Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.4984044
I'll quote the first paragraph of the conclusion: Based on the evaluation of the mean, variance, PCA, and mean square error with respect to a target function, no correlation could be observed between the measured magnitude response and retail price of headphones. However, the variance in low-frequency response seems to decrease with increasing price, indicating an improved bass response measurement consistency across headphones in the higher price range. It is however unclear whether this improved consistency with a higher retail price is the result of better headphones or better repeatability of measurements with more expensive models. Nevertheless, assuming that the perceived audio quality is largely determined by the spectral magnitude response of headphones, there are plenty of relatively cheap models that match the assumed target function, as well as very expensive ones that deviate significantly from an assumed ideal response. I imagine that this paper is largely unsurprising to r.a.h-e regulars. -dsr- -- https://randomstring.org/~dsr/eula.html is hereby incorporated by reference. there is no justice, there is just us. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
frequency response of headphones | Pro Audio | |||
Frequency Response of XM | High End Audio | |||
Frequency response | Pro Audio | |||
Frequency response | Pro Audio | |||
Mic Frequency Response | Pro Audio |