Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a lot of cases, the pro products are ideal but this has to be
determined on a case by case basis. Certainly they are sometimes much more cost effective. The better ones tend to have balanced +4 inputs. This creates an issue in that most consumer driving gear is single ended and -10 into a bridging load. If the manufacturers of CD players, DACs and preamps were serious they would address that, |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 23, 4:36*am, Bret L wrote:
*In a lot of cases, the pro products are ideal but this has to be determined on a case by case basis. Certainly they are sometimes much more cost effective. *The better ones tend to have balanced +4 inputs. This creates an issue in that most consumer driving gear is single ended and -10 into a bridging load. If the manufacturers of CD players, DACs and preamps were serious they would address that, Then there's the whole near field vs. not. If you knew how to make adobe huts properly you'd address that. But no, all you can do is change the oil in a POS 1973 Dodge truck so your credibility is shot. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 23, 10:48*am, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On May 23, 4:36*am, Bret L wrote: *In a lot of cases, the pro products are ideal but this has to be determined on a case by case basis. Certainly they are sometimes much more cost effective. *The better ones tend to have balanced +4 inputs. This creates an issue in that most consumer driving gear is single ended and -10 into a bridging load. If the manufacturers of CD players, DACs and preamps were serious they would address that, Then there's the whole near field vs. not. If you knew how to make adobe huts properly you'd address that. They make them both ways, don't they? Of course they do. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 23, 4:09*pm, Bret L wrote:
On May 23, 10:48*am, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On May 23, 4:36*am, Bret L wrote: *In a lot of cases, the pro products are ideal but this has to be determined on a case by case basis. Certainly they are sometimes much more cost effective. *The better ones tend to have balanced +4 inputs. This creates an issue in that most consumer driving gear is single ended and -10 into a bridging load. If the manufacturers of CD players, DACs and preamps were serious they would address that, Then there's the whole near field vs. not. If you knew how to make adobe huts properly you'd address that. *They make them both ways, don't they? Of course they do. An unqualified reference to a 'monitor' speaker often refers to a 'near-field' (compact or close-field) design. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Studio_monitor You should learn how to solder. What a moron. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: ProAc Studio 3 / ATC SCM 50 passive monitors !!! | Marketplace | |||
FS JBL 4208 passive studio monitors w/ Control SB-5 sub | Marketplace | |||
FA: Yamaha MSP-3 Powered Studio Monitors | Pro Audio | |||
KRK Studio Monitors for a Desktop (Nearfields Passive and Active) | Pro Audio | |||
Using powered computer speakers as monitors? | Pro Audio |