Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I play a Santa Cruz OM PW on stage accompanying trad Irish music, and I'm wondering what you folks think would be a good mic to use on it. Just curious... G Thanks, steveV |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/13/03 11:42 PM, TarBabyTunes eloquently wrote:
I play a Santa Cruz OM PW on stage accompanying trad Irish music, and I'm wondering what you folks think would be a good mic to use on it. Just curious... G Thanks, steveV Steve: Sounds like you've already ruled out a pickup. However, the SC OMPW is, if I remember correctly, quite a responsive and resonant guitar. I have such a guitar - a Tippin OMT, and a mic on stage is disastrous with feedback problems. I have an undersaddle pickup in my Tippin and I am able to dial in a great sound If the on-stage monitor volume isn't too high, you'll be okay for feedback, but even then you'll have issue with proximity and positioning with this guitar. My opinion is for onstage work one wants a neutral and not very resonant guitar, not necessarily one which has a wonderful voice all its own. Having said all that, though, in the last six months I have given up on using pickups in two of the three instruments I use onstage. I now play mostly cittern and banjo and just use a mic. I got really tired of cables and preamps circling my feet and snagging in the instrument stands. I also got tired of two or three gain levels with each instrument and dealing with that. I simply started using a SM57. It really captures a lot of the instruments' fidelity. I guess I'm a lot better at dealing with a mic than I used to be because it doesn't feel like any big deal to dance around in front of it to control gain or even tone. But I still have problems with that resonant Tippin, though, and in the gigs when I play that I still use the pickup. Carlos |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll second the DPA recommendation: their 4060/4061 miniature mics are
a favorite of mine for lavalier/spoken word use as well as the occasional instrumental application. Michael These days, I'd look at a built-in mic. You can start on the cheap with an Audio Technica and work your way up to a Countryman or even a DPA. If you're playing in a typical ceilidh style band with fiddle, accordiong and maybe flute, you're not going to want a full, wide, warm tone, you'd going to want it to sound a bit like a washboard playing chords, so you want to be able to get a lot of higher midrange and not a lot of bass out of it. Also, my experience with Irish musicians is that they're usually deaf on stage and want really high stage levels (as well as house levels) so putting a nice condenser mic like a KM84 a foot or so out from your guitar is out of the question. But then it all depends on your band. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
TarBabyTunes wrote:
I play a Santa Cruz OM PW on stage accompanying trad Irish music, and I'm wondering what you folks think would be a good mic to use on it. On-stage use of an acoustic is tough, piezos make anything good sound like a cigar box with rubber strings. You're not in the optimal situation but some things which work decently are lavalier-type mics with instrument clips, which let you clip the mic on right by the sound hole. This has the advantage that you can move around and still get the same sound. Feedback may still be a problem, though. One to look at is at http://www.audiotechnica.com/prodpro...es/AT831b.html The L.R.Baggs I-beam pickup, which goes inside the body under the bridge, has in what I've heard of it produced very good amplified tones. http://www.lrbaggs.com/html/products...ps_ibeam.shtml -- in days somehow distracted / in nights of troubled sleep these memories long suppressed emerge / too difficult to keep To reach me reverse: moc(dot)xobop(at)ggestran |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In Article , Jonathan Roberts
wrote: TarBabyTunes wrote: I play a Santa Cruz OM PW on stage accompanying trad Irish music, and I'm wondering what you folks think would be a good mic to use on it. On-stage use of an acoustic is tough, piezos make anything good sound like a cigar box with rubber strings. You're not in the optimal situation but some things which work decently are lavalier-type mics with instrument clips, which let you clip the mic on right by the sound hole. This has the advantage that you can move around and still get the same sound. Feedback may still be a problem, though. One to look at is at http://www.audiotechnica.com/prodpro...es/AT831b.html The L.R.Baggs I-beam pickup, which goes inside the body under the bridge, has in what I've heard of it produced very good amplified tones. http://www.lrbaggs.com/html/products...ps_ibeam.shtml Or one Schoeps CMC641 Regards, Ty Ford **Until the worm goes away, I have put "not" in front of my email address. Please remove it if you want to email me directly. For Ty Ford V/O demos, audio services and equipment reviews, click on http://www.jagunet.com/~tford |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Or one Schoeps CMC641 Regards, Ty Ford **Until the worm goes away, I have put "not" in front of my email address. Please remove it if you want to email me directly. For Ty Ford V/O demos, audio services and equipment reviews, click on http://www.jagunet.com/~tford You beat me to this one Ty. I used aCMC6/41 on a live gig and the sound was fabulous. How one monitors is important, but I have heard no better microphone in this situation. Richard H. Kuschel "I canna change the law of physics."-----Scotty |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Biggest problem in live work isn't necessarily the mic but the monitoring.
Internal mics, external mics, piezo transducers, all provide sound, but they also have a situation where without the proper monitoring, you are simply feedback waiting to happen. Personally, I don't like the idea of frontline monitoring of an acoustic guitar one way or the other unless there's someone really qualified at the monitor system. I'd prefer that the artist have a decent backline amp to work with and set it up on a chair or something where the guitar monitoring comes from something other than the frontline monitoring. You always ask for problems. A live mic in front of the guitar just presents that many more problems, feedback not being the most significant (although the most immediate). You'll still have room noise and bleed. I'm working with a latin/cuban band, small by normal circumstances (more closely related to mexican tejano in instrumentation) and their choices of miking the guitars has been somewhat problematic because they play small clubs with inadequate PA solutions. There are so many factors that one has to wonder just how to solve your problem because you're most likely in the same situation, meaning small club and small stage. So what I seriously suggest is to forget the idea of monitoring and check out either a Countryman or other transducer with a decent acoustic amp where YOU control the specifics, don't have any guitar come back through the minimal monitoring system you might have for vocals, and just learn to adapt to how the others in your traditional Irish band play. Often, out of the 700+ live shows I've done, the best FOH sound comes from an accomplished group that mixes themselves on stage. I love it when my problems are solved by a good group of musicians! g -- Roger W. Norman SirMusic Studio Purchase your copy of the Fifth of RAP CD set at www.recaudiopro.net. See how far $20 really goes. "TarBabyTunes" wrote in message ... I play a Santa Cruz OM PW on stage accompanying trad Irish music, and I'm wondering what you folks think would be a good mic to use on it. Just curious... G Thanks, steveV |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger wrote:
Biggest problem in live work isn't necessarily the mic but the monitoring. Internal mics, external mics, piezo transducers, all provide sound, but they also have a situation where without the proper monitoring, you are simply feedback waiting to happen. Personally, I don't like the idea of frontline monitoring of an acoustic guitar one way or the other unless there's someone really qualified at the monitor system. Yeah well, "someone really qualified" at the monitor system is key for sure. Depends on the venue I guess. For little clubs I don't mind an acoustic amp in back of me but in big halls it never cuts it, specially with drum kit compared to a full blown monitor rig altho most times piezos sound like **** coming back that way also IMO of course. I'd prefer that the artist have a decent backline amp to work with and set it up on a chair or something where the guitar monitoring comes from something other than the frontline monitoring. You always ask for problems. A live mic in front of the guitar just presents that many more problems, feedback not being the most significant (although the most immediate). You'll still have room noise and bleed. I'm working with a latin/cuban band, small by normal circumstances (more closely related to mexican tejano in instrumentation) and their choices of miking the guitars has been somewhat problematic because they play small clubs with inadequate PA solutions. There are so many factors that one has to wonder just how to solve your problem because you're most likely in the same situation, meaning small club and small stage. So what I seriously suggest is to forget the idea of monitoring and check out either a Countryman or other transducer with a decent acoustic amp where YOU control the specifics, don't have any guitar come back through the minimal monitoring system you might have for vocals, and just learn to adapt to how the others in your traditional Irish band play. Often, out of the 700+ live shows I've done, the best FOH sound comes from an accomplished group that mixes themselves on stage. I love it when my problems are solved by a good group of musicians! g -- Roger W. Norman SirMusic Studio Purchase your copy of the Fifth of RAP CD set at www.recaudiopro.net. See how far $20 really goes. "TarBabyTunes" wrote in message ... I play a Santa Cruz OM PW on stage accompanying trad Irish music, and I'm wondering what you folks think would be a good mic to use on it. Just curious... G Thanks, steveV |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll give you your experience, but unless you have a good crew presenting
you the way you need to sound, it's all **** anyway. An acoustic guitar doesn't "cut" if it isn't presentable. Like I said, 700 shows and I feel pretty comfortable with how it would ideally be handled. Not all shows are the same, however, and that's the rub. -- Roger W. Norman SirMusic Studio Purchase your copy of the Fifth of RAP CD set at www.recaudiopro.net. See how far $20 really goes. "Mondoslug1" wrote in message ... Roger wrote: Biggest problem in live work isn't necessarily the mic but the monitoring. Internal mics, external mics, piezo transducers, all provide sound, but they also have a situation where without the proper monitoring, you are simply feedback waiting to happen. Personally, I don't like the idea of frontline monitoring of an acoustic guitar one way or the other unless there's someone really qualified at the monitor system. Yeah well, "someone really qualified" at the monitor system is key for sure. Depends on the venue I guess. For little clubs I don't mind an acoustic amp in back of me but in big halls it never cuts it, specially with drum kit compared to a full blown monitor rig altho most times piezos sound like **** coming back that way also IMO of course. I'd prefer that the artist have a decent backline amp to work with and set it up on a chair or something where the guitar monitoring comes from something other than the frontline monitoring. You always ask for problems. A live mic in front of the guitar just presents that many more problems, feedback not being the most significant (although the most immediate). You'll still have room noise and bleed. I'm working with a latin/cuban band, small by normal circumstances (more closely related to mexican tejano in instrumentation) and their choices of miking the guitars has been somewhat problematic because they play small clubs with inadequate PA solutions. There are so many factors that one has to wonder just how to solve your problem because you're most likely in the same situation, meaning small club and small stage. So what I seriously suggest is to forget the idea of monitoring and check out either a Countryman or other transducer with a decent acoustic amp where YOU control the specifics, don't have any guitar come back through the minimal monitoring system you might have for vocals, and just learn to adapt to how the others in your traditional Irish band play. Often, out of the 700+ live shows I've done, the best FOH sound comes from an accomplished group that mixes themselves on stage. I love it when my problems are solved by a good group of musicians! g -- Roger W. Norman SirMusic Studio Purchase your copy of the Fifth of RAP CD set at www.recaudiopro.net. See how far $20 really goes. "TarBabyTunes" wrote in message ... I play a Santa Cruz OM PW on stage accompanying trad Irish music, and I'm wondering what you folks think would be a good mic to use on it. Just curious... G Thanks, steveV |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger wrote:
I'll give you your experience, but unless you have a good crew presenting you the way you need to sound, it's all **** anyway. An acoustic guitar doesn't "cut" if it isn't presentable. Like I said, 700 shows and I feel pretty comfortable with how it would ideally be handled. Not all shows are the same, however, and that's the rub. I'm not necessarily disagreeing at all. For me the few times I've tried to use my little amp on a big stage it was virtually unhearable. Best live thing I ever had for acoustic guitar was ear buds but then you definitely need a good monitor engineer not to hurt you. Having a pickup & external mic is somethign I like. Depends on the music though. If it's slamming the mic's pretty useless but if it's an acoustic vibey thing with broke down drums, cool to have the mic...even if it's just a psychological thing....for me -- Roger W. Norman SirMusic Studio Purchase your copy of the Fifth of RAP CD set at www.recaudiopro.net. See how far $20 really goes. "Mondoslug1" wrote in message ... Roger wrote: Biggest problem in live work isn't necessarily the mic but the monitoring. Internal mics, external mics, piezo transducers, all provide sound, but they also have a situation where without the proper monitoring, you are simply feedback waiting to happen. Personally, I don't like the idea of frontline monitoring of an acoustic guitar one way or the other unless there's someone really qualified at the monitor system. Yeah well, "someone really qualified" at the monitor system is key for sure. Depends on the venue I guess. For little clubs I don't mind an acoustic amp in back of me but in big halls it never cuts it, specially with drum kit compared to a full blown monitor rig altho most times piezos sound like **** coming back that way also IMO of course. I'd prefer that the artist have a decent backline amp to work with and set it up on a chair or something where the guitar monitoring comes from something other than the frontline monitoring. You always ask for problems. A live mic in front of the guitar just presents that many more problems, feedback not being the most significant (although the most immediate). You'll still have room noise and bleed. I'm working with a latin/cuban band, small by normal circumstances (more closely related to mexican tejano in instrumentation) and their choices of miking the guitars has been somewhat problematic because they play small clubs with inadequate PA solutions. There are so many factors that one has to wonder just how to solve your problem because you're most likely in the same situation, meaning small club and small stage. So what I seriously suggest is to forget the idea of monitoring and check out either a Countryman or other transducer with a decent acoustic amp where YOU control the specifics, don't have any guitar come back through the minimal monitoring system you might have for vocals, and just learn to adapt to how the others in your traditional Irish band play. Often, out of the 700+ live shows I've done, the best FOH sound comes from an accomplished group that mixes themselves on stage. I love it when my problems are solved by a good group of musicians! g -- Roger W. Norman SirMusic Studio Purchase your copy of the Fifth of RAP CD set at www.recaudiopro.net. See how far $20 really goes. "TarBabyTunes" wrote in message ... I play a Santa Cruz OM PW on stage accompanying trad Irish music, and I'm wondering what you folks think w |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I spoke in relation to the query. An acoustic guitar with an Irish band.
-- Roger W. Norman SirMusic Studio Purchase your copy of the Fifth of RAP CD set at www.recaudiopro.net. See how far $20 really goes. "Mondoslug1" wrote in message ... Roger wrote: I'll give you your experience, but unless you have a good crew presenting you the way you need to sound, it's all **** anyway. An acoustic guitar doesn't "cut" if it isn't presentable. Like I said, 700 shows and I feel pretty comfortable with how it would ideally be handled. Not all shows are the same, however, and that's the rub. I'm not necessarily disagreeing at all. For me the few times I've tried to use my little amp on a big stage it was virtually unhearable. Best live thing I ever had for acoustic guitar was ear buds but then you definitely need a good monitor engineer not to hurt you. Having a pickup & external mic is somethign I like. Depends on the music though. If it's slamming the mic's pretty useless but if it's an acoustic vibey thing with broke down drums, cool to have the mic...even if it's just a psychological thing....for me -- Roger W. Norman SirMusic Studio Purchase your copy of the Fifth of RAP CD set at www.recaudiopro.net. See how far $20 really goes. "Mondoslug1" wrote in message ... Roger wrote: Biggest problem in live work isn't necessarily the mic but the monitoring. Internal mics, external mics, piezo transducers, all provide sound, but they also have a situation where without the proper monitoring, you are simply feedback waiting to happen. Personally, I don't like the idea of frontline monitoring of an acoustic guitar one way or the other unless there's someone really qualified at the monitor system. Yeah well, "someone really qualified" at the monitor system is key for sure. Depends on the venue I guess. For little clubs I don't mind an acoustic amp in back of me but in big halls it never cuts it, specially with drum kit compared to a full blown monitor rig altho most times piezos sound like **** coming back that way also IMO of course. I'd prefer that the artist have a decent backline amp to work with and set it up on a chair or something where the guitar monitoring comes from something other than the frontline monitoring. You always ask for problems. A live mic in front of the guitar just presents that many more problems, feedback not being the most significant (although the most immediate). You'll still have room noise and bleed. I'm working with a latin/cuban band, small by normal circumstances (more closely related to mexican tejano in instrumentation) and their choices of miking the guitars has been somewhat problematic because they play small clubs with inadequate PA solutions. There are so many factors that one has to wonder just how to solve your problem because you're most likely in the same situation, meaning small club and small stage. So what I seriously suggest is to forget the idea of monitoring and check out either a Countryman or other transducer with a decent acoustic amp where YOU control the specifics, don't have any guitar come back through the minimal monitoring system you might have for vocals, and just learn to adapt to how the others in your traditional Irish band play. Often, out of the 700+ live shows I've done, the best FOH sound comes from an accomplished group that mixes themselves on stage. I love it when my problems are solved by a good group of musicians! g -- Roger W. Norman SirMusic Studio Purchase your copy of the Fifth of RAP CD set at www.recaudiopro.net. See how far $20 really goes. "TarBabyTunes" wrote in message ... I play a Santa Cruz OM PW on stage accompanying trad Irish music, and I'm wondering what you folks think w |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard,
How did you monitor? Martin "Richard Kuschel" wrote in message ... Or one Schoeps CMC641 Regards, Ty Ford **Until the worm goes away, I have put "not" in front of my email address. Please remove it if you want to email me directly. For Ty Ford V/O demos, audio services and equipment reviews, click on http://www.jagunet.com/~tford You beat me to this one Ty. I used aCMC6/41 on a live gig and the sound was fabulous. How one monitors is important, but I have heard no better microphone in this situation. Richard H. Kuschel "I canna change the law of physics."-----Scotty |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would recommed the Crown CM700 condenser mic for stage amplifying. I got
great results with this mic even in large enssebles. It wont be my first choice in the studio but on stage there are other parametres. Recently I've used the L.R.Baggs DI which was fantastic too but you will have to modify the guitar for that and I am not sure it worth the while. -- Joav Shdema Producer/Engineer dB Studio A Joav Shdema Inc. "TarBabyTunes" wrote in message ... I play a Santa Cruz OM PW on stage accompanying trad Irish music, and I'm wondering what you folks think would be a good mic to use on it. Just curious... G Thanks, steveV |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JoavS ) wrote:
Recently I've used the L.R.Baggs DI which was fantastic too but you will have to modify the guitar for that and I am not sure it worth the while. Are you referring to one of their pickups/systems? (the Para Acoustic DI is an external preamp/DI with eq) - Brian |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ichard,
How did you monitor? Martin "Richard Kuschel" wrote in message ... Or one Schoeps CMC641 Regards, Ty Ford **Until the worm goes away, I have put "not" in front of my email address. Please remove it if you want to email me directly. For Ty Ford V/O demos, audio services and equipment reviews, click on http://www.jagunet.com/~tford You beat me to this one Ty. I used aCMC6/41 on a live gig and the sound was fabulous. How one monitors is important, but I have heard no better microphone in this situation. Richard H. Kuschel "I canna change the law of physics."-----Scotty In one situation I didn't and that worked best . Another time I used a Hot Spot. Since the CMC6/41 is supercardioid,there is a heavy null at about 120 degrees from the front of the mic. Work with that and keep monitors low. Richard H. Kuschel "I canna change the law of physics."-----Scotty |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ichard,
How did you monitor? Martin "Richard Kuschel" wrote in message ... Or one Schoeps CMC641 Regards, Ty Ford **Until the worm goes away, I have put "not" in front of my email address. Please remove it if you want to email me directly. For Ty Ford V/O demos, audio services and equipment reviews, click on http://www.jagunet.com/~tford You beat me to this one Ty. I used aCMC6/41 on a live gig and the sound was fabulous. How one monitors is important, but I have heard no better microphone in this situation. Richard H. Kuschel "I canna change the law of physics."-----Scotty In one situation I didn't and that worked best . Another time I used a Hot Spot. Since the CMC6/41 is supercardioid,there is a heavy null at about 120 degrees from the front of the mic. Work with that and keep monitors low. Richard H. Kuschel "I canna change the law of physics."-----Scotty |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
EQ feedback please - acoustic guitar mp3 | Pro Audio | |||
Acoustic guitar mic w/ Grace 101 | Pro Audio | |||
Small Condenser reccomendations for acoustic guitar | Pro Audio | |||
Help with Guitar Tracks Pro!!! | Pro Audio |