Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've heard a couple different Orion installations, with very
different amps, in different rooms. They are not exactly my thing, but they certainly are a remarkable design. They do certain things extremely well. The "mainstream" (sic) high end audio industry (sic) likes to pretend they do not exist. They are far superior in terms of what they do presentationwise to many of the popular high end saloon speaker brands. Since they are not a saloon vendable product and Linkwitz does not buy full page ads in Stereopile this presents an issue for the high end press. I don't own an Orion installation, and I have no plans to do so in the near future. I personally prefer the articulation and delineation of a god horn setup, and although I readily acknowledge the superiority of electronic crossovers and multi-amping, I am content so far with the passive crossover network driven by a halfway decent tube amplifier. But the Orions and Linkwitz lab certainly have proven to be a good revelator of high end bull****. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 12, 7:07�pm, Bret L wrote:
�I've heard a couple different Orion installations, with very different amps, in different rooms. They are not exactly my thing, but they certainly are a remarkable design. They do certain things extremely well. �The "mainstream" (sic) high end audio industry (sic) likes to pretend they do not exist. �They are far superior in terms of what they do presentationwise to many of the popular high end saloon speaker brands. Since they are not a saloon vendable product and Linkwitz does not buy full page ads in Stereopile this presents an issue for the high end press. �I don't own an Orion installation, and I have no plans to do so in the near future. I personally prefer the articulation and delineation of a god horn setup, and although I readily acknowledge the superiority of electronic crossovers and multi-amping, I am content so far with the passive crossover network driven by a halfway decent tube amplifier. �But the Orions and Linkwitz lab certainly have proven to be a good revelator of high end bull****. Maybe, maybe not. Linkwitz is a good designer and has a great track record, but the prices he charges for a finished pair of Orions is hardly a good value. If Scott was able to build them for next to nothing, then he could have done a lot worse. Now Nelson Pass' First Watt "kitchen table" amps are truly interesting designs that sound great...and he charges fair prices for them. I reviewed the F3, and it offered all of the sonic benefits of a great SET amp without the hassles and idiosyncracies. I wouldn't mind owning one in the near future. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 12, 9:46*pm, Boon wrote:
On May 12, 7:07 pm, Bret L wrote: I've heard a couple different Orion installations, with very different amps, in different rooms. They are not exactly my thing, but they certainly are a remarkable design. They do certain things extremely well. The "mainstream" (sic) high end audio industry (sic) likes to pretend they do not exist. They are far superior in terms of what they do presentationwise to many of the popular high end saloon speaker brands. Since they are not a saloon vendable product and Linkwitz does not buy full page ads in Stereopile this presents an issue for the high end press. I don't own an Orion installation, and I have no plans to do so in the near future. I personally prefer the articulation and delineation of a god horn setup, and although I readily acknowledge the superiority of electronic crossovers and multi-amping, I am content so far with the passive crossover network driven by a halfway decent tube amplifier. But the Orions and Linkwitz lab certainly have proven to be a good revelator of high end bull****. Maybe, maybe not. Linkwitz is a good designer and has a great track record, but the prices he charges for a finished pair of Orions is hardly a good value. If Scott was able to build them for next to nothing, then he could have done a lot worse. Now Nelson Pass' First Watt "kitchen table" amps are truly interesting designs that sound great...and he charges fair prices for them. I reviewed the F3, and it offered all of the sonic benefits of a great SET amp without the hassles and idiosyncracies. I wouldn't mind owning one in the near future. Don't argue with Bratzi. The blog he cut-and-pasted that from swore it was the truth. LoL. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 12, 9:46*pm, Boon wrote:
On May 12, 7:07 pm, Bret L wrote: I've heard a couple different Orion installations, with very different amps, in different rooms. They are not exactly my thing, but they certainly are a remarkable design. They do certain things extremely well. The "mainstream" (sic) high end audio industry (sic) likes to pretend they do not exist. They are far superior in terms of what they do presentationwise to many of the popular high end saloon speaker brands. Since they are not a saloon vendable product and Linkwitz does not buy full page ads in Stereopile this presents an issue for the high end press. I don't own an Orion installation, and I have no plans to do so in the near future. I personally prefer the articulation and delineation of a god horn setup, and although I readily acknowledge the superiority of electronic crossovers and multi-amping, I am content so far with the passive crossover network driven by a halfway decent tube amplifier. But the Orions and Linkwitz lab certainly have proven to be a good revelator of high end bull****. Maybe, maybe not. Linkwitz is a good designer and has a great track record, but the prices he charges for a finished pair of Orions is hardly a good value. If Scott was able to build them for next to nothing, then he could have done a lot worse. There's no cheap way around it, because the drivers are expensive. Usually one supplies the amps, the assembly labor _und so weiter_ and buys the XO kit and flatpack with plans and then the drivers from Madisound. Linkwitz does not want to manufacture and really no one buys them complete but rather in the CKD configuration. The link shows that the minimum feasible cost is going to be about $3000 and that isn't including wood. The flatpack wood kit is $1310 alone. http://www.linkwitzlab.com/orion_construction.htm Not that they are the same thing, but finding an old pair of Klassic Klipsch speakers and fitting them with modern tweeter, midrange horn and crossover can still be done cheaper than that. People get rid of cosmetically nice K-horns or La Scalas with blown drivers much cheaper than you can build the cabs. The only Klipsch driver you want is the woofer and they are pretty cheap. Of course that doesn't include amplifiers but with a Klipsch some pretty cheap amps work OK. Now Nelson Pass' First Watt "kitchen table" amps are truly interesting designs that sound great...and he charges fair prices for them. I reviewed the F3, and it offered all of the sonic benefits of a great SET amp without the hassles and idiosyncracies. I wouldn't mind owning one in the near future. I think Nelson Pass is a decent guy (and yes, I know...again irrelevant) but I am not a huge fan of these minimal designs. I think his work with Threshold was a lot better. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 13, 11:11*am, John Stone wrote:
On 5/12/10 9:46 PM, in article , "Boon" wrote: Maybe, maybe not. Linkwitz is a good designer and has a great track record, but the prices he charges for a finished pair of Orions is hardly a good value. If Scott was able to build them for next to nothing, then he could have done a lot worse. I think if you compare them to what is out there from most hi-end speaker manufacturers, they offer extremely good value. It really depends on who builds the cabinets and how much of your own effort you put into them. All the drivers along with completed electronics-including the power amplifier- can be had for about $4800. You can buy a flat pack cabinet kit for $700 and build the whole thing up yourself in a couple of days' work. So, with a little effort, you can get into a complete setup for under $6000. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 13, 5:12*am, Bret L wrote:
On May 12, 9:46*pm, Boon wrote: On May 12, 7:07 pm, Bret L wrote: I've heard a couple different Orion installations, with very different amps, in different rooms. They are not exactly my thing, but they certainly are a remarkable design. They do certain things extremely well. The "mainstream" (sic) high end audio industry (sic) likes to pretend they do not exist. They are far superior in terms of what they do presentationwise to many of the popular high end saloon speaker brands. Since they are not a saloon vendable product and Linkwitz does not buy full page ads in Stereopile this presents an issue for the high end press. I don't own an Orion installation, and I have no plans to do so in the near future. I personally prefer the articulation and delineation of a god horn setup, and although I readily acknowledge the superiority of electronic crossovers and multi-amping, I am content so far with the passive crossover network driven by a halfway decent tube amplifier. But the Orions and Linkwitz lab certainly have proven to be a good revelator of high end bull****. Maybe, maybe not. Linkwitz is a good designer and has a great track record, but the prices he charges for a finished pair of Orions is hardly a good value. If Scott was able to build them for next to nothing, then he could have done a lot worse. *There's no cheap way around it, because the drivers are expensive. Usually one supplies the amps, the assembly labor _und so weiter_ *and buys the XO kit and flatpack with plans and then the drivers from Madisound. Linkwitz does not want to manufacture and really no one buys them complete but rather in the CKD configuration. The link shows that the minimum feasible cost is going to be about $3000 and that isn't including wood. The flatpack wood kit is $1310 alone. http://www.linkwitzlab.com/orion_construction.htm *Not that they are the same thing, but finding an old pair of Klassic Klipsch speakers and fitting them with modern tweeter, midrange horn and crossover can still be done cheaper than that. People get rid of cosmetically nice K-horns or La Scalas with blown drivers much cheaper than you can build the cabs. The only Klipsch driver you want is the woofer and they are pretty cheap. Of course that doesn't include amplifiers but with a Klipsch some pretty cheap amps work OK. Now Nelson Pass' First Watt "kitchen table" amps are truly interesting designs that sound great...and he charges fair prices for them. I reviewed the F3, and it offered all of the sonic benefits of a great SET amp without the hassles and idiosyncracies. I wouldn't mind owning one in the near future. *I think Nelson Pass is a decent guy (and yes, I know...again irrelevant) but I am not a huge fan of these minimal designs. I think his work with Threshold was a lot better. Have you HEARD any of the First Watt designs? |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 13, 11:17*am, Boon wrote:
On May 13, 5:12*am, Bret L wrote: Now Nelson Pass' First Watt "kitchen table" amps are truly interesting designs that sound great...and he charges fair prices for them. I reviewed the F3, and it offered all of the sonic benefits of a great SET amp without the hassles and idiosyncracies. I wouldn't mind owning one in the near future. *I think Nelson Pass is a decent guy (and yes, I know...again irrelevant) but I am not a huge fan of these minimal designs. I think his work with Threshold was a lot better. Have you HEARD any of the First Watt designs? The first of them when he came out with the basic concept, yes. I mean, there was nothing WRONG with it, it worked OK, but it just sounded like any other decent low powered amp. The Tresholds gave you enough power for normal speakers though. Single ended triode amps, if you follow a proven design like the WE 91, are not bad for maintainability at all. That isn't why I basically don't like them: it's because they have low power and high distortion. Yes, it's POSSIBLE to build a SET with enough power (if you use a transmitting tube) and low distortion (you need a big artfully wound OPT and a reasonable amount of feedback), but why bother? |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 13, 11:18*am, John Stone wrote:
On 5/13/10 5:12 AM, in article , "Bret L" wrote: *I think Nelson Pass is a decent guy (and yes, I know...again irrelevant) but I am not a huge fan of these minimal designs. I think his work with Threshold was a lot better. Based on what? The power amps he makes today actually measure much lower distortion and noise, and can put way more power into low impedance loads than the older Threshold products. I'm talking about the X series products in the Pass Labs line, not the First Watt products which are more DIY oriented. I doubt you have any firsthand experience at all with any current Pass Labs products. If you actually measured one thoroughly, you would have to admit they're the real deal in every respect. That's what I felt. I used the First Watt F3 for three months. At the end of the review I had a chance to buy, but I didn't because I already owned a Yamamoto Sound Craft A-08 45 and I felt that their presentations appealed to me in the same way. A few months later, after burning through a couple of sets of NOS 45 output tubes, I kicked myself for not keeping the F3. By the way, since we're talking about Nelson Pass, I recently heard a system powered by an older Pass Aleph 3. That's another gem from Nelson. |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 13, 2:58*pm, Boon wrote:
On May 13, 11:18*am, John Stone wrote: On 5/13/10 5:12 AM, in article , "Bret L" wrote: *I think Nelson Pass is a decent guy (and yes, I know...again irrelevant) but I am not a huge fan of these minimal designs. I think his work with Threshold was a lot better. Based on what? The power amps he makes today actually measure much lower distortion and noise, and can put way more power into low impedance loads than the older Threshold products. I'm talking about the X series products in the Pass Labs line, not the First Watt products which are more DIY oriented. I doubt you have any firsthand experience at all with any current Pass Labs products. If you actually measured one thoroughly, you would have to admit they're the real deal in every respect. That's what I felt. I used the First Watt F3 for three months. At the end of the review I had a chance to buy, but I didn't because I already owned a Yamamoto Sound Craft A-08 45 and I felt that their presentations appealed to me in the same way. A few months later, after burning through a couple of sets of NOS 45 output tubes, I kicked myself for not keeping the F3. In PROPERLY DESIGNED equipment such as the antique radios that used them a 45, singly or in push pull would last many years. I know of a first series Zenith Stratosphere console, which ran four pairs of 45s in push pull which had been run every day since new for several hours and was "retired" only in the early 1980s. It was sold at an estate sale in the early nineties and during restoration it was found that every tube in the set except for two rectifiers was original. Of the eight 45s three of them still met emission spec and only one was completely dead. If I had a Yamamoto Sound Craft A-08 I would first reverse engineer it to see what the problem is and either engineer a fix or dismantle the set for parts, utterly defacing all manufacturer's marks to prevent rebuild and make something more useful out of the remains. Or, give it a good blast of .50 BMG rounds (every fourth a tracer is nice) and put the video on YouTube. |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Boon wrote: On May 12, 7:07?pm, Bret L wrote: ?I've heard a couple different Orion installations, with very different amps, in different rooms. They are not exactly my thing, but they certainly are a remarkable design. They do certain things extremely well. ?The "mainstream" (sic) high end audio industry (sic) likes to pretend they do not exist. ?They are far superior in terms of what they do presentationwise to many of the popular high end saloon speaker brands. Since they are not a saloon vendable product and Linkwitz does not buy full page ads in Stereopile this presents an issue for the high end press. ?I don't own an Orion installation, and I have no plans to do so in the near future. I personally prefer the articulation and delineation of a god horn setup, and although I readily acknowledge the superiority of electronic crossovers and multi-amping, I am content so far with the passive crossover network driven by a halfway decent tube amplifier. ?But the Orions and Linkwitz lab certainly have proven to be a good revelator of high end bull****. Maybe, maybe not. Linkwitz is a good designer and has a great track record, but the prices he charges for a finished pair of Orions is hardly a good value. If Scott was able to build them for next to nothing, then he could have done a lot worse. Now Nelson Pass' First Watt "kitchen table" amps are truly interesting designs that sound great...and he charges fair prices for them. I reviewed the F3, and it offered all of the sonic benefits of a great SET amp without the hassles and idiosyncracies. I wouldn't mind owning one in the near future. I visited Pass' place in Reno while I lived there. He's a very interesting man. |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 14, 1:23*am, Jenn wrote:
In article Now Nelson Pass' First Watt "kitchen table" amps are truly interesting designs that sound great...and he charges fair prices for them. I reviewed the F3, and it offered all of the sonic benefits of a great SET amp without the hassles and idiosyncracies. I wouldn't mind owning one in the near future. I visited Pass' place in Reno while I lived there. *He's a very interesting man. Yes he is. He wrote a lot of good articles for DCHA's magazine in its salad days, and I have talked with him several times. He was also a mentor of sorts to Norm Thagard who went on to (when not flying on the Space Shuttle or a Soyuz rocket) design a couple of remarkable things on his own. |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 13, 11:18*am, John Stone wrote:
On 5/13/10 5:12 AM, in article , "Bret L" wrote: *I think Nelson Pass is a decent guy (and yes, I know...again irrelevant) but I am not a huge fan of these minimal designs. I think his work with Threshold was a lot better. Based on what? The power amps he makes today actually measure much lower distortion and noise, and can put way more power into low impedance loads than the older Threshold products. I'm talking about the X series products in the Pass Labs line, not the First Watt products which are more DIY oriented. I doubt you have any firsthand experience at all with any current Pass Labs products. If you actually measured one thoroughly, you would have to admit they're the real deal in every respect. You are right i am talking about the First Watt and before as the prev poster discussed. The current front line is beyond the scope of this discussion and no I do not have access to one for test. I do have the bench to test it, an AP ATS-1 however. I'm also working a deal for a SRS narrowband spectrum analyzer which should be a lot of fun as well. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Linkwitz Orion: chicago? | Tech | |||
FA: ending tomorrow, clean Orion XTR 9002 amplifier plus WCC/Orion 1600.2 | Car Audio | |||
Linkwitz' Orion design | High End Audio | |||
Linkwitz Orion Open Baffle Loudspeaker System Forsale!!!! | Marketplace |