Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Chuck Duffy
 
Posts: n/a
Default ass backwards on pan law

due to a brain fart while thinking about a linear wet/dry calculation
I posted some really wrong stuff about pan law.

Pan law should not affect signals panned hard left, or hard right -
not "straight up" as I posted.

A single channel panned hard left, with fader at zero, with no effects
or eq should result in nearly identical or identical bounces on
different systems.

Chuck
  #2   Report Post  
LeBaron & Alrich
 
Posts: n/a
Default ass backwards on pan law

Chuck Duffy wrote:

due to a brain fart while thinking about a linear wet/dry calculation
I posted some really wrong stuff about pan law.


Cast iron, stainless, or that modurn won't-stick stuff?

Pan law should not affect signals panned hard left, or hard right -
not "straight up" as I posted.


How 'bout "over easy", or is that too much of a mess?

A single channel panned hard left, with fader at zero, with no effects
or eq should result in nearly identical or identical bounces on
different systems.


But it never happens like that. One always oozes into the other, and
there you are.

--
ha
  #3   Report Post  
LeBaron & Alrich
 
Posts: n/a
Default ass backwards on pan law

Chuck Duffy wrote:

due to a brain fart while thinking about a linear wet/dry calculation
I posted some really wrong stuff about pan law.


Cast iron, stainless, or that modurn won't-stick stuff?

Pan law should not affect signals panned hard left, or hard right -
not "straight up" as I posted.


How 'bout "over easy", or is that too much of a mess?

A single channel panned hard left, with fader at zero, with no effects
or eq should result in nearly identical or identical bounces on
different systems.


But it never happens like that. One always oozes into the other, and
there you are.

--
ha
  #4   Report Post  
LLLindblad
 
Posts: n/a
Default ass backwards on pan law

But it never happens like that. One always oozes into the other, and
there you are.


scrambled........

ha!

laters
tuna
  #5   Report Post  
LLLindblad
 
Posts: n/a
Default ass backwards on pan law

But it never happens like that. One always oozes into the other, and
there you are.


scrambled........

ha!

laters
tuna


  #6   Report Post  
Monte P McGuire
 
Posts: n/a
Default ass backwards on pan law

In article ,
Chuck Duffy wrote:
due to a brain fart while thinking about a linear wet/dry calculation
I posted some really wrong stuff about pan law.

Pan law should not affect signals panned hard left, or hard right -
not "straight up" as I posted.

A single channel panned hard left, with fader at zero, with no effects
or eq should result in nearly identical or identical bounces on
different systems.


Yeah, most folks do panpots this way, but Yamaha doesn't. 12 o'clock
is the unity gain point for them. The trick is to know what gets done
inside your rig. Unfortunately, none of us have the ability to do
anything about panpot laws in modern digital mixers other than dealing
with what someone else provided for us. It's not like the analog days
where one could open up the console and change it if you didn't like
it...


Regards,

Monte McGuire

  #7   Report Post  
Monte P McGuire
 
Posts: n/a
Default ass backwards on pan law

In article ,
Chuck Duffy wrote:
due to a brain fart while thinking about a linear wet/dry calculation
I posted some really wrong stuff about pan law.

Pan law should not affect signals panned hard left, or hard right -
not "straight up" as I posted.

A single channel panned hard left, with fader at zero, with no effects
or eq should result in nearly identical or identical bounces on
different systems.


Yeah, most folks do panpots this way, but Yamaha doesn't. 12 o'clock
is the unity gain point for them. The trick is to know what gets done
inside your rig. Unfortunately, none of us have the ability to do
anything about panpot laws in modern digital mixers other than dealing
with what someone else provided for us. It's not like the analog days
where one could open up the console and change it if you didn't like
it...


Regards,

Monte McGuire

  #8   Report Post  
Chris Smalt
 
Posts: n/a
Default ass backwards on pan law


Monte wrote:

Yeah, most folks do panpots this way, but Yamaha doesn't. 12 o'clock
is the unity gain point for them.



This is true for a mono input channel. For a stereo input channel, hard
L-R is the unity gain point on my Yamaha - a very useful arrangement in
my book.


Chris


__________________________________________
Until the worm goes away, please remove the letter r
from my address to email me directly.
  #9   Report Post  
Chris Smalt
 
Posts: n/a
Default ass backwards on pan law


Monte wrote:

Yeah, most folks do panpots this way, but Yamaha doesn't. 12 o'clock
is the unity gain point for them.



This is true for a mono input channel. For a stereo input channel, hard
L-R is the unity gain point on my Yamaha - a very useful arrangement in
my book.


Chris


__________________________________________
Until the worm goes away, please remove the letter r
from my address to email me directly.
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Great *sounding* CD recommendation? Robert J Dewar General 139 June 19th 04 05:20 PM
Great *sounding* CD recommendation? -GT* Audio Opinions 4 June 19th 04 05:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:38 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"