This article proves beyond doubt that Michael McKelvy is not the true,
classical conservative that he claims to be, but simply a partisan hack. Or
perhaps, in more erudite terms, a Republican attack dog.

I can sum it up for you. The well-known magazine American Conservative has
endorsed John Kerry for President because: "George W. Bush has come to
embody a politics that is antithetical to almost any kind of thoughtful
conservatism."

http://www.amconmag.com/2004_11_08/cover1.html

He will no doubt argue that the magazine endorsement is based entirely on
it's anti-Bush sentiment rather than a smattering of pro-Kerry. And about
that, he will be correct. But, of course, he - yet again - misses the point.

The article rather eloquently argues that the current President's policies
are the very antithesis of traditional conservatism. That is the point.

Schizoid Man wrote:
This article proves beyond doubt that Michael McKelvy is not the true,
classical conservative that he claims to be, but simply a partisan hack. Or
perhaps, in more erudite terms, a Republican attack dog.

I can sum it up for you. The well-known magazine American Conservative has
endorsed John Kerry for President because: "George W. Bush has come to
embody a politics that is antithetical to almost any kind of thoughtful
conservatism."

http://www.amconmag.com/2004_11_08/cover1.html

He will no doubt argue that the magazine endorsement is based entirely on
it's anti-Bush sentiment rather than a smattering of pro-Kerry. And about
that, he will be correct. But, of course, he - yet again - misses the point.

The article rather eloquently argues that the current President's policies
are the very antithesis of traditional conservatism. That is the point.

Bush is the sockpuppet of the neo-cons. Neo-cons don't care about ethic
they only require efficiency at any cost.
*They* are the very antithesis of the traditional conservatism.

"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...
This article proves beyond doubt that Michael McKelvy is not the true,
classical conservative that he claims to be, but simply a partisan hack.
Or
perhaps, in more erudite terms, a Republican attack dog.

I can sum it up for you. The well-known magazine American Conservative has
endorsed John Kerry for President because: "George W. Bush has come to
embody a politics that is antithetical to almost any kind of thoughtful
conservatism."

http://www.amconmag.com/2004_11_08/cover1.html

He will no doubt argue that the magazine endorsement is based entirely on
it's anti-Bush sentiment rather than a smattering of pro-Kerry. And about
that, he will be correct. But, of course, he - yet again - misses the
point.

The article rather eloquently argues that the current President's policies
are the very antithesis of traditional conservatism. That is the point.


No one can argue that Kerry is more the conservative than Bush.

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...
This article proves beyond doubt that Michael McKelvy is not the true,
classical conservative that he claims to be, but simply a partisan hack.
Or
perhaps, in more erudite terms, a Republican attack dog.

I can sum it up for you. The well-known magazine American Conservative
has
endorsed John Kerry for President because: "George W. Bush has come to
embody a politics that is antithetical to almost any kind of thoughtful
conservatism."

http://www.amconmag.com/2004_11_08/cover1.html

He will no doubt argue that the magazine endorsement is based entirely on
it's anti-Bush sentiment rather than a smattering of pro-Kerry. And about
that, he will be correct. But, of course, he - yet again - misses the
point.

The article rather eloquently argues that the current President's
policies
are the very antithesis of traditional conservatism. That is the point.


No one can argue that Kerry is more the conservative than Bush.

But one can argue that Bush isn't conservative.

ScottW

"ScottW" wrote in message
news:_dDfd.44260$bk1.17871@fed1read05...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

"Schizoid Man" wrote in message
...
This article proves beyond doubt that Michael McKelvy is not the true,
classical conservative that he claims to be, but simply a partisan hack.
Or
perhaps, in more erudite terms, a Republican attack dog.

I can sum it up for you. The well-known magazine American Conservative
has
endorsed John Kerry for President because: "George W. Bush has come to
embody a politics that is antithetical to almost any kind of thoughtful
conservatism."

http://www.amconmag.com/2004_11_08/cover1.html

He will no doubt argue that the magazine endorsement is based entirely
on
it's anti-Bush sentiment rather than a smattering of pro-Kerry. And
about
that, he will be correct. But, of course, he - yet again - misses the
point.

The article rather eloquently argues that the current President's
policies
are the very antithesis of traditional conservatism. That is the point.


No one can argue that Kerry is more the conservative than Bush.

But one can argue that Bush isn't conservative.


(Don't look at me, I didn't post that)