Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I don't believe in cable magic and use simple RCA cables to connect my inputs (squeezebox, dvd, cable box, tv) to my stereo amplifier. There is normally a red coloured cable and that goes into the red or + socket so this is very simple for me. I have a few cables that have 3 pins - red, yellow and white. Can I use these instead of the two ways with no sonic degradation? If so the does it matter if I connect the yellow or the white one? Steve |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 27, 4:24=A0pm, Steve wrote:
Hi, I don't believe in cable magic and use simple RCA cables to connect my inputs (squeezebox, dvd, cable box, tv) to my stereo amplifier. There is normally a red coloured cable and that goes into the red or + socket so this is very simple for me. I have a few cables that have 3 pins - red, yellow and white. Can I use these instead of the two ways with no sonic degradation? If so the does it matter if I connect the yellow or the white one? Steve Yes you can use them. No, it doesn't matter which pins you use. If memory serves, the yellow was originally for composite video connections. bob |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 13:24:47 -0700, Steve wrote
(in article ): Hi, I don't believe in cable magic and use simple RCA cables to connect my inputs (squeezebox, dvd, cable box, tv) to my stereo amplifier. There is normally a red coloured cable and that goes into the red or + socket so this is very simple for me. I have a few cables that have 3 pins - red, yellow and white. Can I use these instead of the two ways with no sonic degradation? If so the does it matter if I connect the yellow or the white one? Steve You sure can. Usually, the "triplet" cable is an A/V cable. With red being right-channel audio, white being left-channel audio, and yellow being composite video. There's no electrical difference between any of them really. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve" wrote in message
... Hi, I don't believe in cable magic and use simple RCA cables to connect my inputs (squeezebox, dvd, cable box, tv) to my stereo amplifier. There is normally a red coloured cable and that goes into the red or + socket so this is very simple for me. I have a few cables that have 3 pins - red, yellow and white. Can I use these instead of the two ways with no sonic degradation? If so the does it matter if I connect the yellow or the white one? That trio is intended for composite television hookup. The red and white are audio cables, the yellow is for the composite tv signal. The construction may be the same, but why tempt fate. Just use the red and white as the audio cables they are intended to be. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Steve" wrote in message
... Hi, I don't believe in cable magic and use simple RCA cables to connect my inputs (squeezebox, dvd, cable box, tv) to my stereo amplifier. There is normally a red coloured cable and that goes into the red or + socket so this is very simple for me. I have a few cables that have 3 pins - red, yellow and white. Can I use these instead of the two ways with no sonic degradation? If so the does it matter if I connect the yellow or the white one? Steve Doesn't matter at all. The yellow cable is normally for composite video, but can be used equally for analogue or digital audio. S. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 27, 4:24=A0pm, Steve wrote:
Hi, I don't believe in cable magic and use simple RCA cables to connect my inputs (squeezebox, dvd, cable box, tv) to my stereo amplifier. The magic cables make your money vanish magically. :-) I have a few cables that have 3 pins - red, yellow and white. Can I use these instead of the two ways with no sonic degradation? If so the does it matter if I connect the yellow or the white one? What you have is a video cable (yellow) with stereo audio (red and white). It will work very well for just audio by just not using the yellow plugs. Steve |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thx all - its rare to see everyone agreeing here
![]() |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve wrote:
: Thx all - its rare to see everyone agreeing here ![]() Yes, except no one mentioned the most important factor, which is to plug them in in alphabetical order. Otherwise any speech, or sung words, will come out backwards. -- Andy Barss |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve, I'm sorry but your question is waaay off topic. If you are not
willing to spend at least $6,500 dollars per meter for audiophile cables and don't see the benefits of doing that then this is the wrong newsgroup for you. That's a joke, son! [ As the Guidelines state, high-end refers to the quality of the sound, music and equipment, not the price tag. -- dsr ] |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Piggy-backing on Steve's question...
I'm unexposed to HDMI cables, but think there will be at least one in my future. They carry the audio signal as well as video. This is a digital audio signal I presume, same as the composite (RCA) and toslink type of digital signal carrier? Is the HDMI better than the composite pertaining just to the audio side? My preamp and five channel amp had an optional single wire connection between the two so that a seperate wire needn't be used for each channel. I tried a seperate wire for each channel and it sounded so much better than the single unified cable. This is why I am wondering if HDMI (single wire) is good for audio. Holly smokes! Monster HDMI is almost a hundred bucks for one! ....one more thing - I have 75ohm "video" cables; it does work for audio but I haven't done serious A/B comparison. Is it generally a no- no to use "video" cable for audio or no matter? I wonder if Steve's component cable set yellow wire is 75ohm. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:29:49 -0700, Kele wrote
(in article ): Piggy-backing on Steve's question... I'm unexposed to HDMI cables, but think there will be at least one in my future. They carry the audio signal as well as video. This is a digital audio signal I presume, same as the composite (RCA) and toslink type of digital signal carrier? Is the HDMI better than the composite pertaining just to the audio side? My preamp and five channel amp had an optional single wire connection between the two so that a seperate wire needn't be used for each channel. I tried a seperate wire for each channel and it sounded so much better than the single unified cable. This is why I am wondering if HDMI (single wire) is good for audio. Holly smokes! Monster HDMI is almost a hundred bucks for one! Try: http://www.mycablemart.com/store/car...lts&search=hhx There's no real difference between these and Monster (except the price). I use these folks for most of my cable needs. |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 29, 3:29=A0pm, Kele wrote:
Piggy-backing on Steve's question... I'm unexposed to HDMI cables, but think there will be at least one in my future. =A0They carry the audio signal as well as video. =A0This is a digital audio signal I presume, same as the composite (RCA) and toslink type of digital signal carrier? =A0Is the HDMI better than the composite pertaining just to the audio side? Composite video is not a digital signal. Inexpensive HDMI cables work very well so there is no need to spend anything over a few dollars for one. My preamp and five channel amp had an optional single wire connection between the two so that a seperate wire needn't be used for each channel. =A0I tried a seperate wire for each channel and it sounded so much better than the single unified cable. =A0This is why I am wondering if HDMI (single wire) is good for audio. HDMI works very well. It is also surprising that you obtained better results using individual cables for each audio channel. That would suggest either the hardware was not set up right or there was defective hardware. Most likely, your problem was caused by improper setup. Holly smokes! =A0Monster HDMI is almost a hundred bucks for one! You can get an HDMI cable from Newegg for under $5 and even less if you go to eBay. I have cables from both sources and they all work fine. BTW, if there is a cable problem, the video is much more likely to be degraded since it has much wider bandwidth requirements. ...one more thing - I have 75ohm "video" cables; it does work for audio but I haven't done serious A/B comparison. =A0Is it generally a no- no to use "video" cable for audio or no matter? =A0I wonder if Steve's component cable set yellow wire is 75ohm. There is no problem using 75 ohm cables for audio. |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kele wrote:
Piggy-backing on Steve's question... I'm unexposed to HDMI cables, but think there will be at least one in my future. They carry the audio signal as well as video. This is a digital audio signal I presume, same as the composite (RCA) and toslink type of digital signal carrier? Is the HDMI better than the composite pertaining just to the audio side? I guess you mean "better than S/PDIF." Yes, it is. HDMI can carry up to 8 channels of uncompressed audio at 192 kHz; it can even carry 8 channels of DSD. Also, HDMI uses error correction, which makes it more resistant to interference, and it's a balanced signal. This should make it more resisstant to interference, even though it's much higher capacity. You're talking about the difference between something designed in about 1999 and something designed in about 1985. Holly smokes! Monster HDMI is almost a hundred bucks for one! It's a good idea to shop around for cables. Andrew. |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 30, 8:56=A0pm, Andrew Haley
wrote: Kele wrote: Piggy-backing on Steve's question... Holly smokes! =A0Monster HDMI is almost a hundred bucks for one! It's a good idea to shop around for cables. Andrew. Forget that old set of AV cables ... take a look at these and check out the user-responses! Strangely, these cables come in pairs where I think there's only one suitable orifice to plug them into. .... http://www.amazon.com/AudioQuest-K2-...p/B000J36XR2/= ref=3Dcm_cr_pr_product_top Anthony |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:43:10 -0700, anthony wrote
(in article ): On Mar 30, 8:56=A0pm, Andrew Haley wrote: Kele wrote: Piggy-backing on Steve's question... Holly smokes! =A0Monster HDMI is almost a hundred bucks for one! It's a good idea to shop around for cables. Andrew. Forget that old set of AV cables ... take a look at these and check out the user-responses! Strangely, these cables come in pairs where I think there's only one suitable orifice to plug them into. .... http://www.amazon.com/AudioQuest-K2-...p/B000J36XR2/= ref=3Dcm_cr_pr_product_top Anthony AND! They qualify for free shipping! Heck, for that price, they ought to come with a year's supply of free hookers! At least then you'd be getting something for your money. This way you're getting NOTHING but an $8500 pair of lamp cords. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RCA cable question | Tech | |||
AR-XA turntable cable question | Tech | |||
Cable question (XLR - TRS) | Pro Audio | |||
Cable question (XLR - TRS) | Pro Audio | |||
RCA Cable Question | Car Audio |