[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Thanks to Scottie's direct admission that he considers himself a
"conservative", we now have a reference point for translating some of the
ScottieBark "language" into human language.

We know that Witless is excitable, easily angered, baffled by grammar, and
befuddled by logic. These traits are surely hallmarks of 21st-century
American "conservatives". Witless is also racist, misogynistic, homophobic,
and bestiality-inclined. Except for the bestiality, most self-labeled
"conservatives" share these latter traits to a small or large degree.
Scottie further loves the idea of bombing, shooting, gassing, or otherwise
annihilating our "enemies". The trait of hawkishness has been pronounced
among political "conservatives" for ages, as has Witlessmongrel's pronounced
xenophobia.

Like duh-Scottie, the loony right's talking heads in the media embody the
trait of hypocrisy to an unbelievable degree. They can complain about a
Democratic pol doing exactly the same thing they praised a ****uplican for
doing LAST WEEK. They're also prone to doing THEMSELVES exactly what they
derided when their left-leaning counterparts in responsible media do. The
loony yakmeisters of the airwaves fall short of right-wing politicians'
hypocrisy, of course, because only a "conservative" politician would pervert
the "family values" hogwash the way Sen. Craig (R) and Rep. Foley (R) did.

So now we have some idea of what Scottie Witlessmongrel means when he labels
somebody a "conservative": He is barking that the person indicated is a
bloodthirsty, illogical, language-challenged, hypocritical,
racist/misogynist/homophobic hater whose "opinions" are motivated
principally by selfishness and anger. Thank you, Scottie, for making this
extraordinary effort to convey the meaning of your 'thoughts'.