Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
Been a long time lurker but I'm confused enough this time to post. I have mostly been working as a studio player but the last 7 years been doing my own little projects. Lately business is booming and I've decided to upgrade to something more professional. I have alot of projects coming up! (At least by my standards) I have a remote recording of a 6 piece band, a couple band demos, and several studio CD projects. From my point of of view it was necessary to upgrade from my old reliable 8 channel DAW and go to a 16 channel DAW. A friend of mine who runs a studio thinks I'm crazy. I hope I'm not! My choice is two 8 channel delta 1010-lts running on AMD 2.2/nvidea chipset MB. I'm assembling the new system this week-end. The problem is the interface with the 1010 cards. I have never used a mixer board for my studio. I've also been quite limited in my monitor mixing for my customers because of this. With my old sound card I had an external patch bay with 1/4 inch inputs. With the the 1010s I won't have an external patch bay. The 1010s just have a short snake with RCA connectors. With my old DAW I've always just plugged into a mic pres or simply ran straight into my sound card's external patch bay. I've actually been happy with the direct sound. I thought about building a patch bay for the 1010s but while at it I might as well just get a mixing board and run the RCAs into the board. Right? So for the new system I'm looking for a board to connect to my 1010s and to mix monitor mixes. Probably a USED board as I'm limited to 600$ 1. All I need is a 16 channel board? Or do I need more channels for flexibility? So many variables...... argh... 2. Would a digital mixer work for me? I have little understanding of them and would like to hear about the advantages or uselessness of such nonsense. I'm very happy with the software automation in my Sonar 2. Still I'm thinking a mixer that interfaces with sonar might speed things up a bit. But would I have the input channel interface with my 1010's and monitor mixing capability? 3. I have read so much about having mic pres and yet I have recorded direct using good mics and have been very happy with the results as well as my customers being happy. I hear very little diferrance between using my mic pres and going direct. I have never noticed that hard, brittle sound folkes have talked about. So if I was to get a board I would rather it be as transparent as possible. God! In so many ways I don't know what to ask. I do know I go for as natural of a sound as I can. (I'm a big fan of minimal miking.) Any recommendations on used or new boards that would fit my needs. Or if this is the wrong course of action. I'm bugeted at around 600$ By and far this has been my favorite newsgroup to read. Proud to post here. Is Peter Larsen still around? Ok... I've asked enough.... ;} Best regards to the helpful people here. Mike |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Iowa Recorder)
wrote Date: 12/18/03 8:34 PM Eastern Standard Time in Message-id: From my point of of view it was necessary to upgrade from my old reliable 8 channel DAW and go to a 16 channel DAW. Well all the gear your listing here is great but what about the rooms your recording in, tell us a bit about them. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well all the gear your listing here is great but what about the rooms your
recording in, tell us a bit about them. That was going to be my next question. I have three rooms. One is a beutiful large basement family room with a fireplace, nice lighting and plush furniture. The other is a large unfinished basement storage room. The other is a basement guest bedroom. I have been just working with my DAW right in the family room but am thinking to move the setup upstairs to a spare bedroom so I dont have to use head phones for tracking. I know I'll need to have a good talk back system. I'm not really happy with the family room as it is carpeted and has alot of plush furniture. It's a really dead room but I have gotten some great recordings out of it. The storage room is cement floor and cement walls but with lots of shelves with boxes. I havent used this room yet but would LOVE to put the drums in there and work with the room ambiance. So the storage room is nice and lively but fairly warm. The guest bedroom is carpeted like the family room so it's a fairly dead room as well. Much like a isolation booth. Anyway I'm planning to use these rooms and move my DAW to an upstairs room. I guess this means running a snake down to the basement but hopefully others have more elegant solutions. I mostly plan to use the family room so the bands can have eye contact. It's large enough for a band and I can still get fairly good isolation. I can't do alot of mods on these rooms as it is a really nice house which we plan to sell in a couple years. My fondest hope is in a couple years to get some off site space like a basement in a downtown office building to remodel with barn board paneling and oak flooring but that depends on the income raised from recording projects... I'm right now apprenticing in carpentry just for that goal... Kind regards Mike |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() How about a pinball machine, wide screen TV with surround sound, and a wet bar? Sounds like it would make a good lounge and place for the musicians to hang out, rehearse, tune, and snack. Your post really flipped my head around. Yes, this is a great idea! The other is a large unfinished basement storage room. Having a separate studio and control room is a good idea, but consider how inconvenient it will be to move a microphone if you have to trot downstairs, move the mic, then trop upstairs again to listen to what it sounds like. This (or you) will get old fast. Time to hire someone... hehehe... Yes, I realise this . I just don't see any other choice unless I want to modify the house with a centraly located control room. Right now there is NO control room. One good thing about the house is it is a split foyer and the stairs are centrally located so getting up and down isn't too hard. Hey I'm still in shape... hehehe I think this is the second time in as many days that I've seen someone express the sentiment "It really sounds great but I'm not satisfied with it." What do you REALLY mean? What part doesn't sound great? Good point and I have read this as well. What I mean there are rooms you play in and you find yourself saying it sounds great in here! Then there are rooms you play in that are too lively and your 1/4 notes end up being 1/79 notes - that sucks. Then there's the dead rooms that are ok but not alot of character. This room is dead - not alot of character - and for the most part for recording that is what I need. What I'm mostly unhappy with is the carpet and wish for a wood floor. You might consider using the spare bedroom as your control room and using an upstairs room as an isolation room. It might work out to be more convenient, and make for less running up and down. This really turned my head around. I walked upstairs and clapped my hands a few times. That's how I test rooms. There is ALOT of room upstairs with the living room/dining room/kitchen in one connected area. Lots of sunshine too. Plenty of room for a band and better character in the sound of the room. The only concern is the high vaulted ceiling. But by clapping my hands I did'nt hear any boominess. But how do you get this eye contact? Is there a window between the family room and somewhere else? If you're looking through an open door, there goes your isolation between the studio and control room. This is well thought out Mike. If I have the control room in a bedroom the singer would be in the main room with the band doing a scratch vocal and then doing vocals later as overdubs. I almost always do this for CD projects as I like to give the vocals alot of time and attention. What really got me thinking is I can use ANY room in the house according to the needs of the project. I think I'll use that approach for any upcoming projects. On a side note I'm sure there are a few who would read this thread and go - this guy is doing this for money??? Yes, I would love to have the 100,000$$ to build a dedicated studio that would look good in pictures in a brouchure. How much business would I get from a brouchure? I don't know. Somebody tell me. How much business would I get from someone reading a list of expensive equipment? I don't know. I hope someone can cue me in on that. I quite curious about it. I do know the best studios in our area get alot of business by referal and repeat customers. That's what I focus although I do hope in the future to have a snazzy brouchure. Every customer that comes in gets the very best I can do because I want them to be nothing short of thrilled with the product. Whether its a cheap demo or a lengthy CD project. I want them to come back and definately want a positive buzz going around about what I do. I go overboard in making every recording the best I can do of my ability. May charge them for 20 hours but I usually end up putting in 40 hours making sure everything is perfect. I want repeat customers and want the word to get out. It seems to be working. I have seen several guys in the area invest large bucks in building really cool studios but only getting little cash flow. I have decided to only enlarge my studio according to the cash flow. Right now cash flow is increasing so now I'm upgrading - again! Hopefully I can upgrade some more. Thanks for your help. Mike |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I have tried the workarounds (different rooms with no visual communicaiton) you are talking about. My experience has been that when tracking a band, they are going to line-of-sight to you and to each other in order to be most comfortable and you are going to want the line-of-sight also just to stay in the loop. At least in my situation, when I'm tracking a band or performer, I'm as much of a player as the musician(s). I'm playing the gear. Withoutme and my gear, tey and their gear doesn't get recorded and it often works better if I've got a visual of for what's happening. Sometimes, just looking at a performer's body language can tell you what you need to do to change something for the better. Running up and dow stairs to reposition a mic will introduce a disruption in the flow of a session that incrementally creates a higher level of stress into the equation each time it happens. There's a big psychological factor to running a session. Smooth and glitchless is good. I like to keep the musicians focused on the music (and if it's a band the inevitable internectine jealousies and insecurities that make them fucntion as they do) and handle the rest of it so that they don't really have to think about logistics. Remodel the basement if you can. Doug Joyce Animix Productions Durango, CO "Raymond" wrote in message ... If it where me Mike I'd remodel the whole basement and start from scratch. It sounds like you've got a lot of square foot space down there so you can plan, construct and set things up the right way. This will be costly, time consuming and you (and others) may not think it's necessary but the key to a great pro recording is with the right rooms. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
f.S. Tons of cheapgear | Pro Audio | |||
F.S. tons of gear for sale, keys, modules, pro audio, etc | Pro Audio | |||
F.S. tons of studio/keyboard/rack gear | Pro Audio | |||
WARNING: MusicMatch Jukebox is smarter than you (like XP) | General | |||
BPM Studio, DMP Radio Automation, Jazler, Megamix, DJ all, all VSTI's,AKAI Sample CDs, other | General |