Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
for an acoustic guitar that won't break the bank?
|
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Danny T" wrote in message
for an acoustic guitar that won't break the bank? Shure SLX, Audio Technica 3000 series both work for me! Place to buy on the web is Northern Sound and Lighting. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Danny T wrote: for an acoustic guitar that won't break the bank? Not really. You have two problems: first of all you now either need to use a pickup or stick a mike on the body of the instrument, and secondly you now have the wireless link. I mean, you can do it... and the cheap Sennheiser and Shure stuff is not as bad as it used to be... but you're making an awful lot of sacrifices for it. If I were looking to get into wireless right now, I would look for extremely high end but obsolete VHF systems.... older Lectrosonics VHF stuff is not all that expensive, and the frequency coordination issues with VHF will be less touchy in the coming decade. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Mar 2010 18:27:11 -0500, Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article , Danny T wrote: for an acoustic guitar that won't break the bank? Not really. You have two problems: first of all you now either need to use a pickup or stick a mike on the body of the instrument, and secondly you now have the wireless link. I mean, you can do it... and the cheap Sennheiser and Shure stuff is not as bad as it used to be... but you're making an awful lot of sacrifices for it. If I were looking to get into wireless right now, I would look for extremely high end but obsolete VHF systems.... older Lectrosonics VHF stuff is not all that expensive, and the frequency coordination issues with VHF will be less touchy in the coming decade. --scott I did a "SlumTime Screamer Gig" a couple of days ago where they used the Shure SLX system and it worked rather well from what I could tell. I was concerned because they had a car service in the building next door and I believe they were using 2 way radios circa 1980s ![]() The club owner made a point of bands complaining of the interference. I didn't hear anything odd and nobody complained. My keyboards were wired through DI boxes and I wasn't using the laptop for samples so I wasn't really concerned. The club owner really needs to fix the power though because it was dirty as hell. I suspect an ice machine on the circuit but don't know for sure. All I know is the Furman in my SKB rack was going nuts.... P.S "SlumTime Screamer Gig" = a dive club working as a last minute hired gun. Could also be a wedding gig etc. My own term and SSG for short. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 3, 5:48*pm, M0she_ wrote:
On 3 Mar 2010 18:27:11 -0500, Scott Dorsey wrote: In article , Danny T wrote: for an acoustic guitar that won't break the bank? Not really. You have two problems: first of all you now either need to use a pickup or stick a mike on the body of the instrument, and secondly you now have the wireless link. I mean, you can do it... and the cheap Sennheiser and Shure stuff is not as bad as it used to be... but you're making an awful lot of sacrifices for it. If I were looking to get into wireless right now, I would look for extremely high end but obsolete VHF systems.... older Lectrosonics VHF stuff is not all that expensive, and the frequency coordination issues with VHF will be less touchy in the coming decade. --scott I did a "SlumTime Screamer Gig" a couple of days ago where they used the Shure SLX system and it worked rather well from what I could tell. I was concerned because they had a car service in the building next door and I believe they were using 2 way radios circa 1980s ![]() The club owner made a point of bands complaining of the interference. I didn't hear anything odd and nobody complained. My keyboards were wired through DI boxes and I wasn't using the laptop for samples so I wasn't really concerned. The club owner really needs to fix the power though because it was dirty as hell. I suspect an ice machine on the circuit but don't know for sure. All I know is the Furman in my SKB rack was going nuts.... P.S "SlumTime Screamer Gig" = a dive club working as a last minute hired gun. Could also be a wedding gig etc. My own term and SSG for short. Were you using it on an acoustic? My concern is that while an electric may sound fine, there is so much more detail to lose on an acoustic that it might be something not worth while to try. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:41:21 -0800 (PST), Danny T wrote:
On Mar 3, 5:48*pm, M0she_ wrote: On 3 Mar 2010 18:27:11 -0500, Scott Dorsey wrote: In article , Danny T wrote: for an acoustic guitar that won't break the bank? Not really. You have two problems: first of all you now either need to use a pickup or stick a mike on the body of the instrument, and secondly you now have the wireless link. I mean, you can do it... and the cheap Sennheiser and Shure stuff is not as bad as it used to be... but you're making an awful lot of sacrifices for it. If I were looking to get into wireless right now, I would look for extremely high end but obsolete VHF systems.... older Lectrosonics VHF stuff is not all that expensive, and the frequency coordination issues with VHF will be less touchy in the coming decade. --scott I did a "SlumTime Screamer Gig" a couple of days ago where they used the Shure SLX system and it worked rather well from what I could tell. I was concerned because they had a car service in the building next door and I believe they were using 2 way radios circa 1980s ![]() The club owner made a point of bands complaining of the interference. I didn't hear anything odd and nobody complained. My keyboards were wired through DI boxes and I wasn't using the laptop for samples so I wasn't really concerned. The club owner really needs to fix the power though because it was dirty as hell. I suspect an ice machine on the circuit but don't know for sure. All I know is the Furman in my SKB rack was going nuts.... P.S "SlumTime Screamer Gig" = a dive club working as a last minute hired gun. Could also be a wedding gig etc. My own term and SSG for short. Were you using it on an acoustic? My concern is that while an electric may sound fine, there is so much more detail to lose on an acoustic that it might be something not worth while to try. It was for acoustic... The PA was EAW with Crown amps and from what I could hear it sounded really nice. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 3, 7:51*pm, M0she_ wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:41:21 -0800 (PST), Danny T wrote: On Mar 3, 5:48*pm, M0she_ wrote: On 3 Mar 2010 18:27:11 -0500, Scott Dorsey wrote: In article , Danny T wrote: for an acoustic guitar that won't break the bank? Not really. You have two problems: first of all you now either need to use a pickup or stick a mike on the body of the instrument, and secondly you now have the wireless link. I mean, you can do it... and the cheap Sennheiser and Shure stuff is not as bad as it used to be... but you're making an awful lot of sacrifices for it. If I were looking to get into wireless right now, I would look for extremely high end but obsolete VHF systems.... older Lectrosonics VHF stuff is not all that expensive, and the frequency coordination issues with VHF will be less touchy in the coming decade. --scott I did a "SlumTime Screamer Gig" a couple of days ago where they used the Shure SLX system and it worked rather well from what I could tell. I was concerned because they had a car service in the building next door and I believe they were using 2 way radios circa 1980s ![]() The club owner made a point of bands complaining of the interference. I didn't hear anything odd and nobody complained. My keyboards were wired through DI boxes and I wasn't using the laptop for samples so I wasn't really concerned. The club owner really needs to fix the power though because it was dirty as hell. I suspect an ice machine on the circuit but don't know for sure. All I know is the Furman in my SKB rack was going nuts.... P.S "SlumTime Screamer Gig" = a dive club working as a last minute hired gun. Could also be a wedding gig etc. My own term and SSG for short. Were you using it on an acoustic? My concern is that while an electric may sound fine, there is so much more detail to lose on an acoustic that it might be something not worth while to try. It was for acoustic... The PA was EAW with Crown amps and from what I could hear it sounded really nice. thats great to hear. I guess I will give one a try. I was hoping for a smaller dollar sign but not really expecting it/ |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Danny T" wrote in message
Were you using it on an acoustic? My concern is that while an electric may sound fine, there is so much more detail to lose on an acoustic that it might be something not worth while to try. I did some technical tests on a SLX system before installing it. They are quite flat 100-15 KHz with less than 0.1 % THD at just below clipping and decreasing below that. No problems with excess IM. Frequency response - 3 dB at 80 Hz with a gentle roll off to about -6 dB at 40 Hz. There is a brick wall filter above about 15 KHz. They have about 100 dB dynamic range which is achieved by means of companding. The companding matching is fair, with the received signal being expanded by about 1 dB per 10 dB. IOW if the input signal drops by 10 dB at the transmitter, it drops by 11 dB or a little more at the receiver. The companding has some effect on the transient response, but is pretty well settled out after about 5 cycles in tone burst tests at 100 Hz, 1 KHz, and 10 KHz. My only concern would relate to using a SLX system with a electric bass. Some compensation at the board would be a good idea. My bigger concern would be how to effectively mic an acoustic guitar and retain your ability to move around freely. Not mission impossible, but worth considering. The usual means for micing a vocalist with an acoustic guitar involves 2 mics... That means either mix at the source or have 2 independent wireless system$$$$. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My bigger concern would be how to effectively mic an acoustic guitar and retain your ability to move around freely. Not mission impossible, but worth considering. The usual means for micing a vocalist with an acoustic guitar involves 2 mics... That means either mix at the source or have 2 independent wireless system$$$$. I tape a omni lav just forward of the soundhole, transmitter attached to the strap, a stand mounted vocal mic(at 2020) is fine for the guy I do this for the system is a sennheiser g 100 series I tried two systems with him on a headset but he just could not get a handle on singing into a mic that was ALWAYS at the same distance from his mouth |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 7:13*am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Danny T" wrote in message Were you using it on an acoustic? My concern is that while an electric may sound fine, there is so much more detail to lose on an acoustic that it might be something not worth while to try. I did some technical tests on a SLX system before installing it. *They are quite flat 100-15 KHz with less than 0.1 % THD at just below clipping and decreasing below that. No problems with excess IM. *Frequency response *- 3 dB at 80 Hz with a gentle roll off to about -6 dB at 40 Hz. *There is a brick wall filter above about 15 KHz. They have about 100 dB dynamic range which is achieved by means of companding. *The companding matching is fair, with the received signal being expanded by about 1 dB per 10 dB. IOW if the input signal drops by 10 dB at the transmitter, it drops by 11 dB or a little more at the receiver. The companding has some effect on the transient response, but is pretty well settled out after about 5 cycles in tone burst tests at 100 Hz, 1 KHz, and 10 KHz. My only concern would relate to using a SLX system with a electric bass. Some compensation at the board would be a good idea. My bigger concern would be how to effectively mic an acoustic guitar and retain your ability to move around freely. *Not mission impossible, but worth considering. The usual means for micing a vocalist with an acoustic guitar involves 2 mics... *That means either mix at the source or have 2 independent wireless system$$$$. I play Alvarez Yairi, and or the Alvarez masterworks guitars. I have a system that sounds really nice plugged to my MD350C and MD90C that sound awesome but they feed back like crazy. I've used solid rubber plugs in the whole but they still rumble at low volume. Its the condenser mic inside that is the culprit of course but without it you have yet another boring pickup. Its so bad that I end up playing my other guitars that I put western mini's in. Those pickups don't sound near as true but they can be played at least twice as hot without worries. I'm thinking of going wireless with the western mini pickups I won't be using any mic at all other then vocals. I'm not dancing around but I would like to be able to move about easier. I do solo shows and rarely if ever have anyone trustworthy, doing my sound. I play to small theaters with anything from about 50 to 500 people. Its a sit down show and a listening audience, not a bar with dancing or club with people talking over me. I'm trying to weigh my options for sound verses ease and all. The thing is I am sure that I will be cutting tone yet again. In a perfect world I would use a few room mics and have someone doing my sound. Until then, I'm stuck on the budget tour - |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
M0she_ wrote:
I did a "SlumTime Screamer Gig" a couple of days ago where they used the Shure SLX system and it worked rather well from what I could tell. I was concerned because they had a car service in the building next door and I believe they were using 2 way radios circa 1980s ![]() The club owner made a point of bands complaining of the interference. I didn't hear anything odd and nobody complained. The good news about that is that most of those guys are using low-band VHF in the 30-50 Mhz range, which is far enough away that modern wireless systems don't have even mild overload problems. The bands with problems were almost certainly using high-Z unbalanced lines with guitar amps and were getting rectification in the amp detecting the signal. This is very common with instruments and there isn't all that much to be done about it without affecting the tone. My keyboards were wired through DI boxes and I wasn't using the laptop for samples so I wasn't really concerned. The club owner really needs to fix the power though because it was dirty as hell. I suspect an ice machine on the circuit but don't know for sure. All I know is the Furman in my SKB rack was going nuts.... Oh, don't worry about voltage shifts; most modern gear other than amps is all regulated internally anyway. Worry about imposed noise on the power line from stuff like lighting dimmers and neon signs. Those are where the real nightmares in club gigs come from. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:22:30 -0500, Danny T wrote
(in article ): for an acoustic guitar that won't break the bank? I use a Sennheiser G3 with K&K pickups on the guitars. Works nicely. Regards, Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaPRHMGhGA |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny T wrote:
for an acoustic guitar that won't break the bank? Paraphrasing George Gleason, "A $10K wireless rig is almost as good as a twenty dollar cable" -- ha shut up and play your guitar http://hankalrich.com/ http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/hsadharma |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 5, 6:11*pm, (hank alrich) wrote:
Danny T wrote: for an acoustic guitar that won't break the bank? Paraphrasing George Gleason, "A $10K wireless rig is almost as good as a twenty dollar cable" -- ha shut up and play your guitarhttp://hankalrich.com/http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/hsadharma That's been my hold up! |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Danny T wrote:
On Mar 5, 6:11 pm, (hank alrich) wrote: Danny T wrote: for an acoustic guitar that won't break the bank? Paraphrasing George Gleason, "A $10K wireless rig is almost as good as a twenty dollar cable" That's been my hold up! At least it wasn't Jesse James! -- ha shut up and play your guitar http://hankalrich.com/ http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/hsadharma |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "hank alrich" wrote in message ... Danny T wrote: for an acoustic guitar that won't break the bank? Paraphrasing George Gleason, "A $10K wireless rig is almost as good as a twenty dollar cable" Very, very true. I suspect that true digital wireless systems for popular prices are just around the corner. But they will still technically suck eggs compared to a common mic cable. That all said, you get some pretty good sound out of the better mid-priced current systems if you use them right. |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arny Krueger wrote:
"hank alrich" wrote in message ... Danny T wrote: for an acoustic guitar that won't break the bank? Paraphrasing George Gleason, "A $10K wireless rig is almost as good as a twenty dollar cable" Very, very true. I suspect that true digital wireless systems for popular prices are just around the corner. But they will still technically suck eggs compared to a common mic cable. That all said, you get some pretty good sound out of the better mid-priced current systems if you use them right. Actually, true digital systems for popular prices are here, with stuff like the MiPro wireless. The only problems are they aren't very reliable and they don't sound very good. Oh yes, and there are latency issues. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 11:26:23 -0500, Scott Dorsey wrote
(in article ): Arny Krueger wrote: "hank alrich" wrote in message ... Danny T wrote: for an acoustic guitar that won't break the bank? Paraphrasing George Gleason, "A $10K wireless rig is almost as good as a twenty dollar cable" Very, very true. I suspect that true digital wireless systems for popular prices are just around the corner. But they will still technically suck eggs compared to a common mic cable. That all said, you get some pretty good sound out of the better mid-priced current systems if you use them right. Actually, true digital systems for popular prices are here, with stuff like the MiPro wireless. The only problems are they aren't very reliable and they don't sound very good. Oh yes, and there are latency issues. --scott RIght. There is still life left in analog. I made a recording of an Audio Ltd. 2040 wireless system with a COS-11 lav of my Martin here in the studio and was VERY pleased by the result. To hear it go here http://public.me.com/tyreeford and look in the Audio Folder for the AudioLtd2040 files. Regards, Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaPRHMGhGA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
wireless speaker recommendations? | Audio Opinions | |||
Wireless Speakers Recommendations | High End Audio | |||
Wireless mike recommendations? | Pro Audio | |||
Professional wireless mic recommendations? | Pro Audio | |||
Professional wireless mic recommendations? | Pro Audio |