http://sg.news.yahoo.com/041119/1/3onv4.html

And this is the organization Chirac wants to control the use of military force.

How anyone can agree with this is beyond me.

ScottW

ScottW wrote:
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/041119/1/3onv4.html

And this is the organization Chirac wants to control the use of military force.

How anyone can agree with this is beyond me.

ScottW

Our government is hopelessly corrupt (see recent Delay Rule)
and it gets to have a military to send marauding across the
planet.

What's your beef?

--
Law of Storms

My God, it's full of stars...

"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...
ScottW wrote:
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/041119/1/3onv4.html

And this is the organization Chirac wants to control the use of military
force.

How anyone can agree with this is beyond me.

ScottW

Our government is hopelessly corrupt (see recent Delay Rule)

The rule you are talking about was only enacted to keep leaders from being
removed when they are the subject of political witch hunts.

They would no protect anyone accuses of a serious felony IIRC. It is not a
sign of corruption but a protection from it.


and it gets to have a military to send marauding across the planet.

To free 50 million people, what *******s.


What's your beef?

Idiotic reasoning.

ScottW "The Môron" wrote:

http://sg.news.yahoo.com/041119/1/3onv4.html

And this is the organization Chirac wants to control the use of military
force.

How anyone can agree with this is beyond me.

100% agreed.

Michael McKelvy wrote:

Idiotic reasoning.

Like everything coming from McKelvy. P

Lionel wrote:


ScottW "The Môron" wrote:

http://sg.news.yahoo.com/041119/1/3onv4.html

And this is the organization Chirac wants to control the use of military
force.

How anyone can agree with this is beyond me.

100% agreed.



Also agreed.


Bruce J. Richman

Like everything coming from McKelvy. P

He's right about this. Ronnie Earle has a history of using the office of
Travis County District Attorney for political witch hunts. I've know him for
30 years and one of my best freinds used to an assistant DA of Travis County
under Earle. He left in disgust.

It's a well known fact in Austin that he's partisan, they just don't happen
to care.


"Lionel" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:

Idiotic reasoning.

Like everything coming from McKelvy. P

Bruce J. Richman wrote:

Lionel wrote:


ScottW "The Môron" wrote:

http://sg.news.yahoo.com/041119/1/3onv4.html

And this is the organization Chirac wants to control the use of
military force.

How anyone can agree with this is beyond me.

100% agreed.



Also agreed.


Bruce J. Richman

Why don't you request the replacement of the cover of your killfile ? :-)

Animix wrote:

Like everything coming from McKelvy. P

He's right about this...

If you say it's OK, so...

Lionel wrote:


Bruce J. Richman wrote:

Lionel wrote:


ScottW "The Môron" wrote:

http://sg.news.yahoo.com/041119/1/3onv4.html

And this is the organization Chirac wants to control the use of
military force.

How anyone can agree with this is beyond me.

100% agreed.



Also agreed.


Bruce J. Richman

Why don't you request the replacement of the cover of your killfile ? :-)



It's very effective when I chose to use it. Occasionally, I leave it off for a
little while to see if those in it have changed their ways.





Bruce J. Richman

"Animix" wrote in message

Like everything coming from McKelvy. P

He's right about this. Ronnie Earle has a history of using the office of
Travis County District Attorney for political witch hunts. I've know him
for
30 years and one of my best freinds used to an assistant DA of Travis
County
under Earle. He left in disgust.

It's a well known fact in Austin that he's partisan, they just don't
happen
to care.

He's probably the only public official in the state that has any idea of the
decency and responsibility of public office is all about. Excuse him for
going after people who misuse that trust. I cannot believe I am reading
this.

I lived in Austin for many years till a couple of months ago and I must say
the thing that sets Austin apart from the grime of Dallas, Houston and San
Antonio is that we have people like Ronnie Earle.

That being said... go horns.

Hook 'em.

Bruce J. Richman wrote:

if those in it have changed their ways.

I think you are right... If it's very effective, you don't need to change
the cover, but the way it works.

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...

ScottW wrote:

http://sg.news.yahoo.com/041119/1/3onv4.html

And this is the organization Chirac wants to control the use of military
force.

How anyone can agree with this is beyond me.

ScottW

Our government is hopelessly corrupt (see recent Delay Rule)


The rule you are talking about was only enacted to keep leaders from being
removed when they are the subject of political witch hunts.

Um, a rule Republicans wrote in the first place...to hunt
Democrats.


They would no protect anyone accuses of a serious felony IIRC. It is not a
sign of corruption but a protection from it.

Yet they authored the original rule.

I assume the mere fact Delay is being investigated for shady
**** constitutes a "witch hunt."



and it gets to have a military to send marauding across the planet.


To free 50 million people, what *******s.

Whose free?




What's your beef?


Idiotic reasoning.

Stop rebuking yourself. Very unhealthy.



--
Law of Storms

"My God, it's full of stars..."

Animix wrote:
Like everything coming from McKelvy. P


He's right about this. Ronnie Earle has a history of using the office of
Travis County District Attorney for political witch hunts. I've know him for
30 years and one of my best freinds used to an assistant DA of Travis County
under Earle. He left in disgust.

It's a well known fact in Austin that he's partisan, they just don't happen
to care.

And the recent redistricting planned and executed by Delay
is what, exactly?


--
Law of Storms

"My God, it's full of stars..."

"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...
Animix wrote:
Like everything coming from McKelvy. P


He's right about this. Ronnie Earle has a history of using the office of
Travis County District Attorney for political witch hunts. I've know him
for
30 years and one of my best freinds used to an assistant DA of Travis
County
under Earle. He left in disgust.

It's a well known fact in Austin that he's partisan, they just don't
happen
to care.

And the recent redistricting planned and executed by Delay is what,
exactly?


--

In accordance with the law.

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...

Animix wrote:

Like everything coming from McKelvy. P


He's right about this. Ronnie Earle has a history of using the office of
Travis County District Attorney for political witch hunts. I've know him
for
30 years and one of my best freinds used to an assistant DA of Travis
County
under Earle. He left in disgust.

It's a well known fact in Austin that he's partisan, they just don't
happen
to care.

And the recent redistricting planned and executed by Delay is what,
exactly?


--


In accordance with the law.


Which was altered by whom, and when?

--
Law of Storms

"My God, it's full of stars..."

"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...

Animix wrote:

Like everything coming from McKelvy. P


He's right about this. Ronnie Earle has a history of using the office of
Travis County District Attorney for political witch hunts. I've know him
for
30 years and one of my best freinds used to an assistant DA of Travis
County
under Earle. He left in disgust.

It's a well known fact in Austin that he's partisan, they just don't
happen
to care.

And the recent redistricting planned and executed by Delay is what,
exactly?


--


In accordance with the law.
Which was altered by whom, and when?

The Texas legislature in accordance with the law.

Law of Storms

"My God, it's full of stars..."

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Law of Storms" wrote in message
. ..


Animix wrote:


Like everything coming from McKelvy. P


He's right about this. Ronnie Earle has a history of using the office of
Travis County District Attorney for political witch hunts. I've know him
for
30 years and one of my best freinds used to an assistant DA of Travis
County
under Earle. He left in disgust.

It's a well known fact in Austin that he's partisan, they just don't
happen
to care.

And the recent redistricting planned and executed by Delay is what,
exactly?


--


In accordance with the law.

Which was altered by whom, and when?


The Texas legislature in accordance with the law.

No.



Law of Storms

"My God, it's full of stars..."






--
Law of Storms

"My God, it's full of stars..."

I lived there from 1970 until 2000.

He's probably the only public official in the state that has any idea of
the
decency and responsibility of public office is all about.

This all depends on whether you think selective prosecution of the law is
decent and responsible.

I cannot believe I am reading
this.

How long have you known him?

I must say
the thing that sets Austin apart from the grime of Dallas, Houston and San
Antonio is that we have people like Ronnie Earle.

Austin isn't much different from those towns any more amigo. That's why I
left, though I've still got ties there so I get to see it's continued decay
and sprawl towards Waco, San Antonio, Bastrop and Marble Falls. Ronnie
Earle isn't any better or worse than any other politically motivated
prosecutor. He's just loved by the liberals there because he selectively
enforced drug laws throughout the 70's and 80's to allow the 6th Street
entertainment district a lot of slack and people thought that was cool to
have a DA that didn't encourage the police to bust bar patrons who were
snorting lines on the mirrored coffee tables of Juan Goldstein's Caviar Bar
and guzzling their Perrier Jouet while they watched the 6th St zoo stroll
by. Everyone though it was sooooo cool that drugs were legal in Austin.

"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...

"Animix" wrote in message

Like everything coming from McKelvy. P

He's right about this. Ronnie Earle has a history of using the office of
Travis County District Attorney for political witch hunts. I've know him
for
30 years and one of my best freinds used to an assistant DA of Travis
County
under Earle. He left in disgust.

It's a well known fact in Austin that he's partisan, they just don't
happen
to care.

He's probably the only public official in the state that has any idea of
the
decency and responsibility of public office is all about. Excuse him for
going after people who misuse that trust. I cannot believe I am reading
this.

I lived in Austin for many years till a couple of months ago and I must
say
the thing that sets Austin apart from the grime of Dallas, Houston and San
Antonio is that we have people like Ronnie Earle.

That being said... go horns.

Hook 'em.

"Animix" wrote in message

Austin isn't much different from those towns any more amigo. That's why I
left, though I've still got ties there so I get to see it's continued
decay
and sprawl towards Waco, San Antonio, Bastrop and Marble Falls. Ronnie
Earle isn't any better or worse than any other politically motivated
prosecutor. He's just loved by the liberals there because he selectively
enforced drug laws throughout the 70's and 80's to allow the 6th Street
entertainment district a lot of slack and people thought that was cool to
have a DA that didn't encourage the police to bust bar patrons who were
snorting lines on the mirrored coffee tables of Juan Goldstein's Caviar
Bar
and guzzling their Perrier Jouet while they watched the 6th St zoo stroll
by. Everyone though it was sooooo cool that drugs were legal in Austin.

First tell me which century you're talking about.

Sixth Street is now an overcrowded, dirty and fairly aviodable experience.
I've been to loads of bars and have never seen anything close to coke lines.
Lots of UT kids with fake IDs, sure. But which college town doesn't have
that?

Moreover, I've never even heard of the bars you're talking about. Were they
closed when Reagan was still president?

"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...
Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...

Michael McKelvy wrote:

"Law of Storms" wrote in message
...


Animix wrote:


Like everything coming from McKelvy. P


He's right about this. Ronnie Earle has a history of using the office
of
Travis County District Attorney for political witch hunts. I've know
him for
30 years and one of my best freinds used to an assistant DA of Travis
County
under Earle. He left in disgust.

It's a well known fact in Austin that he's partisan, they just don't
happen
to care.

And the recent redistricting planned and executed by Delay is what,
exactly?


--


In accordance with the law.

Which was altered by whom, and when?


The Texas legislature in accordance with the law.

No.



What law was broken?

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


StupidBorg said:

No
suggestions on where to begin and what path to follow. No alternatives.
No
leadership.

Bush made the mess so he should clean it up.

I guess this means you support our actions in Fallujah and Mosul and Bagdad
masques?


As far as the country's social ills, no Democrat would ever propose a
constitutional amendment about marriage.

This is really a non-issue for most people. Leave it to the states and
most will stick with man and a women marriage as the recent referendums
show. I doubt you support majority rule in this case. But the reason we
need this dealt with at the federal level is this issue about states having
to recognize other states marital status.

The Democrats are consistenly
pro-environment, pro-alternative fuels, and pro-fuel economy.

Latest democrat offering in Ca is a "mileage" tax. Apparently they dont
like people driving fuel efficient vehicles as it impacts their revenue
stream from gas taxes. They want GPS trackers in vehicles to record mileage
and location. Mileage tax rates would vary by what type of road you use.
Even in Ca. these idiots are gonna go to far and lose their grip on the
state legislature.

The
Democrats lead the way in creating equal opportunities in housing,
employment, and education.

One minorities "equal opportunity" is another groups disadvantage.


Need more? Don't look to GOP. They're too busy praying and trying to set
America back to the 19th century.

The 19th century is looking a whole lot better than the 21st century in many
ways.

ScottW

We should only allow democratic countries into the UN.

And this is the organization Chirac wants to control the use of military
force.

How anyone can agree with this is beyond me.

ScottW

"John Williams" wrote in message
...

We should only allow democratic countries into the UN.


That would rule out the entire mid-east except Israel and Turkey.



And this is the organization Chirac wants to control the use of military
force.

How anyone can agree with this is beyond me.

ScottW

ScottW wrote:

The 19th century is looking a whole lot better than the 21st century in
many ways.

Agreed. While your ancesters were finishing to exterminate the natives, here
the 12 years old children were digging in the coal mines.

Scott "The Môron" is trying to make endorse his life failure to the whole
mankind...

All Scott's problems come from the fact that he is scary by is neighbour.
Funny no ?
Is there a charitable Californian to give him the final blow ?

Exactly.

That would rule out the entire mid-east except Israel and Turkey.

he Democrats are consistenly
pro-environment, pro-alternative fuels, and pro-fuel economy. The
Democrats lead the way in creating equal opportunities in housing,
employment, and education.

You really are living in a dream. The environmentalists around these parts
(who walk in lockstep with the Democrat party these days) are directly
responsible for blocking efforts by the US Forest service that destroyed
millions of critters who live in *the environment* around here by
obstructing brush clearance and encouraging the extermination of natural
wildfires which caused a huge imbalance in the ecosystem and burned many
thousands of acres in this area............and lots of birds, elk, deer,
bears, cougar and you name it, not to mention what the catastrophic
mudslides did that followed.

Pro fuel economy???? Really???????? Most of the econimby's in these parts
drive SUV's.

Democrats lead the way in creating equal opportunities .....blah
blah............

yeah, right. Our kids cant' even read the ****in' newspaper, much less have
a clue about how to find their ass with both hands in much else. Lots of
good the *sacred cow* of public school education and it's teachers unions
have done.

Equal housing, well yeah, if you can read a contract.

Employment............same thing. Leftists always bitch about how the jobs
being created are low paying. Sorry amigo, but if I'm going to pay someone a
good wage, he's going to have to be able to spell *cat*.

They're too busy praying and trying to set
America back to the 19th century

Tell me if you can wrap your head around this. Looks to me like people were
a hell of a lot smarter then than now. Can you answer any of the questions
on this website?

http://mwhodges.home.att.net/1895-test.htm

I'll bet not.

Now go fire up a fatty and feel sorry for yourself.



"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


StupidBorg said:

No
suggestions on where to begin and what path to follow. No alternatives.
No
leadership.

Bush made the mess so he should clean it up.

As far as the country's social ills, no Democrat would ever propose a
constitutional amendment about marriage. The Democrats are consistenly
pro-environment, pro-alternative fuels, and pro-fuel economy. The
Democrats lead the way in creating equal opportunities in housing,
employment, and education.

Need more? Don't look to GOP. They're too busy praying and trying to set
America back to the 19th century.

Michael McKelvy wrote:

The problem as I see it with the Democrats is that there are so many
different factions competing for more of our money. How many PETA members
in the GOP? Pretty sure none of the Earth Liberation Front are Republicans,
and nobody from the GOP is trying to save Mumia Jamal, but then only the
left would want to save a cop killer.

I have to call you on this one, though.

Q: have more wars been started and entered into with Democrats
or Republicans in charge?

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Clyde Slick said:

Q: have more wars been started and entered into with Democrats
or Republicans in charge?


Democrats:

WWII
Korea
Viet Nam

You're telling us Eisenhower was a Democrat? That's a surprise.




I credit Kennedy, under Kennedy, it was a war, and we were combatants.
He escalated it to the point of being a war. I also forgot to include
Clinton's Kosovo war.

The analysis is real simple. Dems started wars between
1932 and 1968, when they controlled the White House
for 28 out of 36 years. The Reps started wars between
1968 and 2004, when they controlled the White House
for 24 out of 36 years. The correllation is not whether
Dems or Reps start more wars, the correllation is that WHOVEVER
is in charge of the White House starts more wars. No
surprise there!