Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
These come more or less in two flavors, Magneplanars and
electrostats. Of the two, the electrostat is IMO the best as they are far more rebuildable and serviceable and also I prefer the electrostat sonically. I am probably not the best person to ask about dipoles because they don't have that much appeal to me. I find that people who like chamber music in particular like them and those who don't generally don't. although people who listen to rock at low volumes often like them as well. Audio saloons love to sell Magneplanars because they are, unlike electrostats, an inductively rather than capacitively reactant load, and thus compatible with more amplifiers since most amplifiers are not truly unconditionally stable and do better into inductive loads since that is what voice coil speakers present. In fact there is a school of thought that says electrostats should have their own power amplifiers integrally designed into them and there is a lot to that idea. No expensive output transformer is then required and the panels may be driven directly off high voltage tubes. Does that make the "Maggie" bad? Not necessarily, but it has no advantages other than this over electrostats. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 18, 10:32*pm, Bret L wrote:
*These come more or less in two flavors, Magneplanars and electrostats. Of the two, the electrostat is IMO the best as they are far more rebuildable and serviceable and also I prefer the electrostat sonically. * I am probably not the best person to ask about dipoles because they don't have that much appeal to me. I find that people who like chamber music in particular like them and those who don't generally don't. although people who listen to rock at low volumes often like them as well. Audio saloons love to sell Magneplanars because they are, unlike electrostats, an inductively rather than capacitively reactant load, and thus compatible with more amplifiers since most amplifiers are not truly unconditionally stable and do better into inductive loads since that is what voice coil speakers present. In fact there is a school of thought that says electrostats should have their own power amplifiers integrally designed into them and there is a lot to that idea. No expensive output transformer is then required and the panels may be driven directly off high voltage tubes. *Does that make the "Maggie" bad? Not necessarily, but it has no advantages other than this over electrostats. Actually, Maggies need a lot of power and aren't really that compatible with a large selection of amplifiers. If you don't have at least 150 wpc, then you are better served elsewhere. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Optimus Dipole Tweeters | Marketplace | |||
RBH 44-SE Dipole/Bipole AC Suspension Speakers | Marketplace | |||
what the hell is 2 ohm stable running parallel on 4ohm speakers so the amp "sees" 2 ohm speakers, the speakers still get half the power they would if it were 4 ohm stable | Car Audio | |||
FS: LINAEUM / Optimus Dipole Tweeters (NIB) | Marketplace | |||
FS: LINAEUM / Optimus Dipole Tweeters (NIB) | Marketplace |