when you slander and when you are wrong, that is dodge no. 2
First, "it was an opinion"

It's always been my opinion that there's something fishy about Richman.

Now "it was a figure of speech"
Saying I'm in the book is a figure of speech, means my number is easily
obtainable to anyone who wishes to phone me.

Have you never heard somebody say in reply to a request for a phone number,
"I'm in the book."?

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
thlink.net...

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
news:f5bhs0hrrrr420ekgsg8k8emntbfjhfj02@4ax .com...
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number
to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why
haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and
a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last
four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you
comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

In a book? Does it get delivered to your door on the planet you live
on?

It's a figure of speech. But then you knew that.


So, when you slander and when you are wrong, that is dodge no. 2
First, "it was an opinion"
Now "it was a figure of speech"



Juat like his role model and hero, Krueger, McKelvy will never admit to
deliberately lying and libeling other people.

I promise I will just as soon as I do it. When will you admit to being a
liar and an asshole?

He will just try to invent new
fabrications to cover up all the old ones by playing word games. These
are so
obvious, they insult the intelligence of us all.



Claiming you're insultable is pretty funny.

McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:



"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
news:f5bhs0hrrrr420ekgsg8k8emntbfjhfj02@4ax .com...
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number
to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why
haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and
a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

In a book? Does it get delivered to your door on the planet you live
on?

It's a figure of speech. But then you knew that.

If you were using a figure of speech, then you were speaking figuratively,
which means you had no intention of complying with Paul's request.

Clearly you are insane. It simply means that I'm listed in the phone
directory and if he wishes to call me he can get the number.

Or you could just e-mail it to him. Personally, I've sent Paul my address and
phone number on a couple of occasions, and so far he hasn't done anything bad
to me.


Once again
you cannot live up to your own rules.

Once again you prove that you are a fat fool.

Do you have any idea of what "proof" actually is? I mean, you looked at the
original child pornography post and came to the conclusion that Arny never
admitted to storing the images in his hard drive. I don't think anyone in the
world is taking your word for any kind of "proof."


Once again you look like a complete
idiot in front of the group. But you're used to that.

Once again you show that you have little regard for truth.

No, I'm not showing that at all. You're just saying it, that's all.

Boon

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net...

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
news:f5bhs0hrrrr420ekgsg8k8emntbfjhfj02@4ax .com...
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number
to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why
haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and
a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last
four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you
comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

In a book? Does it get delivered to your door on the planet you live
on?

It's a figure of speech. But then you knew that.


So, when you slander and when you are wrong, that is dodge no. 2
First, "it was an opinion"

It's always been my opinion that there's something fishy about Richman.

Now "it was a figure of speech"
Saying I'm in the book is a figure of speech, means my number is easily
obtainable to anyone who wishes to phone me.

Have you never heard somebody say in reply to a request for a phone
number, "I'm in the book."?

The one that is delivered to England?

Subject: Attn : person posting under the nym "Michael McKelvy"
From: "Michael McKelvy"
Date: 12/27/2004 6:45 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: .net


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
rthlink.net...

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
news:f5bhs0hrrrr420ekgsg8k8emntbfjhfj02@4a x.com...
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone number
to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why
haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar and
a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last
four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you
comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

In a book? Does it get delivered to your door on the planet you live
on?

It's a figure of speech. But then you knew that.


So, when you slander and when you are wrong, that is dodge no. 2
First, "it was an opinion"
Now "it was a figure of speech"



Juat like his role model and hero, Krueger, McKelvy will never admit to
deliberately lying and libeling other people.

I promise I will just as soon as I do it. When will you admit to being a
liar and an asshole?

He will just try to invent new
fabrications to cover up all the old ones by playing word games. These
are so
obvious, they insult the intelligence of us all.



Claiming you're insultable is pretty funny.





I have not read what the compulsive liar, McKelvy has written above. There is
no need to in order to respond. As pointed out previously, with each daily
addition of more idiotic and psychotic rantings and ravings - essentially as
meaningless as the ones he's posted on the previous day - he simply continues
to provide additional evidence of his desperation, his psychotic thought
processes, and of course, his hatred.

No doubt, he will keep responding with further psychotic blather to this post
as well. This assinine, seriously disturbed cretin corresponds quite closely
to a rat in a Skinner box, who robotically presses a bar to get some food. In
this case, the "bar" (metaphorically speaking) would be the voices in his head
telling him to invent more absurdities whenever he sees my name. The "food"
metaphorically speaking would, of course, be the delusional beliefs that others
are getting his "message".

State tuned for another chapter in the never?ending saga of McKelvy's
"Psychotic Fabrications - My Mission on RAO"



Bruce J. Richman, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist



Bruce J. Richman

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Michael McKelvy" wrote in message
link.net...

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:

"Marc Phillips" wrote in message
...
McKelvy said:


"Paul Dormer" wrote in message
news:f5bhs0hrrrr420ekgsg8k8emntbfjhfj02@4a x.com...
As instructed previously, you need to page your mobile phone
number to
me on +44 7626 630135 to confirm that you are not a liar. Why
haven't
you done this already? Is it because you are a fraud and a liar
and a
charlatan? Page me with your number and I will confirm the last
four
digits. I will shut up about this if you comply, assuming you
comply
in a satisfactory manner.


I'm in the book, call me if you wish.

Paul is in England. What book should he look in, you stupid ****?

He can't get international directory service?

In a book? Does it get delivered to your door on the planet you live
on?

It's a figure of speech. But then you knew that.


So, when you slander and when you are wrong, that is dodge no. 2
First, "it was an opinion"

It's always been my opinion that there's something fishy about Richman.

Now "it was a figure of speech"
Saying I'm in the book is a figure of speech, means my number is easily
obtainable to anyone who wishes to phone me.

Have you never heard somebody say in reply to a request for a phone
number, "I'm in the book."?

The one that is delivered to England?

I've mentioned where I live more than once, it no great leap to figure out
that information could provide my number.

But then you couldn't be deliberately obtuse.

Bruce J. Richman wrote:
Timothy Brown lied:


Bruce J. Richman spewed:

He's a big Baghdad Bob fan calling himself Metropolitan Mikey.

Bruce, you should apologize for your unprovoked personal attack on
Mr.
Phillips. Save what little residual professional integrity you have
left.

(Ho Ho Ho, happy holidays!)

TB


Tim, you should apologize to the Usenet poopulation at large for your
reading
comprehension problems and inability to realize - doe to your blatant
stupidity
and dishonesty - that the reference to Mikey refers to McKelvy, not
Phillips.;

'Twas an honest mistake. So you should apologize to Mikey, then....

No wonder you've been fired for incompetence by Pete Goudreau and
probably
other knowledgable professionals as well.

You should apologize to me for repeating such a baseless slander. You
have no proof of the above. Goudreau has disappeared, unable to
function in internet society.

Feliz Navidad.

TB

Tim Brown wrote:


Bruce J. Richman wrote:
Timothy Brown lied:


Bruce J. Richman spewed:

He's a big Baghdad Bob fan calling himself Metropolitan Mikey.

Bruce, you should apologize for your unprovoked personal attack on
Mr.
Phillips. Save what little residual professional integrity you have
left.

(Ho Ho Ho, happy holidays!)

TB


Tim, you should apologize to the Usenet poopulation at large for your
reading
comprehension problems and inability to realize - doe to your blatant
stupidity
and dishonesty - that the reference to Mikey refers to McKelvy, not
Phillips.;

'Twas an honest mistake. So you should apologize to Mikey, then....

No wonder you've been fired for incompetence by Pete Goudreau and
probably
other knowledgable professionals as well.

You should apologize to me for repeating such a baseless slander. You
have no proof of the above. Goudreau has disappeared, unable to
function in internet society.

Feliz Navidad.

TB









(1) This is the 2nd time you've posted the exact same post, complete with my
response.

(2) Therefore, I can only assume that the reason you've done so is to repeat
your slanderous comments about my professional integrity, about which you know
absolutely nothing, since RAO is not a place of business for the practice of
psychology.

(3) And since you mentioned baseless slander, you should review the history of
baseless slander that McKelvy has promoted against me for over 7 years.
If/when you do so, you will see that he owes me an apology for deliberately
misrepresenting information about me, and not the other way around.

Happy New Year.



Bruce J. Richman

The above post is a forgery.

TB