Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roberto's current group listening test is open. This test is at 64
kbit/s, and updates the original test I organized over a year ago: http://audio.ciara.us/test/ Test ends on September 21st. ff123 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 02:43:09 GMT, ff123 wrote:
Roberto's current group listening test is open. This test is at 64 kbit/s, and updates the original test I organized over a year ago: http://audio.ciara.us/test/ Test ends on September 21st. Test results: http://audio.ciara.us/test/64test/results.html Lame mp3 at 128 kbit/s and FhG mp3 at 64 kbit/s are used as the high and low anchors, respectively. 1. No codec at 64 kbit/s can claim to be as good as mp3 at 128 kbit/s. 2. High efficiency AAC (AAC with spectral band replication, similar to mp3 with SBR, aka mp3pro) makes a good first showing, being the first among equals (he-aac, mp3pro, and ogg vorbis). 3. WMA9, Real, and Quicktime AAC make poor showings. While better than the hoary mp3 at 64 kbit/s, they are definitely worse than the top three 64 kbit/s contenders. The test introduces schnofler's java version of abc/hr, the blind listening utility: http://rarewares.hydrogenaudio.org/files/abchr-java.zip ff123 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Yet Another Headphone Question !! | General | |||
Public 128 kbit/s Extension Test | General | |||
Pro-Audio Test CD | General |