Mr. Krueger challenged me to state what kind of a DBT/ABX test would
be acceptable. When I repeated the qualifications for the third time
he said:
I take it that you haven't got a proper answer, Ludo.

You kindly quoted from my previous answer to his previous idnetical
question:

"What part of " Naturally it should be controlled (preplanned
methods),
statistically valid (significant numbers),randomised ( not a
preselected trained group) and truly double blind.*" escaped your
attention? Getting dodgy in your old age"
All of it would be funny if it were not rather pathetic.
Ludovic Mirabel

"ludovic mirabel" wrote in message
m
Mr. Krueger challenged me to state what kind of a DBT/ABX test would
be acceptable. When I repeated the qualifications for the third time
he said:

I take it that you haven't got a proper answer, Ludo.

You kindly quoted from my previous answer to his previous idnetical
question:

"What part of " Naturally it should be controlled (preplanned methods),
statistically valid (significant numbers),randomised ( not a
preselected trained group) and truly double blind.*" escaped your
attention? Getting dodgy in your old age"

All of it would be funny if it were not rather pathetic.

What's pathetic is your answer, Ludo.

Your definition has more holes than all of your regrettable history of
sloppy arguments.

For example:

"Naturally it should be controlled (preplanned methods)"

Allows a full range of responses, ranging from the sublime to the
ridiculous.

When you can provide a good spec for the DBT that you want, let me know.