[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

You *almost* had it for a minute there, champ! Almost!

See, I asked you a question and you actually answered it! Then you
asked me a question and I answered you back!

But then you dropped the discussion ball, 2pid, and turned it back
into one of your 'discussions'.

Let's see what happened here!

On Sep 8, 9:46 pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Sep 8, 7:32 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 8, 9:11 pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Sep 8, 7:03 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 8, 8:40 pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Sep 8, 6:05 pm, vinyl anachronist
wrote:
On Sep 8, 1:44 pm, ScottW2 wrote:
On Sep 8, 11:24 am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 8, 11:42 am, ScottW2 wrote:
On Sep 7, 7:55 pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Sep 7, 10:32 am, ScottW2 wrote:


It's too degrading of military service to acknowledge there
was a time when someone as ideologically unstable as the likes
of you could be considered.

How exactly can somebody be "ideologically unstable"?

When they are politically bipolar, like you.

Define what you mean.

I mean your having claimed to once be a republican and now in just a
few years becoming an ardent socialist is a symptom of extreme
political bipolarism.
No one will ever accuse you of being stable.

Many conservatives are dsillusioned by the Republican Party and the
latter's shift away from core principles. The fact that you pretend
this isn't true

LoL. It's barfs of nonsense like tis which reveal the depth of your
fruadulence.
While many conservatives, myself included, oppose many republican
initiatives, particularly under bush, virtually none of them
became socialist sheep.
Is it really so hard or simply too depressing to just be yourself?

Define "socialist".

1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating
collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means
of production and distribution of goods (or services)
2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private
property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of
production are owned and controlled by the state
3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between
capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of
goods and pay according to work done

I added (or services).

Perfect!

Now apply those definitions to me.

You oppose the government option for Obamacare? Yes or No.

(i.e. See how you stamped your little paws here and *demanded* an
answer? Even considering that you weren't very polite, I answered.)

No.

(i.e. Now, as is wont to happen in a discussion, I asked you some
questions back. Why did you run and hide, my brave little doggy? LoL.)

Do you agree that 45 million uninsured is a problem that has to be
addressed? Yes or no.

Do you 'think' we're getting our money's worth spending over 16% of
the world's largest economy on healthcare? (I already know that 2pid
will answer "yes", so I won't ask. Smart people know the correct
answer including some republicans even. LoL.)

Do you believe that our spending over 16% of our GDP on healthcare
puts us at a competitive disadvantage vis a vis those nations
spending
10% or less? Yes or no.

(i.e. I demanded an answer too, but you ran and hid like the petrified
little mutt you are. LoL.)

Do you oppose gov't ownership of GM? Yes or No.

Yes.

Uh-oh! It doesn't work! Now what?

See above.

Indeed, see above.

Words have meanings, 2pid (a concept that you'll never get). There
are, and alwys will be aspects of the US that lean socialist. Even if
one supports those aspect with their entire being they aren't
"socialists".

What a ****ing numbskull.

(i.e. Silent assent noted.)

BTW, how do you like the US gov't building a car plant in China?

Is the labor there cheaper? LoL.

(i.e. Yet another unanswered question, 2pid. LoL.)