Bruce J. Richman was recently supporting Sackman statement he which he
exposed us that the Abu Ghraib prisonners who have been victim of
torture were terrorists.
Obviously none of the alleged terrotists have been judged, none of them
has never seen and lawyer, an advocate...

But for our 2 Zealots they are guilty because they are Arabs AND Muslims.

Here after the quote of our 2 fascists delirium :

Speaking of the Abu Ghraib victims Sackman was writing :

"These are the people involved with the terrorisitic death of others. "

Richman was responding :

"Lionel, being an antisemitic Hamas sympathizer, is in denial and lies
constantly about what is really happening."

The question to put to the 2 RAO's zealots is :
"Do you have any proof that the Abu Ghraib prisonners were guilty of
terrorism ?"

I am perhaps in denial Doctor but I sincerely prefer Ferstler and
Krueger's lies and/or plaggiarism than your above fascist support and
participation to such insane perception of the justice.

"Lionel" wrote in message
...
Bruce J. Richman was recently supporting Sackman statement he which he
exposed us that the Abu Ghraib prisonners who have been victim of
torture were terrorists.
Obviously none of the alleged terrotists have been judged, none of them
has never seen and lawyer, an advocate...

But for our 2 Zealots they are guilty because they are Arabs AND Muslims.

Here after the quote of our 2 fascists delirium :

Speaking of the Abu Ghraib victims Sackman was writing :

"These are the people involved with the terrorisitic death of others. "

Richman was responding :

"Lionel, being an antisemitic Hamas sympathizer, is in denial and lies
constantly about what is really happening."

The question to put to the 2 RAO's zealots is :
"Do you have any proof that the Abu Ghraib prisonners were guilty of
terrorism ?"

I am perhaps in denial Doctor but I sincerely prefer Ferstler and
Krueger's lies and/or plaggiarism than your above fascist support and
participation to such insane perception of the justice.


A real snore from the future Islamist "republic" (haha) of France

Clyde Slick wrote:
"Lionel" wrote in message
...

Bruce J. Richman was recently supporting Sackman statement he which he
exposed us that the Abu Ghraib prisonners who have been victim of
torture were terrorists.
Obviously none of the alleged terrotists have been judged, none of them
has never seen and lawyer, an advocate...

But for our 2 Zealots they are guilty because they are Arabs AND Muslims.

Here after the quote of our 2 fascists delirium :

Speaking of the Abu Ghraib victims Sackman was writing :

"These are the people involved with the terrorisitic death of others. "

Richman was responding :

"Lionel, being an antisemitic Hamas sympathizer, is in denial and lies
constantly about what is really happening."

The question to put to the 2 RAO's zealots is :
"Do you have any proof that the Abu Ghraib prisonners were guilty of
terrorism ?"

I am perhaps in denial Doctor but I sincerely prefer Ferstler and
Krueger's lies and/or plaggiarism than your above fascist support and
participation to such insane perception of the justice.



A real snore from the future Islamist "republic" (haha) of France

I don't laugh with the fascists.

Art Sackman wrote:

"Lionel" wrote in message
...
Bruce J. Richman was recently supporting Sackman statement he which he
exposed us that the Abu Ghraib prisonners who have been victim of
torture were terrorists.
Obviously none of the alleged terrotists have been judged, none of them
has never seen and lawyer, an advocate...

But for our 2 Zealots they are guilty because they are Arabs AND Muslims.

Here after the quote of our 2 fascists delirium :

Speaking of the Abu Ghraib victims Sackman was writing :

"These are the people involved with the terrorisitic death of others. "

Richman was responding :

"Lionel, being an antisemitic Hamas sympathizer, is in denial and lies
constantly about what is really happening."

The question to put to the 2 RAO's zealots is :
"Do you have any proof that the Abu Ghraib prisonners were guilty of
terrorism ?"

I am perhaps in denial Doctor but I sincerely prefer Ferstler and
Krueger's lies and/or plaggiarism than your above fascist support and
participation to such insane perception of the justice.


A real snore from the future Islamist "republic" (haha) of France










Obviously, nothing I have ever said involoves condoning or favoring the torture
of prisoners, irrespective of what their backgrounds may be. Pathological liar
and antisemite Lionel is clearly quite delusional in his idiotic false claims.
It is also interesting that he continues to demonstrate his severe antisemitism
by using the word "zealots" to erroneously describe Mr. Sackman and myself.

Needless to say, the imbecilic Hamas sympathizer named Lionel can NOT provide
any evidence in terms of any quotation to indicate that I have ever supportee
or approved of the torture of prisoners.

Just more delusional verbval diarrhea from an antisemitic Hamas sympathizer and
pathological liar.



Bruce J. Richman

Bruce J. Richman wrote:
Art Sackman wrote:


"Lionel" wrote in message
...

Bruce J. Richman was recently supporting Sackman statement he which he
exposed us that the Abu Ghraib prisonners who have been victim of
torture were terrorists.
Obviously none of the alleged terrotists have been judged, none of them
has never seen and lawyer, an advocate...

But for our 2 Zealots they are guilty because they are Arabs AND Muslims.

Here after the quote of our 2 fascists delirium :

Speaking of the Abu Ghraib victims Sackman was writing :

"These are the people involved with the terrorisitic death of others. "

Richman was responding :

"Lionel, being an antisemitic Hamas sympathizer, is in denial and lies
constantly about what is really happening."

The question to put to the 2 RAO's zealots is :
"Do you have any proof that the Abu Ghraib prisonners were guilty of
terrorism ?"

I am perhaps in denial Doctor but I sincerely prefer Ferstler and
Krueger's lies and/or plaggiarism than your above fascist support and
participation to such insane perception of the justice.


A real snore from the future Islamist "republic" (haha) of France











Obviously, nothing I have ever said involoves condoning or favoring the torture
of prisoners, irrespective of what their backgrounds may be.


You are a liar Bruce J. Richman :

These are the people involved with the terrorisitic death
of others. You don't give a **** about the vicitims,
or vicitms' families. All I hear you do
is complain about the rights of the perps.











Lionel, being an antisemitic Hamas sympathizer, is in denial and lies
constantly about what is really happening.



Bruce J. Richman
Limited Psychologist

I note that you don't forget to insult me, character assassination, but
you forgot to answer to Sackman that since the prisonners haven't been
judged they cannot be accused of terrorism.

Solutions :
- You are not interesting in justice
- You haven't read Sackman garbage
- You are agree with Sackman






Pathological liar
and antisemite Lionel is clearly quite delusional in his idiotic false claims.
It is also interesting that he continues to demonstrate his severe antisemitism
by using the word "zealots" to erroneously describe Mr. Sackman and myself.

This is not an error, you are an extremist Jewish, you are agree with
the most extremist decisions (expensionisms, assassinations,
colonisation...) taken in Israel, so for me you are a Zealot.
Sackman use to condamn people (specialy Arab and Muslims) before they
have received a judgment, he is a Zealot.


Needless to say, the imbecilic Hamas sympathizer named Lionel can NOT provide
any evidence in terms of any quotation to indicate that I have ever supportee
or approved of the torture of prisoners.

Just more delusional verbval diarrhea from an antisemitic Hamas sympathizer and
pathological liar.



Bruce J. Richman
Limited Psychologist ;-)

Lionel wrote:
Bruce J. Richman wrote:

Art Sackman wrote:


"Lionel" wrote in message
...

Bruce J. Richman was recently supporting Sackman statement he which he
exposed us that the Abu Ghraib prisonners who have been victim of
torture were terrorists.
Obviously none of the alleged terrotists have been judged, none of them
has never seen and lawyer, an advocate...

But for our 2 Zealots they are guilty because they are Arabs AND
Muslims.

Here after the quote of our 2 fascists delirium :

Speaking of the Abu Ghraib victims Sackman was writing :

"These are the people involved with the terrorisitic death of others. "

Richman was responding :

"Lionel, being an antisemitic Hamas sympathizer, is in denial and lies
constantly about what is really happening."

The question to put to the 2 RAO's zealots is :
"Do you have any proof that the Abu Ghraib prisonners were guilty of
terrorism ?"

I am perhaps in denial Doctor but I sincerely prefer Ferstler and
Krueger's lies and/or plaggiarism than your above fascist support and
participation to such insane perception of the justice.



A real snore from the future Islamist "republic" (haha) of France











Obviously, nothing I have ever said involoves condoning or favoring
the torture
of prisoners, irrespective of what their backgrounds may be.



You are a liar Bruce J. Richman :

These are the people involved with the terrorisitic death
of others. You don't give a **** about the vicitims,
or vicitms' families. All I hear you do
is complain about the rights of the perps.











Lionel, being an antisemitic Hamas sympathizer, is in denial and lies
constantly about what is really happening.



Bruce J. Richman
Limited Psychologist


I note that you don't forget to insult me, character assassination, but
you forgot to answer to Sackman that since the prisonners haven't been
judged they cannot be accused of terrorism.

Solutions :
- You are not interesting in justice
- You haven't read Sackman garbage
- You are agree with Sackman

Ooops I forgot :
- You don't understand Sackman's garbage.

"Lionel" wrote in message
...
Bruce J. Richman wrote:
Art Sackman wrote:


"Lionel" wrote in message
.. .

Bruce J. Richman was recently supporting Sackman statement he which he
exposed us that the Abu Ghraib prisonners who have been victim of
torture were terrorists.
Obviously none of the alleged terrotists have been judged, none of them
has never seen and lawyer, an advocate...

But for our 2 Zealots they are guilty because they are Arabs AND
Muslims.

Here after the quote of our 2 fascists delirium :

Speaking of the Abu Ghraib victims Sackman was writing :

"These are the people involved with the terrorisitic death of others. "

Richman was responding :

"Lionel, being an antisemitic Hamas sympathizer, is in denial and lies
constantly about what is really happening."

The question to put to the 2 RAO's zealots is :
"Do you have any proof that the Abu Ghraib prisonners were guilty of
terrorism ?"

I am perhaps in denial Doctor but I sincerely prefer Ferstler and
Krueger's lies and/or plaggiarism than your above fascist support and
participation to such insane perception of the justice.


A real snore from the future Islamist "republic" (haha) of France











Obviously, nothing I have ever said involoves condoning or favoring the
torture
of prisoners, irrespective of what their backgrounds may be.


You are a liar Bruce J. Richman :

These are the people involved with the terrorisitic death
of others. You don't give a **** about the vicitims,
or vicitms' families. All I hear you do
is complain about the rights of the perps.











Lionel, being an antisemitic Hamas sympathizer, is in denial and lies
constantly about what is really happening.



Bruce J. Richman
Limited Psychologist

I note that you don't forget to insult me, character assassination, but
you forgot to answer to Sackman that since the prisonners haven't been
judged they cannot be accused of terrorism.


Doesn't France use the Napleonic Code, IOW guilty until proven innocnet?

Michael McKelvy wrote:
"Lionel" wrote in message
...

Bruce J. Richman wrote:

Art Sackman wrote:



"Lionel" wrote in message
. ..


Bruce J. Richman was recently supporting Sackman statement he which he
exposed us that the Abu Ghraib prisonners who have been victim of
torture were terrorists.
Obviously none of the alleged terrotists have been judged, none of them
has never seen and lawyer, an advocate...

But for our 2 Zealots they are guilty because they are Arabs AND
Muslims.

Here after the quote of our 2 fascists delirium :

Speaking of the Abu Ghraib victims Sackman was writing :

"These are the people involved with the terrorisitic death of others. "

Richman was responding :

"Lionel, being an antisemitic Hamas sympathizer, is in denial and lies
constantly about what is really happening."

The question to put to the 2 RAO's zealots is :
"Do you have any proof that the Abu Ghraib prisonners were guilty of
terrorism ?"

I am perhaps in denial Doctor but I sincerely prefer Ferstler and
Krueger's lies and/or plaggiarism than your above fascist support and
participation to such insane perception of the justice.


A real snore from the future Islamist "republic" (haha) of France











Obviously, nothing I have ever said involoves condoning or favoring the
torture
of prisoners, irrespective of what their backgrounds may be.


You are a liar Bruce J. Richman :


These are the people involved with the terrorisitic death
of others. You don't give a **** about the vicitims,
or vicitms' families. All I hear you do
is complain about the rights of the perps.











Lionel, being an antisemitic Hamas sympathizer, is in denial and lies
constantly about what is really happening.



Bruce J. Richman
Limited Psychologist

I note that you don't forget to insult me, character assassination, but
you forgot to answer to Sackman that since the prisonners haven't been
judged they cannot be accused of terrorism.



Doesn't France use the Napleonic Code, IOW guilty until proven innocnet?

La constitution Française de 1958

Article 66
"Nul ne peut être arbitrairement détenu.
L'autorité judiciaire, gardienne de la liberté individuelle, assure le
respect de ce principe dans les conditions prévues par la loi."

You should try to get out the myths McKelvy.

Anyway I don't care since *my* conviction is that a guy must be
considered innocent until he has been judged and declared guilty.

"Lionel" wrote in message
...

I don't laugh with the fascists.

then have a good laugh with the Islamists.