Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ass backwards on pan law
due to a brain fart while thinking about a linear wet/dry calculation
I posted some really wrong stuff about pan law. Pan law should not affect signals panned hard left, or hard right - not "straight up" as I posted. A single channel panned hard left, with fader at zero, with no effects or eq should result in nearly identical or identical bounces on different systems. Chuck |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ass backwards on pan law
Chuck Duffy wrote:
due to a brain fart while thinking about a linear wet/dry calculation I posted some really wrong stuff about pan law. Cast iron, stainless, or that modurn won't-stick stuff? Pan law should not affect signals panned hard left, or hard right - not "straight up" as I posted. How 'bout "over easy", or is that too much of a mess? A single channel panned hard left, with fader at zero, with no effects or eq should result in nearly identical or identical bounces on different systems. But it never happens like that. One always oozes into the other, and there you are. -- ha |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ass backwards on pan law
Chuck Duffy wrote:
due to a brain fart while thinking about a linear wet/dry calculation I posted some really wrong stuff about pan law. Cast iron, stainless, or that modurn won't-stick stuff? Pan law should not affect signals panned hard left, or hard right - not "straight up" as I posted. How 'bout "over easy", or is that too much of a mess? A single channel panned hard left, with fader at zero, with no effects or eq should result in nearly identical or identical bounces on different systems. But it never happens like that. One always oozes into the other, and there you are. -- ha |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ass backwards on pan law
But it never happens like that. One always oozes into the other, and
there you are. scrambled........ ha! laters tuna |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ass backwards on pan law
But it never happens like that. One always oozes into the other, and
there you are. scrambled........ ha! laters tuna |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ass backwards on pan law
In article ,
Chuck Duffy wrote: due to a brain fart while thinking about a linear wet/dry calculation I posted some really wrong stuff about pan law. Pan law should not affect signals panned hard left, or hard right - not "straight up" as I posted. A single channel panned hard left, with fader at zero, with no effects or eq should result in nearly identical or identical bounces on different systems. Yeah, most folks do panpots this way, but Yamaha doesn't. 12 o'clock is the unity gain point for them. The trick is to know what gets done inside your rig. Unfortunately, none of us have the ability to do anything about panpot laws in modern digital mixers other than dealing with what someone else provided for us. It's not like the analog days where one could open up the console and change it if you didn't like it... Regards, Monte McGuire |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ass backwards on pan law
In article ,
Chuck Duffy wrote: due to a brain fart while thinking about a linear wet/dry calculation I posted some really wrong stuff about pan law. Pan law should not affect signals panned hard left, or hard right - not "straight up" as I posted. A single channel panned hard left, with fader at zero, with no effects or eq should result in nearly identical or identical bounces on different systems. Yeah, most folks do panpots this way, but Yamaha doesn't. 12 o'clock is the unity gain point for them. The trick is to know what gets done inside your rig. Unfortunately, none of us have the ability to do anything about panpot laws in modern digital mixers other than dealing with what someone else provided for us. It's not like the analog days where one could open up the console and change it if you didn't like it... Regards, Monte McGuire |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
ass backwards on pan law
Monte wrote: Yeah, most folks do panpots this way, but Yamaha doesn't. 12 o'clock is the unity gain point for them. This is true for a mono input channel. For a stereo input channel, hard L-R is the unity gain point on my Yamaha - a very useful arrangement in my book. Chris __________________________________________ Until the worm goes away, please remove the letter r from my address to email me directly. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
ass backwards on pan law
Monte wrote: Yeah, most folks do panpots this way, but Yamaha doesn't. 12 o'clock is the unity gain point for them. This is true for a mono input channel. For a stereo input channel, hard L-R is the unity gain point on my Yamaha - a very useful arrangement in my book. Chris __________________________________________ Until the worm goes away, please remove the letter r from my address to email me directly. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Great *sounding* CD recommendation? | General | |||
Great *sounding* CD recommendation? | Audio Opinions |