Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mackie MDR-24/96 questions
I might be buying one of these to record live shows - all I need is a
simple live-to-disk capability for later PC editing, so any of the fancier HDRs seems overkill - I just need something to capture 8 to 16 tracks of audio reliably and quietly. But I have a few questions: - I've read that, with some digging, it's possible to upgrade the BIOS on the MDR to support 32GB drives. Just what is involved? - Is it possible to route the analog inputs directly to the outputs, so that I could connect the MDR between the mic snake and the live mixing board? If so, is it (a) electrically connected (zero latency), (b) just going through the converters (minimal latency) or (c) processed (hellish latency)? - Anybody wanna talk me out of the MDR and into something else that's better for this application? -- Jay Levitt | Wellesley, MA | Hi! Faster: jay at jay dot eff-em | Where are we going? http://www.jay.fm | Why am I in this handbasket? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Mackie MDR-24/96 questions
Jay Levitt wrote:
- Is it possible to route the analog inputs directly to the outputs, so that I could connect the MDR between the mic snake and the live mixing board? If so, is it (a) electrically connected (zero latency), (b) just going through the converters (minimal latency) or (c) processed (hellish latency)? I do know that you will need mic preamps between that mic snake and the MDR. -- Eric www.Raw-Tracks.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Mackie MDR-24/96 questions
Jay Levitt wrote:
- Is it possible to route the analog inputs directly to the outputs, so that I could connect the MDR between the mic snake and the live mixing board? If so, is it (a) electrically connected (zero latency), (b) just going through the converters (minimal latency) or (c) processed (hellish latency)? If you can convince ONE sound reinforcement guy to let you do this, I will buy you dinner at Sardi's. You really want a splitter, if only because it prevents you from getting blamed when things go wrong. Honest. You don't want to feed him from your recorder, or even from the output of your preamps. - Anybody wanna talk me out of the MDR and into something else that's better for this application? It sounds fine to me. Personally, I feel more comfortable with DTRS since you have a physical tape there, and I'll work on festival and touring gigs where we record a lot but use very little. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Mackie MDR-24/96 questions
Jay,
Mackie has discontinued both the MDR and the SDR, so you're looking at a recorder without a lot of future. On the other hand, Mackie has continued to support their old equipment fairly well, and the forums on www.mackie.com are excellent. Mike Rivers is also THE MAN when it comes to Mackie. grin If I were to buy one, I'd be looking for a great price. They are pretty decent boxes, and you can put a variety of hard disks in them, and use a $20. RH-58 carrier from directron.com to slap the hard disk out of the recorder into your PC. -lee- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Mackie MDR-24/96 questions
Feed it from the direct outs on the console. Ideally, you want to use a
console that has had its channels' direct outputs modified so that they are post trim only (in other words they are pre insert, pre EQ, pre fader) so that what you get on "tape" is not processed in any way. "Jay Levitt" wrote in message ... I might be buying one of these to record live shows - all I need is a simple live-to-disk capability for later PC editing, so any of the fancier HDRs seems overkill - I just need something to capture 8 to 16 tracks of audio reliably and quietly. But I have a few questions: - I've read that, with some digging, it's possible to upgrade the BIOS on the MDR to support 32GB drives. Just what is involved? - Is it possible to route the analog inputs directly to the outputs, so that I could connect the MDR between the mic snake and the live mixing board? If so, is it (a) electrically connected (zero latency), (b) just going through the converters (minimal latency) or (c) processed (hellish latency)? - Anybody wanna talk me out of the MDR and into something else that's better for this application? -- Jay Levitt | Wellesley, MA | Hi! Faster: jay at jay dot eff-em | Where are we going? http://www.jay.fm | Why am I in this handbasket? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Mackie MDR-24/96 questions
In article writes: - I've read that, with some digging, it's possible to upgrade the BIOS on the MDR to support 32GB drives. Just what is involved? Officially Mackie doesn't support this upgrade, but it can be done. You have to buy a new BIOS chip from Mackie and swap out the old BIOS. Because of Mackie's licensing deal with eSupport (the BIOS company) you can't flash your existing chip. That part is easy. The hard part is that you have to change some of the CMOS settings from the defaults and that's tricky because the MDR doesn't have a place to plug in a keyboard and monitor. If you noticed my post earlier this week about CMOS, you might get the idea that you may not have to dig into your MDR in order to do the CMOS setup, that it can be done from a disk. - Is it possible to route the analog inputs directly to the outputs, so that I could connect the MDR between the mic snake and the live mixing board? If so, is it (a) electrically connected (zero latency), (b) just going through the converters (minimal latency) or (c) processed (hellish latency)? The inputs are at line level, not mic level, so you can't connect mics directly to it. There is an input monitor function that sends the input to the output, but as you suspect, it makes a trip through the converters. The delay is about 1.6 msec as I recall, insignificant musically. Typically the way people set it up for concert recording is to feed the recorder from a mixer's direct outputs or channel insert outputs. - Anybody wanna talk me out of the MDR and into something else that's better for this application? I think it's wonderful for that application. It's rock solid and it sounds fine. The disadvantage is that it's a discontinued product. Although Mackie is hanging on to enough parts to support it with repairs for a good number of years, don't expect it to get any better than it is today. One thing that you should be aware of is that the Mackie HDR and MDR recorders save a file and start a new one every 15 minutes. Therefore each track of a one-hour long recording will consit of four or five files (give or take the length of the 'hour"). There's no data lost, and they're time stampe broadcast wave files, so if you have a DAW program that can import them in their time-stamped order, they'll fit together seamlessly. Of course the playback is seamless. However, this makes for a large number of files to keep track of. They're named so you can sort them out, and that's a good thing. If you have the disk space (which you will if you upgrade the BIOS and get a larger drive) you can render the tracks, which creates a new, single file containing all the pieces (and edits or punch-ins if you've made any) and that makes importing easier. If you plan to render long recordings, you'll want to add another 128 MB of RAM, or replace the existing 128 MB stick with a 256 MB stick. It's PC-100 SDRAM. Someone will probably try to talk you into the Alesis HD24, which is also a decent choice. -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over, lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Mackie MDR-24/96 questions
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Mackie MDR-24/96 questions
In article znr1080950953k@trad, says...
- I've read that, with some digging, it's possible to upgrade the BIOS on the MDR to support 32GB drives. Just what is involved? If you noticed my post earlier this week about CMOS, you might get the idea that you may not have to dig into your MDR in order to do the CMOS setup, that it can be done from a disk. Oo, excellent - that would certainly be nicer than having to mod the MDR. - Is it possible to route the analog inputs directly to the outputs, so that I could connect the MDR between the mic snake and the live mixing board? If so, is it (a) electrically connected (zero latency), (b) just going through the converters (minimal latency) or (c) processed (hellish latency)? The inputs are at line level, not mic level, so you can't connect mics directly to it. There is an input monitor function that sends the input to the output, but as you suspect, it makes a trip through the converters. The delay is about 1.6 msec as I recall, insignificant musically. Typically the way people set it up for concert recording is to feed the recorder from a mixer's direct outputs or channel insert outputs. Yeah, I will probably do that - I obviously wasn't thinking about mic/line level. Our board's "direct outs" are really inserts, so they're post-EQ, but I think we have access to a Digimax, so we could use those pres instead and use lightpipe outs to the MDR, analog outs to the console... the MDR will accept the standard 8-bus cards to add digital I/O, right? I think it's wonderful for that application. It's rock solid and it sounds fine. The disadvantage is that it's a discontinued product. Although Mackie is hanging on to enough parts to support it with repairs for a good number of years, don't expect it to get any better than it is today. Which is fine - I just need a solid audio-to-hard-drive interface. I don't need or want any editing features whatsoever. I already have too many editors. One thing that you should be aware of is that the Mackie HDR and MDR recorders save a file and start a new one every 15 minutes. Interesting.. well, as long as there's no data loss, no problem. Someone will probably try to talk you into the Alesis HD24, which is also a decent choice. Yeah, but that's still got the 10MB Ethernet, right? Way too slow. I'm sure I will eventually start using removable drives, but I don't want to *have* to. -- Jay Levitt | Wellesley, MA | Hi! Faster: jay at jay dot eff-em | Where are we going? http://www.jay.fm | Why am I in this handbasket? |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Mackie MDR-24/96 questions
Mike Rivers wrote:
In article writes: Feed it from the direct outs on the console. Ideally, you want to use a console that has had its channels' direct outputs modified so that they are post trim only (in other words they are pre insert, pre EQ, pre fader) so that what you get on "tape" is not processed in any way. Funny, but there's a bunch of whiners on the Mackie forum right now who are complaining because the Onyx direct outputs (and firewire A/D inputs if that option is installed) come before the EQ and insert jacks. They're complaining that they can't use the console EQ or insert a compressor in line with their recording. As much as I believe that those are all DAW functions and are best NOT done on a console, I can see why it would be smart to provide both modes of operation. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Mackie MDR-24/96 questions
In article writes: Our board's "direct outs" are really inserts, so they're post-EQ Take a good look. Some are post-EQ, some aren't. but I think we have access to a Digimax, so we could use those pres instead and use lightpipe outs to the MDR, analog outs to the console... the MDR will accept the standard 8-bus cards to add digital I/O, right? Yes, the MDR, HDR, and d8b share the same I/O cards. If you're a stickler, you'll want to use the OPT-8 I/O cards (which cost $100 new and are rarely found second-hand) rather than the DIO-8 ADAT/TDIF cards (which cost much more new but are often sold second-hand at nearly giveaway prices). The Lightpipe input and output on the DIO-8 inverts the polarity of the data. This is based on making the d8b console compatible with playback from the original format ADAT (it's very complicated to explain, trust me) and was never changed or made switchable when Alesis changed to non-inverted data on tape. As I recall, you said you only needed 8 tracks, so a Digimax and an OPT-8 card would be a good solution. If you needed 16 or more tracks, you might look for an OPT-24 card which gives you three Lightpipe ins and outs and installs in the Accessory slot, so you can leave your analog I/O cards in the machine, selecting analog or digital input or output in groups of 8 tracks. Alesis HD24 Yeah, but that's still got the 10MB Ethernet, right? Way too slow. I'm sure I will eventually start using removable drives, but I don't want to *have* to. File transfer from the Ethernet port on the MDR isn't exactly lightning fast either. I don't know if anyone has ever set up a race between a Mackie and an Alesis (same project) but I don't know who would win, or if either would seeem fast. I mix through a real console so I rarely use my computer along with the HDR. When I was using an MDR, I occasionally moved a single track over to the computer (quick enough) through Ethernet to do an edit, then put it back on the MDR. I installed a mating drive bay in my computer so I could pop the drive in there, but I've really only used that capability for experimentation. A number of people are mounting a mating drive bay in an external Firewire enclosure and using that to move files from the recorder to the computer. They say it works great. For a while (maybe still) Alesis was giving away a Firewire dock with a new HD24, but I think you need to run their software with it, and it might be Windows only. -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over, lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Mackie MDR-24/96 questions
Arny Krueger wrote:
Mike Rivers wrote: In article writes: Feed it from the direct outs on the console. Ideally, you want to use a console that has had its channels' direct outputs modified so that they are post trim only (in other words they are pre insert, pre EQ, pre fader) so that what you get on "tape" is not processed in any way. Funny, but there's a bunch of whiners on the Mackie forum right now who are complaining because the Onyx direct outputs (and firewire A/D inputs if that option is installed) come before the EQ and insert jacks. They're complaining that they can't use the console EQ or insert a compressor in line with their recording. As much as I believe that those are all DAW functions and are best NOT done on a console, I can see why it would be smart to provide both modes of operation. And that's the sort of thing I wouldn't mind opening the case and moving jumpers for. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Mackie MDR-24/96 questions
"Jay Levitt" wrote in message ... In this case, I'm also the SR guy, so I'm getting blamed no matter what However, as was pointed out, since I'm using the preamps in the console, I pretty much have to run it through the console first anyway. Does your console have direct outs? TonyP. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Mackie MDR-24/96 questions
"Kurt Albershardt" wrote in message ... As much as I believe that those are all DAW functions and are best NOT done on a console, I can see why it would be smart to provide both modes of operation. And that's the sort of thing I wouldn't mind opening the case and moving jumpers for. On most mixers you simply use the channel inserts for pre fader/EQ direct outs, and use the direct outs for post fader/EQ direct outs. TonyP. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Mackie MDR-24/96 questions
On most mixers you simply use the channel inserts for pre fader/EQ direct
outs, and use the direct outs for post fader/EQ direct outs. Indeed. One BIG exception is the new Onyx mixers from Mackie. Word from Mackie is that they take their "direct outs" as well as the digital firewire outputs *before* the inserts or EQ. -lee- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Seven Questions + | Audio Opinions | |||
Mackie SDR 24/96 - Hard Drive upgrade? | Pro Audio | |||
Mackie hiring Berringher to manufacture all future product :)... | Pro Audio | |||
Recording signal through Mackie 1202 vlz pro | Pro Audio | |||
Mackie Hard Disk Recorder News | Pro Audio |