[Bret L]

Political Correctness Versus Reality

Posted by Bob on August 6, 2009 at 5:40 pm


"When I was coming up, “modern” meant industrial. One writer said, “It is as modern as Marx, as up-to-date as the Webbs.” Fifty years later, I have to explain that the latter were the upper class founders of the old British Labor Party.

Back then, the whole world was going to live in the middle of big
cities because that was where the jobs would be. People would live
where they work.

In fact, millions of blacks and PRs went downtown as workers moved to
the suburbs to get welfare. In the next New Age, people moved to where
they could NOT WORK most profitably. When the suburban and inner city
trends became “inevitable,” of course, THAT pattern broke down.

As a religion, Political Correctness has to have its own Inevitable
Future, its good god called “Change” or “Progress” and its Hell and
Devils residing in “reaction” or racism. Political Correctness is
derived from our other religions, so this follows naturally. The
problem is that other religions were able to make promises in the
afterlife. You believe, you pay for the church, you obey rules set,
and you avoid Hell. But Hell is always put off into the unprovable
period after you are dead, where no one can PROVE it one way or
another.

The Western conflict between science and religion was absolutely
unique in history. No other society had produced a science separate
from its established religion. Even then, had the church stuck to its
doctrine of punishment or reward after death. there would have been no
conflict. But the church claimed Genesis as scientific truth. One
thing the church had to be taught, over and over, was not to stick its
doctrines in areas where they are subject to proof or disproof or they
would be chopped off with a lot of pain to the church.

Evangelical Christianity was growing by leaps and bounds when it,
unlike the Modern churches, kept its serious religion for the
afterlife. Now that it is pushing anti-evolution and a fertilized egg
should be allowed to vote, its growth has stopped in the first world.

Marxism and its product Political Correctness put EVERYTHING into this
world. It is based on the Inevitables of History, and every inevitable
Marx and his followers came up with has turned out, over and over and
over and over, to be sillier than the Church versus Galileo.

You can’t see this if you look for complications. Like Genesis, the
failures of Marxism are with where you START not where you finish.
Stalin used Lysenko to declare that, since Marxism will remake the
world entirely by planning the world, the laws of genetics did not
apply. The result for Soviet agriculture were what those who did not
share the Communist religion would have expected. You can’t make
summer wheat into winter wheat by freezing it.

As with the Mantra, Political Correctness deals with SIMPLY insanity
for a while by complicating it: “You are just being simplistic by
labeling Comrade Lysenko’s doctrines that way,” and then, like the
Catholic Church with Galileo, just never mentioning it again.

The process is the same as any other church. First you bring forward
your Authorities. A lot of people go to huge pain and face oppression
to overthrow the Doctrine. Then it denies that Political Correctness
said such a thing. Anyone who brings up Lysenko or Galileo is being
“simplistic” and “insulting.”

Established religion is allowed to make the same mistake over and over
because no one reminds them of the earlier ones. Respectable
conservatives have made an industry of forgetting that Marxism is just
SILLY. Making a tame opposition part of the establishment. It was a
coalition of Sadducees and Pharisees and so forth who crucified Jesus.

Our job is not a new one. It is the old one that those who valued
truth over the establishment has always had. It now and ever shall be
as long as Authority is used against reality."

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2...ersus-reality/