Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm designing a two-way loudspeaker system using Dynaudio drivers. I
modeled the impedance and acoustic frequency responses of the drivers using CALSOD from measurements that I've taken. I designed the crossover for each driver in order to get 4th order L-R alignments. So far so good. My question is, since drivers aren't perfect, should I optimize the final -system- response for flattest frequency response or should I try to get as close as possible to the theoretical L-R alignments? If I try to get flattest system response then each driver + crossover section deviates quite a bit from the theoretical L-R alignments. I may get very flat frequency response but I lose advantages of the L-R alignments. Which is the better compromise for getting best subjective results? Thanks in advance, Michel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
mixed crossover phase question | Tech | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 2/5) | Car Audio | |||
simple crossover question | General |