Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the advantages of recording at 96000Hz, is that
there is more room between the highest needed captured frequency, and the Nyquist frequency, and so does not need to have so steep a curve, which is of some benefit of a nature that escapes me at the moment. Do most devices actually change filters then, based on current sample rate, or do they just have one that works with 44100, and call that good for everything? Thanks, Tobiah |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Recording Bit and Sample Rates | Pro Audio | |||
Take 2: Recording at different bit depths/sample rates | Pro Audio | |||
Confused About MP3 Sample Rates | Pro Audio | |||
Question about input A/D sample rates | Pro Audio | |||
Combining different sample rates | Pro Audio |