Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
ScottW wrote: On Apr 26, 4:27 am, "Gary Eickmeier" wrote: ScottW wrote: On Apr 24, 7:17 pm, Audio_Empire wrote: Now with cardioids , they have a directional attribute in their pick-up pattern. How does one differentiate in a cardiod output from a quiet sound coming into the front (sensitive area) and a loud sound coming = from the side? Amplitude itself is not sufficient to provide a realistic 3D. You missed the point of AE's post. He wasn't saying that the = cardioid pattern has anything to do with the stereo. Just talking in general = about directivity in microphones. =20 So it was a nice informative obfuscation? I'd still appreciate an answer to the question. Trying to explain to someone how two cardioid mikes pick-up stereo is = obfuscation? Well, pardon me for living! I think this question has been = answered satisfactorily for most people. I'll leave the claim that all close mic'd, studio recordings, etc. = are not in fact stereo recordings....as an opinion based upon ancient greek language. Another misunderstanding. It's a long story. The common modern use of the word as a noun to name a recording or = a playback system....stereo means two channels. http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dict...british/stereo I don't care what somebody's dictionary says. =20 Then you decline to accept the meaning of the word in current society. =20 Words can..and do change meaning. =20 The word means a field-type auditory perspective system. Width, height, and depth in the reproduction of a multi-channel = recording. The Bell Labs had three channels to do the same job. We now have 5. = You could have one channel per instrument and arrange them on your own soundstage and it would still be "stereophonic." You could compose a = piece for ten loudspeakers, a piece that was never performed in any other = space, and it would still be stereophonic if it could be portrayed with = more than one channel and present a width, depth, and height to the = presentation of the sounds. Live music is stereophonic, unless you are listening from the next = room. Technically the "stereo" part means solid, all three axes. The = "phonic" part means on loudspeakers. On the other system, binaural, the "bi" part means two. The "aural" = part means ears. We have binaural and monaural, or one eared. Monophonic = would be one loudspeaker. But it would still be mono if it was played on two loudspeakers, if the music came from just one channel. Mono sound = presented on headphone would be idiotic. All of these terms were defined by = the pioneers from Bell Labs, and then later forgotten. =20 Some people think words are defined by some forgotten use...others think they are defined by their current use in society as recorded by dictionaries...like cambridge. First of all, there's nothing "forgotten" about real stereo. Many record = companies still record that way, but usually, mostly for classical = music. Scott have you ever even heard a real stereo recording played = back on a decent system? It sure doesn't seem so.=20 =20 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stereophonic Realism - a Tautology | High End Audio | |||
Stereophonic to Octophonic | Pro Audio | |||
Is it live or is it Memorex? - Recorded Realism | Pro Audio |