Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
people, just face it already, solid state will NEVER sound as good as
tubes, not even close, nor will NFB designs EVER sound as good as those with NONE. please give up! PS - here is an amazing testament, my friend Paul was having problems, all his favorite music was giving him headaches over the last year, when played with any decent volume at all, on an expensive solid state audiophile amplifier as well as on every other device in his house. And his ears would ring for days after listening to it, and the headaches would persist. So I gave him a Dynaco ST-70 to use and the headaches and ringing disappeared for good! Now just imagine if I gave him a DHTSE amp with no NFB? he would probably become obsessed and be out on the street, having spent the family's food and rent on some 110 db exponential horns. Let's stop all the engineering BS and just face the facts, the greatest amps in the world, with price as no object, are less than 3 watts maximum output, and schematics of the best amps on the earth can be found at vt52.com here is what you engineers need to learn, if you ever want to experience the ultimate sound in audio 1. the best sound is in the first watt, it's all downhill from there 2. most all of the best sounding tubes were designed before 1930 3. all of your engineering numbers, and THD measurements,etc. cannot fool the human ear, it is like telling someone that sex with a beautiful woman does not feel good, because your measurements and analysis and oscilloscopes show that it should be better with a big lard-ass fat chick. Sorry, our senses tell us different. please STOP THE INSANITY |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "cowboy" cacheoverflow@yahooDOTcom wrote in message PS - here is an amazing testament, my friend Paul was having problems, all his favorite music was giving him headaches over the last year, when played with any decent volume at all, on an expensive solid state audiophile amplifier as well as on every other device in his house. And his ears would ring for days after listening to it, and the headaches would persist. So I gave him a Dynaco ST-70 to use and the headaches and ringing disappeared for good! Does it get rid of sinus headaches as well? Would you recommend it over Sudafed? Could I possibly borrow it too? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() cowboy wrote: people, just face it already, solid state will NEVER sound as good as tubes, not even close, nor will NFB designs EVER sound as good as those with NONE. Ahhhh ! A troll ! Byeeeee.... :-) Graham |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "cowboy" cacheoverflow@yahooDOTcom wrote in message ... people, just face it already, solid state will NEVER sound as good as tubes, not even close, nor will NFB designs EVER sound as good as those with NONE. In your opinion. please give up! Why, so we can suffer with lower fidelity, and higher distortion? PS - here is an amazing testament, my friend Paul was having problems, all his favorite music was giving him headaches over the last year, when played with any decent volume at all, on an expensive solid state audiophile amplifier as well as on every other device in his house. And his ears would ring for days after listening to it, and the headaches would persist. So I gave him a Dynaco ST-70 to use and the headaches and ringing disappeared for good! That's such a cute anecdote. Now just imagine if I gave him a DHTSE amp with no NFB? You can't since there's no such thing. as has been pointed out elsewhere, Tubes are have internal NFB. he would probably become obsessed and be out on the street, having spent the family's food and rent on some 110 db exponential horns. His problem was probably bad speakers to begin with. Let's stop all the engineering BS and just face the facts, the greatest amps in the world, with price as no object, are less than 3 watts maximum output, and schematics of the best amps on the earth can be found at vt52.com here is what you engineers need to learn, if you ever want to experience the ultimate sound in audio 1. the best sound is in the first watt, it's all downhill from there Bull****. 2. most all of the best sounding tubes were designed before 1930 So, you like antiques. 3. all of your engineering numbers, and THD measurements,etc. cannot fool the human ear, it is like telling someone that sex with a beautiful woman does not feel good, because your measurements and analysis and oscilloscopes show that it should be better with a big lard-ass fat chick. Sorry, our senses tell us different. Because yoou like lower-fi to play badly recorded music through probably bad speakers or speakers set up improperly, you want everybody else to suffer. Got it. please STOP THE INSANITY You first. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael McKelvy wrote: "cowboy" cacheoverflow@yahooDOTcom wrote in message ... people, just face it already, solid state will NEVER sound as good as tubes, not even close, nor will NFB designs EVER sound as good as those with NONE. In your opinion. please give up! Why, so we can suffer with lower fidelity, and higher distortion? I expect he liked the sound of his Dad's radiogram ! Graham |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Schizoid Man wrote:
Pooh Bear wrote: Michael McKelvy wrote: snip ...a lot of crap and folks in denial keep talking, so far we have identified three idiots! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"cowboy" cacheoverflow@yahooDOTcom said:
people, just face it already, solid state will NEVER sound as good as tubes, not even close, nor will NFB designs EVER sound as good as those with NONE. As nonsensical as saying that only SS makes for a good audio amplifier. There are benefits to both technologies. Hey, I have hybrid amps - the best of both worlds :-) BTW which form of NFB are you talking about? A cathode or emitter resistor *is* NFB, just local. An UL output tap on your tube amp is NFB, just local. A triode is a NFB device, it's just 'local". -- Sander de Waal " SOA of a KT88? Sufficient. " |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "cowboy" cacheoverflow@yahooDOTcom wrote in message ... as on every other device in his house. And his ears would ring for days after listening to it, and the headaches would persist. So I gave him a Dynaco ST-70 to use and the headaches and ringing disappeared for good! Ringing in the ears huh? Yeah, sounds like quite the "audiophile" SS amp! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "cowboy" cacheoverflow@yahooDOTcom wrote in message ... Schizoid Man wrote: Pooh Bear wrote: Michael McKelvy wrote: snip ...a lot of crap and folks in denial keep talking, so far we have identified three idiots! There's a good little troll. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you want no highs, no lows, no dynamic range, no articulation and no
headroom then the first watt is all that matters. All the watts are important. In the real world you buy enough for 99% of the time and rely on the soft clipping of transformer coupled tube amps or the toughness of pro tweeter elements or get a peak limiter or replace cheap tweeters every once in a while....those are your options. Power Goose, for you McWhores, is a peak limiter...... All amplifiers use negative feedback in some form, intentional or not. If perfect components existed all amplifiers, without large NFB, would be oscillators-and paradoxically oscillators would not start themselves. Most importantly, sex with today's fashion models and 'actresses' could not possibly be as good as with the average twenty-pound-overweight waitress, as they are anorexic and gristly. You have to go back to Marilyn, Jayne and so forth to find actual female bodies on popular 'female' talent. If you want to pork a hardbody, you are probably actually after Dick Butkus. I think this is more common than generally admitted, and explains the success of Renee Zellweger, who is a puberty-inhibited boy from the navel up. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vintage Amplifiers for Idiots | Tech | |||
Idiots run amok | Audio Opinions | |||
So many idiots, so little time... | Audio Opinions | |||
why are salesmen such idiots? | Audio Opinions | |||
Morons, idiots, or con artists....... | Tech |